Reply to Suresh-destructive constellations/marriage

November 14, 2000

OHM SHRI RAGAVENDRAYA NAMAH

JAYA JAGANNATHA

Namaste Suresh,

I respect Shri AM Rajagopalan, who answers astrological questions in a Tamil daily, for his expansive knowledge in Veda and Astrological texts (including out of print texts). His compassionate answers only dragged me to learning astrology. He clearly answered for the same questions several times and he tells that there is no reference in any of the vedic scriptures, for this statement that certain nakshatras are destructive for in-laws or anybody for that matter. All the more he condemns such statements, which affects life of many women, who born in this nakshatras in southern India.

There is truth in Narasimha's book extract that the nth constellation from the Janma Nakshatra for a person is unique for the person (still it depends on so many other factors). But, we cannot generalise a sign or nakshatra or a planet for some consequences. We know, astrology is web of collective impacts. All threads in a web are contributing for an incident.

If you need I can send you the exact translation of his answer.

Thanks

Solai Kannan

suresh konda [suresh_konda]Tuesday, November 14, 2000 7:31 AMvarahamihira Subject: [sri Guru] destructive constellations/marriageOM KRISHNA GURUNamasthe All,The girls born on Moola, jyesta, vishakha,.....are suppose to bring trouble/bad to father-inlaw,brother-in-law,......All four padas are bad or Any specific pada only.Are there any antidotes/remedies to this condition.Can any one explain what are the reasons behindthis destructive constellations. How do the resultsoperate.I came across one or two cases of Moola with goodand healthy father-in-law.Can any one explain this and if this was already discussed in any book or previous mails, please tellme.Regards!SureshHARE RAMA KRISHNA HARE RAMA KRISHNA HARE RAMA KRISHNA Calendar - Get organized for the holidays!http://calendar./OM TAT SATArchive: varahamihiraInfo: varahamihira/info.html