Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Brahmin - Guru or Sukraa ?

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

Namaste,

 

 

Guru / Sukraa represent Brahmin?

 

Then should there be a diagonal exists in between them.

 

Are we in order to say Guru / Sukraa have one and the same graham “ruppaa”?

Why this confusion exists?

Why not any one of the above represents Brahmin?

 

I am confused to reason for as to why the Aathikartha of Jyothish had allotted

TWO planets to represent one sect.

 

 

 

 

oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers, not web links.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Dear KRji,

 

Adage “Nadhi moolam and Rishi moolam” should not be probed into for it is

beyond ones capability for we may land in unavoidable human errors in making

judgements.

 

 

 

It is also true that Guru and Sukraa portray ‘Brahmana’ graha rupaas even though

Brahmins represent one sect; there are said be SIX different classifications

according to their duties allotted (SHARMA, VARMAA, GUPTA, DAASAA, MILECHAA AND

NEECHA [in the literal sense]).The first three of the above is represented by

GURU GRAHA and the later three is represented by SUKRAA GRAHA in deciding the

above ,their gunaadisya and nature of services to the society play a pivotal

role.

 

 

 

 

 

The first three have SAATHVIK, RAJASIK OR A COMBINATION BOTH and the later

three have THAAMASIK, RAJASIK OR COMBINATION OF BOTH predominantly cruel thinker

and Hench man with veenayam mostly self centred for personal gains discarding

the values of life like “DRUTHRASHA CATS”(a Tamil adage).

With regards,

D.Sathiyanarayana Gupta.

 

P.S: My intention is not to offend any individual / group.I request

Aathraya,Adavi Srinivasamoorthy to share their balance views.

 

 

 

KARUNAAKARAM RAAGHAVAM <munisevitham wrote:

Namaste,

 

 

Guru / Sukraa represent Brahmin?

 

Then should there be a diagonal exists in between them.

 

Are we in order to say Guru / Sukraa have one and the same graham “ruppaa”?

Why this confusion exists?

Why not any one of the above represents Brahmin?

 

I am confused to reason for as to why the Aathikartha of Jyothish had allotted

TWO planets to represent one sect.

 

 

 

oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers, not web links.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dear guptaji

 

your elaboration is appreciated.

 

even though scriptures mention sukra dosham to be considered while

matchmaking, many modern astrologers are reckoning only kuja dosham

and are ignoring sukra dosham. sukra in 6,8,12 houses forms sukra

dosham.

 

with best wishes and blessings

pandit arjun

www.rudraksharemedy.com

 

vedic astrology , Sathiyanarayana Gupta

<gupta816 wrote:

>

>

> Dear KRji,

>

> Adage " Nadhi moolam and Rishi moolam " should not be probed into

for it is beyond ones capability for we may land in unavoidable human

errors in making judgements.

>

>

>

> It is also true that Guru and Sukraa portray `Brahmana' graha

rupaas even though Brahmins represent one sect; there are said be SIX

different classifications according to their duties allotted (SHARMA,

VARMAA, GUPTA, DAASAA, MILECHAA AND NEECHA [in the literal

sense]).The first three of the above is represented by GURU GRAHA and

the later three is represented by SUKRAA GRAHA in deciding the

above ,their gunaadisya and nature of services to the society play a

pivotal role.

>

>

>

>

>

> The first three have SAATHVIK, RAJASIK OR A COMBINATION BOTH and

the later three have THAAMASIK, RAJASIK OR COMBINATION OF BOTH

predominantly cruel thinker and Hench man with veenayam mostly self

centred for personal gains discarding the values of life

like " DRUTHRASHA CATS " (a Tamil adage).

> With regards,

> D.Sathiyanarayana Gupta.

>

> P.S: My intention is not to offend any individual / group.I

request Aathraya,Adavi Srinivasamoorthy to share their balance views.

>

>

>

> KARUNAAKARAM RAAGHAVAM <munisevitham

wrote: Namaste,

>

>

> Guru / Sukraa represent Brahmin?

>

> Then should there be a diagonal exists in between them.

>

> Are we in order to say Guru / Sukraa have one and the same

graham " ruppaa " ?

> Why this confusion exists?

> Why not any one of the above represents Brahmin?

>

> I am confused to reason for as to why the Aathikartha of Jyothish

had allotted TWO planets to represent one sect.

>

>

>

>

> oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers, not

web links.

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dear Shri.Pt.Arjunji,

“Vasishta’s pronunciation confers Brahma Rishi”-An adage, thanks for (the

Pundits) your recognition, because I always consider that the Pundits are deep

thinkers.

Yes, I agree to your suggestions to consider disposition Sukra for matrimonial

match making. In my ‘balapaada’ I was taught the dispositions of natural benefic

in 3rd,6th,8th,12th houses shall not bestow good results, similarly disposition

of natural malefic in 1st,2nd,4th,5th,7th,9th,11th houses shall only bestow

adverse results.

Further besides Angaaraha dosa, I also consider to see Ragu, Ketu dosha and

Sani dosha while matrimonial matchmaking.

With regards,

D.Sathiyanarayana Gupta

P.S:On priority basis I evaluate doshas.

 

panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004 wrote:

dear guptaji

 

your elaboration is appreciated.

 

even though scriptures mention sukra dosham to be considered while

matchmaking, many modern astrologers are reckoning only kuja dosham

and are ignoring sukra dosham. sukra in 6,8,12 houses forms sukra

dosham.

 

with best wishes and blessings

pandit arjun

www.rudraksharemedy.com

 

vedic astrology , Sathiyanarayana Gupta

<gupta816 wrote:

>

>

> Dear KRji,

>

> Adage " Nadhi moolam and Rishi moolam " should not be probed into

for it is beyond ones capability for we may land in unavoidable human

errors in making judgements.

>

>

>

> It is also true that Guru and Sukraa portray `Brahmana' graha

rupaas even though Brahmins represent one sect; there are said be SIX

different classifications according to their duties allotted (SHARMA,

VARMAA, GUPTA, DAASAA, MILECHAA AND NEECHA [in the literal

sense]).The first three of the above is represented by GURU GRAHA and

the later three is represented by SUKRAA GRAHA in deciding the

above ,their gunaadisya and nature of services to the society play a

pivotal role.

>

>

>

>

>

> The first three have SAATHVIK, RAJASIK OR A COMBINATION BOTH and

the later three have THAAMASIK, RAJASIK OR COMBINATION OF BOTH

predominantly cruel thinker and Hench man with veenayam mostly self

centred for personal gains discarding the values of life

like " DRUTHRASHA CATS " (a Tamil adage).

> With regards,

> D.Sathiyanarayana Gupta.

>

> P.S: My intention is not to offend any individual / group.I

request Aathraya,Adavi Srinivasamoorthy to share their balance views.

>

>

>

> KARUNAAKARAM RAAGHAVAM <munisevitham

wrote: Namaste,

>

>

> Guru / Sukraa represent Brahmin?

>

> Then should there be a diagonal exists in between them.

>

> Are we in order to say Guru / Sukraa have one and the same

graham " ruppaa " ?

> Why this confusion exists?

> Why not any one of the above represents Brahmin?

>

> I am confused to reason for as to why the Aathikartha of Jyothish

had allotted TWO planets to represent one sect.

>

>

>

>

> oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers, not

web links.

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

vedic astrology , Sathiyanarayana Gupta

<gupta816 wrote:

>

> Dear Shri.Pt.Arjunji,

> " Vasishta's pronunciation confers Brahma Rishi " -An adage, thanks

for (the Pundits) your recognition, because I always consider that

the Pundits are deep thinkers.

> Yes, I agree to your suggestions to consider disposition Sukra

for matrimonial match making. In my `balapaada' I was taught the

dispositions of natural benefic in 3rd,6th,8th,12th houses shall not

bestow good results, similarly disposition of natural malefic in

1st,2nd,4th,5th,7th,9th,11th houses shall only bestow adverse results.

> Further besides Angaaraha dosa, I also consider to see Ragu, Ketu

dosha and Sani dosha while matrimonial matchmaking.

> With regards,

> D.Sathiyanarayana Gupta

> P.S:On priority basis I evaluate doshas.

>

> panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004

wrote: dear guptaji

>

> your elaboration is appreciated.

>

> even though scriptures mention sukra dosham to be considered while

> matchmaking, many modern astrologers are reckoning only kuja

dosham

> and are ignoring sukra dosham. sukra in 6,8,12 houses forms sukra

> dosham.

>

> with best wishes and blessings

> pandit arjun

> www.rudraksharemedy.com

>

> vedic astrology , Sathiyanarayana Gupta

> <gupta816@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > Dear KRji,

> >

> > Adage " Nadhi moolam and Rishi moolam " should not be probed

into

> for it is beyond ones capability for we may land in unavoidable

human

> errors in making judgements.

> >

> >

> >

> > It is also true that Guru and Sukraa portray `Brahmana' graha

> rupaas even though Brahmins represent one sect; there are said be

SIX

> different classifications according to their duties allotted

(SHARMA,

> VARMAA, GUPTA, DAASAA, MILECHAA AND NEECHA [in the literal

> sense]).The first three of the above is represented by GURU GRAHA

and

> the later three is represented by SUKRAA GRAHA in deciding the

> above ,their gunaadisya and nature of services to the society play

a

> pivotal role.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > The first three have SAATHVIK, RAJASIK OR A COMBINATION BOTH

and

> the later three have THAAMASIK, RAJASIK OR COMBINATION OF BOTH

> predominantly cruel thinker and Hench man with veenayam mostly

self

> centred for personal gains discarding the values of life

> like " DRUTHRASHA CATS " (a Tamil adage).

> > With regards,

> > D.Sathiyanarayana Gupta.

> >

> > P.S: My intention is not to offend any individual / group.I

> request Aathraya,Adavi Srinivasamoorthy to share their balance

views.

> >

> >

> >

> > KARUNAAKARAM RAAGHAVAM <munisevitham@>

> wrote: Namaste,

> >

> >

> > Guru / Sukraa represent Brahmin?

> >

> > Then should there be a diagonal exists in between them.

> >

> > Are we in order to say Guru / Sukraa have one and the same

> graham " ruppaa " ?

> > Why this confusion exists?

> > Why not any one of the above represents Brahmin?

> >

> > I am confused to reason for as to why the Aathikartha of

Jyothish

> had allotted TWO planets to represent one sect.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers,

not

> web links.

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

dear guptaji

 

my gurus have always taught me to first compliment any fraternal

contribution and then supplement it with my own knoweldge. this way

we not only learn but hone our skills and enhance our knoweldge in a

peaceful manner.

 

knowledge is like light and the more you share the more you learn.

 

may jupiter's light bless all contributing astrologers in this group

including yourself.

 

i encourage both astrologers and learners to pose more queries on the

subject and seek more clarifications so that we would be given an

opportunity to share our knoweldge. earlier we used to have so many

threads on discussing various subject related points and we are

missing them for past few months.

 

with best wishes and blessings

pandit arjun

www.rudraksharemedy.com

 

vedic astrology , Sathiyanarayana Gupta

<gupta816 wrote:

>

> Dear Shri.Pt.Arjunji,

> " Vasishta's pronunciation confers Brahma Rishi " -An adage, thanks

for (the Pundits) your recognition, because I always consider that

the Pundits are deep thinkers.

> Yes, I agree to your suggestions to consider disposition Sukra

for matrimonial match making. In my `balapaada' I was taught the

dispositions of natural benefic in 3rd,6th,8th,12th houses shall not

bestow good results, similarly disposition of natural malefic in

1st,2nd,4th,5th,7th,9th,11th houses shall only bestow adverse results.

> Further besides Angaaraha dosa, I also consider to see Ragu, Ketu

dosha and Sani dosha while matrimonial matchmaking.

> With regards,

> D.Sathiyanarayana Gupta

> P.S:On priority basis I evaluate doshas.

>

> panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004

wrote: dear guptaji

>

> your elaboration is appreciated.

>

> even though scriptures mention sukra dosham to be considered while

> matchmaking, many modern astrologers are reckoning only kuja

dosham

> and are ignoring sukra dosham. sukra in 6,8,12 houses forms sukra

> dosham.

>

> with best wishes and blessings

> pandit arjun

> www.rudraksharemedy.com

>

> vedic astrology , Sathiyanarayana Gupta

> <gupta816@> wrote:

> >

> >

> > Dear KRji,

> >

> > Adage " Nadhi moolam and Rishi moolam " should not be probed

into

> for it is beyond ones capability for we may land in unavoidable

human

> errors in making judgements.

> >

> >

> >

> > It is also true that Guru and Sukraa portray `Brahmana' graha

> rupaas even though Brahmins represent one sect; there are said be

SIX

> different classifications according to their duties allotted

(SHARMA,

> VARMAA, GUPTA, DAASAA, MILECHAA AND NEECHA [in the literal

> sense]).The first three of the above is represented by GURU GRAHA

and

> the later three is represented by SUKRAA GRAHA in deciding the

> above ,their gunaadisya and nature of services to the society play

a

> pivotal role.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > The first three have SAATHVIK, RAJASIK OR A COMBINATION BOTH

and

> the later three have THAAMASIK, RAJASIK OR COMBINATION OF BOTH

> predominantly cruel thinker and Hench man with veenayam mostly

self

> centred for personal gains discarding the values of life

> like " DRUTHRASHA CATS " (a Tamil adage).

> > With regards,

> > D.Sathiyanarayana Gupta.

> >

> > P.S: My intention is not to offend any individual / group.I

> request Aathraya,Adavi Srinivasamoorthy to share their balance

views.

> >

> >

> >

> > KARUNAAKARAM RAAGHAVAM <munisevitham@>

> wrote: Namaste,

> >

> >

> > Guru / Sukraa represent Brahmin?

> >

> > Then should there be a diagonal exists in between them.

> >

> > Are we in order to say Guru / Sukraa have one and the same

> graham " ruppaa " ?

> > Why this confusion exists?

> > Why not any one of the above represents Brahmin?

> >

> > I am confused to reason for as to why the Aathikartha of

Jyothish

> had allotted TWO planets to represent one sect.

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers,

not

> web links.

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

sir,

KINDLY READ AS " PRONOUNCEMENT " INSTEAD OF " PRONUNCIATION "

I REGRET THE ERROR.

dsg.

 

Sathiyanarayana Gupta <gupta816 wrote:

Dear Shri.Pt.Arjunji,

“Vasishta’s pronunciation confers Brahma Rishi”-An adage, thanks for (the

Pundits) your recognition, because I always consider that the Pundits are deep

thinkers.

Yes, I agree to your suggestions to consider disposition Sukra for

matrimonial match making. In my ‘balapaada’ I was taught the dispositions of

natural benefic in 3rd,6th,8th,12th houses shall not bestow good results,

similarly disposition of natural malefic in 1st,2nd,4th,5th,7th,9th,11th houses

shall only bestow adverse results.

Further besides Angaaraha dosa, I also consider to see Ragu, Ketu dosha and

Sani dosha while matrimonial matchmaking.

With regards,

D.Sathiyanarayana Gupta

P.S:On priority basis I evaluate doshas.

 

panditarjun2004 <panditarjun2004 wrote:

dear guptaji

 

your elaboration is appreciated.

 

even though scriptures mention sukra dosham to be considered while

matchmaking, many modern astrologers are reckoning only kuja dosham

and are ignoring sukra dosham. sukra in 6,8,12 houses forms sukra

dosham.

 

with best wishes and blessings

pandit arjun

www.rudraksharemedy.com

 

vedic astrology , Sathiyanarayana Gupta

<gupta816 wrote:

>

>

> Dear KRji,

>

> Adage " Nadhi moolam and Rishi moolam " should not be probed into

for it is beyond ones capability for we may land in unavoidable human

errors in making judgements.

>

>

>

> It is also true that Guru and Sukraa portray `Brahmana' graha

rupaas even though Brahmins represent one sect; there are said be SIX

different classifications according to their duties allotted (SHARMA,

VARMAA, GUPTA, DAASAA, MILECHAA AND NEECHA [in the literal

sense]).The first three of the above is represented by GURU GRAHA and

the later three is represented by SUKRAA GRAHA in deciding the

above ,their gunaadisya and nature of services to the society play a

pivotal role.

>

>

>

>

>

> The first three have SAATHVIK, RAJASIK OR A COMBINATION BOTH and

the later three have THAAMASIK, RAJASIK OR COMBINATION OF BOTH

predominantly cruel thinker and Hench man with veenayam mostly self

centred for personal gains discarding the values of life

like " DRUTHRASHA CATS " (a Tamil adage).

> With regards,

> D.Sathiyanarayana Gupta.

>

> P.S: My intention is not to offend any individual / group.I

request Aathraya,Adavi Srinivasamoorthy to share their balance views.

>

>

>

> KARUNAAKARAM RAAGHAVAM <munisevitham

wrote: Namaste,

>

>

> Guru / Sukraa represent Brahmin?

>

> Then should there be a diagonal exists in between them.

>

> Are we in order to say Guru / Sukraa have one and the same

graham " ruppaa " ?

> Why this confusion exists?

> Why not any one of the above represents Brahmin?

>

> I am confused to reason for as to why the Aathikartha of Jyothish

had allotted TWO planets to represent one sect.

>

>

>

>

> oneSearch: Finally, mobile search that gives answers, not

web links.

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...