How Other Group's Responds to Arjun Pandit for his 1 Mukhi's Business

[Guest guest]

It's pastred from sacred-objects

<sacred-objects >

 

Very Interesting : All world knows his intensions : In this group, he

offered 1 mukhi for 5 lakhs, wherreas in other group he say to sale it

for 3 lakhs..

 

This sort of salesman are true enemy of Vedic Values, Coz he will use

sacred text for befooling and looting ur money. There is another way of

doing a business, give ur's right introduction with ur real name, get

sales tax no, income tax no, get ISI and other quality certificates,

give gurantee and authenticity of the product and make a reasonable

profit..., take ur responsibility.

 

Who will call u bullshit, but no, in India every bullshit will become a

Pandit, Will exploit ur's faith and then create a terror in ur's heart,

and will ask any price .. and if he knows there are some foreigners he

will ask a price unbelievable.

 

Well, read what's bellow, it gives u an insight of rudrakschhas - Lalit.

 

Siddharth Mishra <sidhmis wrote:

Dear Pandit Arjun, For god sake pl dont misguide the menbers of this

group with your stupid theories. Here no body wants your 1 Mukhis

Rudrakshas for 2 or 3 Lakhs. Pl dont befool people for own your

commercial interests. It is a simple logic that a four Mukhi has 4

chambers and four seeds similarly a 5 Mukhi has 5 seeds. There could be

one odd exception where in the bead might have less seed. But for that

exception we can not authentically comment on all Rudrakshas. Now pl

dont ask me how many Rudrakshan I have cut. Respected Richard Sir, Pl

ban this person from the group and his websit be blacklisted. He appears

to be a spurious supplier of Rudrakshas whose main aim is to misguide

people and sell his spurious 1 Mukhis. Lets have the positive people and

knowledgeable people like you, Rajiv Krishna Dasa, Rudra Centre, Amit

Uniyalji, etc. to guide the whole fraternity of Rudrakshas. Regards,

Siddharth

 

panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004 wrote: dear friend ole

 

yes, i stick to my observation that in a four, five or six mukhi

rudraksha the gap between the lines is wide and you find the number

of locules or chambers or seeds within it. but when comes to higher

mukh rudrakhsa like 13, 14 and above, you would fine few lines having

good gap and few lines especially on both sides near the centre, have

as little as no gap between them and hence you find thier inner

chambers mixed and you also find less number of seeds. i dont cut a

rudraksha as lord shiva dwells in it but have seen a couple of 14 and

13mukh beads when they got broken accidentally and then tested them.

i am not a hyprocite to treat a rudraksha as god and then cut and

test it like a commodity. i strictly believe a rudraksha as lord

shiva and hence will not cut it to test it. even the gentleman who

tested a 14mukh and found 14 loculi is laying emphasis on the word

well developed and large sized which means all the small and medium

sized rudraksha will not pass this test. most of the rudraksha of

higher mukh are available in small and medium size and the largest

beads are sold as collector beads at exorbitant prices as they are

very rarely available.

 

also when a rudraksha is plucked from the tree and is cleaned and a

hole made, you would find several seeds falling off when the supplier

makes the hole. very rarely you find a higher mukh rudraksha without

a hole.

 

so all i am saying is that there is no foolproof scientific test and

system to measure the number of seeds of a rudraksha or the number of

chambers inside the rudraksha matching the external lines.

 

with best wishes and blessings

pandit arjun

www.rudraksharemedy.com

 

sacred-objects

<sacred-objects%40> , Ole Alstrup <alstrup

wrote:

>

> Dear Pandit Arjun,

>

> Do I understand you correctly that there is no 13 or 14 Nepali

mukhi beads in existence with the equivalent number of locules

inside? How many beads have you tested? What method did you use?

>

> Thanking you,

>

> Ole

>

> panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004 wrote:

> dear brother richard

>

> you are truly blessed to see the original round ek mukh rudraksha

with

> your trusted late kalibaba. hope this answers to disbelievers who

call

> it a myth.

>

> elementary truth is that one would find several mukhi rudraksha

coming

> from the same tree. so if one finds only one line naturally

developed

> in a round rudraksha bead, he must construe it as a one mukh

rudraksha.

>

> i challenge openly with all those laboratary test hungry

disbelievers

> to prove 14 locules in a 14mukh rudraksha and 13 locules in a

13mukh

> rudraksha. if they start mentioning exceptions and impossibilities,

> then they must not preach locules as a certain rule to decipher the

> number of lines external matching the number of locules within.

>

> the gods and sages have only advised to COUNT the number of lines

ON

> the rudraksha and i follow only that method treating it as a holy

> divine product with the invisible god dwelling in it.

>

> hence rudraksha is a matter of solicitation and a holy object of

> faith. a person who has faith in the sacred object and in the

person

> who provides that, buys it. a person not having faith does not buy

> it. it is as simple as it is. hence there is no need for us to have

> two groups of believers and disbelievers fighting each other to

prove

> their theory is correct.

>

> after all, we are all having the same objective of serving the

natives

> by providing them sacred objects and i advise all rudraksha

fraternity

> to serve their customers in their own ways instead of criticising

> others in an internecine way.

>

> with best wishes and blessings

> pandit arjun

> www.rudraksharemedy.com

>

> sacred-objects

<sacred-objects%40> , " Richard Shaw-Brown "

> <rsbj66@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear All,

> >

> > It is amazing. If you want to see action in this group, then just

> > question goal dhana Eka Mukhi.

> >

> > Late Kali Baba of Nepal had a genuine goal dhana eka mukhi. For

> > certain. Seeing very closely is believing. And Kali Baba deserved

Eka

> > Mukhi. Actually Eka Mukhi is the ornament of Advaitavadins,

tyagis,

> > not Grihastas. I wouldn't wear an eka mukhi even if I had one. I

would

> > worship it as Lord Shiva. In my opinion Chaturdasha Mukhi is the

> > ultimate for Grihastas.

> >

> > Y/s,

> > Richard