(Multiple replies) RE: New method for understanding finances - Raman Hora -

[Guest guest]

|| Om Gurave Namah ||

 

Namaste Raman Suprajarama,

 

> Ayanamsa and there could be some differences in the co-ordinates to that

> when calculated using Lahiri Ayanamsa. Further, the Ayanamsa I use

takes the

> year of coincidence as 397 (Raman value) but calculations are done with

> slightly different figures. The value I use deviates by about 6-8

minutes

> from the value calculated by Jagannatha Hora.

 

 

Can you please some more information the Raman Ayanamsha you use,

 

You said 397 is the year of coinciding but dint give exact date.

 

Jagannatha Hora gives,

 

January 1, 397

Ayanamsa: 0-05-51.94

 

December 31, 397

Ayanamsa: 0-06-36.29

 

43' 55 " difference when I use two extremes.

 

You said " the value I use deviates by about 6-8 " .

 

The Maximum deviation in JHora is about 6' 36.29 " , Where as you say

you use about 8'

 

 

So Can you please throw some light on this.

 

Thank you for your paper.

 

Warm Regards

Sanjay P

 

Hari Om Tat Sat

[Guest guest]

 

|om namo bhagavate vasudevaya|

Dear Narasimha

Why does JHora not use the Raman ayanamsa when it is selected as an option?

With best wishes and warm regards,

Sanjay Rath

* * *

Sri Jagannath Center®

15B Gangaram Hospital Road

New Delhi 110060, India

http://srath.com, +91-11-25717162

* * *

 

 

 

sohamsa [sohamsa ] On Behalf Of sanjayprabhakaranWednesday, August 17, 2005 9:56 AMsohamsa Subject: Re: (Multiple replies) RE: New method for understanding finances - Raman Hora -

|| Om Gurave Namah ||Namaste Raman Suprajarama,> Ayanamsa and there could be some differences in the co-ordinates to that> when calculated using Lahiri Ayanamsa. Further, the Ayanamsa I usetakes the> year of coincidence as 397 (Raman value) but calculations are done with> slightly different figures. The value I use deviates by about 6-8minutes> from the value calculated by Jagannatha Hora.Can you please some more information the Raman Ayanamsha you use,You said 397 is the year of coinciding but dint give exact date.Jagannatha Hora gives, January 1, 397Ayanamsa: 0-05-51.94 December 31, 397Ayanamsa: 0-06-36.2943' 55" difference when I use two extremes.You said "the value I use deviates by about 6-8".The Maximum deviation in JHora is about 6' 36.29", Where as you sayyou use about 8'So Can you please throw some light on this.Thank you for your paper.Warm RegardsSanjay PHari Om Tat Sat

[Guest guest]

Dear Sanjay,

 

For general information about Raman Ayanamsa, I refer you to

revered grandfather’s book “A Manual of Hindu Astrology”. For

the year 2005, the Raman Ayanamsa is 22-28-57 while Jagannatha Hora gives

22-28-28, a difference of about 29 seconds, which is negligible.

 

Om Tat Sat,

 

Raman Suprajarama

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

sohamsa [sohamsa ] On Behalf Of sanjayprabhakaran

Wednesday, August 17, 2005

7:26 PM

sohamsa

Re: (Multiple

replies) RE: New method for understanding finances - Raman Hora -

 

 

|| Om

Gurave Namah ||

 

Namaste Raman Suprajarama,

 

> Ayanamsa and there could be some differences

in the co-ordinates to that

> when calculated using Lahiri Ayanamsa.

Further, the Ayanamsa I use

takes the

> year of coincidence as 397 (Raman value) but

calculations are done with

> slightly different figures. The value I use

deviates by about 6-8

minutes

> from the value calculated by Jagannatha Hora.

 

 

Can you please some more information the Raman

Ayanamsha you use,

 

You said 397 is the year of coinciding but dint

give exact date.

 

Jagannatha Hora gives,

 

January 1, 397

Ayanamsa: 0-05-51.94

 

December 31, 397

Ayanamsa: 0-06-36.29

 

43' 55 " difference when I use two extremes.

 

You said " the value I use deviates by about

6-8 " .

 

The Maximum deviation in JHora is about 6'

36.29 " , Where as you say

you use about 8'

 

 

So Can you please throw some light on this.

 

Thank you for your paper.

 

Warm Regards

Sanjay P

 

Hari Om Tat Sat