My view on deliberations on Thiru Balasubramaniam's Centre

[Guest guest]

I just want to post my views on the issue: Usually in a naadi centre they divide the readers into three: 1. First one is the person who actually gets the naadi from library and reads the initial points like names and charts, they form the first hierarchy. These people come next to the head reader. 2. Second one is the reader who is entrusted to write down the contents into a notebook 3. Third one is the person, who is entrusted only with recording.A member informed me one Sri. Mahendran of Congivaram Centre of Sri Balasubramaniam asked too many questions and tried to figure out the picture from the reply. He might be a novice as usually well experienced readers are entrusted to seek out the pattis in general and novice are entrusted to either copy the contents or record them and a experienced reader won't ask those kind of silly questions. As it may be that time, they would have asked that person named above to read out the script as training. As without training, they can't come up as first line of readers, this is prevalent even in other sectors also; a trainee is entrusted with the regular hands on work to get him accustomed with real work. So, I think the better reply can be given by Sri. Balasubramaniam on the issue and I request the moderators to forward the queries and discussions to concerned naadi centres to get a reply and post them over here. As what is going on in all discussions in this forum is single sided (only member's views are presented) and no counter replies from the concerned. A discussion is incomplete unless it is replied by the opposite party pertaining on whom we make deliberations. To start with I have forwarded the link of this forum to Mr. Balasubramanian's phone and have requested him to view and post his views on the issue, so that we can have a clear picture on the issue, instead of discussing among us. As I think it is duty of the naadi readers / centres to reply the queries sent to them by the forum. I hope our esteemed moderators will implement my idea, as this forum should deliver its real purpose of existence. I also saw some members informing they had increased the rates, for which I don't have current information. Even last month when I saw my deekshai chapter, I paid Rs 150 per Chapter. One had mentioned, they ask for name for giving appointment. This is usual practise, as for registration, they seek name but on actual visit, you need not give your name but just mark the thumb markings with a code word which you only know. I request Wing commander Oak or the Moderators to ascertain the various expressions that have taken place on this august forum with Thiru. D. Balasubramanian and post the same here for benefit of the members both existing and also to come in future. His mobile number: +91 94433 79666, he prefers to be contacted between 19:00 to 21:00 daily.

Last but not least: My observance is: usually naadi readers try to ask some questions to confirm the contents in the patti, as that is the only way the contents can be confirmed and marked as seeker's patti. But this type of confirmative questioning should be very minimal and aimed only on confirmation and nothing more than that.

Dhinakar Rajaram Iyer *** The expressions given by me is in neutral view and not on a partisan basis and I don't have any personal reletionship with them as I am just another customer of naadi readings ***

[Guest guest]

Hi Dhinakar Ji,

 

Even my experience was same but it was with Tambaram centre.

(Mr.Durai subburatinam centre). My nadi reader was young and he asked

me many queries. To be honest, he literally requested for our few

letters of my dad's name as it is difficlut to find. Thats the reason

i lost trust in that centre.

 

But my query is

 

a) How we can say that only few people are wrong in one centre. I

guess its the head (Balasubraniam or Durai Subburatinam) who has

given training to them or who is responsible for them. Might be the

heads are so talented that we don't find loopholes in their inquiring

pattern but their younger ones are getting caught becuase of

inexperince.

 

b) Instead of asking us, why don't they read the names from Leaf and

ask us whether it belongs to our family. If thats the way, then we

can believe nadi easily. They should stop questioning us and read

from it instead. ***I don't think any nadi centre does this.***

 

Any comments?

 

Thanks.

 

 

 

, " rdhinakar4477 "

<dhinakarrajaram wrote:

>

> I just want to post my views on the issue: Usually in a naadi centre

> they divide the readers into three: 

> 1. First one is the person who actually gets the naadi from library

and

> reads the initial points like names and charts, they form the first

> hierarchy. These people come next to the head reader. 

> 2. Second one is the reader who is entrusted to write down the

contents

> into a notebook 

> 3. Third one is the person, who is entrusted only with recording.

> A member informed me one Sri. Mahendran of Congivaram Centre of Sri

> Balasubramaniam asked too many questions and tried to figure out the

> picture from the reply. He might be a novice as usually well

experienced

> readers are entrusted to seek out the pattis in general and novice

are

> entrusted to either copy the contents or record them and a

experienced

> reader won't ask those kind of silly questions. 

> As it may be that time, they would have asked that person named

above to

> read out the script as training. As without training, they can't

come up

> as first line of readers, this is prevalent even in other sectors

also;

> a trainee is entrusted with the regular hands on work to get him

> accustomed with real work. 

> So, I think the better reply can be given by Sri. Balasubramaniam

on the

> issue and I request the moderators to forward the queries and

> discussions to concerned naadi centres to get a reply and post them

over

> here. As what is going on in all discussions in this forum is single

> sided (only member's views are presented) and no counter replies

from

> the concerned. A discussion is incomplete unless it is replied by

the

> opposite party pertaining on whom we make deliberations. 

> To start with I have forwarded the link of this forum to Mr.

> Balasubramanian's phone and have requested him to view and post his

> views on the issue, so that we can have a clear picture on the

issue,

> instead of discussing among us. As I think it is duty of the naadi

> readers / centres to reply the queries sent to them by the forum. I

hope

> our esteemed moderators will implement my idea, as this forum should

> deliver its real purpose of existence. I also saw some members

> informing they had increased the rates, for which I don't have

current

> information. Even last month when I saw my deekshai chapter, I paid

Rs

> 150 per Chapter. One had mentioned, they ask for name for giving

> appointment. This is usual practise, as for registration, they seek

name

> but on actual visit, you need not give your name but just mark the

thumb

> markings with a code word which you only know. I request Wing

> commander Oak or the Moderators to ascertain the various expressions

> that have taken place on this august forum with Thiru. D.

> Balasubramanian and post the same here for benefit of the members

both

> existing and also to come in future. His mobile number: +91 94433

79666,

> he prefers to be contacted between 19:00 to 21:00 daily. Last but

not

> least: My observance is: usually naadi readers try to ask some

> questions to confirm the contents in the patti, as that is the only

way

> the contents can be confirmed and marked as seeker's patti. But this

> type of confirmative questioning should be very minimal and aimed

only

> on confirmation and nothing more than that. Dhinakar Rajaram Iyer

> *** The expressions given by me is in neutral view and not on a

partisan

> basis and I don't have any personal reletionship with them as I am

just

> another customer of naadi readings ***

>

[Guest guest]

You all forgot one thing and that one is not at all discussed here in

this forum: a genuine naadi will also tell what is your qualification

and in which line you studied and in which line you are currently in.

 

Dhinakar

 

, " netpostingid "

<netpostingid wrote:

>

> Hi Dhinakar Ji,

>

> Even my experience was same but it was with Tambaram centre.

> (Mr.Durai subburatinam centre). My nadi reader was young and he

asked

> me many queries. To be honest, he literally requested for our few

> letters of my dad's name as it is difficlut to find. Thats the

reason

> i lost trust in that centre.

>

> But my query is

>

> a) How we can say that only few people are wrong in one centre. I

> guess its the head (Balasubraniam or Durai Subburatinam) who has

> given training to them or who is responsible for them. Might be the

> heads are so talented that we don't find loopholes in their

inquiring

> pattern but their younger ones are getting caught becuase of

> inexperince.

>

> b) Instead of asking us, why don't they read the names from Leaf and

> ask us whether it belongs to our family. If thats the way, then we

> can believe nadi easily. They should stop questioning us and read

> from it instead. ***I don't think any nadi centre does this.***

>

> Any comments?

>

> Thanks.

>

>

>

> , " rdhinakar4477 "

> <dhinakarrajaram@> wrote:

> >

> > I just want to post my views on the issue: Usually in a naadi

centre

> > they divide the readers into three: 

> > 1. First one is the person who actually gets the naadi from

library

> and

> > reads the initial points like names and charts, they form the

first

> > hierarchy. These people come next to the head reader. 

> > 2. Second one is the reader who is entrusted to write down the

> contents

> > into a notebook 

> > 3. Third one is the person, who is entrusted only with recording.

> > A member informed me one Sri. Mahendran of Congivaram Centre of

Sri

> > Balasubramaniam asked too many questions and tried to figure out

the

> > picture from the reply. He might be a novice as usually well

> experienced

> > readers are entrusted to seek out the pattis in general and novice

> are

> > entrusted to either copy the contents or record them and a

> experienced

> > reader won't ask those kind of silly questions. 

> > As it may be that time, they would have asked that person named

> above to

> > read out the script as training. As without training, they can't

> come up

> > as first line of readers, this is prevalent even in other sectors

> also;

> > a trainee is entrusted with the regular hands on work to get him

> > accustomed with real work. 

> > So, I think the better reply can be given by Sri. Balasubramaniam

> on the

> > issue and I request the moderators to forward the queries and

> > discussions to concerned naadi centres to get a reply and post

them

> over

> > here. As what is going on in all discussions in this forum is

single

> > sided (only member's views are presented) and no counter replies

> from

> > the concerned. A discussion is incomplete unless it is replied by

> the

> > opposite party pertaining on whom we make deliberations. 

> > To start with I have forwarded the link of this forum to Mr.

> > Balasubramanian's phone and have requested him to view and post

his

> > views on the issue, so that we can have a clear picture on the

> issue,

> > instead of discussing among us. As I think it is duty of the naadi

> > readers / centres to reply the queries sent to them by the forum.

I

> hope

> > our esteemed moderators will implement my idea, as this forum

should

> > deliver its real purpose of existence. I also saw some members

> > informing they had increased the rates, for which I don't have

> current

> > information. Even last month when I saw my deekshai chapter, I

paid

> Rs

> > 150 per Chapter. One had mentioned, they ask for name for giving

> > appointment. This is usual practise, as for registration, they

seek

> name

> > but on actual visit, you need not give your name but just mark the

> thumb

> > markings with a code word which you only know. I request Wing

> > commander Oak or the Moderators to ascertain the various

expressions

> > that have taken place on this august forum with Thiru. D.

> > Balasubramanian and post the same here for benefit of the members

> both

> > existing and also to come in future. His mobile number: +91 94433

> 79666,

> > he prefers to be contacted between 19:00 to 21:00 daily. Last but

> not

> > least: My observance is: usually naadi readers try to ask some

> > questions to confirm the contents in the patti, as that is the

only

> way

> > the contents can be confirmed and marked as seeker's patti. But

this

> > type of confirmative questioning should be very minimal and aimed

> only

> > on confirmation and nothing more than that. Dhinakar Rajaram Iyer

> > *** The expressions given by me is in neutral view and not on a

> partisan

> > basis and I don't have any personal reletionship with them as I am

> just

> > another customer of naadi readings ***

> >

>

[Guest guest]

hmm.. they ask those queries also when they try to locate the nadi..

nowadyas it is kind of easy to them..first question they ask are you

woking in computers

 

, " rdhinakar4477 "

<dhinakarrajaram wrote:

>

> You all forgot one thing and that one is not at all discussed here

in

> this forum: a genuine naadi will also tell what is your

qualification

> and in which line you studied and in which line you are currently

in.

>

> Dhinakar

>

> , " netpostingid "

> <netpostingid@> wrote:

> >

> > Hi Dhinakar Ji,

> >

> > Even my experience was same but it was with Tambaram centre.

> > (Mr.Durai subburatinam centre). My nadi reader was young and he

> asked

> > me many queries. To be honest, he literally requested for our few

> > letters of my dad's name as it is difficlut to find. Thats the

> reason

> > i lost trust in that centre.

> >

> > But my query is

> >

> > a) How we can say that only few people are wrong in one centre. I

> > guess its the head (Balasubraniam or Durai Subburatinam) who has

> > given training to them or who is responsible for them. Might be

the

> > heads are so talented that we don't find loopholes in their

> inquiring

> > pattern but their younger ones are getting caught becuase of

> > inexperince.

> >

> > b) Instead of asking us, why don't they read the names from Leaf

and

> > ask us whether it belongs to our family. If thats the way, then

we

> > can believe nadi easily. They should stop questioning us and read

> > from it instead. ***I don't think any nadi centre does this.***

> >

> > Any comments?

> >

> > Thanks.

> >

> >

> >

> > , " rdhinakar4477 "

> > <dhinakarrajaram@> wrote:

> > >

> > > I just want to post my views on the issue: Usually in a naadi

> centre

> > > they divide the readers into three: 

> > > 1. First one is the person who actually gets the naadi from

> library

> > and

> > > reads the initial points like names and charts, they form the

> first

> > > hierarchy. These people come next to the head reader. 

> > > 2. Second one is the reader who is entrusted to write down the

> > contents

> > > into a notebook 

> > > 3. Third one is the person, who is entrusted only with

recording.

> > > A member informed me one Sri. Mahendran of Congivaram Centre of

> Sri

> > > Balasubramaniam asked too many questions and tried to figure

out

> the

> > > picture from the reply. He might be a novice as usually well

> > experienced

> > > readers are entrusted to seek out the pattis in general and

novice

> > are

> > > entrusted to either copy the contents or record them and a

> > experienced

> > > reader won't ask those kind of silly questions. 

> > > As it may be that time, they would have asked that person named

> > above to

> > > read out the script as training. As without training, they

can't

> > come up

> > > as first line of readers, this is prevalent even in other

sectors

> > also;

> > > a trainee is entrusted with the regular hands on work to get him

> > > accustomed with real work. 

> > > So, I think the better reply can be given by Sri.

Balasubramaniam

> > on the

> > > issue and I request the moderators to forward the queries and

> > > discussions to concerned naadi centres to get a reply and post

> them

> > over

> > > here. As what is going on in all discussions in this forum is

> single

> > > sided (only member's views are presented) and no counter

replies

> > from

> > > the concerned. A discussion is incomplete unless it is replied

by

> > the

> > > opposite party pertaining on whom we make deliberations. 

> > > To start with I have forwarded the link of this forum to Mr.

> > > Balasubramanian's phone and have requested him to view and post

> his

> > > views on the issue, so that we can have a clear picture on the

> > issue,

> > > instead of discussing among us. As I think it is duty of the

naadi

> > > readers / centres to reply the queries sent to them by the

forum.

> I

> > hope

> > > our esteemed moderators will implement my idea, as this forum

> should

> > > deliver its real purpose of existence. I also saw some members

> > > informing they had increased the rates, for which I don't have

> > current

> > > information. Even last month when I saw my deekshai chapter, I

> paid

> > Rs

> > > 150 per Chapter. One had mentioned, they ask for name for giving

> > > appointment. This is usual practise, as for registration, they

> seek

> > name

> > > but on actual visit, you need not give your name but just mark

the

> > thumb

> > > markings with a code word which you only know. I request Wing

> > > commander Oak or the Moderators to ascertain the various

> expressions

> > > that have taken place on this august forum with Thiru. D.

> > > Balasubramanian and post the same here for benefit of the

members

> > both

> > > existing and also to come in future. His mobile number: +91

94433

> > 79666,

> > > he prefers to be contacted between 19:00 to 21:00 daily. Last

but

> > not

> > > least: My observance is: usually naadi readers try to ask some

> > > questions to confirm the contents in the patti, as that is the

> only

> > way

> > > the contents can be confirmed and marked as seeker's patti. But

> this

> > > type of confirmative questioning should be very minimal and

aimed

> > only

> > > on confirmation and nothing more than that. Dhinakar Rajaram

Iyer

> > > *** The expressions given by me is in neutral view and not on a

> > partisan

> > > basis and I don't have any personal reletionship with them as I

am

> > just

> > > another customer of naadi readings ***

> > >

> >

>