Guest guest Posted January 12, 2003 Report Share Posted January 12, 2003 Dear list,I have the following querries and if you pls help to give the solution , i will be very thankful for the help. a.I want to know that for a perticular sig. if a sub lord on the star lavel does not come with all the required houses but on the sub lavel it gets the balance houses or/with aspect from any other planet , should it be considered that the given planet is fuilling the rquired houses.Example: For research work in any field , 9 and 11 houses should be seen. If the 12 house is also involved then it should be seen that the sig sub lord is also involved in 2 or 6 or 3 or 10 also to get recognistion in the froeign land .Now if the 9-sublord gets only few houses say 11 and 2 and rest of the houses that is 9-10 - 4 etc on the sub lavel and by aspect by another planet to the sub lord then should we consider that the sub lord is fulling the requirement for research or not [ because at star lavel it has not got the required houses in full]. b. In the book of P. Shanmugham ' Astrosecrets part I ' he has written that for the birth time rectification the ruling palnets should be calculated upto their exact degrees and the table should be made with their star lavel and sub lavels . All palents in that table should be taken into consideration and retro palnets or the planets in the star of retro palnets should be ommitted.In the book " Birth time rectification " no such methodolgy has been adopted and they have taken only the RPs and rectified the time. Sir , can you throw the light of your experince that wwhich method is more suitable and correct to use.with deep regards.anurodh.( a kp student) Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 13, 2003 Report Share Posted January 13, 2003 Dear Anurodh, From my experience.... Q 1 ) It depends on which type of analysis you are doing - a)Conventional (star level) significators - b) Extended conventional( Sub level) - c) 4 step theory I have found that when I combine any of the above (a & c or something like that) the result does come give me what you said (even though star level does not signify 4 step theory does, I would take it as significator.) But what I do is, if they are not strong significators of the event then I would not take them. For example for education lets say conventional analysis gave me 4,9 4 step theory gave me strong planets -2, 7 Weak planets -11 So even though 11 comes as significator through 4 step I would not have much faith on it since its a weaker planet. Q2) Follow Shanmugham's tips. They helped me ... Regards, Nagesh l , Anurodh Kumar <anurodh1> wrote: > > Dear list, > I have the following querries and if you pls help to give the solution , i will be very thankful for the help. > > a.I want to know that for a perticular sig. if a sub lord on the star lavel does not come with all the required houses but on the sub lavel it gets the balance houses or/with aspect from any other planet , should it be considered that the given planet is fuilling the rquired houses. > Example: For research work in any field , 9 and 11 houses should be seen. If the 12 house is also involved then it should be seen that the sig sub lord is also involved in 2 or 6 or 3 or 10 also to get recognistion in the froeign land . > Now if the 9-sublord gets only few houses say 11 and 2 and rest of the houses that is 9-10 - 4 etc on the sub lavel and by aspect by another planet to the sub lord then should we consider that the sub lord is fulling the requirement for research or not [ because at star lavel it has not got the required houses in full]. > > b. In the book of P. Shanmugham ' Astrosecrets part I ' he has written that for the birth time rectification the ruling palnets should be calculated upto their exact degrees and the table should be made with their star lavel and sub lavels . All palents in that table should be taken into consideration and retro palnets or the planets in the star of retro palnets should be ommitted. > In the book " Birth time rectification " no such methodolgy has been adopted and they have taken only the RPs and rectified the time. > > Sir , can you throw the light of your experince that wwhich method is more suitable and correct to use. > with deep regards. > anurodh. > ( a kp student) > > > > > > Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.