Guest guest Posted September 5, 1999 Report Share Posted September 5, 1999 JAYA JAGANNATH Dear Narayana, Your calculation of Brahma is correct, but NOT perfect because the logic is not correct. Why did you reject the Moon in the first case and then accept it in the second case? The argument given is " its placement is not in " ODD SIGN " in the first case, but is in ODD sign in the second case. I think it should be " DRUSYA AND ADRUSYA " or " VISIBLE AND INVISIBLE SIGN " respectively. Rest as per Narasimha. You should remember that all deaths are not as per Maheswara and Brahma Dasa may not give very accurate results as it shows the going of the ATMA to SHIVALOKA before its journey further on. Shoola Dasa which shows the destruction of the body is a better method to use. BLESSINGS OF SRI JAGANNATHA Sanjay Rath - Narasimha Rao <pvr Narayan Iyer <navagraha Cc: <vedic astrology > Sunday, September 05, 1999 12:31 AM [vedic astrology] Brahma Dasa of Sri Harish Johari > Dear Narayan, > > We haven't had many examples of Brahma dasa calculation on the list. So > I am forwarding your example to the list, hoping that you won't mind it. > You calculation of Brahma, Maheswara and mahadasas is perfect, but you > made a mistake with antardasas. > > > I have some doubts on Brahma Dasa, based on Sri > > Harish Johari's Chart. > > > > AL = A8 = Sg > > Chara AK is Sun. > > > > Lets use Brahma Dasa to throw light on his death. > > > > Brahma > > ______ > > > > 1. Stronger of 1/7 is 7th. .i.e. Aq. > > 2. From Aq. 6/8/12 lords are Mo, Me & Sa. > > 3. None of them are in odd signs from the 7H from Aq. > > > > 4. So we take the weaker of 1/7. i.e Le. > > 6/8/12 lords are Sa, Ju & Mo. > > Sa cannot be Brahma. > > Between Ju & Mo. Only Mo is in odd house(9) from > > 7-12H from Le. > > Mo is Brahma. > > > > Maheshwara > > __________ > > > > 8L from Char AK is Mars. > > Mars is in own sign. So he cannot be Maheshwara. > > Stronger of 8/12L from Mars i.e Mars/Jup. Since Mars > > cannot be MAheshwara. > > Ju is Maheshwara. > > > > ALL DATES ARE APPROXIMATE > > _________________________ > > > > Brahama Dasas starts from Ar. > > Seq is Ar, Ta, Ge, Cn ... Pi. > > > > Ar : 6H is Me. Me is in Ar. = 0years. > > Ta : 6H is Ju. Ju is in Vi. = 9 - 1 = 8yrs. 34 - 42 > > Ge : 6H is Ma. Ma is in Ar. = 11 - 1 = 10y. 42 - 52 > > Cn : 6H is Ra. Ra is in Cp. = 7 - 1 = 6y. 52 - 58 > > Le : 6H is Sa. Sa is in Aq. = 7 - 1 = 6y. 58 - 64 > > Vi : 6H is Ma. Ma is in Ar. = 6 - 1 = 5 years. 64 - 69 > > Li : 6H is Ju. Ju is in Vi = 12 - 1 = 11y. 69 - 80 > > Sc : 6H is Ge. Me is in Ar = 8 - 1 = 7y. 80 - 87 > > Sg : 6H is Ta. Ve is in Pi = 4 - 1 + 1 = 4y. 87 - 91. > > > > Cp : 6H is Le. Su is in Ar = 10 - 1 + 1 = 10y. 91 - > > 2001< --- Death. > > Correct. > > > Cp is Maraka Sthana from AL & A8. > > But is not aspected by Maheshwara. > > Cp has Rahu , who is lord of 7H from Lagna, and most > > importantly > > its lord of 3rd from AL & A8. > > > > AD > > __ > > > > Cp lord is Sa. Sa is in Aq. > > Seq of AD is Aq, Pi...Cp. > > Each AD is 1year. > > > > Aq : 95 - 96 > > Pi : 96 - 97 > > Ar : 97 - 98 > > Ta : 98 - 99 > > Ge : 99 - 2000 <---- Death Here. > > You made a silly mistake here. Why does the first AD start in 95? Cp > dasa runs during 1991-2001. So Aq's AD should run during 91-92. All the > dates above are wrong by 4 years! > > * * * > > My program doesn't have text output yet and so I am loading a few > screenshots to the web, as JPEG pictures. If you are interested in the > dates & times when various sub-periods started, refer to those. > > (1) ADs in Cp MD: > > /docvault/vedic astrology/hj/hj_ad.jpg > > (Because the lord of Cp is in Aq, 1st, 2nd etc in the picture should be > understood as Aq, Pi etc.) > > (2) PDs in Cp-Sc AD: > > /docvault/vedic astrology/hj/hj_pd.jpg > > (Because the lord of Sc is in Ar, 1st, 2nd etc in the picture should be > understood as Ar, Ta etc.) > > (3) SDs in Cp-Sc-Pi PD: > > /docvault/vedic astrology/hj/hj_sd.jpg > > (Because the lord of Pi is in Vi, 1st, 2nd etc in the picture should be > understood as Vi, Li etc.) > > (4) PADs in Cp-Sc-Pi-Vi SD: > > /docvault/vedic astrology/hj/hj_pad.jpg > > (Because the lord of Vi is in Ar, 1st, 2nd etc in the picture should be > understood as Ar, Ta etc.) > > * * * > > It can be seen that the prana-antardasa running when Sri Johari passed > away is Cp-Sc-Pi-Vi-Ar. > > You've already explained Cp. It is occupied by 7th lord Rahu and its > lord is in 7th from lagna. It is a trine from Maheswara. > > Other sub-periods are more poignant, making this a classic example. AD > sign is Sc and it is the 8th from Moon. PD sign is Pi and it is the 8th > from lagna. SD sign is Vi and it has Maheswara (Jupiter) in natal chart. > PAD sign Ar has Maheswara Jupiter *in transit*! This is a classic > example, especially for SD and PAD. > > Note: You may recall that I suggested interpreting prana-antardasas > based on transits! Though I demonstrated it only for Narayana dasa, my > suggestion holds for ayur-dasas also. For example, when Robert Koch had > a hiking accident, PAD sign as per shoola dasa had Mars in transit. PAD > as per " Rudramsa Mandooka dasa " was Cp and Cp was transited in D-11 by > Ketu, a malefic for physical matters. Cp is an earthy sign and it > suggets nature. Dasa and sookshma dasa activated 6th lord and 6th in > Rudramsa and it led to an accident. PAD sign is an earthy sign that > represents nature and the accident happened while hiking. > > May Jupiter's light shine on us, > Narasimha > > > > ------ > MyPoints-Free Rewards When You're Online. > Start with up to 150 Points for joining! > http://clickhere./click/805 > > > eGroups.com home: vedic astrology > - Simplifying group communications > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.