Aspects and sub-lord--------- querry

[Guest guest]

Respectable Sir,

 

I am reading Astrosecrets part II by Late. Mr. Shanmugham. In a

chapter ' promotion when ' the writer has advocated the use of

western system of aspects and also in the first chapter regarding the

porspects of the higher education the writer has used the western

aspects which in any book of Mr.KSK has not been advocated.

 

Pls advise.

 

 

Should the sub-lord be treated as the significator of the house even

if by it's stellar signification it is not signifying the house , for

example suppose mars is the sub-lord of 10-h but by it's significance

[ on the basis of it's postion and star occupancy etc] it does not

signify the 10-house, should mars be considered as the significator

of 10-h.

 

Pls advice.

 

with deep regards.

 

a student of astrology,

anurodh.

[Guest guest]

DEAR ANURODH,

ALL Indian aspects and all western aspects are considered in K.P.

This has been told by Mr.Krishnamurti himself.

bye,

dr.rahul.

l, " anurodh kumar " <anurodh1> wrote:

> Respectable Sir,

>

> I am reading Astrosecrets part II by Late. Mr. Shanmugham. In a

> chapter ' promotion when ' the writer has advocated the use of

> western system of aspects and also in the first chapter regarding

the

> porspects of the higher education the writer has used the western

> aspects which in any book of Mr.KSK has not been advocated.

>

> Pls advise.

>

>

> Should the sub-lord be treated as the significator of the house

even

> if by it's stellar signification it is not signifying the house ,

for

> example suppose mars is the sub-lord of 10-h but by it's

significance

> [ on the basis of it's postion and star occupancy etc] it does not

> signify the 10-house, should mars be considered as the significator

> of 10-h.

>

> Pls advice.

>

> with deep regards.

>

> a student of astrology,

> anurodh.