Observations on relationship btwn MohanRaam and Pt. Dakshinamoorthiji

[Guest guest]

I will put my observations :

 

Pt. Dakschhinamurty has good knowledge of Astrology and has good

collection of classics. his has good writing skills, soft and

convincing.

 

He owns a Master degree in Psychology..... (mind it)

 

And this MohanRaam.

 

Observe his way of writing, same sort of composition in english as

Pt. Dakschhina has.

 

U see, this MohanRaam repeatedly uses some medical terms of mental

disorderness, talks about Psychology and Psychiatrists, discusses

symptoms and suggests remedies ......

 

Now, watch him closely..., what he claims, astutely !!

 

 

He spreads teror, a scaremonger , He owns destructive occult power,

and if u speak a bit about Pt. Dakschhinamurty, He will curse u, will

kill u.. and bla bla...

 

Pt. Dakschhinamurthy has been selected in defence for the position

of " Commander " or something like this ....

 

Mohanraam gives his introduction like he was in army, participated in

bangladesh war...

 

his age is 86+.

 

now calculate, he was an officer in army, well, his designation is

not known, assuming he was a Major in army, the average age for a

major in army is 35-37.

 

bangladesh war happened in 1971, if we add 36+36 = 72, He can't be

86, may be he was not a major/col. also.

 

Now, come to, His typing...

 

Looks, He writes faster than a paid typist, with no mistakes,

beleive, he is 86... and his fingers are so nice.

 

He has only one pupose, that is to spread terror of his

occultpower.., How, By creating a Psychological Game to curb other's

opinions, amd particularly if there is any thing related with Pt.

Dakschhinamurty.

 

I have not traced his IP address, wherefrom he posts his mails, But,

I m prone to think, Some Nexus, Some Link between two mail Ids.

 

I leave it to the group to observe his behavior.

 

regards,

Lalit.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

vedic astrology , " mohanraaam " <mohanraaam

wrote:

>

> Dear Group:

>

> Lalith has made a serious allegation that " there is a nexus between

> me and Pandit Dakshinamoorthi " ....There have been certain other

> persons also who have alluded to that in the past....I want to

> clarify on that.....

>

> I accept that definitely I am an admirer of Pandit

Dakshinamoorthiji

> because as an elderly yogi who has seen life, very rarely have I

come

> across a person of such a calibre and definitely not in this

present

> generation. So, I do write glowingly about him, and I do get

tensed

> when someone attacks him, and retort with mails.

>

> But, there is no unholy nexus between us. I am not a " paid "

agent.

> I write only what I have felt about him. I have no mal intentions

in

> that. I do not think Panditji needs a person like me to sing his

> praise; as someone in this group wrote earlier " Knowledge needs no

> introduction " , and Panditji's knowledge would have been obvious to

> everyone in the group.

>

> I am supporting Panditji only because as you all might be aware, he

> was not contributing to the group regularly for sometime; when

asked,

> he said that there were unnecessary controversies and he felt it is

> beneath a scholar to indulge in unsavoury exchanges, at the same

> time, as a practising professional he cannot afford to keep quite

if

> someone attacks his professionalism which might spoil his

> professional image. So, I brought him back with the promise that I

> will be his mouthpiece and spokesperson to defend him if unsavoury

> controversies arise. Even initially, it was on my invitation that

> Guruji joined this group in the first instance. I did this only

for

> the benefit of the learner of the group. Guruji is a very private

> person who tends to hide his Glow in a bushel. I wanted his

> intelligence and wisdom to benefit many and that is why I

introduced

> him to the group; and I support him and write mails only so that he

> does not quit the group due to unsavoury incidents. Old members

will

> remember that I was once even banned from the group.

>

> Other than this, there is no other unholy or mal intentions in my

> supporting Guruji. Definitely, this is not at his request. He is

> not one to make such requests. He will be patient to his limits;

and

> if his limit exceeds, he will just walk away from the group which

> will be the loss to the group. That is why, in an attempt to

retain

> his services here, I do write supporting him.

>

> In exchanges with Lalith, Guruji is not involved at all. In fact,

he

> requested me not to fight with Lalith and asked me to ignore him.

> But, the challenging tone of Lalith only impels me to write again

and

> again. But, Guruji's name is unnecessarily drawn into this.

>

> THE TRUTH IS THAT I HAVE SEEN GURUJI; BUT GURUJI HAS NOT SEEN ME

EVEN

> ONCE IN HIS LIFE.

>

> Blessings,

> Mohanraaam

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Group:

 

I have nothing to comment on this! I leave it to the group to

decide, if the necessity arises. But the allegation has definitely

pained me beyond words can express.

 

Blessed be.

Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI

 

vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit

wrote:

>

> I will put my observations :

>

> Pt. Dakschhinamurty has good knowledge of Astrology and has good

> collection of classics. his has good writing skills, soft and

> convincing.

>

> He owns a Master degree in Psychology..... (mind it)

>

> And this MohanRaam.

>

> Observe his way of writing, same sort of composition in english as

> Pt. Dakschhina has.

>

> U see, this MohanRaam repeatedly uses some medical terms of mental

> disorderness, talks about Psychology and Psychiatrists, discusses

> symptoms and suggests remedies ......

>

> Now, watch him closely..., what he claims, astutely !!

>

>

> He spreads teror, a scaremonger , He owns destructive occult power,

> and if u speak a bit about Pt. Dakschhinamurty, He will curse u,

will

> kill u.. and bla bla...

>

> Pt. Dakschhinamurthy has been selected in defence for the position

> of " Commander " or something like this ....

>

> Mohanraam gives his introduction like he was in army, participated

in

> bangladesh war...

>

> his age is 86+.

>

> now calculate, he was an officer in army, well, his designation is

> not known, assuming he was a Major in army, the average age for a

> major in army is 35-37.

>

> bangladesh war happened in 1971, if we add 36+36 = 72, He can't be

> 86, may be he was not a major/col. also.

>

> Now, come to, His typing...

>

> Looks, He writes faster than a paid typist, with no mistakes,

> beleive, he is 86... and his fingers are so nice.

>

> He has only one pupose, that is to spread terror of his

> occultpower.., How, By creating a Psychological Game to curb

other's

> opinions, amd particularly if there is any thing related with Pt.

> Dakschhinamurty.

>

> I have not traced his IP address, wherefrom he posts his mails,

But,

> I m prone to think, Some Nexus, Some Link between two mail Ids.

>

> I leave it to the group to observe his behavior.

>

> regards,

> Lalit.

>

>

>

>

>

vedic astrology , " mohanraaam " <mohanraaam@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Group:

> >

> > Lalith has made a serious allegation that " there is a nexus

between

> > me and Pandit Dakshinamoorthi " ....There have been certain other

> > persons also who have alluded to that in the past....I want to

> > clarify on that.....

> >

> > I accept that definitely I am an admirer of Pandit

> Dakshinamoorthiji

> > because as an elderly yogi who has seen life, very rarely have I

> come

> > across a person of such a calibre and definitely not in this

> present

> > generation. So, I do write glowingly about him, and I do get

> tensed

> > when someone attacks him, and retort with mails.

> >

> > But, there is no unholy nexus between us. I am not a " paid "

> agent.

> > I write only what I have felt about him. I have no mal

intentions

> in

> > that. I do not think Panditji needs a person like me to sing his

> > praise; as someone in this group wrote earlier " Knowledge needs

no

> > introduction " , and Panditji's knowledge would have been obvious

to

> > everyone in the group.

> >

> > I am supporting Panditji only because as you all might be aware,

he

> > was not contributing to the group regularly for sometime; when

> asked,

> > he said that there were unnecessary controversies and he felt it

is

> > beneath a scholar to indulge in unsavoury exchanges, at the same

> > time, as a practising professional he cannot afford to keep quite

> if

> > someone attacks his professionalism which might spoil his

> > professional image. So, I brought him back with the promise that

I

> > will be his mouthpiece and spokesperson to defend him if

unsavoury

> > controversies arise. Even initially, it was on my invitation

that

> > Guruji joined this group in the first instance. I did this only

> for

> > the benefit of the learner of the group. Guruji is a very private

> > person who tends to hide his Glow in a bushel. I wanted his

> > intelligence and wisdom to benefit many and that is why I

> introduced

> > him to the group; and I support him and write mails only so that

he

> > does not quit the group due to unsavoury incidents. Old members

> will

> > remember that I was once even banned from the group.

> >

> > Other than this, there is no other unholy or mal intentions in my

> > supporting Guruji. Definitely, this is not at his request. He

is

> > not one to make such requests. He will be patient to his limits;

> and

> > if his limit exceeds, he will just walk away from the group which

> > will be the loss to the group. That is why, in an attempt to

> retain

> > his services here, I do write supporting him.

> >

> > In exchanges with Lalith, Guruji is not involved at all. In

fact,

> he

> > requested me not to fight with Lalith and asked me to ignore

him.

> > But, the challenging tone of Lalith only impels me to write again

> and

> > again. But, Guruji's name is unnecessarily drawn into this.

> >

> > THE TRUTH IS THAT I HAVE SEEN GURUJI; BUT GURUJI HAS NOT SEEN ME

> EVEN

> > ONCE IN HIS LIFE.

> >

> > Blessings,

> > Mohanraaam

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Dear Lalith:

 

You need not trouble yourself with tracing the IP address.....You

will get the IP address of Panditji only if you trace it. I have

been sending it from his computer only.

 

Yesterday night, we had a long session of exchange; at that time

Panditji was asleep, and his younger brother and mother were also

there in the house at that time. His computer was inside his locked

office room.

 

You who speak of miracles must know that there are people capable of

doing those things. I have consumed large amounts of food from his

house which no normal human being can do.......His whole family knows

of all these. They are all perplexed by that.

 

Guruji has himself traced the IP id once to his own computer when he

got it traced through a software engineer client of his...So, it is

nothing new.

 

By the way, I was not a major in the Indian army during the

Bangladesh war....how did you assume I was only a " major " ? What

makes you think that I did not serve earlier wars? What makes you

think that I was not a Brigadier at that time?

 

Young man you have a long way to go in occult to understand that many

miracles can happen in normal life.......I have not threatened you

with death or anything......I had infact openly written that I have

not even cursed you.

 

Guruji has no connection with me; he is not asking me to do what I am

doing. I have been typing from his computer - sometimes even as he

is chatting with clients, I have sent mails from his email id. You

can check the time stamps to confirm this. One software engineer who

traced this (on the request of Panditji himself) found that 5

different mails had been sent at the same time that too in detail and

in reply to mails received at the same time (it was not a stored mail

being sent; but a live mail sent as a reply to 5 different persons).

 

So, tracing IP address will prove nothing. You may erraneously

assume that Panditji or someone in his family might be doing that (he

has parallel connection and his brother uses the other connection

from his room; so you might assume that if it is not Panditji,

someone close to him is doing that......But even that is not true.

His family is as perplexed by some of my activities as you are all!)

 

If Panditji and I are the same, how come he receives my mails? Why

does he write to my email id? Is it humanly possible to maintain

such elaborate set up, and what purpose it will serve?

 

Your doubt is not baseless, but a simple logical thinking will tell

you that it is not possible for a man of his schedule to indulge in

empty antics like that!

 

If the group can believe this, let them believe. I have said THE

TRUTH.

 

Mohanraaam.

 

vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit

wrote:

>

> I will put my observations :

>

> Pt. Dakschhinamurty has good knowledge of Astrology and has good

> collection of classics. his has good writing skills, soft and

> convincing.

>

> He owns a Master degree in Psychology..... (mind it)

>

> And this MohanRaam.

>

> Observe his way of writing, same sort of composition in english as

> Pt. Dakschhina has.

>

> U see, this MohanRaam repeatedly uses some medical terms of mental

> disorderness, talks about Psychology and Psychiatrists, discusses

> symptoms and suggests remedies ......

>

> Now, watch him closely..., what he claims, astutely !!

>

>

> He spreads teror, a scaremonger , He owns destructive occult power,

> and if u speak a bit about Pt. Dakschhinamurty, He will curse u,

will

> kill u.. and bla bla...

>

> Pt. Dakschhinamurthy has been selected in defence for the position

> of " Commander " or something like this ....

>

> Mohanraam gives his introduction like he was in army, participated

in

> bangladesh war...

>

> his age is 86+.

>

> now calculate, he was an officer in army, well, his designation is

> not known, assuming he was a Major in army, the average age for a

> major in army is 35-37.

>

> bangladesh war happened in 1971, if we add 36+36 = 72, He can't be

> 86, may be he was not a major/col. also.

>

> Now, come to, His typing...

>

> Looks, He writes faster than a paid typist, with no mistakes,

> beleive, he is 86... and his fingers are so nice.

>

> He has only one pupose, that is to spread terror of his

> occultpower.., How, By creating a Psychological Game to curb

other's

> opinions, amd particularly if there is any thing related with Pt.

> Dakschhinamurty.

>

> I have not traced his IP address, wherefrom he posts his mails,

But,

> I m prone to think, Some Nexus, Some Link between two mail Ids.

>

> I leave it to the group to observe his behavior.

>

> regards,

> Lalit.

>

>

>

>

>

vedic astrology , " mohanraaam " <mohanraaam@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Group:

> >

> > Lalith has made a serious allegation that " there is a nexus

between

> > me and Pandit Dakshinamoorthi " ....There have been certain other

> > persons also who have alluded to that in the past....I want to

> > clarify on that.....

> >

> > I accept that definitely I am an admirer of Pandit

> Dakshinamoorthiji

> > because as an elderly yogi who has seen life, very rarely have I

> come

> > across a person of such a calibre and definitely not in this

> present

> > generation. So, I do write glowingly about him, and I do get

> tensed

> > when someone attacks him, and retort with mails.

> >

> > But, there is no unholy nexus between us. I am not a " paid "

> agent.

> > I write only what I have felt about him. I have no mal

intentions

> in

> > that. I do not think Panditji needs a person like me to sing his

> > praise; as someone in this group wrote earlier " Knowledge needs

no

> > introduction " , and Panditji's knowledge would have been obvious

to

> > everyone in the group.

> >

> > I am supporting Panditji only because as you all might be aware,

he

> > was not contributing to the group regularly for sometime; when

> asked,

> > he said that there were unnecessary controversies and he felt it

is

> > beneath a scholar to indulge in unsavoury exchanges, at the same

> > time, as a practising professional he cannot afford to keep quite

> if

> > someone attacks his professionalism which might spoil his

> > professional image. So, I brought him back with the promise that

I

> > will be his mouthpiece and spokesperson to defend him if

unsavoury

> > controversies arise. Even initially, it was on my invitation

that

> > Guruji joined this group in the first instance. I did this only

> for

> > the benefit of the learner of the group. Guruji is a very private

> > person who tends to hide his Glow in a bushel. I wanted his

> > intelligence and wisdom to benefit many and that is why I

> introduced

> > him to the group; and I support him and write mails only so that

he

> > does not quit the group due to unsavoury incidents. Old members

> will

> > remember that I was once even banned from the group.

> >

> > Other than this, there is no other unholy or mal intentions in my

> > supporting Guruji. Definitely, this is not at his request. He

is

> > not one to make such requests. He will be patient to his limits;

> and

> > if his limit exceeds, he will just walk away from the group which

> > will be the loss to the group. That is why, in an attempt to

> retain

> > his services here, I do write supporting him.

> >

> > In exchanges with Lalith, Guruji is not involved at all. In

fact,

> he

> > requested me not to fight with Lalith and asked me to ignore

him.

> > But, the challenging tone of Lalith only impels me to write again

> and

> > again. But, Guruji's name is unnecessarily drawn into this.

> >

> > THE TRUTH IS THAT I HAVE SEEN GURUJI; BUT GURUJI HAS NOT SEEN ME

> EVEN

> > ONCE IN HIS LIFE.

> >

> > Blessings,

> > Mohanraaam

> >

>