[Jagannath] Pusya

[Guest guest]

> Jaya Jagannath

> Dear Syamasundara ji,

> The Moon has the ignomy of stealing the wife of Brihaspati (the lord

> of Pusya Nakshatra). Thus, it is advisable to keep marriages out of Pusya

> Star, else it is likely that a romantic " Moon " can run away with the

> bride!! Best Regards,

> Sanjay Rath

> Sri Jagannath Vedic Center

> 152-B Pocket-C, Mayur Vihar Ph-2, Delhi,

> INDIA 110091.Tel:+91-11-2489531

> Website: http://www.sjvc.net

> -

> COM: Shyamasundara (das) ACBSP (Sylva, NC - USA)

> <Shyamasundara.ACBSP

> COM: Vedic Astrology (Symposium hosted by Shyamasundara Das)

> <Vedic.Astrology

> Friday, February 25, 2000 1:35 AM

> Pusya

>

 

 

Dear Sanjay Prabhu,

 

Jaya Radhe! Thank you for that input but I would like to suggest an

alternative reason. That being that Brhaspati himself once approached his

sister-in-law Mamata who was already pregnant and raped her. By his potency

she again became pregnant, the child being Bharadvaja Rsi. I think that this

is more fitting for the following reasons:

 

1) In the case that you mention it is Brhaspati who is sinned against, his

marriage bed being despoiled by another.

 

2) In the present case mentioned by me, it is Brhaspati himself who is the

culprit.

 

However in both cases whether sinner or sinned against Brhaspati the ruler

of Pusya seems to have ill luck regarding marriage.

 

Hare Krsna!

 

Shyama

 

 

 

 

 

>

> > [Text 3040430 from COM]

> >

> > > Dear Syamasundara prabhu,

> > >

> > > Please accept my humble obeisances. All glories to Srila Prabhupada.

> > >

> > > I have a question about the Naksatra Pusya, under which it is said to

> > > be inauspicious for performing a marriage ceremony, though it is also

> > > described as the best of all constellations, being deva in nature and

> > > ruled by Brhaspati. Why is it inauspicious for marriage and are there

> > > redeeming factors?

> >

> > Honestly, off the top of my head I don't know why it is inauspicious for

> > marriage. That would require a lot of research to find out. Maybe

> > someone else knows.

> >

> > Even such a nakshatra could be nuetralized if favorable Guru or Venus

> > were in the lagna.

> >

> > >There will be marriage ceremony planned on 30th July

> > > 2000, around five in the afternoon, which has Moon in Pusya, 2nd pada,

> on

> > > Amavasya tithi, with a line-up of planets in Cancer, which is boy's

> > > ascendant, and girl's 11 th house in the birth charts.

> > > What would you say about the auspiciousness (or inauspiciousness) of

> > > the function?

> > >

> >

> > However I can tell you why this is a terrible day to get married and

> should

> > definitely be changed. First off the Moon should never be conjoined any

> > planet in a Muhurta what to speak of being conj 4 other planets,

> especially

> > being caught between Rahu and Mars(nica) and being almost extinguished

> > in rays. The time given (no place but I assume Europe) puts 2 planets in

> > the seventh, and one in the 8th this verboten for a marriage muhurta.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > > Your servant,

> > > Dhira Krsna dasa

> >