Guest guest Posted November 30, 1999 Report Share Posted November 30, 1999 285 AD & 50 " per year SR - Gauranga Das <gauranga Varahamihira <varahamihira > Tuesday, November 30, 1999 11:55 PM [Jagannath] Re: Why Lahiri? > JAYA JAGANNATHA! > > Dear Gurudeva, > > Pranaams. > > ---------- > > OM KRISHNA GURU OM > > Dear Gauranga, > > Krishnamurti's yearly precession is not higher than Lahiri. It is the > > same old 50 seconds per year which has already been established as faulted. > > The correction (seemingly) was only for the ayanamsa till the 1920's > > thereafter the error again creeps in. > > For the time being use Lahiri Ayanamsa. > > What are the exact parameters for using Lahiri by hand? The year of coincidence is vernal equinoxe of 285 AD and the yearly precession is 50 " or 50.3 " or 50 1/3 " ? Which one fo these is used? > > Your shishya, Gauranga das > > > ------ > HARI OM TAT SAT > Jaya Jagannatha Mahaprabhu > > ------ > Get 75% Off Our Best Selling Health and Wellness Books! > SelfCare.com has everything you need to take care of you and your family, > plus spend $40 or more and your shipping is free! > http://clickhere./click/1824 > > > > -- Create a poll/survey for your group! > -- /vote?listname=varahamihira & m=1 > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.