Guest guest Posted March 20, 2000 Report Share Posted March 20, 2000 Namaste Dina-natha, I am offended by the following words in which you are obviously referring to me (because you quoted a few words from me). I don't understand how will this be ever possible when some of the SJVC gurus are pushing other students into the darkness of ignorance. Not that I don't want to participate on the Varahamihira list but I am totally discouraged to write anything because some persons who know a bit of Sanskrit cannot understand the basics of philosophy of Bhagavad Gita or Srimad Bhagavatam and are trying also to mislead others, and not only that but they also dare to challenge the basis of the Jyotish parampara in which SJVC is also coming and than they are posing as gurus in SJVC while they don't even understand the meaning of parampara. When I try to quote from Puranas they say that meaning of Puranas are "full of ambiguities which are interpreted by different schools in different ways" and then they quote from Purana giving their own translation without following or referring to any of previous acaryas and we are supposed to take their interpretations as absolute truth while they are asking us to ignore acaryas like Srila Prabhupada, Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati Thakur and even Lord Caitanya Himself. (1) You are not at all in a position to judge whether I know "a bit of Sanskrit" or a lot of Sanskrit. I am afraid it is presumptuous of you to jump to any conclusions on how much Sanskrit I know and how much of "the basics of philosophy, Bhagavad Gita" etc I know, based on our little interaction. You are crossing your limits. Why this sudden bitterness anyway? (2) I only made a general comment that some things in Puranas are not as clear as they may be in the English translations one may read. This is an absolutely correct statement. My advice is not meant to push anyone into darkness, but to put things in the right perspective. I am not telling you to not believe in what you read, as passed to you in your parampara. Definitely belive in it, blindly. I am only suggesting that one should keep an open mind and atleast have some basic respect for other schools. Some new converts (I am not referring to any particular person) don't have the right perspective and are often intolerant/fanatical towards other schools. I am only trying promote some open-mindedness and the right perspective. I am not insulting any particular schools by pointing out that there are several interpretations. I am sorry to know that you haven't taken it well and I can't understand why. (3) The expression that offended me the most is "posing as gurus in SJVC". When Sanjay told me I would be an SJVC guru, I asked him if he thought I was qualified for it. I told him I was embarrassed by the title "Pandit" and preferred my bare name without any such high-sounding prefixes and titles. But it was Sanjay's decision to make me a guru. I never asked for it. So why do you say that I am "posing as a guru in SJVC"? Dina-natha Prabhu, this bitterness - all too evident in the word "posing as" - is very unfair! Please reconsider. I am disappointed and offended by this unnecessary bitterness. May Jagannatha shower his blessings on all of us and fill us with sattva guna. May Jupiter's light shine on us, Narasimha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.