Rahu AK - Sanjay ji

[Guest guest]

|| Hare Rama Krishna ||

 

Dear Swee-ji,

Pranam. I am sorry for my typo. I meant that Ra as AK

doesn't get to decide who the Ishta Devata will be. It is decided by

the Vishwatman how He wants to guide that native and hence zodiacal

direction needs to be adopted as the Sun represents Vishwatman.

 

Some references of Ra as AK in Robert-ji's new book is helpful.

 

Best Regards,

 

Sourav

================================================================

 

sohamsa , " Swee Chan " <swee@c...> wrote:

>

> Jaya Jagannatha

>

> Dear Sourav,

> Namaste

>

> Ra does not get to decide who his AK will be;

>

> My original question is what becomes when Rahu is AK. 2nd or 12th?

Guess

> this is too much of a mind twister. Never mind ;-)

>

> A short note: if you read up in Srimad Bhagavatam on parts of

Canto 3, 5 and

> 8, " Ra-Ke " showed egoistic authority and were cursed by the

Kumaras. Their

> " human " birth took place on earth which was still submerged in

water. Read

> up on portends of Rahu which ensue the birth of Saturn (sorrow).

>

> Love,

>

> Swee

>

[Guest guest]

|| Hare Rama Krishna ||

 

Dear Swee-ji,

Pranam. Well, Sanjay-ji takes zodiacally 12-th from

it and I agree to that.

 

Best regards,

 

Sourav

====================================================================

 

 

sohamsa , " Swee Chan " <swee@c...> wrote:

>

> Jaya Jagannatha

>

> Dear Sourav,

> Namaste

>

> Dear Swee-ji,

> Pranam. Rahu may be non-conformist but the form that

Lord

> has wished to take to guide Rahu Ak doesn't have to conform to

Ra's

> nature.

>

> The initial question still remains unanswered. 2nd or 12th to Rahu

is the

> Lord's form. Thank you for the other answers.

> I will leave things be.

>

> Love,

>

> Swee

>

[Guest guest]

|| Hare Rama Krishna ||

 

Dear Swee-ji,

Pranam. Ra doesn't take an exception because Ra

doesn't have the opportinutiy to do that. This is as far as I can

understand and communicate. If I am not understanding your query,

let me wait for Sanjay-ji or other Guru-ji's to appropriately answer

you.

 

Best regards,

 

Sourav

================================================================

 

sohamsa , " Swee Chan " <swee@c...> wrote:

>

> Jaya Jagannatha

>

> Dear Sourav,

> Namaste

>

> I am not disputing that fact. But why does Rahu not take an

exception in

> this case? Give me an example in the shastra which I can relate to.

>

> Thanks.

>

> Love,

> Swee

>

>

>

> sohamsa [sohamsa ] On

Behalf Of

> Sourav Chowdhury

> Tuesday, October 11, 2005 6:03 PM

> sohamsa

> Re: Rahu AK - Sanjay ji

>

> || Hare Rama Krishna ||

>

> Dear Swee-ji,

> Pranam. Well, Sanjay-ji takes zodiacally 12-th

from

> it and I agree to that.

>

> Best regards,

>

> Sourav

>

====================================================================

>

>

> sohamsa , " Swee Chan " <swee@c...> wrote:

> >

> > Jaya Jagannatha

> >

> > Dear Sourav,

> > Namaste

> >

> > Dear Swee-ji,

> > Pranam. Rahu may be non-conformist but the form that

> Lord

> > has wished to take to guide Rahu Ak doesn't have to conform to

> Ra's

> > nature.

> >

> > The initial question still remains unanswered. 2nd or 12th to

Rahu

> is the

> > Lord's form. Thank you for the other answers.

> > I will leave things be.

> >

> > Love,

> >

> > Swee

> >

>

*tat savitur varenyam*

>

[Guest guest]

sohamsa , " Swee Chan " <swee@c...> wrote:

>

> My original question is what becomes when Rahu is AK. 2nd or 12th?

 

12th from Ra, which is zodiacally 2nd. I can't see how Ra's

progression in degrees to its position of AK can be reckoned in a

direction disparate to the ID's determination. ID is the guiding deity

to onward, progressing soul, thus naturally being in 12th from it.

 

This is just whistling in the breeze; I've no scripture to back me

up

 

+++