[Jagannath] Ashtamsa Controversy (JHL question)

[Guest guest]

Jaya Jagannath

Dear Jyotisha,

Dr Raman must have written those books under very difficult

circumstances. As recent as 1998 I was correcting proofs with a pen and

sending it to a type setting press. So, printers devil can have its say.

Narasimha is correct and this is what I have told him. There is also a

difference between the Rudramsa given in my book and the Tajaka system. I

have my grandfathers book on divisional charts (in Oriya) out of print since

ages where all this is given along with the various types of D Charts and

what to use.

Om Tat Sat

Best Wishes

Sanjay Rath

-

Vijay <pvklnrao

PVR Narasimha Rao <nrao

Cc: Sanjay Rath <srath; Sanjay Rath <SRath; PVR

Narasimha Rao <pvr; Lakshminarayanarao Pingali Vijaya Kumara

<pvklnrao

Tuesday, February 08, 2000 11:06 PM

Re: [vedic astrology] Re: Ashtamsa Controversy (JHL question)

 

 

> Narasimha Rao wrote:

>

> > Ashtamsa: For movable, fixed and dual signs, Dr. Raman teaches

> > placing the 8 parts of the sign (8 ashtamsas) in consecutive

> > signs from Ar, Le and Sg respectively. Instead, I use Ar, Sg and

> > Le. This results in continuity. The 8th part in a sign and the

> > 1st part in the next sign go to consecutive signs with the

> > definition JHLite uses. With Dr. Raman's definition, you will get

> > discontinuities.

>

> guru: brahmaa, gururvishnu: gururdaevoe mahaeswara:

> gurussaakshaat parabrahmaa, tasmai Sree guravae nama:

>

> My dear brother,

>

> Above statement is rising an interesting question. Is " Continuty " a

> wanted

> propery to be satisfied by devisional charts? Is, so, are there any

> hidden principles

> meant to be used in devisional charts which take advantage of this

> " continuty " ?

>

> Only advantage or " add-in " I see, if devisional chart definition yeilds

> a continuous chart, is that

> it can be seen as if it was a " Rasi " chart. So, is any technic that uses

> " planetory " longitudes in Rasi

> chart extendible to Devisional charts (that are continuous)?

> For example, there might be D-8 version of Vimsottari dasa, D-8 version

> of KCD. I am not

> saying D-n vimsottari and D-n KCD are usefull. What I am asking is is

> there any such thing to

> your knowledge? Otherwise, " WHY " did you though of second definition of

> D-8, and decided

> to use it? (Does " CONTINUTY " has any impact on you).

>

> Regards,

> Vijay

>

>

>

>

> Talk to your friends online with Messenger.

> http://im.

>

>