Karaka Tithi Questions to Sanjay

[Guest guest]

Hare Rama Krishna

 

Dear Sanjay P, Namaskar

 

Thanks for your reply. Further queries on your following comments:

 

> Sanjay P: Rahu need not indicate just material benefits. If you do

so

> then Ketu would indicate the other extreme. But, Ketu rules no

tithi.

> So no thithi will be conducive to spirituality?.

>

> In Vedic astrology there is no seperate ruler for two opposites.

Both

> opposites are ruled by the same diety or indicator. But different

> dieties can control each other.

>

> As an example there is House for Dharma, 9th. There is no house for

> Adharma. When 9th gets afflicted we get Adharma.

>

> Another example, Sun has two wife, Sanjana(Light maker) and Chaaya

> (Shadow). So Both Light and Shadow are from same source the Surya

> devata. It's upto the observer(moon) now to see the difference.

>

> Now, When Rahu was created at the same time Ketu was created. Thus

> Rahu's other side Ketu spirituality is also create. So Rahu ruled

> tithi can show extreme spirituality also.

 

Viswanadham: If we take spirituality as a processs of knowing

oneself - realising the true identity of self, then Rahu representing

ahamkara (false identity)is not conducive for that realisation. So

karaka tithi is the indicator of the level of this consciousness.

While, Saturn rules Pournima, Rahu rules the opposite, Amavasya. Both

lord the gateway to the natural 12th house. One doubt still remains

is that, are the two karaka tithis like Trayodasi of Krishna & Sukla

paksha the same?

 

i think, Sudarshan chakra (which was chisled out of the effulgence

of Surya by Viswa Karma)cut the asura, very fine indeed. Though, Ketu

does not rule a tithi, it also is not a part of the 8 CKs (being a

moksha karaka). On the natural path of the Soul, Rahu is an

impediment, is it not?

 

 

 

 

> Sanjay P : This is a good question. I would take the replace tithi

to

> see what changes in Life the replaced tithi lord indicates and

predict

> the same at the time of replacement. I would like other views.

 

Viswanadham: i like to hear other's views.

 

>

> Warm Regards

> Sanjay P

>

 

Many thanks & regards

Viswanadham

 

 

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > On 7/21/05, Guru Sanjay Rath <guruji@s...> wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > |om namo bhagavate vasudevaya|

> > > Dear Vishwanadham

> > > Rahu is good for Rajayoga

> > > With best wishes and warm regards,

> > > Sanjay Rath

> > > * * *

> > > Sri Jagannath Center®

> > > 15B Gangaram Hospital Road

> > > New Delhi 110060, India

> > > http://srath.com, +91-11-25717162

> > > * * *

> > >

> > >

> > > ________________________________

> > > jyotisa [jyotisa ]

On

> Behalf Of

> > > vishwanatham

> > > Thursday, July 21, 2005 3:05 PM

> > > jyotisa

> > > Karaka Tithi Questions to Sanjay

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > > Hare Rama Krishna

> > >

> > > Dear Sanjay Ji, Pranams

> > >

> > > Happy Guru Pournima.

> > >

> > > On the discussion so far we had on Karaka Tithi, i have a

doubt.

> > > Please clear my doubt.

> > >

> > > While AK & Amk together give a Raja Sambandha yoga, they being

> > > together in one rasi, within 12 degrees, gives the karaka tithi

ruler

> > > as Rahu.

> > >

> > > Is this to be taken as total darkeness or the small spark of

atma

> > > shining brightly in the totality of darkness that Rahu

represents.

> > >

> > > Also, what if this Rahu happens to be BK in the chart and is

being

> > > replaced by Sun (MK)? (i'm talking about my chart, and

completing 45

> > > by next January )

> > >

> > > Many thanks & kind regards

> > >

> > > Suryaviswanadham

> > >