Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

[Jagannath] Gaudiya M. stand on ritvik

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

At 2. 4. 2000 8:02:00, you wrote:

>Jaya Jagannath,

>Dear Zavisa,

>

> That is an excellent posting as it clearly spells out the views of the

>tradition of Jagannath Puri. Kindly offer my humble " Shadanga Pranaam " to

>Tripurari Maharaj. I have always held that the Siksha Guru is INFERIOR to

>the Diksha Guru for the following reason.

>

> Sri Achyuta Dasa explains that the Sisya(Student), Guru(Teacher) and

>Isa(God-Krishna) are represented by the three beejakshara " HRIM " , SHRIM " and

> " KLEEM " respectively. Some people especially the so called " Ritvik

>Continuation Propagators " believe that " SHRIM " is the general Beejakshara

>for all guru's and their stand about Diksha Guru and Siksha Guru is very

>confused and misleading.

>

> The REAL function of the Diksha Guru is to propagate Dharma itself or

>the Veda whereas the function of a Siksha Guru is to teach a part of the

>Veda like a Vedanga. Thus the Diksha Guru does the function of Isa or God

>whereas the Siksha Guru is doing the function of a helper of Isa. There is a

>difference between God and His helpers and this distinction is there between

>Diksha Guru and Siksha Guru. It is possible that both these functions can be

>taken up by one person and hence that person shall represent the SHRIM &

>KLEEM Beeja, else the Siksha guru shall represent the SHRIM Beeja and the

>Diksha Guru shall represent the KLEEM Beeja.

>

> (Beeja means seed and Beejakshara means seed syllable or phoneme). Take

>my personal example: My Diksha and Siksha Guru is Late Pt. Kasinath Rath as

>he has given me the Gayatri Mantra (Diksha) and also initiated me into

>Jyotish. There are many other Siksha Guru like Ramachandan Harichandan or my

>father who taught me the mathematical aspects. However, they cannot compare

>with my Diksha Guru. Now, the lineage comes from Maharshi Atri and hence

>Maharshi Atri should be considered the Param Guru of the family. The Jyotish

>Lineage comes from Sri Achyuta who can also be considered a Param Guru.

>

> In this manner, it is incorrect on the part of the Ritviks to consider

>Srila Prabhupada as merely a Siksha Guru when, actually he is the Param

>Guru. To say that he did not order the Guru-Sisya parampara continuation in

>the form of a legal order or something like that is twisting the truth.

>Ritviks were appointed by him to work on his behalf during his lifetime and

>to say that they can continue to give Diksha on his behalf 'WITHOUT TAKING

>THE RESPONSIBILITY " of being a Diksha Guru is running away from

>responsibility as the Diksha Guru has to take one-sixth of the sins of the

>student. These fellows want that Srila Prabhupada continue to take the sins

>of the student as they can shirk this responsibility while enjoying its

>position on behalf of Srila.

>

 

Sri Sri Guru Gauranga Jayatah

 

Yes, when I was in my Jup-Ketu(both placed in 5th in Aries) one person was

constantly offering me to read some things from PADA(ritvikvadis). Ketu realy

tested me in that direction. Or might be deb sat transit over my jup-ketu. That

person's gonna take initiation from Narayan Maharaja when he sees him.

I did some preaching to him.

I haven't encountered anybody but him. In Zagreb so far Krishna protected us

from that deviation. I thank him for that.

 

I have one question in regards to what you've written.

Can you explain how sins are distibuted on initiation? Couple of years ago when

I was wondering about that I could not get that definitely answered.

 

yours sisya,

 

Zavisa

 

> They try to hide this in a show of humility that they are actually

>working for Srila where their actions have resulted in their comparing him

>to a mere Siksha Guru. If what they say is right, then they should be

>prepared to give me the same position that they give to Srila!!! See now

>this sounds so absurd and it actually is.

>

>Best Wishes

>Sanjay Rath

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

At 2. 4. 2000 8:02:00, you wrote:

>Jaya Jagannath,

>Dear Zavisa,

>

> That is an excellent posting as it clearly spells out the views of the

>tradition of Jagannath Puri. Kindly offer my humble " Shadanga Pranaam " to

>Tripurari Maharaj. I have always held that the Siksha Guru is INFERIOR to

>the Diksha Guru for the following reason.

>

> Sri Achyuta Dasa explains that the Sisya(Student), Guru(Teacher) and

>Isa(God-Krishna) are represented by the three beejakshara " HRIM " , SHRIM " and

> " KLEEM " respectively. Some people especially the so called " Ritvik

>Continuation Propagators " believe that " SHRIM " is the general Beejakshara

>for all guru's and their stand about Diksha Guru and Siksha Guru is very

>confused and misleading.

>

> The REAL function of the Diksha Guru is to propagate Dharma itself or

>the Veda whereas the function of a Siksha Guru is to teach a part of the

>Veda like a Vedanga. Thus the Diksha Guru does the function of Isa or God

>whereas the Siksha Guru is doing the function of a helper of Isa. There is a

>difference between God and His helpers and this distinction is there between

>Diksha Guru and Siksha Guru. It is possible that both these functions can be

>taken up by one person and hence that person shall represent the SHRIM &

>KLEEM Beeja, else the Siksha guru shall represent the SHRIM Beeja and the

>Diksha Guru shall represent the KLEEM Beeja.

>

> (Beeja means seed and Beejakshara means seed syllable or phoneme). Take

>my personal example: My Diksha and Siksha Guru is Late Pt. Kasinath Rath as

>he has given me the Gayatri Mantra (Diksha) and also initiated me into

>Jyotish. There are many other Siksha Guru like Ramachandan Harichandan or my

>father who taught me the mathematical aspects. However, they cannot compare

>with my Diksha Guru. Now, the lineage comes from Maharshi Atri and hence

>Maharshi Atri should be considered the Param Guru of the family. The Jyotish

>Lineage comes from Sri Achyuta who can also be considered a Param Guru.

>

> In this manner, it is incorrect on the part of the Ritviks to consider

>Srila Prabhupada as merely a Siksha Guru when, actually he is the Param

>Guru. To say that he did not order the Guru-Sisya parampara continuation in

>the form of a legal order or something like that is twisting the truth.

>Ritviks were appointed by him to work on his behalf during his lifetime and

>to say that they can continue to give Diksha on his behalf 'WITHOUT TAKING

>THE RESPONSIBILITY " of being a Diksha Guru is running away from

>responsibility as the Diksha Guru has to take one-sixth of the sins of the

>student. These fellows want that Srila Prabhupada continue to take the sins

>of the student as they can shirk this responsibility while enjoying its

>position on behalf of Srila.

>

> They try to hide this in a show of humility that they are actually

>working for Srila where their actions have resulted in their comparing him

>to a mere Siksha Guru. If what they say is right, then they should be

>prepared to give me the same position that they give to Srila!!! See now

>this sounds so absurd and it actually is.

>

>Best Wishes

>Sanjay Rath

 

 

 

Sri Sri Guru Gauranga Jayatah

 

There is also one other deviation that might arise and that is not worshiping

anybody except your guru even though that other person

comes in the same tradition and has a same realisation. Not necessarily

worshiping, but rejecting. That also is not bonafide.

So in lines with that I send one other lecture I just read and therefore got the

inspiration to send it. Since this thread is recent

this is not out of context.

 

 

 

Someone once told me, " Srila Prabhupada gave us everything - we don't need

anyone else. " I replied, " Srila Prabhupada gave us everything - he also

gave us everyone else. "

 

An address given at the Krishna Balaram Mandir by Swami B.V.Tripurari on

the Tirobhava Mahotsava of His Divine Grace A.C. Bhaktivedanta Swami

Prabhupada.

 

Today, let me speak to you from my heart about my realization of Srila

Prabhupada, especially what I have learned over the last eight years

serving him outside the formal boundaries of the International Society for

Krishna Consciousness.

 

I hope you will accept my appreciation of Srila Prabhupada, even though it

may speak of a different vision of His Divine Grace from what you are

familiar with. After all, each and every atom of this world may be examined

from many, many angles of vision - what to speak of a person whose every

atomic particle of existence is cent percent dedicated to the service of

the Supreme Lord. As Krishna himself is like a bright jewel who shows

himself to his devotee as he himself sees fit, so his pure devotee, Srila

Prabhupada, is a multifaceted personality who shows himself to his

followers in many wonderful and diverse ways at the same time.

 

Let us not limit Prabhupada to our own vision of His Divine Grace. Rather,

on this occasion of his disappearance, we might do well to question whether

any of us have ever seen him " as he is. " Guru tattva is a vast subject, an

elusive tattva. We are humbled in our attempt to say anything about

Prabhupada at all, and to do so certainly requires his grace.

 

Srila Rupa Goswami has said in Ujjvala-nilamani that love, like a snake,

moves in a crooked way, 'aher iva gatih premnah svabhava-kutila bhavet.'

'Hetor ahetos ca', with cause or without cause, sometimes in love

differences arise. This is the nature of loving affairs. Let us consider,

on this occasion where there is considerable talk of unity, that the

differences between Vaishnavas arise out of love and everything that is

spoken is not the whole truth. Srila Prabhupada said many things about his

godbrothers, and they have often been quoted out of context to establish a

policy that falls short of unifying all Gaudiya Vaishnavas, which he so

desired.

 

In the last days of his manifest lila, I was present when Akincana

Krishnadasa Babaji Maharaja and other godbrothers, assembled at Srila

Prabhupada's bedside. At that time, Srila Prabhupada asked for forgiveness

for any offenses he may have committed. Babaji Maharaja was quick to reply,

" All you have said was spoken in the service of preaching and in that there

is no offense. " Prabhupada replied, " Now the war is over. Please try to

help them (my disciples). " For the last eight years, I have been trying to

realize this vision, an expanded vision of Srila Prabhupada's family. He

was a maha-bhagavata, he loved all, what to speak of his godbrothers, even

while he criticized them.

 

I would like to suggest that there is much to gain for all from

unification. As far as it is possible, we should strive for it. It was

something that Srila Prabhupada held dear. But in order to do so, we must

learn to be flexible, while at the same time resolute within the

philosophical parameters of our Gaudiya siddhanta. We must broaden our

outlook from that of a 'bhara-vahi' Vaishnava, to that of a 'saragrahi'

Vaishnava. We must become essential Vaishnavas, not merely formal

Vaishnavas. We must move from the outer terrain of forms, titles, corporate

and geographical identification, to the inner landscape that Vaishnavism is

all about.

 

Where are we in terms of the Brahmanda, the Viraja, Brahmaloka, Vaikuntha,

Ayodhya, Dvaraka, and ultimately Goloka, that should be our only concern.

In this inner world of realization we can find both gradation and the

possiblity of unity. We must leave the kanistha adhikari conception of

Vaishnavism and act as madhyama adhikaris. We must question and learn to

look deeply within ourselves. We must examine the sriptures and the words

of our spiritual master in terms of their essential meaning. We must become

acquainted, not merely with the outside - the vapu, of those instructions,

but with the vani - or spirit, of those words. In doing so, we challenge

our faith and thus run the risk of losing our heart, our faith. But shallow

faith is not what we are interested in, but only inasmuch as it serves to

help us go deeper into the heart of Sri Chaitanya's teachings.

 

Srila Prabhupada was a great Vaishnava. It is said that the symptom of the

highest devotee is that whoever sees him immediately begins to chant the

Holy Name of Krishna. Srila Prabhupada was so great that whoever saw him,

or whoever sees his disciples or grand disciples, shouts Hare Krishna. We

may not be that kind of Vaishnava, but at least we can learn to appreciate,

to smile, when we see another Vaishnava, regardless of where he rests at

night. Let us be careful that in shouting 'amar guru jagad guru!', 'my

guru is the best guru!', that we do not fall short in this glorification by

putting greater emphasis on 'amar' - 'my', than on 'jagad'. For, by doing

so, we may only be glorifying ourselves.

 

Let us remember that we are all moving in this world with our own

realization of Srila Prabhupada. We have not captured him in our fist. And

we cannot pound our limited realization of him into everyone else's head

and expect to realize the desired unity. We must have a generous attitude

with one another and with all those who claim faith in our Savior, Sri

Chaitanya.

 

Love moves in a crooked way. Its ways are wonderful, yet difficult to

understand. We have gathered here to glorify Srila Prabhupada, yet he is

not alone. There is a land of Prabhupadas. In the words of Srila Sridhara

Maharaja, " A land of gurus. " There, we may find the likes of Uddhava,

Brahma, or Mahadeva in a grain of sand. We are trying in our service to

Srila Prabhupada to approach that plane, but we have no qualification. The

confidence we have should be derived, not from our ability to practice, but

from our realization of the generous nature of that great welfare state.

Our Guru's generosity is like that of the mother who names her blind son

" lotus eyed. " Realizing this generosity, we have some hope.

 

Let us position ourselves to realize this truth, and thus realize

Mahaprabhu's vision of humility and tolerance. When he said one should be

more humble than a blade of grass, more tolerant than a tree, he was not

merely making a poetic statement. When Mahaprabhu saw the grass, when he

saw the trees, this is what came to his mind. We are seeing grass and trees

every day as well, yet we do not read the environment the way Mahaprabhu

did. We must strive for this vision - 'Chaitanya darshana'. We must learn

to worship everything by drawing inspiration to serve God and Guru from

even the inanimate world, what, then, to speak of our own godbrothers,

godsisters, uncles, and cousins - our own family.

 

Someone once told me, " Srila Prabhupada gave us everything - we don't need

anyone else. " I replied, " Srila Prabhupada gave us everything - he gave us

everyone else. " On this I stake my activities of the last eight years

outside the formal institution of our Gurudeva. And those whom I have met,

those who are also part of Srila Prabhupada's family, whatever I have

gathered from them, I am using in His Divine Grace's service. This, to me,

is unity in diversity, acintya-bhedabheda. This, to me, is a glimpse at the

heart where unity may be found.

 

And in pursuing this vision, I hope that, if not today, then in some

distant future, you will accept me as your godbrother. By embracing this

spirit, by showing our love for him through cooperation, my prayer is that

together we will see Srila Prabhupada 'as he is' for the first time in our

eternal life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

OM VISHNAVE NAMAH

 

Dear Zavisa,

Shadripu or six forms of sins make up the body of the " PaapaPurusha " (or

the evil within all people). One of these is forgiven at the time of

initiation and hence one-sixth of the Paapa or sin is destroyed. The person

doing so takes this upon himself and due to his Tejas (Fire of Purity) is

able to burn them.

 

Can you tell me how to study this from the Horoscope?

 

Best Wishes

Sanjay Rath

 

> I have one question in regards to what you've written.

> Can you explain how sins are distibuted on initiation? Couple of years ago

when I was wondering about that I could not get that definitely answered.

>

> yours sisya,

>

> Zavisa

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...