Guest guest Posted December 3, 2002 Report Share Posted December 3, 2002 Dear Anurodh, I have news for you. I wish there were set of rules out there for RP's. Even I have the same problem - every now and then the rules change. I have read part 1 astrosecrets and I know what you are taking about. Some astrologers even suggest taking retro RP's for short term predictions. I presume the best approach would be applying a set of rules which you think MIGHT work and then go on adding/subtracting rules. 1. Match question: If the sublord of the cusp of 11th is a significator of 1,2,3,6,10,11 then victory provided the sub lord and constellation lord are not retrograde. I will provide the answers to rest of them in few days. Regards, Nagesh l, Anurodh Kumar <anurodh1> wrote: > > De4ar List members, > I have following things to confirm, > > For taking the ruling planets should follwing planets be taken as Rp in additon to the regular Rp by applying KP , which is generally done? > > a. Planet(s) occupying/ and aspecting the lagna of the RP chart. > b. Planet(s) aspected by the RPs. > c. Planet(s) aspecting the RPs. > d. Planet(s) occupying the sign of RPs. > e. Planet(s) in the stars of Rps > f. Planet(s) ruling the subs of Rps. > g. Planet(s) ruling the stars , Rps occupying. > h. Planet(s) in the star of sub-lord of the significant cusp. > > i. Planet(s) aspecting /aspected by/occupying star/occupying sign, of the additional Rps i have asked about > > > > I am asking beca use very contradictory things have come across when I have gone through the artilces published in the 'Astrosecrets part II 'by late shiri. Shanmugam. These principles are not mentioned in the Book ' RP & KP ' . > > I look forward for the clearification. > > with regards. > a student of asrology, > anurodh. > > > > > > Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 3, 2002 Report Share Posted December 3, 2002 dear nagesh, sorry if i am interrupting you. but in the match query the 6th sub should be significator of 6, 10,11 and the 12th sub should not be a strong significator of 5,8,12( the opponents points) dr.rahul. l, " Nagesh " <nd44130> wrote: > Dear Anurodh, > I have news for you. I wish there were set of rules out > there for RP's. Even I have the same problem - every now and then the > rules change. I have read part 1 astrosecrets and I know what you are > taking about. Some astrologers even suggest taking retro RP's for > short term predictions. > I presume the best approach would be applying a set of > rules which you think MIGHT work and then go on adding/subtracting rules. > > 1. Match question: > If the sublord of the cusp of 11th is a significator of 1,2,3,6,10,11 > then victory provided the sub lord and constellation lord are not > retrograde. > I will provide the answers to rest of them in few days. > > Regards, > Nagesh > > > > > l, Anurodh Kumar <anurodh1> wrote: > > > > De4ar List members, > > I have following things to confirm, > > > > For taking the ruling planets should follwing planets be taken as Rp > in additon to the regular Rp by applying KP , which is generally done? > > > > a. Planet(s) occupying/ and aspecting the lagna of the RP chart. > > b. Planet(s) aspected by the RPs. > > c. Planet(s) aspecting the RPs. > > d. Planet(s) occupying the sign of RPs. > > e. Planet(s) in the stars of Rps > > f. Planet(s) ruling the subs of Rps. > > g. Planet(s) ruling the stars , Rps occupying. > > h. Planet(s) in the star of sub-lord of the significant cusp. > > > > i. Planet(s) aspecting /aspected by/occupying star/occupying sign, > of the additional Rps i have asked about > > > > > > > > I am asking beca > > use very contradictory things have come across when I have gone > through the artilces published in the 'Astrosecrets part II 'by late > shiri. Shanmugam. These principles are not mentioned in the Book ' RP > & KP ' . > > > > I look forward for the clearification. > > > > with regards. > > a student of asrology, > > anurodh. > > > > > > > > > > > > Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 4, 2002 Report Share Posted December 4, 2002 Dr.Rahul, I agree. I will throw out another rule.. The sub of 6 cusp should signify 11th house and its 11th sublord should signify 1,2,3,6,10 and 11 for win. If sub of 6th or 11th signifies 4,5,8,7,10,12 then defeat. Regards, Nagesh l, " Rahul " <dr_rahul_99> wrote: > dear nagesh, > sorry if i am interrupting you. but in the match query the 6th sub > should be significator of 6, 10,11 and the 12th sub should not be a > strong significator of 5,8,12( the opponents points) > dr.rahul. > l, " Nagesh " <nd44130> wrote: > > Dear Anurodh, > > I have news for you. I wish there were set of rules out > > there for RP's. Even I have the same problem - every now and then > the > > rules change. I have read part 1 astrosecrets and I know what you > are > > taking about. Some astrologers even suggest taking retro RP's for > > short term predictions. > > I presume the best approach would be applying a set of > > rules which you think MIGHT work and then go on adding/subtracting > rules. > > > > 1. Match question: > > If the sublord of the cusp of 11th is a significator of > 1,2,3,6,10,11 > > then victory p rovided the sub lord and constellation lord are not > > retrograde. > > I will provide the answers to rest of them in few days. > > > > Regards, > > Nagesh > > > > > > > > > > l, Anurodh Kumar <anurodh1> wrote: > > > > > > De4ar List members, > > > I have following things to confirm, > > > > > > For taking the ruling planets should follwing planets be taken as > Rp > > in additon to the regular Rp by applying KP , which is generally > done? > > > > > > a. Planet(s) occupying/ and aspecting the lagna of the RP chart. > > > b. Planet(s) aspected by the RPs. > > > c. Planet(s) aspecting the RPs. > > > d. Planet(s) occupying the sign of RPs. > > > e. Planet(s) in the stars of Rps > > > f. Planet(s) ruling the subs of Rps. > > > g. Planet(s) ruling the stars , Rps occupying. > > > h. Planet(s) in the star of sub-lord of the significant cusp. > > > > > > i. Planet(s) aspecting /aspected by/occupying star/occupying sign, > > of the additional Rps i have asked about > > > > > > > > > > > > I am asking beca > > > > use very contradictory things have come across when I have gone > > through the artilces published in the 'Astrosecrets part II 'by late > > shiri. Shanmugam. These principles are not mentioned in the Book ' > RP > > & KP ' . > > > > > > I look forward for the clearification. > > > > > > with regards. > > > a student of asrology, > > > anurodh. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.