[va] Responses to Arjun Pandit in Other Groups 1 Mukhi's Business 14/8

[Guest guest]

Dear Mr. Kumar,

 

Thanx for the best wishes, Pls. rest assured, only an individual kills

his character by doing mal practises, thye did same.. forget that, it's

a past now.

 

Well, I w'd like to see what u have to say in the following case of a

US couple, they have been married for last 19 yrs, it's contrary to

Guna Matching.

 

Her birthday is August 15, 1966 at 11:57 pm

She was born in Hammond, IN - US - Zip Code 46327.

 

Her Husband Michael's birthday is June 6, 1961 at 6:01 am

He was born at Andrew's Airforce Base, MD - US - Zip Code 20762

 

regards,

Lalit.

 

 

 

 

 

 

vedic astrology , Prashant Kumar G B

<pkgoteti wrote:

>

> Lalit

>

> As I have aid earlier I am no dealer in any remedy that can be

marketed, but suggest just prayers I will pref prayers done by them

inperson at home then temples and also at home any havans done by their

own local priests we don't have a network of pundits for it at least

>

> SO NOW

>

> I woild appriciate if u can show the same zeal in exposing just lesser

mortals here who max by ur scale cheat some, but the vast majority who

don't visit astrologers here do visit many RTO, IT depts, cops, metro,

municipal officials and so on who get cheated day in day out if uc an

really prove u can fix someone pl fix 5 a month surely we all will give

u a better award for it all here I an try to mobilise them for it as of

now I know no1 here but can make an appeal like this

>

> u can see this havinga ripple effect and help many more, it is

thelka.com type fixed character assination right now,that is u know u

can fix them on fake pretexts like MP's question scams where all of them

were asked to raise questions for which they were paid and these

questions did not affect, did thelka do anyting on abdul karim telgi,

Lalo, jayalalitha, Mayavati, Mulyam YSR reddy Deve gowda family and so

on no as their brains can't match the serious criminals only can fix

some possoble criminals

>

> THIS IS A TEST that can make u a national hero, take it up this is a v

small place of max 7k members.

> and who u claim have been cornered if they r criminals they can still

be part of a diff group with a diff name they r not is proof enough just

don't go by some notional assumptions I am sure some of them it is a

coincidence or incompetence on net issues that ufeel is being exposed I

allow many to use my PC it wont mean much isnt it

> if a few mails come from the same IP but diff ID's

>

> best wishes

>

> best wishes

>

> litsol mishra.lalit wrote:

> Dear Mr. Rao,

>

> I appreciate ur slanted logic, so u mean, if a person befools next

> one, let him befool, if a person cheats next one, let him cheat coz

> this is next persons destiny... to be cheated upon, Why u r favoring

> only bullshit's destiny ,if tomorrow if someone cheats u, that's ur

> destiny, isn't it , with the approach, don't u think u r justifying

> crime only.

>

> Pls. correct ur mindset, it's destiny of the cheaters that they all

> are exposed. what's ur problem man... I m giving right information to

> members about 1 mukhi rudraakschhas. in fact, few members of our

> group only provided me bunch of informations.

>

> I will post more on 1 mukhi, coz it's ur destiny to read that and my

> destiny is to post and educate people like u.

>

> regards,

> Lalit.

>

> vedic astrology , tadiknda@ wrote:

> >

> > Dear Mr. Lalitji,

> >

> > If we believe astrology, destiny, karma etc. (hope that is the

> reason why we all are here), then it is individual's destiny to be

> befooled by any tom dick and harry and pandits are not necessary to

> fool the persons. So, such discussion have no value in today's

> system, where there are n number of cases of deceiving and getting

> deceived all over the globe. So, india is no exception, particularly

> where people are more spiritual and god fearing.

> >

> > And, also, in my opinion wise men (i think you are) does not waste

> time in such unwanted and irrelevant matters (for this group) and

> instead concentrate on educating self and in turn educating and

> helping others.

> >

> > Hope this will be taken in a right spirit instead of stamping as a

> support to some persons or rebuttal to your message.

> >

> > Don't expect any more replies from me for any of your followup

> mails.

> >

> > With blessings,

> >

> >

> > T. V. Rao

> > +91 9879110682

> >

> > -

> > litsol mishra.lalit@

> > Sunday, August 12, 2007 2:08 am

> > [vedic astrology] Responses to Arjun Pandit in Other

> Groujps 1 Mukhi's Business

> > vedic astrology

> >

> >

> > > Very Interesting : All world knows his intensions, In our

> group, he

> > > offered 1 mukhi for 5 lakhs, wherreas in other group he w'd sell

> it for

> > > 3 lakhs..

> > >

> > > This sort of spurious salesman are true enemy of Vedic

> Values, Coz

> > > such a man will use

> > > sacred text for befooling and looting ur money.

> > >

> > > There is another way of doing a business too, give ur's right

> > > introduction with ur real name, get sales tax no, income tax

> no, get

> > > ISI and other quality certificates,

> > > give gurantee and authenticity of the product and make a

> reasonable

> > > profit..., take ur responsibility.

> > >

> > > Who will call u bullshit if u r not doing wrong practise, but

> no,

> > > in

> > > India every bullshit will

> > > become a Pandit, Will exploit ur's faith and then create a

> terror

> > > in

> > > ur's heart,

> > > and will ask any price .. and if he knows there are some

> > > foreigners he

> > > will ask a price unbelievable.

> > >

> > > Well, read what's bellow, it gives u an insight of

> rudrakschhas -

> > > Lalit.

> > >

> > > ============================================================

> > >

> > > It's pasted from sacred-objects

> > > <

> > >

> > > Siddharth Mishra sidhmis@ wrote:

> > >

> > >

> > > Dear Pandit Arjun, For god sake pl dont misguide the menbers

> of this

> > > group with your stupid theories. Here no body wants your 1

> Mukhis

> > > Rudrakshas for 2 or 3 Lakhs. Pl dont befool people for own

> your

> > > commercial interests.

> > >

> > > It is a simple logic that a four Mukhi has 4

> > > chambers and four seeds similarly a 5 Mukhi has 5 seeds.

> > >

> > > There could be one odd exception where in the bead might have

> less

> > > seed.

> > > But for that exception we can not authentically comment on all

> > > Rudrakshas.

> > >

> > > Now pl dont ask me how many Rudrakshan I have cut, Respected

> Richard

> > > Sir, Pl

> > > ban this person from the group and his websit be blacklisted.

> > >

> > > He appears to be a spurious supplier of Rudrakshas whose main

> aim is

> > > to

> > > misguide

> > > people and sell his spurious 1 Mukhis. Lets have the positive

> people

> > > and

> > > knowledgeable people like you, Rajiv Krishna Dasa, Rudra

> Centre, Amit

> > > Uniyalji, etc. to guide the whole fraternity of Rudrakshas.

> > >

> > > Regards,

> > > Siddharth

> > >

> > > panditarjun2004 panditarjun2004@ wrote: dear friend ole

> > >

> > > yes, i stick to my observation that in a four, five or six

> mukhi

> > > rudraksha the gap between the lines is wide and you find the

> number

> > > of locules or chambers or seeds within it. but when comes to

> higher

> > > mukh rudrakhsa like 13, 14 and above, you would fine few

> lines having

> > > good gap and few lines especially on both sides near the

> centre, have

> > > as little as no gap between them and hence you find thier

> inner

> > > chambers mixed and you also find less number of seeds. i dont

> cut

> > > a

> > > rudraksha as lord shiva dwells in it but have seen a couple

> of 14

> > > and

> > > 13mukh beads when they got broken accidentally and then

> tested them.

> > > i am not a hyprocite to treat a rudraksha as god and then cut

> and

> > > test it like a commodity. i strictly believe a rudraksha as

> lord

> > > shiva and hence will not cut it to test it. even the

> gentleman who

> > > tested a 14mukh and found 14 loculi is laying emphasis on the

> word

> > > well developed and large sized which means all the small and

> medium

> > > sized rudraksha will not pass this test. most of the

> rudraksha of

> > > higher mukh are available in small and medium size and the

> largest

> > > beads are sold as collector beads at exorbitant prices as

> they are

> > > very rarely available.

> > >

> > > also when a rudraksha is plucked from the tree and is cleaned

> and

> > > a

> > > hole made, you would find several seeds falling off when the

> supplier

> > > makes the hole. very rarely you find a higher mukh rudraksha

> without

> > > a hole.

> > >

> > > so all i am saying is that there is no foolproof scientific

> test and

> > > system to measure the number of seeds of a rudraksha or the

> number

> > > of

> > > chambers inside the rudraksha matching the external lines.

> > >

> > > with best wishes and blessings

> > > pandit arjun

> > > www.rudraksharemedy.com

> > >

> > > sacred-objects

> > > <sacred-objects%40 , Ole Alstrup

> alstrup@

> > > wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear Pandit Arjun,

> > >

> > > Do I understand you correctly that there is no 13 or 14

> Nepali

> > > mukhi beads in existence with the equivalent number of locules

> > > inside? How many beads have you tested? What method did you

> use?

> > >

> > > Thanking you,

> > >

> > > Ole

> > >

> > > panditarjun2004 panditarjun2004@ wrote:

> > > dear brother richard

> > >

> > > you are truly blessed to see the original round ek mukh

> rudraksha

> > > with

> > > your trusted late kalibaba. hope this answers to

> disbelievers who

> > > call

> > > it a myth.

> > >

> > > elementary truth is that one would find several mukhi

> rudraksha

> > > coming

> > > from the same tree. so if one finds only one line naturally

> > > developed

> > > in a round rudraksha bead, he must construe it as a one mukh

> > > rudraksha.

> > >

> > > i challenge openly with all those laboratary test hungry

> > > disbelievers

> > > to prove 14 locules in a 14mukh rudraksha and 13 locules in

> a

> > > 13mukh

> > > rudraksha. if they start mentioning exceptions and

> impossibilities,

> > > then they must not preach locules as a certain rule to

> decipher

> > > the

> > > number of lines external matching the number of locules

> within.

> > >

> > > the gods and sages have only advised to COUNT the number of

> lines

> > > ON

> > > the rudraksha and i follow only that method treating it as

> a holy

> > > divine product with the invisible god dwelling in it.

> > >

> > > hence rudraksha is a matter of solicitation and a holy

> object of

> > > faith. a person who has faith in the sacred object and in

> the

> > > person

> > > who provides that, buys it. a person not having faith does

> not buy

> > > it. it is as simple as it is. hence there is no need for us

> to have

> > > two groups of believers and disbelievers fighting each

> other to

> > > prove

> > > their theory is correct.

> > >

> > > after all, we are all having the same objective of serving

> the

> > > natives

> > > by providing them sacred objects and i advise all rudraksha

> > > fraternity

> > > to serve their customers in their own ways instead of

> criticising

> > > others in an internecine way.

> > >

> > > with best wishes and blessings

> > > pandit arjun

> > > www.rudraksharemedy.com

> > >

> > > sacred-objects

> > > <sacred-objects%40 , " Richard Shaw-

> Brown "

> > > <rsbj66@ wrote:

> > >

> > > Dear All,

> > >

> > > It is amazing. If you want to see action in this group,

> then just

> > > question goal dhana Eka Mukhi.

> > >

> > > Late Kali Baba of Nepal had a genuine goal dhana eka

> mukhi. For

> > > certain. Seeing very closely is believing. And Kali Baba

> deserved

> > > Eka

> > > Mukhi. Actually Eka Mukhi is the ornament of

> Advaitavadins,

> > > tyagis,

> > > not Grihastas. I wouldn't wear an eka mukhi even if I had

> one.

> > > I

> > > would

> > > worship it as Lord Shiva. In my opinion Chaturdasha Mukhi

> is the

> > > ultimate for Grihastas.

> > >

> > > Y/s,

> > > Richard

> > >

> > >

> > >

> > >