Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

punarvasu

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

JAYA JAGANNATH

Dear Sunil,

I am not interested in another net address. I am interested in the

Jyotisha in this GJ List of my best friend Goravani. What will that link

tell me? Another quote from the Valmiki Ramayana giving the star positions

at the time of Sri Rama. Or maybe if the astrologer was more enlightened, he

will be able to give the charts of Bharata, Laxman and Satrughana as well (I

wonder how many know this)!. I wanted you to catch the truth here.

My good friend MASTER-MU has been speaking so much about Lagna

Nakshatra. So, I thought that I could add a line in her support out here.

Although the advocation for Lagna Nakshatra alone is quite off the mark,

asctually the Shastra gives atleast four options for picking up the

constellation that will start the Vimsottari Dasa. Lagna Nakshatra is just

one of these options, with the highest weightage in the case of doubt being

given to the Moon's constellation.

NOW SOME MATHEMATICS: Even if the Sun was in Zero degree of Aries

(Minimum point) and the Moon in 3Deg 20 Min of Cancer (Highest degree of

Punarvasu), then the Maximum angle possible is 93 Deg 20 Min and the Maximum

tithi would Astami (8). Hence, mathematically, the chart and tithi do not

match. Thus, there has been some terrible misunderstanding of Valmiki's

teachings. THE ONLY OTHER ALTERNATIVE IS TARA DASA WHICH IS AN ALTERNATIVE

OPTION OF VIMSOTTARI DASA. It is exactly the same as Vimsottari, but starts

from the Lagna instead of the Moon. This happens when the Lagna is very

strong with planets in quadrants. Thus, since we find that there are FIVE

planets in quadrants in the chart of bhagawan Sri Rama and that four of

these are exalted, the Lagna becomes far too powerful and the Nakshatra

mentioned by Valmiki should be Lagna nakshatra.

I am open to criticism and discussions.

Hare Krishna

Sanjay Rath

P.S. Mu, Would you treat me to a nice ice-cream for this post!!

 

 

-

Sunil Padala <sunil.padala

<srath; g j list <gjlist

Friday, October 01, 1999 2:12 AM

Re: punarvasu

 

 

> Dear Sanjay and others,

>

> Here is an excerpt from the " Astronomical Dating of the Ramayan " by Dr.

P.V.Vartak at http://www.hindunet.org/alt_hindu/1994_2/msg00026.html.

>

>

> > Now we shall proceed with the astral route. Valmiki records the birth

> > of Raam as Chaitra Shuddha Navami (9th), on Punarvasu Nakshatra and

> > five plants were exalted then; Sun in Mesha upto 10 deg., Mars in

> > Capricorn at 28 deg., Jupiter in Cancer at 5 deg., Venus in Pisces at

> > 27 deg. and Saturn in Libra at 20 deg. (Bala Kanda.18/Shloka 8,9).

>

>

> SP

>

>

>

>

> ---- Begin Original Message ----

>

> " Sanjay Rath " <srath

> Fri, 1 Oct 1999 00:34:28 +0530

> " G J List " <GJList, " Sunil Padala "

<sunil.padala

> Re: punarvasu

>

>

> JAYA JAGANNATH

> Dear Sunil,

> Is Punarvasu Lord Rama's Moon Star? If so, can you tell me How He was

> born on the Navami Tithi (Moon Minus Sun should be between 96 and 108

> Degrees).

> Hare Krishna

> Sanjay Rath

> -

> Sunil Padala <sunil.padala

> <GJLIST

> Thursday, September 30, 1999 10:15 AM

> punarvasu

>

>

> > Salutations

> >

> > Some of my relatives discuss other family members nakshatras. They often

> seem to focus on those that have the purnarvasu nakshatra. Apparently

> punarvasu is also Lord Rama's nakshatra. Is there a particular reason for

> punarvasu to warrant the attention??

> >

> > SP

> >

> >

> > Get your Free E-mail at http://mantra.zzn.com

> > _________

> > Get your own Web-based E-mail Service at http://www.zzn.com

>

>

>

> ---- End Original Message ----

>

>

>

> Get your Free E-mail at http://mantra.zzn.com

> _________

> Get your own Web-based E-mail Service at http://www.zzn.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

JAYA JAGANNATH

Dear sateesh,

Fourth or Fifth star..Utpanna Nakshatra.

Hare Krishna

Sanjay Rath

-

Zoltar@Spectra <sat

Sanjay Rath <srath; SJVC <sjvc >; Mu'Min Bey

<mumin_bey; <vedic astrology >

Cc: Gorvani list <gjlist; SJVC Astrology Class

<varahamihira >

Friday, October 01, 1999 10:43 PM

[vedic astrology] Re: punarvasu

 

 

> (Special Note to All Members on GJ List - if you don't like seeing my Posts,

> take Das's advice, and simply delete them without opening them! Thanks).

>

>

> Dear Sanjay,

>

> A long-ish Post to you - apologies.

>

> Thank you so much for your further confirmation that Moon-Position is NOT

> the only starting Constellation that one can calculate Dasas from.

>

> You said -

>

> > Although the advocation for Lagna Nakshatra alone is quite off the mark,

> > asctually the Shastra gives atleast four options for picking up the

> > constellation that will start the Vimsottari Dasa. Lagna Nakshatra is just

> > one of these options, with the highest weightage in the case of doubt

> >being given to the Moon's constellation.

>

>

> You have stated one as From-Moon, and one as From-Lagna - what are the other

> 2 Starting Points that we can reckon Dasas from? You mentioned At Least 4

> options.

>

>

> >THE ONLY OTHER ALTERNATIVE IS TARA DASA WHICH IS AN ALTERNATIVE

> > OPTION OF VIMSOTTARI DASA. It is exactly the same as Vimsottari, but

> starts

> > from the Lagna instead of the Moon.

>

>

> Do we use Equal OR Sripati House-Divisions when using Tara Dasa?

>

>

> >This happens when the Lagna is very

> > strong with planets in quadrants. Thus, since we find that there are FIVE

> > planets in quadrants in the chart of bhagawan Sri Rama and that four of

> > these are exalted, the Lagna becomes far too powerful and the Nakshatra

> > mentioned by Valmiki should be Lagna nakshatra.

>

>

> But what if one's Moon is in the Same SIGN as Lagna, but in a different

> Constellation?

> Do I use the Moon, or Ascendant as a starting Point (note, these are only

> one Constellation apart in my Chart, Hasta for Moon and Chitra for

> Ascendant, but give very different Dates)? - Chart attached.

>

> How in these cases can you possibly judge who (Moon or Lagna) is more

> powerful, when both Moon and Lagna are in Same Sign?

>

> Thanks again.

>

> Very best regards - Sateesh.

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

 

 

--

 

 

>

>

> ------

> Access archives at vedic astrology

> ---------

> Om Tat Sat!

> Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu!!

> ---------

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Sanjay,

 

Many thanks for this, but I am still a little unclear.

 

4th or 5th Star from Moon or from Lagna?

 

Very best regards - Sateesh.

 

============

 

 

-

Sanjay Rath <srath

 

JAYA JAGANNATH

Dear sateesh,

Fourth or Fifth star..Utpanna Nakshatra.

Hare Krishna

Sanjay Rath

-

Zoltar@Spectra <sat

Sanjay Rath <srath; SJVC <sjvc >; Mu'Min Bey

<mumin_bey; <vedic astrology >

Cc: Gorvani list <gjlist; SJVC Astrology Class

<varahamihira >

Friday, October 01, 1999 10:43 PM

[vedic astrology] Re: punarvasu

 

 

> (Special Note to All Members on GJ List - if you don't like seeing my

Posts,

> take Das's advice, and simply delete them without opening them! Thanks).

>

>

> Dear Sanjay,

>

> A long-ish Post to you - apologies.

>

> Thank you so much for your further confirmation that Moon-Position is NOT

> the only starting Constellation that one can calculate Dasas from.

>

> You said -

>

> > Although the advocation for Lagna Nakshatra alone is quite off the mark,

> > asctually the Shastra gives atleast four options for picking up the

> > constellation that will start the Vimsottari Dasa. Lagna Nakshatra is

just

> > one of these options, with the highest weightage in the case of doubt

> >being given to the Moon's constellation.

>

>

> You have stated one as From-Moon, and one as From-Lagna - what are the

other

> 2 Starting Points that we can reckon Dasas from? You mentioned At Least 4

> options.

>

>

> >THE ONLY OTHER ALTERNATIVE IS TARA DASA WHICH IS AN ALTERNATIVE

> > OPTION OF VIMSOTTARI DASA. It is exactly the same as Vimsottari, but

> starts

> > from the Lagna instead of the Moon.

>

>

> Do we use Equal OR Sripati House-Divisions when using Tara Dasa?

>

>

> >This happens when the Lagna is very

> > strong with planets in quadrants. Thus, since we find that there are

FIVE

> > planets in quadrants in the chart of bhagawan Sri Rama and that four of

> > these are exalted, the Lagna becomes far too powerful and the Nakshatra

> > mentioned by Valmiki should be Lagna nakshatra.

>

>

> But what if one's Moon is in the Same SIGN as Lagna, but in a different

> Constellation?

> Do I use the Moon, or Ascendant as a starting Point (note, these are only

> one Constellation apart in my Chart, Hasta for Moon and Chitra for

> Ascendant, but give very different Dates)? - Chart attached.

>

> How in these cases can you possibly judge who (Moon or Lagna) is more

> powerful, when both Moon and Lagna are in Same Sign?

>

> Thanks again.

>

> Very best regards - Sateesh.

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

 

 

----------

----

 

 

>

>

> ------

> Access archives at vedic astrology

> ---------

> Om Tat Sat!

> Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu!!

> ---------

>

>

 

 

 

------

MyPoints-Free Rewards When You're Online.

Start with up to 150 Points for joining!

http://clickhere./click/805

 

Access archives at vedic astrology

---------

Om Tat Sat!

Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu!!

---------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Moon

Sanjay

-

Zoltar@Spectra <sat

<vedic astrology >

Cc: SJVC Astrology Class <varahamihira >

Sunday, October 03, 1999 10:23 PM

Re: [vedic astrology] punarvasu

 

 

> Dear Sanjay,

>

> Many thanks for this, but I am still a little unclear.

>

> 4th or 5th Star from Moon or from Lagna?

>

> Very best regards - Sateesh.

>

> ============

>

>

> -

> Sanjay Rath <srath

>

> JAYA JAGANNATH

> Dear sateesh,

> Fourth or Fifth star..Utpanna Nakshatra.

> Hare Krishna

> Sanjay Rath

> -

> Zoltar@Spectra <sat

> Sanjay Rath <srath; SJVC <sjvc >; Mu'Min Bey

> <mumin_bey; <vedic astrology >

> Cc: Gorvani list <gjlist; SJVC Astrology Class

> <varahamihira >

> Friday, October 01, 1999 10:43 PM

> [vedic astrology] Re: punarvasu

>

>

> > (Special Note to All Members on GJ List - if you don't like seeing my

> Posts,

> > take Das's advice, and simply delete them without opening them!

Thanks).

> >

> >

> > Dear Sanjay,

> >

> > A long-ish Post to you - apologies.

> >

> > Thank you so much for your further confirmation that Moon-Position is

NOT

> > the only starting Constellation that one can calculate Dasas from.

> >

> > You said -

> >

> > > Although the advocation for Lagna Nakshatra alone is quite off the

mark,

> > > asctually the Shastra gives atleast four options for picking up the

> > > constellation that will start the Vimsottari Dasa. Lagna Nakshatra is

> just

> > > one of these options, with the highest weightage in the case of doubt

> > >being given to the Moon's constellation.

> >

> >

> > You have stated one as From-Moon, and one as From-Lagna - what are the

> other

> > 2 Starting Points that we can reckon Dasas from? You mentioned At Least

4

> > options.

> >

> >

> > >THE ONLY OTHER ALTERNATIVE IS TARA DASA WHICH IS AN ALTERNATIVE

> > > OPTION OF VIMSOTTARI DASA. It is exactly the same as Vimsottari, but

> > starts

> > > from the Lagna instead of the Moon.

> >

> >

> > Do we use Equal OR Sripati House-Divisions when using Tara Dasa?

> >

> >

> > >This happens when the Lagna is very

> > > strong with planets in quadrants. Thus, since we find that there are

> FIVE

> > > planets in quadrants in the chart of bhagawan Sri Rama and that four

of

> > > these are exalted, the Lagna becomes far too powerful and the

Nakshatra

> > > mentioned by Valmiki should be Lagna nakshatra.

> >

> >

> > But what if one's Moon is in the Same SIGN as Lagna, but in a different

> > Constellation?

> > Do I use the Moon, or Ascendant as a starting Point (note, these are

only

> > one Constellation apart in my Chart, Hasta for Moon and Chitra for

> > Ascendant, but give very different Dates)? - Chart attached.

> >

> > How in these cases can you possibly judge who (Moon or Lagna) is more

> > powerful, when both Moon and Lagna are in Same Sign?

> >

> > Thanks again.

> >

> > Very best regards - Sateesh.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

>

>

> --------

--

> ----

>

>

> >

> >

> > ------

> > Access archives at vedic astrology

> > ---------

> > Om Tat Sat!

> > Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu!!

> > ---------

> >

> >

>

>

>

> ------

> MyPoints-Free Rewards When You're Online.

> Start with up to 150 Points for joining!

> http://clickhere./click/805

>

> Access archives at vedic astrology

> ---------

> Om Tat Sat!

> Sarvam Sri Krishnaarpanamastu!!

> ---------

------

> MyPoints-Free Rewards When You're Online.

> Start with up to 150 Points for joining!

> http://clickhere./click/805

>

> OM TAT SAT

> Jaya Jagannatha Mahaprabhu

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...