Query - LESSON 13: Using Progressions in Jyotish

[Guest guest]

OHM SHRI RAGAVENDRAYA NAMAH

JAYA JAGANNATHA

 

Namaste Narasimha,

 

Thanks for your elaborate explanation on my questions. It has cleared my doubts.

 

One more question on Seham.

 

I do not have Dr.BV Raman's books. My understanding about seham is based on COVA.

 

When I calculated Vivaha seham for me, I added 30 degrees as Lagna is not falling between Venus and Saturn.

 

Calculation: Day time birth

 

Vivaha seham = Venus (2 Li 04) - Saturn (5 Aq 19) + Lagna (25 Aq 36) = 22 Li 22

 

Adding 30 degrees, it will be 22 Sc 22.

 

But as per JHL calculation it is 22 Li 22.

 

I think my understanding is wrong, please clarify.

 

Thanks

Your sisya

Solai Kannan

 

 

[Guest guest]

Pranaam Gurudeva,

 

> Dear Solai,

> What about Venus the Karaka? Please check the transit/progressed

Sun to

> this.

> Secondly, in progression, the actual accurate method is to check

the exact

> psition of the transit Sun on a particular date and time. The

calculations

> are an approximation.

> Take your birth date and time and add the progressed days to it. In

this

> case it is 26.91667

> or 26 days, 22 hours. Then check the exact degree of the Sun on the

date

> arrived at.

 

Why 26 days 22 hours? Do you suggest using thrimsamsa based

progression to time marriage???

 

You told me to use progressions based on D-9, D-10, D-12, D-24 etc

based on the matter and told me to use D-30 only for evils and

misfortunes. Why do you then suggest D-30 progression for marriage?

 

I and Solai were trying to use navamsa based progression. Using it,

progressed Sun (5Aq23) was over natal lagna lord Saturn (5Aq18) and

in a trine from natal Venus (2Li04).

 

In addition to being in a trine from Venus (within 3 deg), progressed

Sun is exactly at lagna lord Saturn's natal position. I thought lagna

lord is a very important planet giving prosperity in all matters and

when navamsa-progressed Sun touches him, marriage is a possibility

and explained it like that. Does it make sense?

 

> Please report back.

> With Best Wishes

> Sanjay Rath

 

Your sishya,

Narasimha