Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

[Jagannath] Ashtamsa Controversy (JHL question)

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Jaya Jagannath

Dear Gauranga,

None of the divisional charts approved by Parasara have " backward

counting " . Keep this principle in mind. That is why the Tajaka system is

often argued as being outside the strict boundary of Jyotish Lineage, but

within the broad scope of Vedic Astrology.

Om Tat Sat

Best Wishes

Sanjay Rath

-

Gauranga Das <gauranga

Varahamihira <varahamihira >

Wednesday, February 09, 2000 6:47 PM

[Jagannath] Re: Ashtamsa Controversy (JHL question)

 

 

JAYA JAGANNATHA!

 

Dear Narasimha,

 

Pranaams.

 

> You asked about Sanjay's opinion. In a mail that somehow did

> not make it to varahamihira list yet, he confirmed that the

> definition I gave is correct.

 

Thank You. And what is the alternative system for Rudramsha reckoning?

Raman gives counting backwards from the 12th sign.

 

I'm also interested in that text on Astottaramsa. Could Youforward it to me?

 

Yours, Gauranga das.

 

 

------

HARE RAMA KRISHNA

 

 

------

Join eGroups eLerts to Save!

Sign up for one or two today!

http://click./1/1235/3/_/2192/_/950102270/

 

eGroups.com Home: varahamihira/

- Simplifying group communications

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...