Guest guest Posted December 27, 2005 Report Share Posted December 27, 2005 Hi Everybody, If you are not a believer of Birth/Rebirth/Karma it is advised that do not read further. However, Critics of Nadi are encouraged to read further. Thanks. It is my personal experience that Nadi Josiyam is true regarding ones birth, death, current life, earlier life and future rebirth if any. To talk in terms of science, it is nothing else but 'property of matter' wherein 'soul' is the matter. Like how scientists are able to predict the behaviour of atoms of varying atomic weight, same way one can predict the behaviour of human beings if you know the likes and dislikes of a person. This last point will clearly predict one's behaviour. However, where Nadi Josiyam excels is the ability to predict the future regarding the Death of a person and future birth's if any. It is also able to tell the justification for the sufferings of an individual in current life and what is in store for his/her next birth. Karma is nothing but the net effect of what good/bad deeds a person is committing in this life. The resultant is carried out. When God created man, he ensured that ** Man is born in this world with NOTHING and goes with NOTHING. Thereby , HE (God) has established HIS supremacy over man but allowed the man to carry over his KARMA. This is because, GOD also has given man the ability to distinguish between GOOD/BAD and the option is left to the man. Hence, if man has to exit from the viscious cycle of rebirth, he has to do good. ** The critics of Nadi Josiyam has to keep in mind one important thing. While it is observed by many that the future is correct only to some extent, nevertheless Nadi comes true for the past. In this regard, I would like to bring two points. 1) What is PAST for us, is already FUTURE for those who had written it 1000s of years ago. Then what is the so called FUTURE people have been talking about? 2) Let's say someone went to see his nadi on Jan 1'2002 (say), he/she finds that the Nadi has been true for the Past but is somewhat correct for the future as reflected in Nadi. BUT when the same person goes (say) after two years, the Nadi is about to say about the PAST (I mean what has happened to the person between Jan 1st 2002 and Jan 1st 2004. Then what is the PAST/FUTURE the Critics have been talking about?. Can any Critic of Nadi Josiyam pass on his/her remarks on the above? Thanks Govindan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 27, 2005 Report Share Posted December 27, 2005 Govind and other List members. (Read only if you believe in karma/rebirth) This is pretty interesting. I am curious to know if an horoscope in the non-nadi system can be interpreted to tell one about your one's previousbirth. What lagna would denote the previous birth and can the same chart be interpreted for details of the past life. While it is accepted that what you suffer now is due to karma, it is ntural I want to know did I do in the past that I suffer like this now. That helps to be an eye-opener, not that you need one. Yet it is a different dimension.I shall thank all for any feedback. Seshadriexsolar9 <exsolar9 wrote: Hi Everybody,If you are not a believer of Birth/Rebirth/Karma it is advised that do not read further. However, Critics of Nadi are encouraged to read further. Thanks. It is my personal experience that Nadi Josiyam is true regarding ones birth, death, current life, earlier life and future rebirth if any. To talk in terms of science, it is nothing else but 'property of matter' wherein 'soul' is the matter. Like how scientists are able to predict the behaviour of atoms of varying atomic weight, same way one can predict the behaviour of human beings if you know the likes and dislikes of a person. This last point will clearly predict one's behaviour. However, where Nadi Josiyam excels is the ability to predict the future regarding the Death of a person and future birth's if any. It is also able to tell the justification for the sufferings of an individual in current life and what is in store for his/her next birth. Karma is nothing but the net effect of what good/bad deeds a person is committing in this life. The resultant is carried out. When God created man, he ensured that ** Man is born in this world with NOTHING and goes with NOTHING. Thereby , HE (God) has established HIS supremacy over man but allowed the man to carry over his KARMA. This is because, GOD also has given man the ability to distinguish between GOOD/BAD and the option is left to the man. Hence, if man has to exit from the viscious cycle of rebirth, he has to do good. ** The critics of Nadi Josiyam has to keep in mind one important thing. While it is observed by many that the future is correct only to some extent, nevertheless Nadi comes true for the past. In this regard, I would like to bring two points. 1) What is PAST for us, is already FUTURE for those who had written it 1000s of years ago. Then what is the so called FUTURE people have been talking about? 2) Let's say someone went to see his nadi on Jan 1'2002 (say), he/she finds that the Nadi has been true for the Past but is somewhat correct for the future as reflected in Nadi. BUT when the same person goes (say) after two years, the Nadi is about to say about the PAST (I mean what has happened to the person between Jan 1st 2002 and Jan 1st 2004. Then what is the PAST/FUTURE the Critics have been talking about?. Can any Critic of Nadi Josiyam pass on his/her remarks on the above? ThanksGovindan. for Good - Make a difference this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 27, 2005 Report Share Posted December 27, 2005 dear friend govindan the example cited by you is excellent which reminds me to submit a similar example. a patient visits a doctor on 1.1.2002. he subject him to all kinds of tests and come to a cohesive conclusion that the patient is suffering from this and that. the patient too nods his head in acquiescence. the doctor gives a long list of prescriptions and follow up visits and the patient end up coughing thousands of rupees. on 1.1.2003 the patient is still loyal to the same doctor even though he is not getting cured from the doctor. then the doctor does analysis of medicines taken during 1.1.2002 to 1.1.2003 and come out with his findings which are true. and the saga continues on and on and on. in my experience as astrologer, i never took shelter in the name of karmic theory, for for a person following karma theory, planets and astrology are useless. i have high respect for this ancient nadi reading and am searching for solutions as to how the future (in govindan's language) is read only HINDSIGHT and not beforehand like we do in vedic astrology. with best wishes arjun , Sesh Krish <kseshadri_2000> wrote: > > Govind and other List members. > (Read only if you believe in karma/rebirth) > This is pretty interesting. I am curious to know if an horoscope in the non-nadi system can be interpreted to tell one about your one's previousbirth. What lagna would denote the previous birth and can the same chart be interpreted for details of the past life. While it is accepted that what you suffer now is due to karma, it is ntural I want to know did I do in the past that I suffer like this now. That helps to be an eye-opener, not that you need one. Yet it is a different dimension.I shall thank all for any feedback. > Seshadri > > exsolar9 <exsolar9> wrote: > Hi Everybody, > > If you are not a believer of Birth/Rebirth/Karma it is advised that > do not read further. However, Critics of Nadi are encouraged to read > further. Thanks. > > It is my personal experience that Nadi Josiyam is true regarding ones > birth, death, current life, earlier life and future rebirth if any. > To talk in terms of science, it is nothing else but 'property of > matter' wherein 'soul' is the matter. Like how scientists are able to > predict the behaviour of atoms of varying atomic weight, same way one > can predict the behaviour of human beings if you know the likes > and dislikes of a person. This last point will clearly predict one's > behaviour. However, where Nadi Josiyam excels is the ability to > predict the future regarding the Death of a person and future birth's > if any. It is also able to tell the justification for the sufferings > of an individual in current life and what is in store for his/her > next birth. Karma is nothing but the net effect of what good/bad > deeds a person is committing in this life. The resultant is carried > out. When God created man, he ensured that > > ** Man is born in this world with NOTHING and goes with NOTHING. > Thereby , HE (God) has established HIS supremacy over man but allowed > the man to carry over his KARMA. This is because, GOD also has given > man the ability to distinguish between GOOD/BAD and the option > is left to the man. Hence, if man has to exit from the viscious cycle > of rebirth, he has to do good. > > ** The critics of Nadi Josiyam has to keep in mind one important > thing. While it is observed by many that the future is correct only > to some extent, nevertheless Nadi comes true for the past. In this > regard, I would like to bring two points. > > 1) What is PAST for us, is already FUTURE for those who had written > it 1000s of years ago. Then what is the so called FUTURE people > have been talking about? > > 2) Let's say someone went to see his nadi on Jan 1'2002 (say), he/she > finds that the Nadi has been true for the Past but is somewhat > correct for the future as reflected in Nadi. BUT when the same person > goes (say) after two years, the Nadi is about to say about the PAST > (I mean what has happened to the person between Jan 1st 2002 and Jan > 1st 2004. Then what is the PAST/FUTURE the Critics have been talking > about?. > > Can any Critic of Nadi Josiyam pass on his/her remarks on the above? > > Thanks > Govindan. > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.