Nadi Reading - some Myths and Facts 2

[Guest guest]

Dear All,

Continuing my previous email on this subject matter:

 

3. Myth - in shanti kandam - the names mentioned of the temples are

all from South/Tamilnadu only

 

Fact: I've seen various anmes of the temples from all over India -

mentioned in the shanti kandam.

my own case - I've asked to visit - Saptashrungi devi of Vani,

Trambyakeshwar of Nashik

 

it does not mean always these temples will belong to one area/state

only or since I've checked in Maharashtra, the temples will be from

Maharashtra only as in my wife's case - the temples to be visited

where - Tuljapur & Pandharpur + Balaji....

 

Conclusion: The temples mentioned in Shanti Kandam are not restricted

to South/Tamilnadu and there must be some reasoning for the specific

temples asked to be visited.....

 

Regards

 

Rajas

 

, " rajas_astrology "

<rajas_astrology wrote:

>

> Dear All,

> As mentioned in my earlieremail, I'm writing herewith on this

subject

> matter my viewpoints. I'll try to cover the points raised on the

> group as much as I can.

>

> 1. the nadi readers collect data from us thru question/asnwer

session

> and then share with us in a consolidated way as if it is written in

> on the nadi leaf and then confirm that he has found the nadi leaf.

> Facts: It is true that many times, most of the facts are confirmed

by

> us during the question/asnwer session, but still it will not be at

> 100% level. If the above mentioned objection was true, in all the

> cases - to find the nadi leaf, it would have taken substantially

> longer time. If the nadi reader has to collect 100% info of the

> person thru the Q & A session, he can hardly check one nadi leaf in

> one/two days. No matter how much the person is trained to use

skills

> of permutations/combinations to arrive at the exact names of the

> person, his spouse and his parents, he will not be able to arrive

at

> the exact 4 names in even no. of days conversation as the

possibility

> of the permutation/combination is just endless… I've witnessed

12/15

> nadi readings and in none of the reading, all these 4 names were

> arrived at by the nadi reader thru such permutation/combination

> exercise. On an average 2 out of 4 names were confirmed by the

person

> to the reader. But the rest of the 2 names were exactly matched

when

> the other 2 names were already matched/confirmed to be right as

> writtenon the nadi leaf.

> I've seen the nadi leaf found which was only 3rd or 4th leaf seed

> during the session. And during the conversation on first 2/3 nadi

> leafs rejected, hardly any facts were disclosed to the nadi reader.

> This is just next to impossible to do it by any skillful method

> adopted by the nadi reader.

>

> Conclusion - therefore, I believe that the reader only reads what

is

> mentioned in the nadi leaf.

>

> To overcome this feeling what people get sometimes during their

nadi

> finding session, in the Pune Nadi conference, it was suggested that

> it will be good if the nadi reader asks questions on only 2 or 3

> basic facts and when all those facts are matched in one of the nadi

> leaf, then only they should ask questions related to other matters……

> Say for eg: he can ask name/check name of only his/her father and

> himself/herself and not of the spouse and mother. We need to see

how

> such practice can be implemented across the nadi centres. May be

when

> we people visit the nadi centre, we can specify such things that we

> will not disclose the name of say mother till everyhting else is

> matched. If the reader agrees, go ahead, if he does not, try

another

> nadi reader who agrees to this….

>

> 2. the nadi reading shared by the nadi reader in the form of

notebook

> and audio cassete/cd is not actually written on the nadi leaf.

Since

> we do not understand the language in which it is written, we cannot

> verify whether the details are actually written in the nadi leaf or

> not.

>

> Facts: those who have read Mr. Shashikant Oak's book will agree

that

> this is not true. Mr. Oak has verified that his name was actually

> written on the nadi leaf which was shown to him as his nadi leaf.

>

> On the ocassion of nadi conference, he has again verified the name

> written on the nadi leaf of one person which he showed to me also.

> During that exercise, I realised that there is not a very big

> difference in the prevelant tamil language writing and the one

> written on the andi leaf. I request the people who are very well

> conversant with the tamil to come forward and attempt to corelate

the

> two written form. Though I'm non tamil person, now a days I'm

> attempting to learn tamil writing and then next step will be to try

> to corelate it with the nadi writing… let us see how much I can

excel

> in this exercise….

>

> Conclusion: the nadi reading done by the nadi reader is actually

> written on the nadi leaf and it is not something which he is just

> talking on his own….

>

> Further this also makes the first point objection invalid. Because

if

> the reader is first collecting info from the person, and then

writing

> it on the nadi leaf and then in the text book and then sharing it

in

> audio cassette, then he need some time to goo back and write the

> same. Whereas, as per my understanding, in Mr. Oak's case, when his

> nadi leaf was found, immediately then and there onlt the nadi

reader

> showed him his name written in the nadi leaf which the reader

> concluded that it belongs to Mr. Oak.

>

> We can also try this out. We can ask the reader to show the name

> written on the nadi leaf and also ask him to corelate it with the

> tamil font…

>

> I hope that yhe group will agree with my facts and conclusion. if

> not, I'm open for healthy positive deliberation on this in the

> interest of all the group members...

>

> Will continue to cover other points in my nect email.

> pl also give me ur valuable feedback.

>

> Regards

>

> Rajas

> rajas.khaladkar

> mobile no. 9890658280

>