Guest guest Posted December 2, 2002 Report Share Posted December 2, 2002 De4ar List members,I have following things to confirm, For taking the ruling planets should follwing planets be taken as Rp in additon to the regular Rp by applying KP , which is generally done? a. Planet(s) occupying/ and aspecting the lagna of the RP chart.b. Planet(s) aspected by the RPs.c. Planet(s) aspecting the RPs.d. Planet(s) occupying the sign of RPs.e. Planet(s) in the stars of Rpsf. Planet(s) ruling the subs of Rps.g. Planet(s) ruling the stars , Rps occupying.h. Planet(s) in the star of sub-lord of the significant cusp. i. Planet(s) aspecting /aspected by/occupying star/occupying sign, of the additional Rps i have asked about I am asking because very contradictory things have come across when I have gone through the artilces published in the 'Astrosecrets part II 'by late shiri. Shanmugam. These principles are not mentioned in the Book ' RP & KP ' . I look forward for the clearification. with regards.a student of asrology,anurodh. Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.