Fwd Message

[Guest guest]

Jaya Jagannath

Dear Manoj & Karu,

Venus is the brilliant Morning star that is exalted in Pisces the house of

the Maharishi's. In determining Muhurat, Friday coinciding with Revati

Nakshatra the star of exaltation of Venus is considered very auspicious. It

is evident that the conjunction of Jupiter either in the Rasi chart or

during Dasa (like Jup-Ven) is considered very auspicious and excellent

results have been prescribed.

 

The deity of Venus is Mahalakshmi and when the Asura had defeated the

Deva's and were running away with Mahalakshmi, the Deva's went to Dattatreya

(Om form of Vishnu) and asked Him to do something. With His divine sight

Dattaguru saw that the Asura were carrying Lakshmi on their head and started

smiling. He asked the Deva not to worry and told that Lakshmi would return

very soon. This happened exactly as Dattatreya had predicted and the

perplexed Deva asked for the reasons.

 

Dattatreya explained that Lakshmi is symbolic of money and those people who

have Lakshmi in their heads are bound to lose Her grace and consequently

lose Her. Instead those who have Lakshmi in their thighs (ninth

house-Dharma) will always find stability in wealth and Lakshmi will be

please to be with them.

 

Thus, Rahu & Saturn have Rajyoga due to Venus and Venus becomes a

Yogakaraka for Capricorn and Aquarius. These people are always yearning for

Lakshmi and consequently they may be fortunate to get Her sometimes, but

invariably lose Her. That is why Rahu-Ven or Ven-Rahu, Sat-Ven or Ven-Sat

periods are terrible as Lakshmi is said to LEAVE THE HOUSE. Financial

pressures and misfortune results. The only exceptions are the Lagna of

Jupiter (Pisces & Sagitarius) as they have the sence to use Lakshmi properly

and give Her a respectable place next to Her Lord...see the real life &

jyotish implications.

 

Best Wishes,

Sanjay Rath

Web Site: http://www.sjvc.net

 

 

gjlist-request [gjlist-request]On

Behalf Of Manoj Pathak

Monday, April 03, 2000 3:52 PM

gjlist

Re: Kuja Dosha

 

 

Have you ever wondered, why the results ascribed to Mars-Venus conjunction

and Saturn-Venus, or Rahu-Venus conjunctions, so different in nature ? Think

over it.

 

Manoj

 

> " Karu " <heen

> " GJLIST " <gjlist

>Re: Kuja Dosha

>Sat, 1 Apr 2000 13:14:46 +1000

>

>

>

> >This is only a physical condition of females. Certainly it can effect

> >marriage related issues, but not for marriage. " why blame only Mars? "

> >It was not a question I was asking, It was a poser I was posing to those

>who were overly perturbed with the Kuja Dosha. For me Kuja Dosha is just

>another " arishta " in the chart and I dont lay any undue emphasis on it.

>Remember that.

>

>My dear Manoj,

>I already told my views. In addition to earlier mentioned, 2nd, 4th, and 12

>th with Mars make Kuja dosa. This all related family, happiness, sexual

>matters and longevity. Malefic, in above places can be damage mentioned

>aspects of marriage.

>without knowing all exemption and other factors, one can say either " IT IS

>KUJA

>DOSA- NO GOOD or KUJA DOSA IS NOT SO HARMFULL. My view is both above

>mentioned are not correct, since we don't know exactly all related

>exemption etc. What we must understand is, find this secrets through

>discussion. Any one can write their own way and own thought which

>absolutely

>meanness, but me, myself not reject or accept anything without proper

>understand.

>

> >On your physical aspect of females part, My dear, let me tell you that it

>is only after attaining that state that makes a female a female and you

>would

>find Mars very closely related to that activity.

>

>

>Your point is exactly correct for females. A female become a female. But

>the

>question I asked was " ..is there any different between Mars and

>other malefic in related to marriage ? Is Mars signify any thing related

>marriage or relationship matters, other than other malefic ? " ..

>

>Your views for this matter is given. It is true Mars effects to this. But

>how Mars affect to marriage ? It is not been answered. In fact, you do not

>have to answer.

>But if you kindly let us know it will very much helpful to me as well.

>

>With respect,

>Karu

>

>