MahaMrityunjaya Mantram (SJC website)

October 31, 2005

|| Om Gurave Namah ||

Namaste,

I verified with Rig veda 7-59-12 Web version at

http://sanskrit.gde.to/mirrors/rigveda/e-text.htm and there too the

version is as per Sourav's reference.

The Itrans Text is as given below " \_ " & \' indicates lowering and rasing pitch.

Warm Regards

Sanjay P

tryambakaM yajaamahe su\_gandhi\'m puShTi\_vardha\'nam |\\

u\_rvaa\_ru\_kam i\'va\_ bandha\'naan mR^i\_tyor mu\'kShiiya\_ maamR^itaa\'t || \EN{7}{059}{12} \\

tryambakaá¹ yajÄmahe suÌ±gandhiÌm puá¹£á¹iÌ±vardhaÌnam | uÌ±rvÄÌ±ruÌ±kam iÌvaÌ± bandhaÌnÄn má¹›Ì±tyor muÌká¹£Ä«yaÌ± mÄmá¹›tÄÌt ||

On 10/30/05, Sourav Chowdhury <souravc108 wrote:

|| Hare Rama Krishna ||Dear Learned Members,

Namaskar. I am finding some discrepancy in this mantram written in

devanagai in the SJC website:http://www..org/spirituality/mantra/mrityu-mantra.htm

1. It should be " Trayambakam " and not " Trayambakkam " (in the Devanagari), because the correct word is Ambakam

(Eye) and not Ambakkam. Infact it should be " Tryambakam " without

an " a " before the " y " . It comes as Tri + Ambakam (i+A becomes " ya " -fala

added to the " Tr " .2. It should be " Urvarukamiva " and not " Urvaruhamiva " (2nd line in the Devanagari).3. In " Mukshiiya " it should be hrashsha-u and not dirga-u.

Would someone in charge kindly correct this mistake, or else it might be propagated. I am using Mantrapushpam mantram. If I am making a mistake, I would like to stand corrected.

Best regards,Sourav

*tat savitur varenyam*

November 1, 2005

... hamsasso.aham..

As per the Kapali Instituteâ€™s publication

of the RV, the version below is missing a leading udatta (trya\â€™mbakam).

But even then, there seems to be a slight

difference in swaras between this version and the one found in the Taittiriya

Samhita.

Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â ajit

sohamsa [sohamsa ] On Behalf Of Sanjay Prabhakaran

Monday, October 31, 2005

7:46 AM

sohamsa

Re:

MahaMrityunjaya Mantram (SJC website)

|| Om

Gurave Namah ||

Namaste,

I verified with Rig veda 7-59-12 Web version at http://sanskrit.gde.to/mirrors/rigveda/e-text.htm

and there too the version is as per Sourav's reference.

The Itrans Text is as given below " \_ " & \' indicates lowering

and rasing pitch.

Warm Regards

Sanjay P

tryambakaM yajaamahe su\_gandhi\'m puShTi\_vardha\'nam |\\

u\_rvaa\_ru\_kam i\'va\_ bandha\'naan mR^i\_tyor mu\'kShiiya\_

maamR^itaa\'t || \EN{7}{059}{12} \\

à¤¤à¥à¤°à¥à¤¯à¤®à¥à¤¬à¤•à¤‚

tryambakaá¹

yajÄmahe suÌ±gandhiÌm puá¹£á¹iÌ±vardhaÌnam | uÌ±rvÄÌ±ruÌ±kam iÌvaÌ± bandhaÌnÄn má¹›Ì±tyor muÌká¹£Ä«yaÌ± mÄmá¹›tÄÌt ||

On 10/30/05, Sourav

Chowdhury <souravc108

wrote:

|| Hare Rama Krishna ||

Dear

Learned Members,

Namaskar. I am finding some discrepancy in this mantram written in devanagai in

the SJC website:

http://www..org/spirituality/mantra/mrityu-mantra.htm

1. It

should be " Trayambakam "

and not " Trayambakkam "

(in the Devanagari), because the correct word is Ambakam (Eye) and not Ambakkam. Infact it should be

" Tryambakam " without an " a " before the " y " . It

comes as Tri + Ambakam (i+A becomes " ya " -fala added to the

" Tr " .

2. It

should be " Urvarukamiva "

and not " Urvaruhamiva "

(2nd line in the Devanagari).

3. In

" Mukshiiya " it should be hrashsha-u and not dirga-u.

Would

someone in charge kindly correct this mistake, or else it might be propagated.

I am using Mantrapushpam mantram.

If I am making a mistake, I would like to stand corrected.

Best

regards,

Sourav

November 1, 2005

|| Jaya Jagannath ||

Dear Ajit,

Could the difference is due to its appearance in two different Vedas Rk and Yajur?

Rgds

Sarajit

sohamsa [sohamsa ] On Behalf Of Ajit Krishnan

Tuesday, November 01, 2005

9:43 AM

sohamsa

RE:

MahaMrityunjaya Mantram (SJC website)

... hamsasso.aham..

As per the Kapali Instituteâ€™s publication

of the RV, the version below is missing a leading udatta (trya\â€™mbakam).

But even then, there seems to be a slight

difference in swaras between this version and the one found in the Taittiriya Samhita.

ajit

sohamsa [sohamsa ] On Behalf Of Sanjay Prabhakaran

Monday, October 31, 2005

7:46 AM

sohamsa

Re:

MahaMrityunjaya Mantram (SJC website)

|| Om

Gurave Namah ||

Namaste,

I verified with Rig veda 7-59-12 Web version at http://sanskrit.gde.to/mirrors/rigveda/e-text.htm

and there too the version is as per Sourav's reference.

The Itrans Text is as given below " \_ " & \' indicates lowering

and rasing pitch.

Warm Regards

Sanjay P

tryambakaM yajaamahe su\_gandhi\'m puShTi\_vardha\'nam |\\

u\_rvaa\_ru\_kam i\'va\_ bandha\'naan mR^i\_tyor mu\'kShiiya\_

maamR^itaa\'t || \EN{7}{059}{12} \\

à¤¤à¥à¤°à¥à¤¯à¤®à¥à¤¬à¤•à¤‚

à¤®à¤¾à¤®à¥ƒà¤¤à¤¾à¥‘à¤¤à¥ à¥¥

tryambakaá¹

yajÄmahe suÌ±gandhiÌm puá¹£á¹iÌ±vardhaÌnam | uÌ±rvÄÌ±ruÌ±kam iÌvaÌ± bandhaÌnÄn má¹›Ì±tyor muÌká¹£Ä«yaÌ± mÄmá¹›tÄÌt ||

On 10/30/05, Sourav

Chowdhury <souravc108

wrote:

|| Hare Rama Krishna ||

Dear

Learned Members,

Namaskar. I am finding some discrepancy in this mantram written in devanagai in

the SJC website:

http://www..org/spirituality/mantra/mrityu-mantra.htm

1. It

should be " Trayambakam "

and not " Trayambakkam " (in

the Devanagari), because the correct word is Ambakam

(Eye) and not Ambakkam. Infact it should be " Tryambakam " without

an " a " before the " y " . It comes as Tri + Ambakam (i+A

becomes " ya " -fala added to the " Tr " .

2. It

should be " Urvarukamiva "

and not " Urvaruhamiva "

(2nd line in the Devanagari).

3. In

" Mukshiiya " it should be hrashsha-u and not dirga-u.

Would

someone in charge kindly correct this mistake, or else it might be propagated.

I am using Mantrapushpam mantram.

If I am making a mistake, I would like to stand corrected.

Best

regards,

Sourav

November 2, 2005

... hamsasso.aham ..

Dear Sarajit,

I honestly don’t know. The word “sugandhim”

seems to appear only once in both the Rig and Taittiriya shakas, so it is

difficult to crosscheck.

Voja, why would its appearance in the Rk

and Yajur vedas explain the difference? Before the codification by Veda Vyasa,

there was presumably only one ‘stream’ of mantras.

ajit

sohamsa [sohamsa ] On Behalf Of Voya Traykovic

Tuesday, November 01, 2005

7:35 AM

sohamsa

Re:

MahaMrityunjaya Mantram (SJC website)

Om namaste ganapataye

Dear Sarajit,

yes, this difference in swaras could be due to its

appearance in two

different Vedas, Rk and Yajur.

Best regards,

Voja

sohamsa ,

" Sarajit Poddar " <sarajitp@g...>

wrote:

>

> || Jaya Jagannath ||

> Dear Ajit,

>

> Could the difference is due to its appearance

in two different

Vedas Rk and Yajur?

>

> Rgds

>

> Sarajit

>

November 3, 2005

Om namaste ganapataye

Dear Ajit,

I said "could be", I'm not sure, can't state. As I know sometimes there are little differences in text, not only in svaras in some texts appearing in two sakhas. Maybe I'm wrong...

I attach audio record of Mahamrityunjaya mantra correct both in text and svaras according to what I have found in more then one version of Rigveda.

Best regards,

Voja

... hamsasso.aham ..

Dear Sarajit,

I honestly don’t know. The word “sugandhim” seems to appear only once in both the Rig and Taittiriya shakas, so it is difficult to crosscheck.

Voja, why would its appearance in the Rk and Yajur vedas explain the difference? Before the codification by Veda Vyasa, there was presumably only one ‘stream’ of mantras.

ajit

sohamsa [sohamsa ] On Behalf Of Voya TraykovicTuesday, November 01, 2005 7:35 AMsohamsa Subject: Re: MahaMrityunjaya Mantram (SJC website)

Om namaste ganapatayeDear Sarajit,yes, this difference in swaras could be due to its appearance in two different Vedas, Rk and Yajur.Best regards,Vojasohamsa , "Sarajit Poddar" <sarajitp@g...> wrote:>> || Jaya Jagannath ||> Dear Ajit,> > > Could the difference is due to its appearance in two different Vedas Rk and Yajur?> > > > Rgds> > Sarajit