[Jagannath] Narayan Dasa / strenght rules and dasa years

[Guest guest]

Jaya Jagannath

Dear Dinanath,

Both are equally conjoined, but Venus is in a dual sign and Mars in a

movable. So, Libra is stronger. Rule 4 given by you is not correct as the

signs in the 1st and 7th wil always be of the same type. This should be

corrected to lords of 1st/7th.

Om Tat Sat

Best Wishes

Sanjay Rath

-

Dina-natha Das <vmihira

<varahamihira >

Wednesday, February 23, 2000 9:28 AM

[Jagannath] Narayan Dasa / strenght rules and dasa years

 

 

Dear Sanjayji,

 

Jaya Jagannatha!

 

Here is the birth data for a person for whom I am trying to calculate

Narayana dasas. Chart has more exceptions than almost any other one that I

have seen, so it will be interesting to analyse it and very important to get

your input.

 

Date of Birth: November 24, 1973

Time of Birth: 2:20:00 pm

Time Zone of Birth: 1:00 East of GMT

Longitude of Birth: 21 E 26

Latitude of Birth: 41 N 59

Lunar month (maasa): Karthika

Lunar day (tithi): Amavasya

Tithi balance: 0.2567

Nakshatra balance: 0.8340

Sun-Moon Yoga: Atiganda

Sun-Moon Karana: Naga

Vara (weekday): Saturday

 

The problem is in finding stronger between Lagna and 7th house. According to

the rules posted by Robert to vedic astrology list it seems like Libra is

stronger but there are also oppinions that Aries is stronger.

 

+----------------------+

| | | | Ket |

| | MarR | | |

| BL | | | SatR |

| | Asc | | |

| | | | GL |

|-------------|---------------------------|-------------|

| | | |

| | | |

| Mnd | | HL |

| | | |

| | | |

|-------------| R A S I |-------------|

| | | |

| Jup | | |

| | | |

| Glk | | |

| | | |

|-------------|---------------------------|-------------|

| | | | |

| Rah | Moo | | |

| | | Mer | |

| Ven | Sun | | |

| | | | |

+----------------------+

 

 

I spoke to some members of Varahamihira list about this chart and I was

advised to post it for discussion.

 

Here is my analysis following strength rules send by Robert to

vedic astrology list few days ago:

 

1. If one of the above houses has a larger number of planets, then it is

stronger.

 

Lagna and 7th house have same number of planets. Let's go to rule number 2.

 

2. If both houses have an equal number of planets, or if neither has any

planets, then the stronger one, is the one which is occupied or aspected

by more out of:

 

(a.) Jupiter, (b.) Mercury and (c.) its lord

 

Lagna conjoins it's lord Mars and Libra (7th) conjoins Mercury, so also in

this case they are the same. Jupiter aspects none of them and Venus (in

Gemini) doesn't aspect Libra.

 

3. If both competing signs have an equal number of planets, then the

stronger one is the one occupied by an exalted planet. Similarly, if one

is occupied by a debilitated planet, then the other is stronger.

 

None of the houses (lagna and 7th) have exalted or debilitated planets, so

we have to go to rule number 4.

(Now there are oppinions that rule could be extended so that the stronger

sign is the one occupied by an exalted planet or planet in own house. What

do you Sanjayji think about this?)

 

4. Signs are stronger in order according to the following sequence:

Dual>Fixed>Movable

 

Lagna and 7th from it are both in moveable sign, again they are the same.

 

5. A sign whose lord is in a sign of different oddity, is stronger than a

sign whose lord is in a sign with the same oddity. For example, an odd

sign whose lord is in an even sign, is stronger than an even sign whose

lord is in an even sign.

 

Mars is in Aries and Venus is in Gemini, so both lords of odd signs are also

in odd signs, so we have to go to rule no. 6.

 

6. A sign whose lord is more advanced in longitude from the beginning of

its

sign is stronger. Rahu and Ketu's advancement should be measured from the

end

of sign, not the beginning.

 

In this case Venus wins (it is also AK) and Mars is only in 1 degree 49

minutes of Aries and is also Darakaraka. According to this Libra is stronger

than Aries and should initiate Narayana dasas. In that case dasa would be in

this order:

 

1. Libra /2 years/ (November '73) to '75

2. Scorpio / 7 / '82 *Ketu conjoins Saturn in Gemini and hence is stronger

than Mars

3. Sagittarius / 0 /82 **Jupiter is in 2nd house from Sagittarius,

debilitated so it is 2-1-1=0

4. Capricorn / 7 / 89

5. Aquarius / 8 / 97 ***Saturn gives more years in it's dasa than Rahu so I

did counting from Saturn (Gemini)

( have taken Scorpio to be debilitation sign for Rahu and Taurus for Ketu)

6. Pisces / 1 / 98

7. Aries / 12 / 2010

8. Taurus / 7 / 2017

9. Gemini / 4 / 2021

10. Cancer / 7 / 2028

11. Leo / 9 / 2037

12. Virgo / 11 / 2048

13. Libra / 10 / 2058

14. Scorpio / 5 / 2063

15. Sagittarius / 12 / 2075 ****In first cycle Sagittarius had 0 years so

now it gets full 12

16. Capricorn / 5 / 2090

17. Aquarius / 4 / 2094

18. Pisces / 11 / 2105

19. Aries / 0 / 2105 *****Aries got 12 years in first cycle so in second

gets 0

20. Taurus / 5 / 2110

21. Gemini / 8 / 2118

22. Cancer / 5 / 2123

23. Leo / 3 / 2127

24. Virgo / 1 / 2128

 

 

If Narayana Dasa for this horoscope starts from Libra than dasa order should

be OK. I have taken Scorpio and Taurus for debilitation sign for Rahu and

Ketu respectively. Is that correct for Narayana Dasas? If exaltation point

for Narayana Dasa are Gemini and Sagittarius for Rahu and Ketu, than

Sagittarius should be debilitation point for Rahu and Gemini for Ketu, still

I have taken Scorpio and Taurus, so number of years in dasa could be wrong.

What are recommened debilitation signs for Rahu and Ketu for Narayana Dasas?

 

Hare Krishna,

Dina-natha Das.

 

 

 

 

------

HARE RAMA KRISHNA

 

 

------

Get what you deserve with NextCard Visa! Rates as low as 2.9%

Intro or 9.9% Fixed APR, online balance transfers, Rewards Points,

no hidden fees, and much more! Get NextCard today and get the

credit you deserve! Apply now! Get your NextCard Visa at:

http://click./1/913/3/_/2192/_/951278212/

 

-- Talk to your group with your own voice!

-- /VoiceChatPage?listName=varahamihira & m=1