Guest guest Posted January 13, 2003 Report Share Posted January 13, 2003 Dear Nagesh, I am thankful to you for the enlighment . with regards. anurodh. "Vizkid <nd44130" <nd44130 wrote: Dear Anurodh, From my experience....Q 1 )It depends on which type of analysis you are doing- a)Conventional (star level) significators - b) Extended conventional( Sub level)- c) 4 step theoryI have found that when I combine any of the above (a & c or somethinglike that) the result does come give me what you said (even thoughstar level does not signify 4 step theory does, I would take it assignificator.) But what I do is, if they are not strong significatorsof the event then I would not take them.For example for education lets say conventional analysis gave me 4,94 step theory gave me strong planets -2, 7 Weak planets -11So even though 11 comes as significator through 4 step I would nothave much faith on it since its a weaker planet.Q2) Follow Shanmugham's tips. They helped me ...Regards,Nageshl , Anurodh Kumar <anurodh1> wrote:> > Dear list,> I have the following querries and if you pls help to give thesolution , i will be very thankful for the help.> > a.I want to know that for a perticular sig. if a sub lord on thestar lavel does not come with all the required houses but on the sublavel it gets the balance houses or/with aspect from any other planet, should it be considered that the given planet is fuilling therquired houses.> Example: For research work in any field , 9 and 11 houses should beseen. If the 12 house is also involved then it should be seen that thesig sub lord is also involved in 2 or 6 or 3 or 10 also to getrecognistion in the froeign land .> Now if the 9-sublord gets only few houses say 11 and 2 and rest ofthe houses that is 9-10 - 4 etc on the sub lavel and by aspect byanother planet to the sub lord then should we consider that the sublord is fulling the requirement for research or not [ because at starlavel it has not got the required houses in full].> > b. In the book of P. Shanmugham ' Astrosecrets part I ' he haswritten that for the birth time rectification the ruling palnetsshould be calculated upto their exact degrees and the table should bemade with their star lavel and sub lavels . All palents in that tableshould be taken into consideration and retro palnets or the planets inthe star of retro palnets should be ommitted.> In the book " Birth time rectification " no such methodolgy has beenadopted and they have taken only the RPs and rectified the time.> > Sir , can you throw the light of your experince that wwhich methodis more suitable and correct to use.> with deep regards.> anurodh.> ( a kp student)> > > > > > Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.