Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

discussion continued----- [ dr. rahul/ mr. nagesh ]

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Dear Dr. Rahul and Mr. Nagesh,

Hope both of you are fine.

I want to put a understanding of mine before both of you in connection to the discussion took place on the role of sub of the sub lord.

From the discussion, i have understood that for a specific significance as per querry, only the 4 step theory should be taken . For the yes/no, sub of sublord should be seen but the 'significance of that "sub" of sublord' should not be added to that sub-lord in question.

Am I correct?

Because , In the astrosecrets part 1 , the writter has taken the 4 step theory + sub of sub-lord significance + planet conjoined with the sub lord + planet aspecting the sub lord + nodes sig [ if involved]. After taking everything into account he says that, the sig of the sub-lord in question should be understood.

Please clearify.

 

with regards.anurodh.Anurodh Kumar C1917 mini LIG Raja JI Puram LucknowU.P.-226017

E mail-

anurodh1, sampark_anurodhDo you ?

Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Anurodh,

we all should examine this condition in each and every chart that we

study. this is in an evolution stage.

in the 4 steps, the first 2 steps tell us what event will occur and

the last 2 steps tell us what wil be the effect of the event- benefic

or malefic.

many charts go wrong when we consider all the 4 steps for event

signification.

what is your analysis?

1) getting all the 4 steps for event signification gives best results

or

2) getting only first two steps for event signification gives

accurate results

 

i hereby request all the members to give the feedback.

thank you,

dr.rahul.

 

l , Anurodh Kumar <anurodh1> wrote:

>

> Dear Dr. Rahul and Mr. Nagesh,

>

> Hope both of you are fine.

>

>

> I want to put a understanding of mine before both of you in

connection to the discussion took place on the role of sub of the sub

lord.

>

> From the discussion, i have understood that for a specific

significance as per querry, only the 4 step theory should be taken .

For the yes/no, sub of sublord should be seen but the 'significance

of that " sub " of sublord' should not be added to that sub-lord in

question.

>

>

> Am I correct?

>

> Because , In the astrosecrets part 1 , the writter has taken the 4

step theory + sub of sub-lord significance + planet conjoined with

the sub lord + planet aspecting the sub lord + nodes sig [ if

involved]. After taking everything into account he says that, the sig

of the sub-lord in question should be understood.

>

> Please clearify.

>

>

>

> with regards.

> anurodh.

>

>

>

> Anurodh Kumar

> C1917 mini LIG

> Raja JI Puram

> Lucknow

> U.P.-226017

>

> E mail-

>

> anurodh1@r..., sampark_anurodh@i...

>

>

>

>

>

> Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...