Many interesting Yogas

______________________________\

____

Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail beta.

March 3, 2007

हरे राम कृष्ण॥

Dear Krishna, Namaskar

If we analyze charts in this way we can find many mahabhogis.

Instead note the following: Suryas rasi dispositor is in dusthana, so

not much rajayoga in this life. Suryas navamsa dispositor is exalted in

navamsa! so a lot of earnings are possible.

Chandra Nakshatra is Guru... again in dusthana. Arudha lagna nakshatra

is lorded by Shani - neecha in navamsa. Based on this there is a need

for remedies to ensure a fruitful life.

And then what about that Kala Sarpa Yoga?

Best remedy is to strengthen the Sun, advise the wearing of a ruby,

association with father, and performing Surya mantras.

Yours sincerely,

--

Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

Jaimini SJC - Denmark

email: visti

For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit: http://srigaruda.com

Krishnamurthy Seetharama wrote:

Dear Vistiji,

The chart of a new born has many interesting Yogas like:

1. Gajakesari Yoga

2. Shakti Yoga

3. Tapaswi Yoga

4. Guru-Mangala Yoga

5. Harsha Yoga

6. Dhimanta Yoga

What would you think the person will grow into?

The birth details are:

DOB: 26-12-2006

TOB: 18:08

POB: Bangalore

I am curious to get your thoughts on this chart.

Regards,

Krishna

Regards,

Krishna

________

Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail beta.

March 4, 2007

Dear Vistiji,

Thanks for your observations. I take note of the remedies

suggested by you.

I have a couple of questions on what you have noted:

- Though Sani in Navamsa is neecha, he is also retro, hence can

we consider Sani uchcha?

- Regarding KSY: The planets are between Ketu-Rahu and not

between Rahu-Ketu. Should this be considered as Kaala Amrita

Yoga, instead of KSY? Also, Rahu and Ketu are exalted in navamsa

- Another aspect of Guru, which I need your opinion on:

Though Guru is in different houses in Rasi and Navamsa, if one

considers the position in degrees they are pretty close (in Rasi

it is 223 deg, in Navamsa it is 208 deg.) Hence, can we consider

Guru as Vargottama?

Even if you don't agree on Guru's strenth, then the only problem

remains that Surya's dispositor Guru is not strong. For this I

will take your remedy of wearing Ruby.

Do we still ignore the differnt Yogas that are present in the

chart?

Regards,

Krishna

--- Visti Larsen <visti wrote:

> ??? ??? ??????

>

> Dear Krishna, Namaskar

> If we analyze charts in this way we can find many mahabhogis.

> Instead note the following: Suryas rasi dispositor is in

> dusthana, so

> not much rajayoga in this life. Suryas navamsa dispositor is

> exalted in

> navamsa! so a lot of earnings are possible.

> Chandra Nakshatra is Guru... again in dusthana. Arudha lagna

> nakshatra

> is lorded by Shani - neecha in navamsa. Based on this there is

> a need

> for remedies to ensure a fruitful life.

>

> And then what about that Kala Sarpa Yoga?

> Best remedy is to strengthen the Sun, advise the wearing of a

> ruby,

> association with father, and performing Surya mantras.

>

> Yours sincerely,

>

> --

> Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> Jaimini SJC - Denmark

> email: visti <visti

> For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:

>

> Krishnamurthy Seetharama wrote:

> >

> > Dear Vistiji,

> >

> > The chart of a new born has many interesting Yogas like:

> >

> > 1. Gajakesari Yoga

> > 2. Shakti Yoga

> > 3. Tapaswi Yoga

> > 4. Guru-Mangala Yoga

> > 5. Harsha Yoga

> > 6. Dhimanta Yoga

> >

> > What would you think the person will grow into?

> >

> > The birth details are:

> >

> > DOB: 26-12-2006

> > TOB: 18:08

> > POB: Bangalore

> >

> > I am curious to get your thoughts on this chart.

> >

> > Regards,

> > Krishna

> >

> > Regards,

> > Krishna

> > http://astrokrishna.blogspot.com

> >

> > ________

> >

> > Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail beta.

> > http://new.mail. <http://new.mail.>

> >

>

Regards,

Krishna

______________________________\

____

Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail beta.

March 4, 2007

Hare Ram Krishna

Dear Krishna,

My humble 2 cents and I am sure Visti will comment as well

The chart has KSY, as Visti has taught, put your finger on Ketu and move zodiacally, if you get all planets until you reach Rahu , its KSY , if its opposite its KAY.

KSY will restrict all the yogas in the natal chart and requires remedy. Unless KSY is broken natal chart will not fulfil its promise.

Hope this helps.

Regards

Sharat

-

Krishnamurthy Seetharama

Sunday, March 04, 2007 12:58 PM

Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Many interesting Yogas

Dear Vistiji,Thanks for your observations. I take note of the remediessuggested by you.I have a couple of questions on what you have noted:- Though Sani in Navamsa is neecha, he is also retro, hence canwe consider Sani uchcha?- Regarding KSY: The planets are between Ketu-Rahu and notbetween Rahu-Ketu. Should this be considered as Kaala AmritaYoga, instead of KSY? Also, Rahu and Ketu are exalted in navamsa- Another aspect of Guru, which I need your opinion on:Though Guru is in different houses in Rasi and Navamsa, if oneconsiders the position in degrees they are pretty close (in Rasiit is 223 deg, in Navamsa it is 208 deg.) Hence, can we considerGuru as Vargottama?Even if you don't agree on Guru's strenth, then the only problemremains that Surya's dispositor Guru is not strong. For this Iwill take your remedy of wearing Ruby. Do we still ignore the differnt Yogas that are present in thechart?Regards,Krishna--- Visti Larsen <visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com> wrote:> ??? ??? ??????> > Dear Krishna, Namaskar> If we analyze charts in this way we can find many mahabhogis.> Instead note the following: Suryas rasi dispositor is in> dusthana, so > not much rajayoga in this life. Suryas navamsa dispositor is> exalted in > navamsa! so a lot of earnings are possible.> Chandra Nakshatra is Guru... again in dusthana. Arudha lagna> nakshatra > is lorded by Shani - neecha in navamsa. Based on this there is> a need > for remedies to ensure a fruitful life.> > And then what about that Kala Sarpa Yoga?> Best remedy is to strengthen the Sun, advise the wearing of a> ruby, > association with father, and performing Surya mantras.> > Yours sincerely,> > -- > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru> Jaimini SJC - Denmark> email: visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com <visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com>> For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:> http://srigaruda.com > <http://srigaruda.com>> > Krishnamurthy Seetharama wrote:> >> > Dear Vistiji,> >> > The chart of a new born has many interesting Yogas like:> >> > 1. Gajakesari Yoga> > 2. Shakti Yoga> > 3. Tapaswi Yoga> > 4. Guru-Mangala Yoga> > 5. Harsha Yoga> > 6. Dhimanta Yoga> >> > What would you think the person will grow into?> >> > The birth details are:> >> > DOB: 26-12-2006> > TOB: 18:08> > POB: Bangalore> >> > I am curious to get your thoughts on this chart.> >> > Regards,> > Krishna> >> > Regards,> > Krishna> > http://astrokrishna.blogspot.com> <http://astrokrishna.blogspot.com>> >> > ________> > > > Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail beta.> > http://new.mail. <http://new.mail.>> >> > > Regards,Krishnahttp://astrokrishna.blogspot.com________Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail beta.http://new.mail.

March 4, 2007

हरे राम कृष्ण॥

Dear Krishna, Namaskar

Answers to your queries.

I have a couple of questions on what you have noted:

- Though Sani in Navamsa is neecha, he is also retro, hence can

we consider Sani uchcha?

He is not Uccha but will help him out a great deal through his

determination and thus ACT as exalted.

- Regarding KSY: The planets are between Ketu-Rahu and not

between Rahu-Ketu. Should this be considered as Kaala Amrita

Yoga, instead of KSY? Also, Rahu and Ketu are exalted in navamsa

Sharat has answered this point. The exaltation is relevant but does

not change the type of yoga.

- Another aspect of Guru, which I need your opinion on:

Though Guru is in different houses in Rasi and Navamsa, if one

considers the position in degrees they are pretty close (in Rasi

it is 223 deg, in Navamsa it is 208 deg.) Hence, can we consider

Guru as Vargottama?

Excuse me? No we cannot say that.

Even if you don't agree on Guru's strenth, then the only problem

remains that Surya's dispositor Guru is not strong. For this I

will take your remedy of wearing Ruby.

Do we still ignore the differnt Yogas that are present in the

chart?

No, but we must keep in mind that they will have difficulty

functioning.

Yours sincerely,

--

Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

Jaimini SJC - Denmark

email: visti

For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit: http://srigaruda.com

Krishnamurthy Seetharama wrote:

Dear Vistiji,

Thanks for your observations. I take note of the remedies

suggested by you.

I have a couple of questions on what you have noted:

- Though Sani in Navamsa is neecha, he is also retro, hence can

we consider Sani uchcha?

- Regarding KSY: The planets are between Ketu-Rahu and not

between Rahu-Ketu. Should this be considered as Kaala Amrita

Yoga, instead of KSY? Also, Rahu and Ketu are exalted in navamsa

- Another aspect of Guru, which I need your opinion on:

Though Guru is in different houses in Rasi and Navamsa, if one

considers the position in degrees they are pretty close (in Rasi

it is 223 deg, in Navamsa it is 208 deg.) Hence, can we consider

Guru as Vargottama?

Even if you don't agree on Guru's strenth, then the only problem

remains that Surya's dispositor Guru is not strong. For this I

will take your remedy of wearing Ruby.

Do we still ignore the differnt Yogas that are present in the

chart?

Regards,

Krishna

--- Visti Larsen <visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com>

wrote:

> ??? ??? ??????

>

> Dear Krishna, Namaskar

> If we analyze charts in this way we can find many mahabhogis.

> Instead note the following: Suryas rasi dispositor is in

> dusthana, so

> not much rajayoga in this life. Suryas navamsa dispositor is

> exalted in

> navamsa! so a lot of earnings are possible.

> Chandra Nakshatra is Guru... again in dusthana. Arudha lagna

> nakshatra

> is lorded by Shani - neecha in navamsa. Based on this there is

> a need

> for remedies to ensure a fruitful life.

>

> And then what about that Kala Sarpa Yoga?

> Best remedy is to strengthen the Sun, advise the wearing of a

> ruby,

> association with father, and performing Surya mantras.

>

> Yours sincerely,

>

> --

> Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> Jaimini SJC - Denmark

> email: visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com

> For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:

>

> Krishnamurthy Seetharama wrote:

> >

> > Dear Vistiji,

> >

> > The chart of a new born has many interesting Yogas like:

> >

> > 1. Gajakesari Yoga

> > 2. Shakti Yoga

> > 3. Tapaswi Yoga

> > 4. Guru-Mangala Yoga

> > 5. Harsha Yoga

> > 6. Dhimanta Yoga

> >

> > What would you think the person will grow into?

> >

> > The birth details are:

> >

> > DOB: 26-12-2006

> > TOB: 18:08

> > POB: Bangalore

> >

> > I am curious to get your thoughts on this chart.

> >

> > Regards,

> > Krishna

> >

> > Regards,

> > Krishna

> > http://astrokrishna.blogspot.com

> >

> > ________

> >

> > Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail beta.

> > http://new.mail.

<http://new.mail.>

> >

>

Regards,

Krishna

________

Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail beta.

March 4, 2007

Dear Visti,

Thanks for your clarifications. However, I am still not

convinced about the definition of KSY. Let me explain why:

Let us assume that Rahu (the head) is in Aries and Ketu (the

tail) in Libra. Rahu would be moving towards Pices and hence

would be facing pices. Now, the so called body of the Kaala

Sarpa extends from head to the tail, that is from Aries,

Taurus,...,Virgo to Libra. Hence, if all the planets fall Rasis

Taurus to Virgo, then it is like all planets being swallowed by

the Sarpa. And, that is considered as KSY. Is it not?

Is there a flaw in my thinking?

I referred to couple of sources as well. It appears that SJC's

definition and what people like B V Raman have defined seems to

be different.

Please clarify.

Regards,

Krishna

--- Visti Larsen <visti wrote:

> ??? ??? ??????

>

> Dear Krishna, Namaskar

> Answers to your queries.

>

> /I have a couple of questions on what you have noted:

>

> - Though Sani in Navamsa is neecha, he is also retro, hence

> can

> we consider Sani uchcha?/

>

> He is not Uccha but will help him out a great deal through his

>

> determination and thus ACT as exalted.

>

> /- Regarding KSY: The planets are between Ketu-Rahu and not

> between Rahu-Ketu. Should this be considered as Kaala Amrita

> Yoga, instead of KSY? Also, Rahu and Ketu are exalted in

> navamsa

> /

>

> Sharat has answered this point. The exaltation is relevant but

> does not

> change the type of yoga.

>

> /- Another aspect of Guru, which I need your opinion on:

>

> Though Guru is in different houses in Rasi and Navamsa, if one

> considers the position in degrees they are pretty close (in

> Rasi

> it is 223 deg, in Navamsa it is 208 deg.) Hence, can we

> consider

> Guru as Vargottama?/

>

> Excuse me? No we cannot say that.

>

> /Even if you don't agree on Guru's strenth, then the only

> problem

> remains that Surya's dispositor Guru is not strong. For this I

> will take your remedy of wearing Ruby.

>

> Do we still ignore the differnt Yogas that are present in the

> chart?

> /

>

> No, but we must keep in mind that they will have difficulty

> functioning.

>

> Yours sincerely,

>

> --

> Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> Jaimini SJC - Denmark

> email: visti <visti

> For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:

>

> Krishnamurthy Seetharama wrote:

> >

> > Dear Vistiji,

> >

> > Thanks for your observations. I take note of the remedies

> > suggested by you.

> >

> > I have a couple of questions on what you have noted:

> >

> > - Though Sani in Navamsa is neecha, he is also retro, hence

> can

> > we consider Sani uchcha?

> >

> > - Regarding KSY: The planets are between Ketu-Rahu and not

> > between Rahu-Ketu. Should this be considered as Kaala Amrita

> > Yoga, instead of KSY? Also, Rahu and Ketu are exalted in

> navamsa

> >

> > - Another aspect of Guru, which I need your opinion on:

> >

> > Though Guru is in different houses in Rasi and Navamsa, if

> one

> > considers the position in degrees they are pretty close (in

> Rasi

> > it is 223 deg, in Navamsa it is 208 deg.) Hence, can we

> consider

> > Guru as Vargottama?

> >

> > Even if you don't agree on Guru's strenth, then the only

> problem

> > remains that Surya's dispositor Guru is not strong. For this

> I

> > will take your remedy of wearing Ruby.

> >

> > Do we still ignore the differnt Yogas that are present in

> the

> > chart?

> >

> > Regards,

> > Krishna

> >

> > --- Visti Larsen <visti

> <visti%40srigaruda.com>>

> > wrote:

> >

> > > ??? ??? ??????

> > >

> > > Dear Krishna, Namaskar

> > > If we analyze charts in this way we can find many

> mahabhogis.

> > > Instead note the following: Suryas rasi dispositor is in

> > > dusthana, so

> > > not much rajayoga in this life. Suryas navamsa dispositor

> is

> > > exalted in

> > > navamsa! so a lot of earnings are possible.

> > > Chandra Nakshatra is Guru... again in dusthana. Arudha

> lagna

> > > nakshatra

> > > is lorded by Shani - neecha in navamsa. Based on this

> there is

> > > a need

> > > for remedies to ensure a fruitful life.

> > >

> > > And then what about that Kala Sarpa Yoga?

> > > Best remedy is to strengthen the Sun, advise the wearing

> of a

> > > ruby,

> > > association with father, and performing Surya mantras.

> > >

> > > Yours sincerely,

> > >

> > > --

> > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark

> > > email: visti <visti%40srigaruda.com>

> > <visti <visti%40srigaruda.com>>

> > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:

> > > http://srigaruda.com <http://srigaruda.com>

> > > <http://srigaruda.com <http://srigaruda.com>>

> > >

> > > Krishnamurthy Seetharama wrote:

> > > >

> > > > Dear Vistiji,

> > > >

> > > > The chart of a new born has many interesting Yogas like:

> > > >

> > > > 1. Gajakesari Yoga

> > > > 2. Shakti Yoga

> > > > 3. Tapaswi Yoga

> > > > 4. Guru-Mangala Yoga

> > > > 5. Harsha Yoga

> > > > 6. Dhimanta Yoga

> > > >

> > > > What would you think the person will grow into?

> > > >

> > > > The birth details are:

> > > >

> > > > DOB: 26-12-2006

> > > > TOB: 18:08

> > > > POB: Bangalore

> > > >

> > > > I am curious to get your thoughts on this chart.

> > > >

> > > > Regards,

> > > > Krishna

> > > >

> > > > Regards,

> > > > Krishna

> > > > http://astrokrishna.blogspot.com

> <http://astrokrishna.blogspot.com>>

> > > <http://astrokrishna.blogspot.com

> > > >

> ________

> > > >

> > > > Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail beta.

> > > > http://new.mail. <http://new.mail.>

> > <http://new.mail. <http://new.mail.>>

> > > >

> > >

> >

> > Regards,

> > Krishna

> > http://astrokrishna.blogspot.com

> >

> > ________

> >

> > Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail beta.

> > http://new.mail. <http://new.mail.>

> >

>

Regards,

Krishna

______________________________\

____

Any questions? Get answers on any topic at www.Answers.. Try it now.

March 4, 2007

||Hare Ram Krishna||

Dear Krishna,

Visti teaches about KSY/KAYin his book as well and Sanjay ji mentions it in one of his lectures.

Kaal Sarpa yog means that all planets are hemmed between Rahu and Ketu. Find Ketu and move zodiacally. If you go across all the planets then all of them are moving towards Rahu, which is the head and this is KSY. If instead you reach Rahu and then find all the planets, then all of them are moving towars Ketu which is the head of the sarpa and this is KAY.

In the example you give: Ra in Aries( say this is Asc) and Ketu in Libra,(7H) if all the planets lie between Libra(7H) moving zodiacally to the Asc zodiacally, then it is KSY with head being Rahu. If the planets are between Ra and Ke, then they are all moving towards Ke which is the head and this is KAY.

If you loook at this yoga in this way it will be easier to understand, this how I learned it.

Hope this helps.

Regards

Sharat

-

Krishnamurthy Seetharama

Sunday, March 04, 2007 5:26 PM

Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Many interesting Yogas

Dear Visti,Thanks for your clarifications. However, I am still notconvinced about the definition of KSY. Let me explain why:Let us assume that Rahu (the head) is in Aries and Ketu (thetail) in Libra. Rahu would be moving towards Pices and hencewould be facing pices. Now, the so called body of the KaalaSarpa extends from head to the tail, that is from Aries,Taurus,...,Virgo to Libra. Hence, if all the planets fall RasisTaurus to Virgo, then it is like all planets being swallowed bythe Sarpa. And, that is considered as KSY. Is it not?Is there a flaw in my thinking?I referred to couple of sources as well. It appears that SJC'sdefinition and what people like B V Raman have defined seems tobe different.Please clarify.Regards,Krishna--- Visti Larsen <visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com> wrote:> ??? ??? ??????> > Dear Krishna, Namaskar> Answers to your queries.> > /I have a couple of questions on what you have noted:> > - Though Sani in Navamsa is neecha, he is also retro, hence> can> we consider Sani uchcha?/> > He is not Uccha but will help him out a great deal through his> > determination and thus ACT as exalted.> > /- Regarding KSY: The planets are between Ketu-Rahu and not> between Rahu-Ketu. Should this be considered as Kaala Amrita> Yoga, instead of KSY? Also, Rahu and Ketu are exalted in> navamsa> /> > Sharat has answered this point. The exaltation is relevant but> does not > change the type of yoga.> > /- Another aspect of Guru, which I need your opinion on:> > Though Guru is in different houses in Rasi and Navamsa, if one> considers the position in degrees they are pretty close (in> Rasi> it is 223 deg, in Navamsa it is 208 deg.) Hence, can we> consider> Guru as Vargottama?/> > Excuse me? No we cannot say that.> > /Even if you don't agree on Guru's strenth, then the only> problem> remains that Surya's dispositor Guru is not strong. For this I> will take your remedy of wearing Ruby.> > Do we still ignore the differnt Yogas that are present in the> chart?> /> > No, but we must keep in mind that they will have difficulty> functioning.> > Yours sincerely,> > -- > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru> Jaimini SJC - Denmark> email: visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com <visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com>> For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:> http://srigaruda.com > <http://srigaruda.com>> > Krishnamurthy Seetharama wrote:> >> > Dear Vistiji,> >> > Thanks for your observations. I take note of the remedies> > suggested by you.> >> > I have a couple of questions on what you have noted:> >> > - Though Sani in Navamsa is neecha, he is also retro, hence> can> > we consider Sani uchcha?> >> > - Regarding KSY: The planets are between Ketu-Rahu and not> > between Rahu-Ketu. Should this be considered as Kaala Amrita> > Yoga, instead of KSY? Also, Rahu and Ketu are exalted in> navamsa> >> > - Another aspect of Guru, which I need your opinion on:> >> > Though Guru is in different houses in Rasi and Navamsa, if> one> > considers the position in degrees they are pretty close (in> Rasi> > it is 223 deg, in Navamsa it is 208 deg.) Hence, can we> consider> > Guru as Vargottama?> >> > Even if you don't agree on Guru's strenth, then the only> problem> > remains that Surya's dispositor Guru is not strong. For this> I> > will take your remedy of wearing Ruby.> >> > Do we still ignore the differnt Yogas that are present in> the> > chart?> >> > Regards,> > Krishna> >> > --- Visti Larsen <visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com> <visti%40srigaruda.com>> > > wrote:> >> > > ??? ??? ??????> > >> > > Dear Krishna, Namaskar> > > If we analyze charts in this way we can find many> mahabhogis.> > > Instead note the following: Suryas rasi dispositor is in> > > dusthana, so> > > not much rajayoga in this life. Suryas navamsa dispositor> is> > > exalted in> > > navamsa! so a lot of earnings are possible.> > > Chandra Nakshatra is Guru... again in dusthana. Arudha> lagna> > > nakshatra> > > is lorded by Shani - neecha in navamsa. Based on this> there is> > > a need> > > for remedies to ensure a fruitful life.> > >> > > And then what about that Kala Sarpa Yoga?> > > Best remedy is to strengthen the Sun, advise the wearing> of a> > > ruby,> > > association with father, and performing Surya mantras.> > >> > > Yours sincerely,> > >> > > --> > > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru> > > Jaimini SJC - Denmark> > > email: visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com <visti%40srigaruda.com> > > <visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com <visti%40srigaruda.com>>> > > For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:> > > http://srigaruda.com <http://srigaruda.com>> > > <http://srigaruda.com <http://srigaruda.com>>> > >> > > Krishnamurthy Seetharama wrote:> > > >> > > > Dear Vistiji,> > > >> > > > The chart of a new born has many interesting Yogas like:> > > >> > > > 1. Gajakesari Yoga> > > > 2. Shakti Yoga> > > > 3. Tapaswi Yoga> > > > 4. Guru-Mangala Yoga> > > > 5. Harsha Yoga> > > > 6. Dhimanta Yoga> > > >> > > > What would you think the person will grow into?> > > >> > > > The birth details are:> > > >> > > > DOB: 26-12-2006> > > > TOB: 18:08> > > > POB: Bangalore> > > >> > > > I am curious to get your thoughts on this chart.> > > >> > > > Regards,> > > > Krishna> > > >> > > > Regards,> > > > Krishna> > > > http://astrokrishna.blogspot.com> <http://astrokrishna.blogspot.com>> > > <http://astrokrishna.blogspot.com> <http://astrokrishna.blogspot.com>>> > > >> > > >> ________> > > > > > > > Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail beta.> > > > http://new.mail. <http://new.mail.> > > <http://new.mail. <http://new.mail.>>> > > >> > > >> > >> >> > Regards,> > Krishna> > http://astrokrishna.blogspot.com> <http://astrokrishna.blogspot.com>> >> > ________> > > > Everyone is raving about the all-new Mail beta.> > http://new.mail. <http://new.mail.>> >> > > Regards,Krishnahttp://astrokrishna.blogspot.com________Any questions? Get answers on any topic at www.Answers.. Try it now.

March 5, 2007

Dear Sharat,

I understood what you said in your previous mail. However, I see

a totally opposite approach taken by SJC as compared to rest of

the freternity in defining KSY. I am not able to understand why.

Hence my question to Vistiji.

Also you say Ketu is the head of the Sarpa. I have learnt that

Rahu is the head of the Sarpa and Ketu is the tail. Looks like

that is where the basic difference comes in.

What baffles me is that - how can different VA groups give

diametrically opposite definitions for the same yoga!

Regards,

Krishna

--- Sharat <gidoc wrote:

> ||Hare Ram Krishna||

>

> Dear Krishna,

>

> Visti teaches about KSY/KAYin his book as well and Sanjay ji

> mentions it in one of his lectures.

>

> Kaal Sarpa yog means that all planets are hemmed between Rahu

> and Ketu. Find Ketu and move zodiacally. If you go across all

> the planets then all of them are moving towards Rahu, which is

> the head and this is KSY. If instead you reach Rahu and then

> find all the planets, then all of them are moving towars Ketu

> which is the head of the sarpa and this is KAY.

>

> In the example you give: Ra in Aries( say this is Asc) and

> Ketu in Libra,(7H) if all the planets lie between Libra(7H)

> moving zodiacally to the Asc zodiacally, then it is KSY with

> head being Rahu. If the planets are between Ra and Ke, then

> they are all moving towards Ke which is the head and this is

> KAY.

>

> If you loook at this yoga in this way it will be easier to

> understand, this how I learned it.

>

> Hope this helps.

>

> Regards

>

> Sharat

-

> Krishnamurthy Seetharama

>

> Sunday, March 04, 2007 5:26 PM

> Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Many interesting Yogas

>

> Dear Visti,

>

> Thanks for your clarifications. However, I am still not

> convinced about the definition of KSY. Let me explain why:

>

> Let us assume that Rahu (the head) is in Aries and Ketu (the

> tail) in Libra. Rahu would be moving towards Pices and hence

> would be facing pices. Now, the so called body of the Kaala

> Sarpa extends from head to the tail, that is from Aries,

> Taurus,...,Virgo to Libra. Hence, if all the planets fall

> Rasis

> Taurus to Virgo, then it is like all planets being swallowed

> by

> the Sarpa. And, that is considered as KSY. Is it not?

>

> Is there a flaw in my thinking?

>

> I referred to couple of sources as well. It appears that

> SJC's

> definition and what people like B V Raman have defined seems

> to

> be different.

>

> Please clarify.

>

> Regards,

> Krishna

>

> --- Visti Larsen <visti wrote:

>

> > ??? ??? ??????

> >

> > Dear Krishna, Namaskar

> > Answers to your queries.

> >

> > /I have a couple of questions on what you have noted:

> >

> > - Though Sani in Navamsa is neecha, he is also retro,

> hence

> > can

> > we consider Sani uchcha?/

> >

> > He is not Uccha but will help him out a great deal through

> his

> >

> > determination and thus ACT as exalted.

> >

> > /- Regarding KSY: The planets are between Ketu-Rahu and

> not

> > between Rahu-Ketu. Should this be considered as Kaala

> Amrita

> > Yoga, instead of KSY? Also, Rahu and Ketu are exalted in

> > navamsa

> > /

> >

> > Sharat has answered this point. The exaltation is relevant

> but

> > does not

> > change the type of yoga.

> >

> > /- Another aspect of Guru, which I need your opinion on:

> >

> > Though Guru is in different houses in Rasi and Navamsa, if

> one

> > considers the position in degrees they are pretty close

> (in

> > Rasi

> > it is 223 deg, in Navamsa it is 208 deg.) Hence, can we

> > consider

> > Guru as Vargottama?/

> >

> > Excuse me? No we cannot say that.

> >

> > /Even if you don't agree on Guru's strenth, then the only

> > problem

> > remains that Surya's dispositor Guru is not strong. For

> this I

> > will take your remedy of wearing Ruby.

> >

> > Do we still ignore the differnt Yogas that are present in

> the

> > chart?

> > /

> >

> > No, but we must keep in mind that they will have

> difficulty

> > functioning.

> >

> > Yours sincerely,

> >

> > --

> > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> > Jaimini SJC - Denmark

> > email: visti <visti

> > For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:

> > http://srigaruda.com

> > <http://srigaruda.com>

> >

> > Krishnamurthy Seetharama wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Vistiji,

> > >

> > > Thanks for your observations. I take note of the

> remedies

> > > suggested by you.

> > >

> > > I have a couple of questions on what you have noted:

> > >

> > > - Though Sani in Navamsa is neecha, he is also retro,

> hence

> > can

> > > we consider Sani uchcha?

> > >

> > > - Regarding KSY: The planets are between Ketu-Rahu and

> not

> > > between Rahu-Ketu. Should this be considered as Kaala

> Amrita

> > > Yoga, instead of KSY? Also, Rahu and Ketu are exalted in

> > navamsa

> > >

> > > - Another aspect of Guru, which I need your opinion on:

> > >

> > > Though Guru is in different houses in Rasi and Navamsa,

> if

> > one

> > > considers the position in degrees they are pretty close

> (in

> > Rasi

> > > it is 223 deg, in Navamsa it is 208 deg.) Hence, can we

> > consider

> > > Guru as Vargottama?

> > >

> > > Even if you don't agree on Guru's strenth, then the only

> > problem

> > > remains that Surya's dispositor Guru is not strong. For

> this

> > I

> > > will take your remedy of wearing Ruby.

> > >

> > > Do we still ignore the differnt Yogas that are present

> in

> > the

> > > chart?

> > >

> > > Regards,

> > > Krishna

> > >

> > > --- Visti Larsen <visti

> > <visti%40srigaruda.com>>

> > > wrote:

> > >

> > > > ??? ??? ??????

> > > >

> > > > Dear Krishna, Namaskar

> > > > If we analyze charts in this way we can find many

> > mahabhogis.

> > > > Instead note the following: Suryas rasi dispositor is

> in

> > > > dusthana, so

>

=== message truncated ===

Regards,

Krishna

http://autos./new_cars.html

______________________________\

____

Don't pick lemons.

See all the new 2007 cars at Autos.

March 5, 2007

हरे राम कृष्ण॥

Dear Krishna, Namaskar

This is a common confusion when it comes to directions of movement.

Whether we consider Ketu as the tail or Rahu as the head we can derive

calculations which will suit both.

Rahu as the HEAD:

Put your finger on Rahu and move in the zodiacal direction until you

reach Ketu. If you pass all the planets in the process then its Kala

Amrita Yoga! Otherwise its Kala Sarpa Yoga.

Why is it so? The node ENDING the yoga is the king of the yoga...

Ketu leads to moksha marga and thus the Amrita which follows, whilst

Rahu leads to Bhoga marga and the sarpa which follows.

As far as i know there is no confusion in this regard.

Now terminology comes in. If its Kala Amrita Yoga then Ketu is the

head/king as the entire life is being directed by Ketu. This is of

course opposite for Rahu and Kala Sarpa Yoga.

In truth Rahu is the 'dragons head' and because of this Rahu is ever

more taking the mind in a direction to reap desires or increase them

even more. Whereas Ketu is taking the person away from this.

Yours sincerely,

--

Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

Jaimini SJC - Denmark

email: visti

For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit: http://srigaruda.com

Krishnamurthy Seetharama wrote:

Dear Sharat,

I understood what you said in your previous mail. However, I see

a totally opposite approach taken by SJC as compared to rest of

the freternity in defining KSY. I am not able to understand why.

Hence my question to Vistiji.

Also you say Ketu is the head of the Sarpa. I have learnt that

Rahu is the head of the Sarpa and Ketu is the tail. Looks like

that is where the basic difference comes in.

What baffles me is that - how can different VA groups give

diametrically opposite definitions for the same yoga!

Regards,

Krishna

--- Sharat <gidoc (AT) ukfsn (DOT) org>

wrote:

> ||Hare Ram Krishna||

>

> Dear Krishna,

>

> Visti teaches about KSY/KAYin his book as well and Sanjay ji

> mentions it in one of his lectures.

>

> Kaal Sarpa yog means that all planets are hemmed between Rahu

> and Ketu. Find Ketu and move zodiacally. If you go across all

> the planets then all of them are moving towards Rahu, which is

> the head and this is KSY. If instead you reach Rahu and then

> find all the planets, then all of them are moving towars Ketu

> which is the head of the sarpa and this is KAY.

>

> In the example you give: Ra in Aries( say this is Asc) and

> Ketu in Libra,(7H) if all the planets lie between Libra(7H)

> moving zodiacally to the Asc zodiacally, then it is KSY with

> head being Rahu. If the planets are between Ra and Ke, then

> they are all moving towards Ke which is the head and this is

> KAY.

>

> If you loook at this yoga in this way it will be easier to

> understand, this how I learned it.

>

> Hope this helps.

>

> Regards

>

> Sharat

>

> -

> Krishnamurthy Seetharama

>

> Sunday, March 04, 2007 5:26 PM

> Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Many interesting Yogas

>

> Dear Visti,

>

> Thanks for your clarifications. However, I am still not

> convinced about the definition of KSY. Let me explain why:

>

> Let us assume that Rahu (the head) is in Aries and Ketu (the

> tail) in Libra. Rahu would be moving towards Pices and hence

> would be facing pices. Now, the so called body of the Kaala

> Sarpa extends from head to the tail, that is from Aries,

> Taurus,...,Virgo to Libra. Hence, if all the planets fall

> Rasis

> Taurus to Virgo, then it is like all planets being swallowed

> by

> the Sarpa. And, that is considered as KSY. Is it not?

>

> Is there a flaw in my thinking?

>

> I referred to couple of sources as well. It appears that

> SJC's

> definition and what people like B V Raman have defined seems

> to

> be different.

>

> Please clarify.

>

> Regards,

> Krishna

>

> --- Visti Larsen <visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com>

wrote:

>

> > ??? ??? ??????

> >

> > Dear Krishna, Namaskar

> > Answers to your queries.

> >

> > /I have a couple of questions on what you have noted:

> >

> > - Though Sani in Navamsa is neecha, he is also retro,

> hence

> > can

> > we consider Sani uchcha?/

> >

> > He is not Uccha but will help him out a great deal through

> his

> >

> > determination and thus ACT as exalted.

> >

> > /- Regarding KSY: The planets are between Ketu-Rahu and

> not

> > between Rahu-Ketu. Should this be considered as Kaala

> Amrita

> > Yoga, instead of KSY? Also, Rahu and Ketu are exalted in

> > navamsa

> > /

> >

> > Sharat has answered this point. The exaltation is relevant

> but

> > does not

> > change the type of yoga.

> >

> > /- Another aspect of Guru, which I need your opinion on:

> >

> > Though Guru is in different houses in Rasi and Navamsa, if

> one

> > considers the position in degrees they are pretty close

> (in

> > Rasi

> > it is 223 deg, in Navamsa it is 208 deg.) Hence, can we

> > consider

> > Guru as Vargottama?/

> >

> > Excuse me? No we cannot say that.

> >

> > /Even if you don't agree on Guru's strenth, then the only

> > problem

> > remains that Surya's dispositor Guru is not strong. For

> this I

> > will take your remedy of wearing Ruby.

> >

> > Do we still ignore the differnt Yogas that are present in

> the

> > chart?

> > /

> >

> > No, but we must keep in mind that they will have

> difficulty

> > functioning.

> >

> > Yours sincerely,

> >

> > --

> > Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> > Jaimini SJC - Denmark

> > email: visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com

> > For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:

> > http://srigaruda.com

> > <http://srigaruda.com>

> >

> > Krishnamurthy Seetharama wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Vistiji,

> > >

> > > Thanks for your observations. I take note of the

> remedies

> > > suggested by you.

> > >

> > > I have a couple of questions on what you have noted:

> > >

> > > - Though Sani in Navamsa is neecha, he is also retro,

> hence

> > can

> > > we consider Sani uchcha?

> > >

> > > - Regarding KSY: The planets are between Ketu-Rahu and

> not

> > > between Rahu-Ketu. Should this be considered as Kaala

> Amrita

> > > Yoga, instead of KSY? Also, Rahu and Ketu are exalted in

> > navamsa

> > >

> > > - Another aspect of Guru, which I need your opinion on:

> > >

> > > Though Guru is in different houses in Rasi and Navamsa,

> if

> > one

> > > considers the position in degrees they are pretty close

> (in

> > Rasi

> > > it is 223 deg, in Navamsa it is 208 deg.) Hence, can we

> > consider

> > > Guru as Vargottama?

> > >

> > > Even if you don't agree on Guru's strenth, then the only

> > problem

> > > remains that Surya's dispositor Guru is not strong. For

> this

> > I

> > > will take your remedy of wearing Ruby.

> > >

> > > Do we still ignore the differnt Yogas that are present

> in

> > the

> > > chart?

> > >

> > > Regards,

> > > Krishna

> > >

> > > --- Visti Larsen <visti (AT) srigaruda (DOT) com

> > <visti%40srigaruda.com>>

> > > wrote:

> > >

> > > > ??? ??? ??????

> > > >

> > > > Dear Krishna, Namaskar

> > > > If we analyze charts in this way we can find many

> > mahabhogis.

> > > > Instead note the following: Suryas rasi dispositor

is

> in

> > > > dusthana, so

>

=== message truncated ===

Regards,

Krishna

http://autos./new_cars.html

________

Don't pick lemons.

See all the new 2007 cars at Autos.

March 5, 2007

Dear Vistiji,

Thanks for the clarification. You have cleared a long-standing

confusion.

My thanks to Sharat as well for trying to show me the right

path.

Regards,

Krishna

--- Visti Larsen <visti wrote:

> ??? ??? ??????

>

> Dear Krishna, Namaskar

> This is a common confusion when it comes to directions of

> movement.

> Whether we consider Ketu as the tail or Rahu as the head we

> can derive

> calculations which will suit both.

>

> Rahu as the HEAD:

> Put your finger on Rahu and move in the zodiacal direction

> until you

> reach Ketu. If you pass all the planets in the process then

> its Kala

> Amrita Yoga! Otherwise its Kala Sarpa Yoga.

>

> Why is it so? The node ENDING the yoga is the king of the

> yoga... Ketu

> leads to moksha marga and thus the Amrita which follows,

> whilst Rahu

> leads to Bhoga marga and the sarpa which follows.

>

> As far as i know there is no confusion in this regard.

>

> Now terminology comes in. If its Kala Amrita Yoga then Ketu is

> the

> head/king as the entire life is being directed by Ketu. This

> is of

> course opposite for Rahu and Kala Sarpa Yoga.

>

> In truth Rahu is the 'dragons head' and because of this Rahu

> is ever

> more taking the mind in a direction to reap desires or

> increase them

> even more. Whereas Ketu is taking the person away from this.

>

> Yours sincerely,

>

> --

> Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> Jaimini SJC - Denmark

> email: visti <visti

> For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit:

>

> Krishnamurthy Seetharama wrote:

> >

> > Dear Sharat,

> >

> > I understood what you said in your previous mail. However, I

> see

> > a totally opposite approach taken by SJC as compared to rest

> of

> > the freternity in defining KSY. I am not able to understand

> why.

> > Hence my question to Vistiji.

> >

> > Also you say Ketu is the head of the Sarpa. I have learnt

> that

> > Rahu is the head of the Sarpa and Ketu is the tail. Looks

> like

> > that is where the basic difference comes in.

> >

> > What baffles me is that - how can different VA groups give

> > diametrically opposite definitions for the same yoga!

> >

> > Regards,

> > Krishna

> >

> > --- Sharat <gidoc <gidoc%40ukfsn.org>>

> wrote:

> >

> > > ||Hare Ram Krishna||

> > >

> > > Dear Krishna,

> > >

> > > Visti teaches about KSY/KAYin his book as well and Sanjay

> ji

> > > mentions it in one of his lectures.

> > >

> > > Kaal Sarpa yog means that all planets are hemmed between

> Rahu

> > > and Ketu. Find Ketu and move zodiacally. If you go across

> all

> > > the planets then all of them are moving towards Rahu,

> which is

> > > the head and this is KSY. If instead you reach Rahu and

> then

> > > find all the planets, then all of them are moving towars

> Ketu

> > > which is the head of the sarpa and this is KAY.

> > >

> > > In the example you give: Ra in Aries( say this is Asc) and

> > > Ketu in Libra,(7H) if all the planets lie between

> Libra(7H)

> > > moving zodiacally to the Asc zodiacally, then it is KSY

> with

> > > head being Rahu. If the planets are between Ra and Ke,

> then

> > > they are all moving towards Ke which is the head and this

> is

> > > KAY.

> > >

> > > If you loook at this yoga in this way it will be easier to

> > > understand, this how I learned it.

> > >

> > > Hope this helps.

> > >

> > > Regards

> > >

> > > Sharat

> > >

> > > -

> > > Krishnamurthy Seetharama

> > >

> > <%40>

> > > Sunday, March 04, 2007 5:26 PM

> > > Re: [Om Krishna Guru] Many interesting Yogas

> > >

> > > Dear Visti,

> > >

> > > Thanks for your clarifications. However, I am still not

> > > convinced about the definition of KSY. Let me explain why:

> > >

> > > Let us assume that Rahu (the head) is in Aries and Ketu

> (the

> > > tail) in Libra. Rahu would be moving towards Pices and

> hence

> > > would be facing pices. Now, the so called body of the

> Kaala

> > > Sarpa extends from head to the tail, that is from Aries,

> > > Taurus,...,Virgo to Libra. Hence, if all the planets fall

> > > Rasis

> > > Taurus to Virgo, then it is like all planets being

> swallowed

> > > by

> > > the Sarpa. And, that is considered as KSY. Is it not?

> > >

> > > Is there a flaw in my thinking?

> > >

> > > I referred to couple of sources as well. It appears that

> > > SJC's

> > > definition and what people like B V Raman have defined

> seems

> > > to

> > > be different.

> > >

> > > Please clarify.

> > >

> > > Regards,

> > > Krishna

> > >

> > > --- Visti Larsen <visti

> > <visti%40srigaruda.com>> wrote:

> > >

> > > > ??? ??? ??????

> > > >

> > > > Dear Krishna, Namaskar

> > > > Answers to your queries.

> > > >

> > > > /I have a couple of questions on what you have noted:

> > > >

> > > > - Though Sani in Navamsa is neecha, he is also retro,

> > > hence

> > > > can

> > > > we consider Sani uchcha?/

> > > >

> > > > He is not Uccha but will help him out a great deal

> through

> > > his

> > > >

> > > > determination and thus ACT as exalted.

> > > >

> > > > /- Regarding KSY: The planets are between Ketu-Rahu and

> > > not

> > > > between Rahu-Ketu. Should this be considered as Kaala

> > > Amrita

> > > > Yoga, instead of KSY? Also, Rahu and Ketu are exalted in

> > > > navamsa

> > > > /

> > > >

> > > > Sharat has answered this point. The exaltation is

> relevant

> > > but

> > > > does not

> > > > change the type of yoga.

> > > >

> > > > /- Another aspect of Guru, which I need your opinion on:

> > > >

> > > > Though Guru is in different houses in Rasi and Navamsa,

> if

> > > one

> > > > considers the position in degrees they are pretty close

> > > (in

>

=== message truncated ===

Regards,

Krishna

http://videogames./platform?platform=120121

______________________________\

____

Be a PS3 game guru.

Get your game face on with the latest PS3 news and previews at Games.

March 12, 2007

|| Hare Rama Krsna ||

Dear Vistiji, Members,

Please comment on my son's chart(Ashutosh Rai), was born through

Ceaseran, Mother was taken into C-Section at around 11:5AM - 11:20 am,

Details below --

DOB : 15th October 2006

TOB : 11:47 AM - 11:50 AM

POB : Sydney,Australia

Ashutosh was in hospital for 10 days, due to low blood sugar level etc

has Neecha Bhanga Yogas in Rasi Chart, I am more concerned about

Navamash, D-60 etc

Kind Regards,

Abhijeet

, Visti Larsen <visti wrote:

>

> ??? ??? ??????

>

> Dear Krishna, Namaskar

> Answers to your queries.

>

> /I have a couple of questions on what you have noted:

>

> - Though Sani in Navamsa is neecha, he is also retro, hence can

> we consider Sani uchcha?/

>

> He is not Uccha but will help him out a great deal through his

> determination and thus ACT as exalted.

>

> /- Regarding KSY: The planets are between Ketu-Rahu and not

> between Rahu-Ketu. Should this be considered as Kaala Amrita

> Yoga, instead of KSY? Also, Rahu and Ketu are exalted in navamsa

> /

>

> Sharat has answered this point. The exaltation is relevant but does not

> change the type of yoga.

>

> /- Another aspect of Guru, which I need your opinion on:

>

> Though Guru is in different houses in Rasi and Navamsa, if one

> considers the position in degrees they are pretty close (in Rasi

> it is 223 deg, in Navamsa it is 208 deg.) Hence, can we consider

> Guru as Vargottama?/

>

> Excuse me? No we cannot say that.

>

> /Even if you don't agree on Guru's strenth, then the only problem

> remains that Surya's dispositor Guru is not strong. For this I

> will take your remedy of wearing Ruby.

>

> Do we still ignore the differnt Yogas that are present in the

> chart?

> /

>

> No, but we must keep in mind that they will have difficulty functioning.

>

> Yours sincerely,

>

> --

> Visti Larsen - SJC Guru

> Jaimini SJC - Denmark

> email: visti <visti

> For consultations, free mp3's and articles visit: http://srigaruda.com