Aspects of a Yogakaraka who is also a natural malefic

[Guest guest]

sohamsa , " svayambu " <svayambu> wrote:

>

> 1. It is said that a natural malefic (NM) disturbs the houses it

> aspects. What happens when the NM is a yogakara for that chart ?

For example what will be the effect of Saturn being yogakaraka for

Libra lagna stationed in the 10th house in Cancer?

 

 

Can't be bad for the career in general, Svayambu, but check the

narayana dasa to time favorable periods. Aspecting the 4th, 7th and

12th houses, nuptial life may just encounter bad weather, again to

be timed by proper dasas and transits.

 

 

> 2. When do Moon and Mercury become natural malefics. Some books

say that Krishna-paksha Moon and Badly associated mercury are

malefics ?

> Does " badly associated " mean aspected by natural malefics or does

it

> mean conjoined with natural malefics. I am a little confused here.

 

 

Association means a relationship, which can mean being together, in

quadrants from one another or Me being aspected by a natural

malefic. Can't see where the confusion comes from

 

Mo is at worst a mild kinduva malefic, and nothing much to be scared

about. The effects of the Moon dasa is a different ballgame; when in

trines from Jupiter, eg, the Moon dasa can be particularly testing.

You can't of course disregard other factors like astakavarga bindus,

placement in D-9, etc.

 

hth

[Guest guest]

Dear Guru Vernalagnia

 

First, thanks for a such a quick response.

 

Regarding the Yogakaraka (YK) as NM aspecting, could you please give

me some general pointers. So by your analysis (of libra) I

understand that even though Sat is a YK he will still give some

troubles. Generalising this a YK will give good or bad depending on

his nature being NM or NB.

 

Secondly my confusion regarding Mercury comes from this, in some

books (by Sri DeFouw & Svoboda, Sri B. Suryanarain Rao, and maybe by

Sri B.V Raman) it is said that association here means a planet

joining another in a house. Therefore this would then make ME a

malefic not by aspect but only by conjunction.

 

In some instances I have also read that ME is malefic if " weak &

afflicted " (Sri. K. N. Rao).

 

So for a newbie like myself even little things like this cause

confusion.

 

Thanks again.

 

Svayambu

 

 

 

sohamsa , " vernalagnia " <vernalagnia>

wrote:

>

> sohamsa , " svayambu " <svayambu> wrote:

> >

> > 1. It is said that a natural malefic (NM) disturbs the houses it

> > aspects. What happens when the NM is a yogakara for that chart ?

> For example what will be the effect of Saturn being yogakaraka for

> Libra lagna stationed in the 10th house in Cancer?

>

>

> Can't be bad for the career in general, Svayambu, but check the

> narayana dasa to time favorable periods. Aspecting the 4th, 7th

and

> 12th houses, nuptial life may just encounter bad weather, again to

> be timed by proper dasas and transits.

>

>

> > 2. When do Moon and Mercury become natural malefics. Some books

> say that Krishna-paksha Moon and Badly associated mercury are

> malefics ?

> > Does " badly associated " mean aspected by natural malefics or

does

> it

> > mean conjoined with natural malefics. I am a little confused

here.

>

>

> Association means a relationship, which can mean being together,

in

> quadrants from one another or Me being aspected by a natural

> malefic. Can't see where the confusion comes from

>

> Mo is at worst a mild kinduva malefic, and nothing much to be

scared

> about. The effects of the Moon dasa is a different ballgame; when

in

> trines from Jupiter, eg, the Moon dasa can be particularly

testing.

> You can't of course disregard other factors like astakavarga

bindus,

> placement in D-9, etc.

>

> hth

>

[Guest guest]

sohamsa , " svayambu " <svayambu> wrote:

 

> Dear Guru Vernalagnia

 

 

You make it seem like a proper noun

 

 

> Regarding the Yogakaraka (YK) as NM aspecting, could you please

give me some general pointers. So by your analysis (of libra) I

> understand that even though Sat is a YK he will still give some

> troubles. Generalising this a YK will give good or bad depending

on his nature being NM or NB.

 

 

Yea you can say so. If Ma is yogakaraka, you might win your battles

but be left scarred. Ra might give you lots of dubious wealth, etc.

 

 

> Secondly my confusion regarding Mercury comes from this, in some

> books (by Sri DeFouw & Svoboda, Sri B. Suryanarain Rao, and maybe

by Sri B.V Raman) it is said that association here means a planet

> joining another in a house. Therefore this would then make ME a

> malefic not by aspect but only by conjunction.

 

 

If association exclusively means conjunction, ignore my previous

post. I can't hold a candle to either BVSR or BVR.

 

 

> In some instances I have also read that ME is malefic if " weak &

> afflicted " (Sri. K. N. Rao).

 

 

Old hat. Actually, just 'afflicted' is bad 'nuff too, since Me is

regarded an intelligent if impressionable child.

 

hth