Guest guest Posted December 3, 2000 Report Share Posted December 3, 2000 Jaya Jagannath Dear Austin Kindly sign (mention name) your message in future. Yesterday I sent a mail about Nakshatra Pada and their ruling Tatwa. Read that first. Now, If the Lagna/Janma Nakshatra Pada is reckoned as " 1 " , ane we know that we have NINE Nakshatra Pada in every sign, then SEVEN SIGNS will give 7x9 = 63 Pada. Thus the first Pada of the EIGHTH HOUSE shall be the 63+1= 64th Pada as counted from the Janma/Lagna Nakshatra. Now if the first Pada from Lagna/Janma Star indicates the begining of life, then the 64th shall indicate the begining of death & disease. Now, coming to Tatwa, the Tatwa of Lagna/Janma Nakshatra will be the same as 1st, 5th, 9th,...(keep adding 4) and so on till 61st, 65th..etc. When we discussed Gandanta, we were talking of how the Jala Tatwa was coming just before Agni. Similarly, the TATWA of the 64th Nakshatra will also be the one just before the Tatwa of Lagna/Janma. For example if the Lagna is in the first Pada of Aswini (Agni), then the 64th Pada shall be the first Pada of Scorpio i.e. Jala and we know about Jala ending Agni. Also note the perfect order: 1. The Tatwa of the first, middle (5th) and last (9th) Pada in any sign is always the same as that of the sign. It is in these Pada that the nature of the sign comes out. Further do consider begining as Brahma, Middle as Visnu and end as Shiva. 2. Can there be a relationship or say 'mapping' (using Narasimha's Language) between the nine Pada or nine tara (Navatara) and the Nava Graha or nine planets? Rest later Sanjay Rath - austin <fschmidt <varahamihira > Sunday, December 03, 2000 07:53 Rath [sri Guru] Regarding the 64th Navamsa > JAYA JAGANNATHA > Namaste, > Can someone give me insight on this i.e. 64th Navamsa. This is new to me > and I do not understand its calculation or significance as a graha passes > though this point. > A brief review of it's significance, is it calculation only from the > Lagna? > used in all vargas?, etc. > ... help here is appreciated. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 3, 2000 Report Share Posted December 3, 2000 In a message dated 12/2/2000 7:24:57 PM Eastern Standard Time, fschmidt writes: JAYA JAGANNATHA Namaste Frank, Sanjay has already defined 64th Navamsa in terms of padas and also gave some insights re the tawttas, etc. 64th Navamsa should be considered from both the lagna and the Moon. When malefics transit this critical point in a chart, it can cause suffereing, ill health, death, obstacles, etc. The lord of the 64th Navamsa also has some maleficence and this should be taken into account when evaluating the nature of planets and their intention for the native. Planets in the 64th Navamsa, from lagna or Moon, can also be problematic and this should also be taken into account. The 64th Navamsa from the Moon corresponds to the 4th house from the Moon in D-9. E.g., in your chart your Moon is in the 5th navamsa of Taurus which is Taurus. The 8th from your Moon is Sagittatius and therefore your 64th navamsa from the Moon is the 5th navamsa of Sag = Leo (4th house from Moon in Navamsa). So the lord of your 64th Navamsa from the Moon is the Sun. You can also see the 64th Navamsa from the lagna in same way. Regards, Brendan > Namaste, > Can someone give me insight on this i.e. 64th Navamsa. This is new to me > and I do not understand its calculation or significance as a graha passes > though this point. > A brief review of it's significance, is it calculation only from the > Lagna? > used in all vargas?, etc. > ... help here is appreciated. > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 9, 2000 Report Share Posted December 9, 2000 Dear Brendan, When you say the lord of the 64th navamsa is malefic, do you mean the lord of the rasi it is in OR the lord of the nakshatra it is in? Thanks. Regards........Hanna Bpfeeley <Bpfeeleyvarahamihira <varahamihira >Sunday, December 03, 2000 10:45 AMRe: [sri Guru] Regarding the 64th NavamsaIn a message dated 12/2/2000 7:24:57 PM Eastern Standard Time, fschmidt writes:JAYA JAGANNATHANamaste Frank,Sanjay has already defined 64th Navamsa in terms of padas and also gave some insights re the tawttas, etc. 64th Navamsa should be considered from both the lagna and the Moon. When malefics transit this critical point in a chart, it can cause suffereing, ill health, death, obstacles, etc. The lord of the 64th Navamsa also has some maleficence and this should be taken into account when evaluating the nature of planets and their intention for the native.Planets in the 64th Navamsa, from lagna or Moon, can also be problematic and thisshould also be taken into account.The 64th Navamsa from the Moon corresponds to the 4th house from the Moon in D-9. E.g., in your chart your Moon is in the 5th navamsa of Taurus which is Taurus. The 8th from your Moon is Sagittatius and therefore your 64th navamsa from the Moon is the 5th navamsa of Sag = Leo (4th house from Moon in Navamsa). So the lord of your 64th Navamsa from the Moon is the Sun.You can also see the 64th Navamsa from the lagna in same way.Regards,Brendan> Namaste,> Can someone give me insight on this i.e. 64th Navamsa. This is new to me> and I do not understand its calculation or significance as a graha passes> though this point.> A brief review of it's significance, is it calculation only from the> Lagna?> used in all vargas?, etc.> ... help here is appreciated.> OM TAT SATArchive: varahamihiraInfo: varahamihira/info.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 10, 2000 Report Share Posted December 10, 2000 In a message dated 12/9/2000 3:18:01 PM Eastern Standard Time, 2000 writes: Hare Rama Krishn Namaste Hanna, Let us assume the Moon occupies 2 degrees Aries. The 64th navamsa from the Moon would be the first navamsa of Scorpio. The lord of this navamsa is the lord in question. In this case, the navamsa is Cancer and therefore ruled by the Moon itself. The Moon in this case would occupy the sign of Aries and the lord of the 64th navamsa from the Moon would be the lord of the 4th house from the Moon and in this example the lord is the Moon itself. Another example! Suppose the Moon is 4 deg 10 mins of Taurus. It occupies the 2nd navamsa of Ta which is Aquarius. The 64th navamsa from this position is the 2nd navamsa of Sag, which is Ta. So Venus is the lord of the 64th navamsa. Hope this is not too confusing. When we see the degree of a planet in a sign, we should be able to calculate the navamsa in our head. Regards, Brendan > Dear Brendan, When you say the lord of the 64th navamsa is malefic, do you > mean the lord of the rasi it is in OR the lord of the nakshatra it is in? > Thanks. > Regards........Hanna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2000 Report Share Posted December 16, 2000 Brendan,thankyou.I did not read my emails for a few days and then had to concentrate on this issue. Thankyou for the explanation.The basis seems to be figuring out where the planet would be in the navamsa. BTW your lecture on medical astrology in Orlando was wonderful! Regards..........Hanna Bpfeeley <Bpfeeleyvarahamihira <varahamihira >Sunday, December 10, 2000 9:45 PMRe: [sri Guru] Regarding the 64th NavamsaIn a message dated 12/9/2000 3:18:01 PM Eastern Standard Time, 2000 writes:Hare Rama KrishnNamaste Hanna,Let us assume the Moon occupies 2 degrees Aries. The 64th navamsa from the Moon would be the first navamsa of Scorpio. The lord of this navamsa is the lord in question. In this case, the navamsa is Cancer and therefore ruled by the Moon itself. The Moon in this case would occupy the sign of Aries and the lord of the 64th navamsa from the Moon would be the lord of the 4th house from the Moon and in this example the lord is the Moon itself.Another example! Suppose the Moon is 4 deg 10 mins of Taurus. It occupies the 2nd navamsa of Ta which is Aquarius. The 64th navamsa from this position is the 2nd navamsa of Sag, which is Ta. So Venus is the lord of the 64th navamsa.Hope this is not too confusing. When we see the degree of a planet in a sign, we should be able to calculate the navamsa in our head.Regards,Brendan> Dear Brendan, When you say the lord of the 64th navamsa is malefic, do you > mean the lord of the rasi it is in OR the lord of the nakshatra it is in?> Thanks.> Regards........HannaOM TAT SATArchive: varahamihiraInfo: varahamihira/info.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 17, 2000 Report Share Posted December 17, 2000 Sri Gurave Namah Dear Brendan, Can we have a copy of your lecture for the benefit of the group? Sanjay Rath - 2000 <2000 <varahamihira > Friday, December 15, 2000 7:02 PM Re: [sri Guru] Regarding the 64th Navamsa Brendan,thankyou.I did not read my emails for a few days and then had to concentrate on this issue. Thankyou for the explanation.The basis seems to be figuring out where the planet would be in the navamsa. BTW your lecture on medical astrology in Orlando was wonderful! Regards..........Hanna Bpfeeley <Bpfeeley varahamihira <varahamihira > Sunday, December 10, 2000 9:45 PM Re: [sri Guru] Regarding the 64th Navamsa In a message dated 12/9/2000 3:18:01 PM Eastern Standard Time, 2000 writes: Hare Rama Krishn Namaste Hanna, Let us assume the Moon occupies 2 degrees Aries. The 64th navamsa from the Moon would be the first navamsa of Scorpio. The lord of this navamsa is the lord in question. In this case, the navamsa is Cancer and therefore ruled by the Moon itself. The Moon in this case would occupy the sign of Aries and the lord of the 64th navamsa from the Moon would be the lord of the 4th house from the Moon and in this example the lord is the Moon itself. Another example! Suppose the Moon is 4 deg 10 mins of Taurus. It occupies the 2nd navamsa of Ta which is Aquarius. The 64th navamsa from this position is the 2nd navamsa of Sag, which is Ta. So Venus is the lord of the 64th navamsa. Hope this is not too confusing. When we see the degree of a planet in a sign, we should be able to calculate the navamsa in our head. Regards, Brendan > Dear Brendan, When you say the lord of the 64th navamsa is malefic, do you > mean the lord of the rasi it is in OR the lord of the nakshatra it is in? > Thanks. > Regards........Hanna eGroups Sponsor OM TAT SAT Archive: varahamihira Info: varahamihira/info.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 17, 2000 Report Share Posted December 17, 2000 JAYA JAGANNATHA! Dear Gurudeva and members, Pranaams. On the other day Narashimha voiced his concerns on VA list that there is a great need for an authentic book on medical astrology. I think that Brendan is the one who should porduce it. What is your opinion? Your shishya, Gauranga Das Vedic Astrologer <gauranga Phone:+36-309-140-839 Gauranga Das Vedic Astrologer <gauranga Phone:+36-309-140-839 -----Eredeti üzenet----- Feladó: Sanjay Rath <srath Címzett: <varahamihira > Elküldve: 2000. december 17. 7:35 Tárgy: Re: [sri Guru] Regarding the 64th Navamsa > Sri Gurave Namah > Dear Brendan, > Can we have a copy of your lecture for the benefit of the group? > Sanjay Rath > - > 2000 <2000 > <varahamihira > > Friday, December 15, 2000 7:02 PM > Re: [sri Guru] Regarding the 64th Navamsa > > > Brendan,thankyou.I did not read my emails for a few days and then had to > concentrate on this issue. > Thankyou for the explanation.The basis seems to be figuring out where the > planet would be in the navamsa. > BTW your lecture on medical astrology in Orlando was wonderful! > Regards..........Hanna > > Bpfeeley <Bpfeeley > varahamihira <varahamihira > > Sunday, December 10, 2000 9:45 PM > Re: [sri Guru] Regarding the 64th Navamsa > > > In a message dated 12/9/2000 3:18:01 PM Eastern Standard Time, > 2000 writes: > > Hare Rama Krishn > Namaste Hanna, > > Let us assume the Moon occupies 2 degrees Aries. The 64th navamsa from the > Moon would be the first navamsa of Scorpio. The lord of this navamsa is > the > lord in question. In this case, the navamsa is Cancer and therefore ruled > by > the Moon itself. The Moon in this case would occupy the sign of Aries and > the > lord of the 64th navamsa from the Moon would be the lord of the 4th house > from the Moon and in this example the lord is the Moon itself. > > Another example! Suppose the Moon is 4 deg 10 mins of Taurus. It occupies > the > 2nd navamsa of Ta which is Aquarius. The 64th navamsa from this position > is > the 2nd navamsa of Sag, which is Ta. So Venus is the lord of the 64th > navamsa. > > Hope this is not too confusing. When we see the degree of a planet in a > sign, > we should be able to calculate the navamsa in our head. > > Regards, > Brendan > > > Dear Brendan, When you say the lord of the 64th navamsa is malefic, do > you > > mean the lord of the rasi it is in OR the lord of the nakshatra it is > in? > > Thanks. > > Regards........Hanna > > eGroups Sponsor > > > OM TAT SAT > Archive: varahamihira > Info: varahamihira/info.html OM TAT SAT > Archive: varahamihira > Info: varahamihira/info.html > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 18, 2000 Report Share Posted December 18, 2000 In a message dated 12/16/2000 12:18:21 PM Eastern Standard Time, srath writes: Jaya Jagganatha Pranaam Sanjay, The lecture was largely based on the Trimsamsa and medical astrology and some on D-6 as well. I can write up the cases I presented for SJVC or Jyotish News. Let me know what you suggest. Regards, Brendan > Sri Gurave Namah > Dear Brendan, > Can we have a copy of your lecture for the benefit of the group? > Sanjay Rath Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 19, 2000 Report Share Posted December 19, 2000 Dear Gauranga/friends, I would be willing to help Brendan, since I've interpreted a few Ayurvedic Courses held by eminene Vaidyas. We've learnt many things about doshas, subdoshas, dhatus, nadi-vigyan etc. The person that impressed me was a doctor named Vyas(He runs clynics in the vicinity of New Delhi, perhaps someone has heard of him?). His brother I think is a jyotish.I remeber once he felt a pulse of a person who had doubts about her lagna. He said that she must have had rahu in lagna, and moon in kendra, by feeling a pulse. She was at the border of dhanu lagna with rahu in lagna and moon in virgo(10th house) and scorpio lagna with rahu in second and moon in 11th. He was wearing Gomed and mentioned a few facts about his chart and insisted on relation of jyotish and ayur veda.So, I think I could help Brendan with this Yours Zoran Gauranga Das wrote: > JAYA JAGANNATHA! > > Dear Gurudeva and members, > > Pranaams. > > On the other day Narashimha voiced his concerns on VA list that there is a great need for > an authentic book on medical astrology. I think that Brendan is the one who should porduce > it. > > What is your opinion? > > Your shishya, > > Gauranga Das Vedic Astrologer > <gauranga > Phone:+36-309-140-839 > > Gauranga Das Vedic Astrologer > <gauranga > Phone:+36-309-140-839 > > -----Eredeti üzenet----- > Feladó: Sanjay Rath <srath > Címzett: <varahamihira > > Elküldve: 2000. december 17. 7:35 > Tárgy: Re: [sri Guru] Regarding the 64th Navamsa > > > Sri Gurave Namah > > Dear Brendan, > > Can we have a copy of your lecture for the benefit of the group? > > Sanjay Rath > > - > > 2000 <2000 > > <varahamihira > > > Friday, December 15, 2000 7:02 PM > > Re: [sri Guru] Regarding the 64th Navamsa > > > > > > Brendan,thankyou.I did not read my emails for a few days and then had to > > concentrate on this issue. > > Thankyou for the explanation.The basis seems to be figuring out where the > > planet would be in the navamsa. > > BTW your lecture on medical astrology in Orlando was wonderful! > > Regards..........Hanna > > > > Bpfeeley <Bpfeeley > > varahamihira <varahamihira > > > Sunday, December 10, 2000 9:45 PM > > Re: [sri Guru] Regarding the 64th Navamsa > > > > > > In a message dated 12/9/2000 3:18:01 PM Eastern Standard Time, > > 2000 writes: > > > > Hare Rama Krishn > > Namaste Hanna, > > > > Let us assume the Moon occupies 2 degrees Aries. The 64th navamsa from the > > Moon would be the first navamsa of Scorpio. The lord of this navamsa is > > the > > lord in question. In this case, the navamsa is Cancer and therefore ruled > > by > > the Moon itself. The Moon in this case would occupy the sign of Aries and > > the > > lord of the 64th navamsa from the Moon would be the lord of the 4th house > > from the Moon and in this example the lord is the Moon itself. > > > > Another example! Suppose the Moon is 4 deg 10 mins of Taurus. It occupies > > the > > 2nd navamsa of Ta which is Aquarius. The 64th navamsa from this position > > is > > the 2nd navamsa of Sag, which is Ta. So Venus is the lord of the 64th > > navamsa. > > > > Hope this is not too confusing. When we see the degree of a planet in a > > sign, > > we should be able to calculate the navamsa in our head. > > > > Regards, > > Brendan > > > > > Dear Brendan, When you say the lord of the 64th navamsa is malefic, do > > you > > > mean the lord of the rasi it is in OR the lord of the nakshatra it is > > in? > > > Thanks. > > > Regards........Hanna > > > > eGroups Sponsor > > > > > > OM TAT SAT > > Archive: varahamihira > > Info: varahamihira/info.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > OM TAT SAT > > Archive: varahamihira > > Info: varahamihira/info.html > > > > > > > > > OM TAT SAT > Archive: varahamihira > Info: varahamihira/info.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 19, 2000 Report Share Posted December 19, 2000 Jaya Jagannath Dear Brendan, A few cases in the form of a lesson would be very nice for the Jyotisha out here. Thank you Regards Sanjay Rath - <Bpfeeley <varahamihira > Sunday, December 17, 2000 8:39 PM Re: [sri Guru] Regarding the 64th Navamsa > In a message dated 12/16/2000 12:18:21 PM Eastern Standard Time, > srath writes: > > Jaya Jagganatha > > Pranaam Sanjay, > > The lecture was largely based on the Trimsamsa and medical astrology and some > on D-6 as well. I can write up the cases I presented for SJVC or Jyotish > News. Let me know what you suggest. > Regards, > Brendan > > > Sri Gurave Namah > > Dear Brendan, > > Can we have a copy of your lecture for the benefit of the group? > > Sanjay Rath > > > OM TAT SAT > Archive: varahamihira > Info: varahamihira/info.html > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.