Guest guest Posted January 5, 2005 Report Share Posted January 5, 2005 As the tragic and catastrophic story of the South Asia Tsunami of December 26, 2004 continues to unfold, I wish to raise FOUR points of clarification, which ought to be propaedeutic to any future relevant horoscopic analysis of the event in question: FIRST: As for the doubter's of the SAMVA horoscope (Rectification by Jorge) for Indonesia: August 17, 1945. Among the doubters are those who raise the matter of Indonesia's so-called birth on December 27, 1949. Even Nicholas Campion maintains that the 1949 event is the basis of THE birthchart. In brief, Campion is wrong and Jorge is right. The 1945 horoscope is the " Nation-State " birth chart; the 1949 horoscope is the " National Government " birth chart. Grasping the difference is crucial to choosing science over chaos. SECOND: The geographic extent of the Indonesian nation-state is NOT co- terminous with the geographic extent of the Indonesian national government: The geography of the Indonesian national government encompasses the " 27 " provinces of the so-called nation, which is the expanse of Indonesia as commonly understood and reported in the press; Whereas in distinction, the geography of the Indonesian nation- state comprises " 25 " provinces, which excludes 2 " provinces " : Aceh and West Papua (New Guinea). Aceh became its own nation-state on December 4, 1976. The revolution to expel the Indonesian invaders continues. The Indonesian government is no more welcome in Aceh than George III's armies were welcome in the United States between July 2nd, 1776 and September 3, 1783. Furthermore, the nationhood of Aceh, preceding the existence of the Aceh state (necessarily so, logically and historically), has been in existence since the year 1530. THIRD: Jorge rightly points out the impact of the Tsunami on the 1945 Indonesia chart. However, the impact relates to the devastation in north Sumatra, in areas OTHER THAN Aceh. " Other than Aceh " is the pivotal consideration here, for reasons logically entailed in the matters mentioned above. FOURTH: The 1949 Indonesia chart doesn't show the catastrophic impact of the Tsunami. (And, of course, it shouldn't for one who grasps the metaphysical difference of STATE and GOVERNMENT.) However, very much to the contrary, the Tsunami's devastation of Aceh has presented a golden political opportunity for the national government of Indonesia to complete its task of the violent expropriation and domination of the Aceh people. The likelihood of complete annexation is now inevitable. The Tsunami event of December 26 represents, for the government of Indonesia, beneficence not maleficence. My best wishes to Jorge and Professor Choudry. John SAMVA , " Jorge Angelino " <jorge.angelino@n...> wrote: > Dear Professor, > > Thank you for reporting it. > > Best wishes, > > Jorge > > > SIHA [siha@v...] > domingo, 2 de Janeiro de 2005 03:00 > SAMVA > Re: INDONESIA still in great danger > > > > Hello dear Jorge, > > Fresh earthquake was felt in Indonesia (Sumatra) yesterday and it was > about > 7 on richtor scale. However, no fresh damage was reported immediately. > > Best wishes, > > > > - > " Jorge Angelino " <jorge.angelino@n...> > <SAMVA > > Friday, December 31, 2004 7:06 AM > INDONESIA still in great danger > > > Dear List Members, > > > > Indonesia is still in great danger: > > 1) The transit Moon is in H12. > > 2) Natal Jupiter is being exactly afflicted by Rahu and transit Jupiter > is under the partial aspects of natal Saturn and natal Mars. > > 3) Natal Venus will be closely afflicted by transit Sun and transit > Venus is, together with transit Mercury, L1, exactly afflicted by natal > Mars. > > 4) Transit Saturn keeps afflicting the MEP4 (almost exactly). > > > > Let us hope nothing serious happens. > > > > Best wishes, > > > > Jorge > > > > > > > > > > > <http://satva.blogspot.com/> satva > Jorge Angelino > > Rua da Sociedade Filarmónica Perpétua Azeitonense, 29 > 2925-598 Azeitão > Portugal > > > <jorge.angelino@n...> jorge.angelino@n... > > > tel: > mobile: > > 210813674 > 963916784 > > > > > > <https://www.plaxo.com/add_me? u=21475072036 & v0=451086 & k0=1260191974> > Add me to your address book... > > <http://www.plaxo.com/signature> Want a signature like this? > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 6, 2005 Report Share Posted January 6, 2005 Dear John, Thank you for this precious clarification regarding ACEH. In fact, the 1949 Indonesia chart does not explain the catastrophes I have used in the rectification. The August 17, 1945 chart does. You said, " Aceh became its own nation-state on December 4, 1976. " Do you know any details of it? Thanks in advance. Best wishes, Jorge John T W B [jtwbjakarta] quinta-feira, 6 de Janeiro de 2005 06:38 SAMVA INDONESIA still in great danger/ACEH is not INDONESIA As the tragic and catastrophic story of the South Asia Tsunami of December 26, 2004 continues to unfold, I wish to raise FOUR points of clarification, which ought to be propaedeutic to any future relevant horoscopic analysis of the event in question: FIRST: As for the doubter's of the SAMVA horoscope (Rectification by Jorge) for Indonesia: August 17, 1945. Among the doubters are those who raise the matter of Indonesia's so-called birth on December 27, 1949. Even Nicholas Campion maintains that the 1949 event is the basis of THE birthchart. In brief, Campion is wrong and Jorge is right. The 1945 horoscope is the " Nation-State " birth chart; the 1949 horoscope is the " National Government " birth chart. Grasping the difference is crucial to choosing science over chaos. SECOND: The geographic extent of the Indonesian nation-state is NOT co- terminous with the geographic extent of the Indonesian national government: The geography of the Indonesian national government encompasses the " 27 " provinces of the so-called nation, which is the expanse of Indonesia as commonly understood and reported in the press; Whereas in distinction, the geography of the Indonesian nation- state comprises " 25 " provinces, which excludes 2 " provinces " : Aceh and West Papua (New Guinea). Aceh became its own nation-state on December 4, 1976. The revolution to expel the Indonesian invaders continues. The Indonesian government is no more welcome in Aceh than George III's armies were welcome in the United States between July 2nd, 1776 and September 3, 1783. Furthermore, the nationhood of Aceh, preceding the existence of the Aceh state (necessarily so, logically and historically), has been in existence since the year 1530. THIRD: Jorge rightly points out the impact of the Tsunami on the 1945 Indonesia chart. However, the impact relates to the devastation in north Sumatra, in areas OTHER THAN Aceh. " Other than Aceh " is the pivotal consideration here, for reasons logically entailed in the matters mentioned above. FOURTH: The 1949 Indonesia chart doesn't show the catastrophic impact of the Tsunami. (And, of course, it shouldn't for one who grasps the metaphysical difference of STATE and GOVERNMENT.) However, very much to the contrary, the Tsunami's devastation of Aceh has presented a golden political opportunity for the national government of Indonesia to complete its task of the violent expropriation and domination of the Aceh people. The likelihood of complete annexation is now inevitable. The Tsunami event of December 26 represents, for the government of Indonesia, beneficence not maleficence. My best wishes to Jorge and Professor Choudry. John SAMVA , " Jorge Angelino " <jorge.angelino@n...> wrote: > Dear Professor, > > Thank you for reporting it. > > Best wishes, > > Jorge > > > SIHA [siha@v...] > domingo, 2 de Janeiro de 2005 03:00 > SAMVA > Re: INDONESIA still in great danger > > > > Hello dear Jorge, > > Fresh earthquake was felt in Indonesia (Sumatra) yesterday and it was > about > 7 on richtor scale. However, no fresh damage was reported immediately. > > Best wishes, > > > > - > " Jorge Angelino " <jorge.angelino@n...> > <SAMVA > > Friday, December 31, 2004 7:06 AM > INDONESIA still in great danger > > > Dear List Members, > > > > Indonesia is still in great danger: > > 1) The transit Moon is in H12. > > 2) Natal Jupiter is being exactly afflicted by Rahu and transit Jupiter > is under the partial aspects of natal Saturn and natal Mars. > > 3) Natal Venus will be closely afflicted by transit Sun and transit > Venus is, together with transit Mercury, L1, exactly afflicted by natal > Mars. > > 4) Transit Saturn keeps afflicting the MEP4 (almost exactly). > > > > Let us hope nothing serious happens. > > > > Best wishes, > > > > Jorge > > > > > > > > > > > <http://satva.blogspot.com/> satva > Jorge Angelino > > Rua da Sociedade Filarmónica Perpétua Azeitonense, 29 > 2925-598 Azeitão > Portugal > > > <jorge.angelino@n...> jorge.angelino@n... > > > tel: > mobile: > > 210813674 > 963916784 > > > > > > <https://www.plaxo.com/add_me? u=21475072036 & v0=451086 & k0=1260191974> > Add me to your address book... > > <http://www.plaxo.com/signature> Want a signature like this? > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 6, 2005 Report Share Posted January 6, 2005 Hi Jorge and Group The Aceh " state " generically considered has been in existence since the early 16th century. For much of its 474 years this state was monarchical. Following on its transition to democracy in he modern era, the democratic state of Aceh's first act of international cooperation was its commitment to join the Federal Republic of Indonesia on December 27, 1949. As far as Aceh was concerned, this was the sovereign act of its state joining a federal government in concert with the state of Indonesia which had been established by the Proclamation of August 17, 1945. From the point of view of Aceh's elite, this federal constitutional arrangement was quite like the USA's Articles of Confederation, a " treaty " consented to by 13 sovereign states. After 1950 Indonesia changed the character of its constitution from federal to unitary. The Aceh leadership viewed this change with suspicion. On September 20, 1953 the Governor of Aceh, David Beureueh, issued Aceh's Declaration of Independence from the Unitary Republic of Indonesia. A nine year war of Independence commenced; the revolution was put down by Sukarno's armed forces. However the Aceh elites never unanimously surrendered their nation's sovereignty. On December 4, 1976 Beureueh's Declaration was " re-issued " by the militant dissident group led by Tengku de Tiro. The passive resistance of the period 1962-1976 morphed to active resistance for a second time in post-colonial history, and has continued to the present day. I suspect that both dates: September 20, 1953 and December 4, 1976 should have to be " tested " in the SAMVA-empirical manner by determining correlations with major historic events ..... Such as the December 26th, 2004 TSUNAMI. So I will further look into the history in question in order to establish the times of day and locations of these two historic dates in Aceh's history. If any member has a ready reference for these determinations, please contribute. John SAMVA , " Jorge Angelino " <jorge.angelino@n...> wrote: > Dear John, > > Thank you for this precious clarification regarding ACEH. > > In fact, the 1949 Indonesia chart does not explain the catastrophes I > have used in the rectification. The August 17, 1945 chart does. > > You said, " Aceh became its own nation-state on December 4, 1976. " Do you > know any details of it? Thanks in advance. > > Best wishes, > > Jorge > > > John T W B [jtwbjakarta] > quinta-feira, 6 de Janeiro de 2005 06:38 > SAMVA > INDONESIA still in great danger/ACEH is not INDONESIA > > > > > As the tragic and catastrophic story of the South Asia Tsunami of > December 26, 2004 continues to unfold, I wish to raise FOUR points of > clarification, which ought to be propaedeutic to any future relevant > horoscopic analysis of the event in question: > > FIRST: > > As for the doubter's of the SAMVA horoscope (Rectification by Jorge) > for Indonesia: August 17, 1945. Among the doubters are those who > raise the matter of Indonesia's so-called birth on December 27, 1949. > Even Nicholas Campion maintains that the 1949 event is the basis of > THE birthchart. In brief, Campion is wrong and Jorge is right. The > 1945 horoscope is the " Nation-State " birth chart; the 1949 horoscope > is the " National Government " birth chart. Grasping the difference is > crucial to choosing science over chaos. > > SECOND: > > The geographic extent of the Indonesian nation-state is NOT co- > terminous with the geographic extent of the Indonesian national > government: The geography of the Indonesian national government > encompasses the " 27 " provinces of the so-called nation, which is the > expanse of Indonesia as commonly understood and reported in the > press; Whereas in distinction, the geography of the Indonesian nation- > state comprises " 25 " provinces, which excludes 2 " provinces " : Aceh > and West Papua (New Guinea). Aceh became its own nation-state on > December 4, 1976. The revolution to expel the Indonesian invaders > continues. The Indonesian government is no more welcome in Aceh than > George III's armies were welcome in the United States between July > 2nd, 1776 and September 3, 1783. Furthermore, the nationhood of Aceh, > preceding the existence of the Aceh state (necessarily so, logically > and historically), has been in existence since the year 1530. > > THIRD: > > Jorge rightly points out the impact of the Tsunami on the 1945 > Indonesia chart. However, the impact relates to the devastation in > north Sumatra, in areas OTHER THAN Aceh. " Other than Aceh " is the > pivotal consideration here, for reasons logically entailed in the > matters mentioned above. > > FOURTH: > > The 1949 Indonesia chart doesn't show the catastrophic impact of the > Tsunami. (And, of course, it shouldn't for one who grasps the > metaphysical difference of STATE and GOVERNMENT.) However, very much > to the contrary, the Tsunami's devastation of Aceh has presented a > golden political opportunity for the national government of Indonesia > to complete its task of the violent expropriation and domination of > the Aceh people. The likelihood of complete annexation is now > inevitable. The Tsunami event of December 26 represents, for the > government of Indonesia, beneficence not maleficence. > > My best wishes to Jorge and Professor Choudry. > > John > > > > > SAMVA , " Jorge Angelino " <jorge.angelino@n...> > wrote: > > Dear Professor, > > > > Thank you for reporting it. > > > > Best wishes, > > > > Jorge > > > > > > SIHA [siha@v...] > > domingo, 2 de Janeiro de 2005 03:00 > > SAMVA > > Re: INDONESIA still in great danger > > > > > > > > Hello dear Jorge, > > > > Fresh earthquake was felt in Indonesia (Sumatra) yesterday and it > was > > about > > 7 on richtor scale. However, no fresh damage was reported > immediately. > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > > > - > > " Jorge Angelino " <jorge.angelino@n...> > > <SAMVA > > > Friday, December 31, 2004 7:06 AM > > INDONESIA still in great danger > > > > > > Dear List Members, > > > > > > > > Indonesia is still in great danger: > > > > 1) The transit Moon is in H12. > > > > 2) Natal Jupiter is being exactly afflicted by Rahu and transit > Jupiter > > is under the partial aspects of natal Saturn and natal Mars. > > > > 3) Natal Venus will be closely afflicted by transit Sun and transit > > Venus is, together with transit Mercury, L1, exactly afflicted by > natal > > Mars. > > > > 4) Transit Saturn keeps afflicting the MEP4 (almost exactly). > > > > > > > > Let us hope nothing serious happens. > > > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > > > Jorge > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <http://satva.blogspot.com/> satva > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jorge Angelino > > > > Rua da Sociedade Filarmónica Perpétua Azeitonense, 29 > > 2925-598 Azeitão > > Portugal > > > > > > <jorge.angelino@n...> jorge.angelino@n... > > > > > > tel: > > mobile: > > > > 210813674 > > 963916784 > > > > > > > > > > > > <https://www.plaxo.com/add_me? > u=21475072036 & v0=451086 & k0=1260191974> > > Add me to your address book... > > > > <http://www.plaxo.com/signature> Want a signature like this? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 6, 2005 Report Share Posted January 6, 2005 Dear John, Thank you again for this clarification. I have been doing some net research, but nothing comes up regarding the most probable moment of the December 4, 1976, re-declaration of independence. For testing/rectifying the chart(s), we will also need a list of some " strong " events in ACEH. The chart in attachment is not rectified. Just to give an idea of the transits on December 26, 2004. Best wishes, Jorge John T W B [jtwbjakarta] quinta-feira, 6 de Janeiro de 2005 10:37 SAMVA Re: INDONESIA still in great danger/ACEH is not INDONESIA Hi Jorge and Group The Aceh " state " generically considered has been in existence since the early 16th century. For much of its 474 years this state was monarchical. Following on its transition to democracy in he modern era, the democratic state of Aceh's first act of international cooperation was its commitment to join the Federal Republic of Indonesia on December 27, 1949. As far as Aceh was concerned, this was the sovereign act of its state joining a federal government in concert with the state of Indonesia which had been established by the Proclamation of August 17, 1945. From the point of view of Aceh's elite, this federal constitutional arrangement was quite like the USA's Articles of Confederation, a " treaty " consented to by 13 sovereign states. After 1950 Indonesia changed the character of its constitution from federal to unitary. The Aceh leadership viewed this change with suspicion. On September 20, 1953 the Governor of Aceh, David Beureueh, issued Aceh's Declaration of Independence from the Unitary Republic of Indonesia. A nine year war of Independence commenced; the revolution was put down by Sukarno's armed forces. However the Aceh elites never unanimously surrendered their nation's sovereignty. On December 4, 1976 Beureueh's Declaration was " re-issued " by the militant dissident group led by Tengku de Tiro. The passive resistance of the period 1962-1976 morphed to active resistance for a second time in post-colonial history, and has continued to the present day. I suspect that both dates: September 20, 1953 and December 4, 1976 should have to be " tested " in the SAMVA-empirical manner by determining correlations with major historic events ..... Such as the December 26th, 2004 TSUNAMI. So I will further look into the history in question in order to establish the times of day and locations of these two historic dates in Aceh's history. If any member has a ready reference for these determinations, please contribute. John SAMVA , " Jorge Angelino " <jorge.angelino@n...> wrote: > Dear John, > > Thank you for this precious clarification regarding ACEH. > > In fact, the 1949 Indonesia chart does not explain the catastrophes I > have used in the rectification. The August 17, 1945 chart does. > > You said, " Aceh became its own nation-state on December 4, 1976. " Do you > know any details of it? Thanks in advance. > > Best wishes, > > Jorge > > > John T W B [jtwbjakarta] > quinta-feira, 6 de Janeiro de 2005 06:38 > SAMVA > INDONESIA still in great danger/ACEH is not INDONESIA > > > > > As the tragic and catastrophic story of the South Asia Tsunami of > December 26, 2004 continues to unfold, I wish to raise FOUR points of > clarification, which ought to be propaedeutic to any future relevant > horoscopic analysis of the event in question: > > FIRST: > > As for the doubter's of the SAMVA horoscope (Rectification by Jorge) > for Indonesia: August 17, 1945. Among the doubters are those who > raise the matter of Indonesia's so-called birth on December 27, 1949. > Even Nicholas Campion maintains that the 1949 event is the basis of > THE birthchart. In brief, Campion is wrong and Jorge is right. The > 1945 horoscope is the " Nation-State " birth chart; the 1949 horoscope > is the " National Government " birth chart. Grasping the difference is > crucial to choosing science over chaos. > > SECOND: > > The geographic extent of the Indonesian nation-state is NOT co- > terminous with the geographic extent of the Indonesian national > government: The geography of the Indonesian national government > encompasses the " 27 " provinces of the so-called nation, which is the > expanse of Indonesia as commonly understood and reported in the > press; Whereas in distinction, the geography of the Indonesian nation- > state comprises " 25 " provinces, which excludes 2 " provinces " : Aceh > and West Papua (New Guinea). Aceh became its own nation-state on > December 4, 1976. The revolution to expel the Indonesian invaders > continues. The Indonesian government is no more welcome in Aceh than > George III's armies were welcome in the United States between July > 2nd, 1776 and September 3, 1783. Furthermore, the nationhood of Aceh, > preceding the existence of the Aceh state (necessarily so, logically > and historically), has been in existence since the year 1530. > > THIRD: > > Jorge rightly points out the impact of the Tsunami on the 1945 > Indonesia chart. However, the impact relates to the devastation in > north Sumatra, in areas OTHER THAN Aceh. " Other than Aceh " is the > pivotal consideration here, for reasons logically entailed in the > matters mentioned above. > > FOURTH: > > The 1949 Indonesia chart doesn't show the catastrophic impact of the > Tsunami. (And, of course, it shouldn't for one who grasps the > metaphysical difference of STATE and GOVERNMENT.) However, very much > to the contrary, the Tsunami's devastation of Aceh has presented a > golden political opportunity for the national government of Indonesia > to complete its task of the violent expropriation and domination of > the Aceh people. The likelihood of complete annexation is now > inevitable. The Tsunami event of December 26 represents, for the > government of Indonesia, beneficence not maleficence. > > My best wishes to Jorge and Professor Choudry. > > John > > > > > SAMVA , " Jorge Angelino " <jorge.angelino@n...> > wrote: > > Dear Professor, > > > > Thank you for reporting it. > > > > Best wishes, > > > > Jorge > > > > > > SIHA [siha@v...] > > domingo, 2 de Janeiro de 2005 03:00 > > SAMVA > > Re: INDONESIA still in great danger > > > > > > > > Hello dear Jorge, > > > > Fresh earthquake was felt in Indonesia (Sumatra) yesterday and it > was > > about > > 7 on richtor scale. However, no fresh damage was reported > immediately. > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > > > - > > " Jorge Angelino " <jorge.angelino@n...> > > <SAMVA > > > Friday, December 31, 2004 7:06 AM > > INDONESIA still in great danger > > > > > > Dear List Members, > > > > > > > > Indonesia is still in great danger: > > > > 1) The transit Moon is in H12. > > > > 2) Natal Jupiter is being exactly afflicted by Rahu and transit > Jupiter > > is under the partial aspects of natal Saturn and natal Mars. > > > > 3) Natal Venus will be closely afflicted by transit Sun and transit > > Venus is, together with transit Mercury, L1, exactly afflicted by > natal > > Mars. > > > > 4) Transit Saturn keeps afflicting the MEP4 (almost exactly). > > > > > > > > Let us hope nothing serious happens. > > > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > > > Jorge > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <http://satva.blogspot.com/> satva > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jorge Angelino > > > > Rua da Sociedade Filarmónica Perpétua Azeitonense, 29 > > 2925-598 Azeitão > > Portugal > > > > > > <jorge.angelino@n...> jorge.angelino@n... > > > > > > tel: > > mobile: > > > > 210813674 > > 963916784 > > > > > > > > > > > > <https://www.plaxo.com/add_me? > u=21475072036 & v0=451086 & k0=1260191974> > > Add me to your address book... > > > > <http://www.plaxo.com/signature> Want a signature like this? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.