Guest guest Posted August 6, 2000 Report Share Posted August 6, 2000 OHM SHRI RAGAVENDRAYA NAMAH JAYA JAGANNATHA Dear Mr.Karu, As no one is replying for our answers, I am making my comments below for our mutual benefit. Please check and reply. Jaya Jagannath Dear Solai, This is a very good idea. Perhaps, Sanjay may be busy. Even me myself not comfortable until know about my answers. So the best in this case will be your sugestion. My answers below. Namasthe Gurudeva Sanjay, Here is my answers for question 6 of Vimsottari dasa part 2. I still have to do death of his wife and farther. 3. Marriage 8th Feb 1916 (Venus-sun) rule;The Vimsottari dasa planet must have good relationship with Navamsa lagna Venus having suba argala on navamsa lagna and co-lord of the lagna and lord of the Upapada Rahu too having argala on Venus. Here, how is Rahu become co-lord of lagna? Because, I am getting Capricorn as the Navamsa lagna. Please, check the input data. My input data is according to given details of the lesson. Lagna is 23.42 Cancer. Just now found the problem. Goravani shows the time zone as 5.35 which is imposible.Even if I change the time zone to 5.30 GJ shows Kumba navamsa. JHL shows Capricorn navamsa. I do not know why ? How ever, if the Makara navamsa correct, we have to learn more, as Venus is not having primery argala on navamsa lagna lord. Moon too qualified as Mahadasa lord here. If he did not marry in Venus dasa, he would marry in Moon's dasa. How is Moon become Mahadasa lord, when the Mahadasa is Venus? Please take the navamsa lagna as Kumba for now. Venus and Moon having unobstructed argala on lagna. Both this planets are qualified for give the marriage to native in their dasas. Venus dasa came first and Venus given the marriage. Unless disqualified by any other reason, Moon too could give him the marriage in her dasa, only if he failed to marry in Venus dasa. Hope it is clear enough. Infact, I am looking for others sugetions too. Vimsottari antar dasa planet must associate with 7th from navamsa lagna. In here lord of the 7th of navamsa lagna is Sun and associate with Saturn, Ketu, Jupiter. Among this all only Sun having suba argala on Upapada.(in rasi) The date he married Jupiter is in Pisces, 2nd from Upapada and conjoined Venus. It was Saturn pratyantar dasa. Satunr is in trine to the 7th lord in navamsa. (PAD lord must be in trine to the 7th house/ lord or Venus. 4. Birth of Daughter. 19 Nov 1917 (Venus- Moon) Lord of the Saptamsa lagna must have argala on planet to qualified as Maha dasa lord, or any planet having argala on Lagna /lord of the lagna will be qualified. Lord of the saptamsa Mercury having Argala on Venus and Saturn.Also Venus obstruct argala of Sun, mars, and Moon. Here only Venus qualified. according to Saptamsa, the 2nd and 3rd issues (if any) must be male. Only 1st issue indicate a female. So this must be 1st child. lord of the 5th from 7D Venus in Scorpio. there is no conjoined so Venus it self says about Daughter. Rules cannot be ignored. Since Venus and Mars having a parivartana yoga, Mars stand for Venus. Mars is in Taurus (Female) and conjoined Sun (male) and Moon (Female). So birth of female child shown again.] Here, Moon is exalted, so it must be Male. Sign is Female and conjoined planets represent male. What I think is Venus at Scorpio is to be considered as the sign to determine the sex. Perhaps, the effect of this parivarthana might imply as manly nature. May Gurudeva correct us. In her Moon it self would not give results but Moon contribute to give the results. Lord of the issue is not exalted. If lord of the issue exalted, yes, the birth must be male. The Saptamsa lesson says, " exalted or conjoins exalted planets " , but COVA don't say that. On the other hand we must have to find out, how worth is this exaltion of Moon, when it is with Sun and what will be the effect of Mars when it with Sun. Secondly, in the first place, before go to parivartana yoga it shows about female birth, and the next point is parivartana yoga. If we do not have to use parivartana yoga here, I like to know clear reason for that. Otherwise, I hate that type of Astrology. (I useed one rule for one chart some time ago.) Now if we do not know any thing about this chart we will definetly use this parivartana yoga and may be predict a male or female birth. Also after apply Rath rule for vedic date, probably looking 10th from Taurus and predict wrong vedic date too! There must be many exemption we don't know yet. I hope we will learn where the mistake is. I am looking forward for an answer from our learned members -Please. Hare Krishna, Karu Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.