[Jagannath] Attn: Live Prasna

[Guest guest]

Jaya Jagannath

Dear Narasimha,

The decision as to whether the Prasna is genuine or not is very tricky.

I believe that this was a genuine prasna. Now that we have all arrived at

different charts we are required to make different readings and to offer our

opinion. That person for whom this prasna was originally intended shall get

the correct chart since the prasna is genuine. If it was not genuine, then

none shall get the correct chart nor correct answer. That is the way of

Jagannatha. Sometimes, we get different charts but the same answer like

Robert Koch and I had different charts of Clinton but the same prediction,

while KNRao and the host of others who said that Clinton was doomed also

used these charts. Thus, we cannot arrive at any conclusion. Prasna is a

higher aspect of Vedic astrology where a lot depends on the Grace of God to

guide the person. This aspect of Jyotish can never be fully logical.

Om Tat Sat

Best Wishes

Sanjay Rath

-

Narasimha Rao <pvr

<varahamihira >

Cc: <vedic astrology >

Monday, January 17, 2000 8:34 PM

[Jagannath] Re: Attn: Live Prasna

 

 

> Om Sree Gurubhyo Namaha

> Dear Gauranga,

>

> > Interestingly enough when Sarajit posted his " Live Prashna " , I

> > have made a

> > prashna chart for the time when I opened the letter. It was

> > different from

> > what Sarajit gave or when Gurudeva did it. I don't remember it

> > exactly, but

> > there were indications into both directions, so it wasn't

> > unilateral, so I

> > left it to others to try. When Gurudeva made His prashna, I

> > just added upon

> > the number of opponents and said that they are more dangerous

> > than they look

> > like. This only shows that prashna is a very peculiar thing

> > and depends only

> > on Sri Jagannath's will. and who knows, maybe later you will

> > be able to

> > comprehend why Gurudeva said that you won by apparenlty losing

> > this

> > opportunity.

>

> This is precisely what I was saying earlier. Going by Sanjay's

> approach of casting the chart when the astrologer answers prasna,

> you get one chart, Sanjay gets one chart, I get one chart and so

> on. Which chart is correct? It is arbitrary. The only way we can

> solve this riddle is by saying that Sarajit's prasna is invalid

> because it is posed to many people.

>

> Using my father's approach of casting the chart when the queror

> asks his prasna, there is a clearly and uniquely defined chart

> for the prasna. That is also Jagannatha's will. Sarajit may have

> wondered about it several times, but decided to ask us at one

> particular moment due to Jagannatha's will.

>

> I don't see why the second approach has to be rejected outright.

> In fact, it is the first approach that fails the scientific

> sanity check (unless we say that a prasna posed to many people is

> invalid. Then, why did Sanjay try Sarajit's prasna which was

> posed to the whole Varahamihira list?).

>

> May Jupiter's light shine on us,

> Narasimha

>

>

>

> ------

> HARE RAMA KRISHNA

>

>

> ------

> For the fastest and easiest way to backup your files and, access them from

> anywhere. Try @backup Free for 30 days. Click here for a chance to win a

> digital camera.

> http://click./1/337/3/_/2192/_/948183169/

>

> -- Easily schedule meetings and events using the group calendar!

> -- /cal?listname=varahamihira & m=1

>

>

>