[Jagannath] Clashes Between My Three Gurus

[Guest guest]

Jaya Jagannath

Dear sateesh,

Marriage will surely occur during the transit of Jupiter in Taurus

between May 2000 to May 2001. Ask the girl to fast on Thursdays from SR to

Sunset and to worship Sri Vishnu in the Satya Narayan Vesha. The Mantra is

OM TAT SAT (for constant chanting) and OM NAMO NARAYANAYA for POOJA. She

shouldtake the prasad (in the form of sweets).

Best Regards,

Sanjay Rath

Sri Jagannath Vedic Center

152-B Pocket-C, Mayur Vihar Ph-2, Delhi,

INDIA 110091.Tel:+91-11-2489531

Website: http://www.sjvc.net

-

Sateesh Batas <makara

Narasimha Rao <pvr; <varahamihira

Saturday, February 12, 2000 11:06 PM

Re: [vedic astrology] Clashes Between My Three Gurus

 

 

> Dear Narasimha and Sanjay,

>

> I have followed your exchanges whenever you disagree on an issue (in part

or

> whole) - I wish to state my admiration for the stance both of you take -

> that is, Narasimha for not being scared to disagree with his Guru(s), and

> for Sanjay not being offended by any disagreements - more so because both

> of you are not afraid of doing this publicly - well done - you could hide

> behind private e-mails to disguise any contentions, but choose not to - it

> encourages me to make my own choices too when I see 2 or 3 conflicting

> opinions from the Teachers.

>

> In fact, whenever I have asked you a question and given you 2 or 3 options

I

> have been taught, Narasimha you have always stressed it is just YOUR

opinion

> (and therefore you do not force it upon me).

>

> Going on from this, Narasimha - I attach a question from me which you

> answered some months back - I was at the Time I posted this much less

> accurate than I am now at predicting - at the time I posted, I was using

the

> " Conservative " methods of Jyotish, i.e. the ones that you and Sanjay

> favour - at Present I am using 's System Analysis - my

> Predictive Techniques are as accurate with both Techniques!

>

> " The Same Destination by Different Paths " :-) .

>

> Here is that Post - I will tell you why I was so amazed at the end...

>

> Link -

>

> vedic astrology/1963.html?

>

> =============

>

> Re: Marriage Puzzle - Moon / Ascendant?

> Narasimha Rao

>

>

> [sateesh wrote]

>

> Dear All,

>

> Female - Born on

>

> 21-October-1976

> at 9:55 A.M.

> Place of birth - Bombay

>

> Had an arranged marriage (did not go through with it) - commenced

engagement

> in November '98, due to be Married in July '99, but had arrangement

break-up

> in July '99 itself (due to Dowry request from boy's family).

>

> Having looked over Rasi / Chandra / Navamsa Charts, I make marriage

> possible ****from July 99 to December 99 (Moon-Reckoned Dasas)****

> OR ****December 99 to May 2000 (Ascendant-Reckoned Dasas)****

>

>

> [Narasimha wrote]

>

> > Marriage is possible in the next few months as you are expecting [....]

>

>

> [sateesh wrote]

>

> Native is also concerned with Nature / Status of future Husband (if

> not able to find one on her own, will no doubt have arranged Marriage

> imposed

> by Parents elsewhere).

>

>

> [Narasimha wrote]

>

> Husband may be an honorable, noble and idealistic intellectual (upapada in

> Sagittarius, aspected by Moon and exalted Mercury).

>

> ==========

>

> Narasimha,

>

> The girl contacted me just a few days ago - she got married on the 7th of

> January 2000 - her Childhood friend (who moved to the USA) came to India

on

> a re-visit, and proposed.

>

> So the Method I and you used then of " Conservative " Jyotish worked!

>

> Having said that, the S.A. methods also work, added to which I am now a

few

> more months wiser in my predictions, since making that one!

>

> As per your comment on the Character of the Native's Spouse, you said -

>

> " Husband may be an honorable, noble and idealistic intellectual (upapada

in

> Sagittarius, aspected by Moon and exalted Mercury). "

>

> Native now confirms this is indeed the Case.

>

> Thank you, and very best - Sateesh.

>

> =====================================================================

>

>

> -

> " Narasimha Rao " <pvr

> <varahamihira >

> Cc: <vedic astrology >

> 12 February 2000 17:10

> [vedic astrology] Clashes Between My Three Gurus

>

>

> > Pranaam Sanjay,

> >

> > > Your father belongs to the East-India tradition that

> > > florished in the

> > > coast of the Bay of Bengal from Bengal to Andhra. That is why

> > > we (He & I)

> > > have similar views in so many matters. There are some small

> > > differences in

> > > the D-Charts etc as used in Karnataka, Rajasthan etc, but then

> > > these are not

> > > exactly important from Parasara's 16 Div-chart perspective and

> > > do not alter

> > > the content of basic jyotish. I guess it's OK. To each his own.

> >

> > I wasn't taught this ashtamsa by my father.

> >

> > However, what you said is correct. Overall, I did not have much

> > clash between the teachings of my three gurus. The only main

> > clashes in the teachings are:

> >

> > (1) My father taught me that each rasi is a house. If lagna is at

> > 1 deg in Li and Jupiter is at 29 deg in Vi, he still considers

> > Jupiter to be in 12th. My father told me that this is very very

> > basic. He said that there is no ambiguity in the teachings of

> > maharshis in this matter and he told me ignore later day

> > additions like Sripathi house division etc.

> >

> > Dr. Raman's stand on this is tough to gather from his books, but

> > he seemed to go with Sripathi's house division method. Though my

> > father respects Dr. Raman, he told me very confidently that each

> > rasi is a house.

> >

> > Later, your teachings also matched my father's on this one.

> >

> > (2) My father is thoughly convinced about savana years. In

> > aharganas, varsha, masa and vara balas of shadbalas, we take

> > years of 360 days (360 normal days). My father thinks that the

> > same year should be used in Vimsottari dasa.

> >

> > Those who argue that " 360 days " has no astro-significance will do

> > well to note that 1 year = 360 normal days (where a new day

> > starts at a new sunrise) in calculating varsha bala ( " year

> > strength " ) of shadbalas. Savana years are not without a strong

> > astro-basis.

> >

> > Now, the teachings of my third Guru - you - suggest 365.2425 day

> > years. I decided to go with my father's teachings.

> >

> > (3) In prasna (horary), you suggest casting a chart for the

> > moment when the astrologer answers the question. My father taught

> > me to cast the chart for the moment when the queror formed the

> > question in mind. I intend to give a couple of examples for this

> > approach today or tomorrow.

> >

> > But for a few differences like these, the teachings of my 3 Gurus

> > do not clash. The good thing is that all my teachers are flexible

> > and do not take offense if I question them or take a different

> > stand.

> >

> > Your sishya,

> > Narasimha

> >

> >

> >

> > ------

> >

> >

> >

> > ....... May Jupiter's light shine on us .......

> >

> >

> > ------

> > eLerts!

> > Save on products you choose.

> > http://click./1/1415/0/_/311/_/950375603/

> >

> > -- Talk to your group with your own voice!

> > -- /VoiceChatPage?listName=vedic astrology & m=1

> >

> >

>