in program jaganatha hora : bug in sudasa calc.? or not?

[Guest guest]

I am using jaganatha hora for 2 years. I am very glad to use it. but not

calculating manualy again for each dasa order. if so I am very sorry for this,

it will take to many hours to do these for each chart.

 

wish to hear from Dear Narasimha Rao's thoughts for this sudasa calculation at

least. it will be best explanation I think. I wrote him but no answer yet:(

hope to get soon

 

best regards...

 

rozi

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

, Sam Sivaskandan <samsivaskandan wrote:

>

> *Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya. Om Namo Narayanaya Namaha.*

>

> JHora 7.32 is the most comprehensive program ever written for Vedic

> Astrology that I have had the opportunity to use. But I believe there may

> still be some bugs. One of them appears to be in Sudasa calculations.

> According to PVR's book Vedic Astrology an Integrated Approach, he states

> that:

>

> 1. Sudasa starts from the rasi having SL in it. Sudasa progresses from

> that SL rasi in quadrants first, followed by panaparas and apoklimas.

> 2. The direction of progression depends on whether the rasi containing SL

> is odd or even. If the rasi containing SL is odd (say Leo), then the

> progression will be Leo, Scorpio, Aquarius, Taurus, Virgo, Saggitarius,

> Pisces, Gemini, Libra, Capricorn, Aries, Cancer. If the rasi containing

> SL is even (say Cancer), then the progression will be reverse (i.e. Cancer,

> Aries, Capricorn, Libra, Gemini, Pisces, Saggitarius, Virgo, Taurus,

> Aquarius, Scorpio, Leo).

> 3. If Saturn is present with SL, then the progression is regular

> 4. If Ketu is in SL then the order of progression is reversed (e.g. if

> Ketu is in Cancer with SL (but without Saturn), then progression will be

> Cancer, Libra, Capricorn, etc.)

> 5. Dasa time periods are calculated just like Narayana Dasa time periods.

> 6. There is a time period adjustment for the first dasa. (30 - SL)/30

> times the period of the first dasa is the balance of the first dasa at

> birth.

>

> Sudasa is identical to Lagna Kendradi Dasa (LKD) with the exception that SL

> rasi has to be the starting sign. Another way to compute Sudasa in JHora

> 7.32 is to

>

> - run the LKD on Jhora by forcing the start of dasa from the SL rasi by

> changing the default start of dasa rasi to the rasi having SL. (Normally,

if

> you don't force select option, LKD will select the stronger of Lagna or

7th

> to start, but Sudasa necessarily starts from SL).

> - then manually find out how many years the balance of dasa should be for

> the starting dasa by using the ((30-SL)/30) X (first dasa time period).

> - Manually adjust all subsequent dasa periods to be consistent with the

> balance of dasa computed above. For example, if first dasa is 9 years and

> the fraction for balance of dasa is 0.4, the the first dasa is only 3.6

> years for Sudasa (not 9 years as shown in the LKD calculations by the

> program). So all subsequent dasas will start (9-3.6) years = 5.4 years *

> earlier* than what is listed for LKD. So if the LKD calculations shows a

> subsequent dasa as starting in 1-1-1980, the Sudasa for that rasi will

> actually start in 5.4 years *earlier *than 1-1-1980.

>

> I noticed that JHora 7.32 does not progress in the reverse for SL in

> Cancer for example (without Ketu and Saturn in it). It starts as Cn, Ar,

> Cp, Li, then instead of going Ge, Pi, Sg, Vi - it goes Le, Sc, Aq, Ta -

> which is not what PVR's book says.

>

> The preceding is my understanding. Others, please feel free to correct me.

>

> Somnath

>

> *Om Namo Bhagavate Vasudevaya. Om Namo Narayanaya Namaha.*

>

>

>

> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 1:20 AM, rozi <astrologya wrote:

>

> > hare rama krishna dear members nad gurus

> >

> > I am using jaganatha hora program

> >

> > but I confuse about sudasa calculation

> >

> >

> > Narasimha Rao mentioned about SL must starting always from SL sign

> >

> > but when I calculating my chart by jaganatha hora it begins from opposite

> > of SL sign.

> >

> > do I change some menus? or not

> >

> > would it be possible to enlighten me did I undertsand this Sudasa wrong?

> >

> >

> > best regards..

> >

> > rozi

> >

> >

> >

>