[Jagannath] EXAMPLE: Phases of good and bad predictions

[Guest guest]

Namaste friends,

 

I mentioned a while ago that an astrologer may experience phases

of good and bad predictions. D-27 (nakshatramsa) is the chart of

strengths and weaknesses as per Parasara. I said that the 2nd and

5th in D-27 show vaag bala (power of speech) and intuition. I

said that we can treat the dasa rasi as per D-27 Narayana dasa as

lagna and do this analysis for various periods in one's life. I

will give an example - myself.

 

Because the principles we use have some truth in it, we have

successes even in the worst dasas. Because the principles we use

help only to some extent and a guess has to be made finally, our

successes depend on our luck also. And our luck depends on our

dasas. So we don't have the same amount of successes always.

 

* * *

 

Birthdata: April 4, 1970, 5:50 pm (IST), 81e12, 16n15.

 

My D-27:

 

Ar - Mars; Ta - Saturn; Ge - Mercury & Jupiter; Cn - Sun & Ketu;

Le - Lagna; Sc - Moon & Venus; Cp - Rahu. (Lagna in rasi chart:

Vi.)

 

Event data:

 

(1) 1998-99: I did not make many public predictions. I made just

one prediction in print and it was a disaster. I predicted very

very confidently that Clinton would be impeached. I was wrong. I

was confident, but wrong this year.

 

(2) 1999: I wasn't feeling confident like last year, but I made

some predictions in a magazine. Not all were right, but some were

very correct. I wrote in print that India might have an

unpleasant confrontation after May 18 (air strikes on Pakistani

infiltrators were from May 25), that India would take a bold

stand ( " no talks until infiltrators leave " ) and that the world

would support India's bold stand (even US did!). I also wrote

that Russia would get into trouble after the eclipse and that

Russia might get involved in an armed conflict.

 

Let us see how this fits with my D-27 Narayana dasa.

 

* * *

 

If you have trouble with calculations, please refer to the

archives for Narayana dasa lessons.

 

Because 27 modulo 12 is 3, look at the 3rd lord in my rasi chart.

It is Mars. Mars is in Ar in D-27. Ar is stronger than Li.

 

So start dasas from Ar. Ar dasa is 1970-1982. Ta dasa is

1982-1998 (Venus is in Sc). Ge dasa is 1988-2000.

 

Antardasas in Ge dasa go as Ge, Cn, Le, Vi etc.

 

I ran Ar antardasa during Apr 1998-Apr 1999. I ran Ta antardasa

during Apr 1999-Apr 2000. Let us analyze both now. In each

antardasa, take the antardasa sign as lagna and analyze the

chart.

 

* * *

 

(1) Ar antardasa: The 2nd from Ar is occupied in natal D-27 by

Saturn. This is not good for vaag bala. Saturn in 2nd weakens

vaag bala (power of speech).

 

The 5th house from Ar shows the power of intuition in Ar dasa.

The 5th from Ar is Leo. It is empty and it is aspected by Mars

and Rahu. Neither Mars nor Rahu promises good intuition. Rahu in

fact misleads.

 

However, arudha of Venus is in Leo! Watery benefic Venus gives

smooth intuition in 5th. Arudha of Venus in 5th doesn't do that

in reality, but the native will feel that way. So I was very

comfortable with my intuition then and felt it was working

smoothly.

 

(2) Ta antardasa: The 2nd from Ta is Gemini. Mercury and Jupiter

occupy it!! So Ta antardasa can be reasonably good for me even in

a bad mahadasa. Mercury and Jupiter in 2nd suggest good vaag

bala. The 5th house from there is Virgo. It has no planets and

the same duo aspects it ffrom Ge. Ethery Jupiter gives good

intuition, while earthy Mercury gives clarity and focus.

 

However, arudhas of Sun, Saturn and Jupiter occupy Virgo. Sun and

Saturn in 5th is not good. Saturn in 5th gives hesitating and

lazy intuition. But Jupiter there gives good intuition after some

Saturnine hesitation. So I feel less confident when making

predictions in print this year. Despite some creditable successes

this year, I don't feel too confident when I look at charts this

year.

 

* * *

 

I hope some ideas presented here will provoke thoughts.

 

Points to consider:

 

(1) Astrologer's chart also matters, especially when the

principles used are weak.

 

(2) Nakshatramsa is important for that. D-24 shows knowledge, but

it is D-27 that shows whether one's intuition is powerful and

whether one's vaak (speech) is powerful.

 

(3) Narayana dasa is an excellent phalita dasa and Narayana dasa

of D-27 can be used to time phases of good and bad predictions.

 

(4) An astrologer may feel diffident, but make good predictions.

He may feel confident and make stupid predictions. How one feels

is an illusion and that illusion can be different from the

reality. Arudha padas of planets help in understanding the

native's illusions/perceptions. And, arudha lagna helps in

understanding the illusions/perceptions of the world about the

native.

 

* * *

 

As Satish pointed out, today's astrologers mix up many techniques

because their precise uses are lost to us. We have to understand

the precise uses of varous tools, before astrology is accepted as

a valid subject. We have a herculean task in front of us.

 

If we keep faith in Parasara and strive to understand him

correctly, I am confident that we will have an astrology

department in many universities oneday.

 

May Jupiter's light shine on us,

Narasimha