Guest guest Posted July 27, 2000 Report Share Posted July 27, 2000 Pranaam Sanjay, > RATH: HOW CAN KETU ASPECT WHEN HE DOES NOT HAVE A HEAD? PARASARA GIVES THE > ASPECT OF ALL PLANETS VERY CLEARLY. THERE IS NO MENTION OF KETU. SO, KETU > DOES NOT HAVE ANY ASPECTS. Rahu's Ashtottara Sata Nama Stotram says " kabandha maatra dehascha " . Ketu's Ashtottara Sata Nama Stotram says " Siro- maatro dhwajaakritih " . This is not from one source, but from a few different sources and I have no reason to doubt its authenticity. In fact, I request you to read the 108 names of Rahu and Ketu if a pooja book you have gives them. You will find that Ketu is described as having only head. The above clearly says that Ketu has head (and only head). On what basis are you saying that Ketu has no head? I am curious to find the origin of this discrepancy. Your sishya, Narasimha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 28, 2000 Report Share Posted July 28, 2000 JAYA JAGANNATHA! Dear Gurudeva, Pranaams. The aspectws of Ketu are cleared. What are the aspects of Rahu, could you explain? Your shishya, Gauranga das Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.