Guest guest Posted July 20, 2007 Report Share Posted July 20, 2007 Dear Shri Lalith: There is no contradiction in my predictions at all....you are as usual confused in your reading of my predictions...... The pisacha baadha that I detected was definitely that of your wife of earlier incarnations or a karmic baadha that arose out of your ill- treatment of your wife of earlier incarnations (you have not understood the dynamics of this as usual; the ghost need not be the same entity that was originally affected by you; once you have misbehaved with female gender, some other entity that had suffered similar fate at the hands of someone else can definitely get at you when your karma is like that). The thing I wrote about your ancestors who died as " sumangali " is for remedial purpose. I had requested you to offer pooja to those " benevolent " beings (they are not ghosts for your information) as a protection against the " paisacha baadhaa " . These are two different things; you have confused the " remedy " with your " problem " . You can take it if you believe it or leave it if you don't believe it. I did not even say anything in detail to you because you might misunderstand it; and it has happened! But, do not impute motives to me, and do not rubbish my predictions in your misunderstanding. I think now you are " defaming " me by putting me in the wrong light for no fault of mine. Please stop this. Even now, I have only given clarification to you; I think I cannot do anything further than this. I am not God to change your Fate. I have suggested a remedy as I deemed fit. Please stop this controversy here. Blessed be. Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit wrote: > > > You look quite Cunning, Clever and claim to be an Yogi !! > > A baised man, with handful knowledge, Why i should not take you to the > court , I seek a Sorry from you otherwise to give u a lsson, I will > lodge a case of defamation against you, next week i will lodge a case, > Now be ready to know and read ur own fate. See it in ur's prashna chart > or ur's horoscope. I had no issues with you, still, u tried to become > oversmart, So, u should get e lesson. > > > And see the contradiction in PanditJi's analysis - > He says two things, this is to me in my mails - > > " Though none of your ancestors died a premature death, there will > definitely be some lady ancestor who died even as her husband was alive > at least 4 generations back. They are venerated for auspiciousness. > You try to find out if someone was like that. If no one was like that, > even then the sumangali pooja can be done for your sister. This will > definitely help you " > > " Actually, when I said I will pray for you, I had this ghostly > disturbance in mind. I had already decided that I will what I can to > control that. But, as you might be aware, it is quite possible that the > entity may be more powerful than me, and might win the battle! That is > why I did not want to commit anything " > > And this is in the group - > > " Honestly, I did identify the Paisacha Baadha which has got to do > with his own maltreatment of his wife of earlier birth. That is why > I said it was karmic. If it is a simple ghostly visit, exorcism is > not difficult; but when his karma intervenes, we cannot help him > unless his attitude changes and he " accepts " he has possibly gone > wrong somewhere .... " > > Now, see, on the one hand " The lady spirit is my ancestor, and on the > other, my previsou birth's wife or someone related to my wife " . > > Open ur eyes, old man... ur ego wont help u and u wont win any respect > with ur cunningness. > Ur biased nature indicates faults in ur horoscope, Post ur horoscope in > the group, ur truth will come out in ur own way. > > This is the gist of ur's 86 years of life and yoga sadhana that u are > biased and cunning, political and clever in ur approach. cramming > shlokas wont help u in ur unethical behavior. > > U say, if i m craving for meeting or knowing a person, i have an affair, > now, i m craving to meet u, I have an affair with u, what a genius u r > !! great and if u dont say sorry, i will meet u in the court room. I can > firgive u if u confess ur biased attitude. > > ~Lalit. > > vedic astrology , " dakshinastrologer " > <dakshinastrologer@> wrote: > > > > Respected Mohanraaamji: > > > > I will just represent these facts: > > > > 1) I did refuse to share my mobile no. with the member Lalith just > > as I do with everyone. I am always accessible by email; and email > > exchanges are convenient to me because I can answer them back as > > soon as I am free after a pooja session or counselling session. > > Getting a phone call in the midst of a pooja or a counselling > > disturbs me. Everyone who has moved with me knows that. Somehow > > Shri. Lalith got offended by that. I could not help it, and I don't > > intend to change my stance of not sharing mobile nos. with anyone. > > I DID REFUSE TO SHARE THE PRASHNA CHART WITH HIM FOR REASONS I HAVE > > STATED BEFORE AND WHICH RAFALJI HAS ALSO POINTED OUT CORRECTLY > > > > 2) I NEVER CLAIMED I AM A VVIP IN ANY OF MY MAILS TO HIM....He is > > probably exaggerating it in his anger. However, when he wrote > > lecturistic mails saying things like " You are unprofessional; you > > are hiding something, it is not fair " , etc. I did write " I am too > > senior to be taking advices from novices like you " . This is exactly > > (or something similar in meaning) what I wrote to him. You are right > > in saying that I would not have written like that... Thanks for your > > trust in me and my nature. > > > > 3) Honestly, I did identify the Paisacha Baadha which has got to do > > with his own maltreatment of his wife of earlier birth. That is why > > I said it was karmic. If it is a simple ghostly visit, exorcism is > > not difficult; but when his karma intervenes, we cannot help him > > unless his attitude changes and he " accepts " he has possibly gone > > wrong somewhere and that is the root of his frustration. Again, he > > is not able to digest that he will not get a wife according to his > > expectations. That was the real root of the problem. I had > > categorically told him that which is what prompted the frequent > > mails between us. CAN THE ASTROLOGER PLAY GOD AND SAY WHAT THE > > CLIENT WISHES TO HEAR? I do not believe in that. I am a human with > > normal human limitations, and I belive even remedies are only humble > > Mercy Petitions and it is up to Divine Providence to hear our pleas > > and consider our requests favourably. > > > > 4) I believe Fate is dynamic and remedies do have the potential to > > change Fate. It is customary of me to avoid predicting events for > > which I have given remedies for this simple reason.....Remedies are > > given ONLY when the astrologer sees something is wrong and there is > > some hope to redeem the situation. That being the case, if the > > client insists on a technically correct analysis at this point of > > time - then the prediction should necessarily be negative. But, > > then what about the remedies? If they succeed, the thing could > > change! Now, what can the astrologer say in this situation. So, my > > usual request to clients in such a situation is to perform the > > remedies and get back to me after certain period, and later check > > with a prashna to see if the remedies have infact produced any > > desirable alteration in Fate. Somehow, the member has misunderstood > > the dynamics of this and possibly even my motives. > > > > 5) He wrote to me yesterday apologizing for the bitter turn of > > events, and I have Blessed him and requested him to do the > > remedies. Even today, he asked for guidance about the sumangali > > pooja because it seems the Vedic Pandits in his areas did not about > > it. I have detailed the procedure to him. I wonder why he still > > harps on the matter sharing things uncharitably about me. I have > > been providing him support and guidance to the best of my abilities > > and if he still misunderstands me, I can't help it; nor do I have > > the time to brood on that. > > > > Please for the benefit of the forum, let us end this here. > > > > If Shri Lalith is not willing to end the matter, Mohanraaamji - I > > implore you ....you at least end this exchange with him. > > > > Blessed be. > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > > > vedic astrology , " mohanraaam " > > mohanraaam@ wrote: > > > > > > Dear Lalith: > > > > > > Can you post in the forum Panditji's mail where you claim he has > > > written he is a VVIP? This must be a blatant lie. Pandit > > > Dakshinamoorthiji is not one to write like that! This is a > > blatant > > > lie! I am sure. If Panditji has really claimed he is a VVIP, I > > > will take back all that I have written to you. > > > > > > He has never given his phone no. to anyone in this list. So, what > > > special previlege do you think you have got you faggot? Does he > > not > > > have a right for his own privacy? > > > > > > What will happen to his sanity if he starts getting your idiotic > > > phone calls on top of your stupid mails? > > > > > > He would have repeatedly written to you only in reply. You would > > > have pestered him and he would have replied. You idiot have > > failed > > > to understand the decency of an astrologer when he has hinted at > > > your problems diplomatically, and now you claim " he changed lines " > > > as if he is a cheat! > > > > > > I do not know how long you are associated with this > > group.......Ask > > > any forum member here whether Panditji is a person who changes > > tack > > > like that. In fact he is one of the more honest astrologers who > > > admits that he has made a mistake if ever he has made one! But, > > you > > > are almost putting words into his mouth, and depicting as if he > > has > > > failed in his predictions. > > > > > > Truth to be told, Panditji would have felt no hope in your > > situation > > > unless you change yourself; and he would not have seen any > > > possibility for that also. Hence he would have been at a loss of > > > words as to what to do. Collaring an astrologer when he is trying > > > to soothen you with some hopeful predictions is really rude. > > > > > > Panditji is too senior and respected; otherwise, I would have > > > written to him directly regarding this matter and known what is > > all > > > this......But, believing an idiot like you and enquiring with a > > > senior astrologer is not possible. > > > > > > I again challenge you......show us the mail where Panditji claimed > > > hs is VVIP......You liar.....know whom you are accusing! > > > > > > Mohanraaam.-- In vedic astrology , " litsol " > > > <mishra.lalit@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > What to say u old man, U have lost power to understand : > > > > > > > > I gave him my own resume, all my projects that i did, simply > > gave > > > him. > > > > > > > > Now, I have all rights to call u " Idiot " . U r too full of > > > urself, A > > > > blind man with heap of false EGO,what happened to me, I shared > > > with u > > > > and all, still u see, i m telling lies, m criminal. Constantly u > > r > > > > advancing with ur poor logic and handful knowledge to blame me > > for > > > > everything. > > > > > > > > So, you are here to advocate pandit ji, I have not said a single > > > word > > > > against him and u are abusing me constantly, I have posted my > > birth > > > > details in the group: - 17 -08-1972, 08:15 PM at Rewa (M.P) and > > > sent to > > > > pandit ji, if u r using that to tell there is some debilitated > > > planet, > > > > not a strange for a man like u to play tricks. > > > > > > > > I purchased a service, didn't complain any thing to any one, > > just > > > asked > > > > a phone no. to remove my doubts, It was my fault coz the Pandit > > Ji > > > was > > > > VVIP, it is his right to not to give me his phone and i have no > > > rights. > > > > stop it and don't try to be smart. Ok, i still compromised and > > > became > > > > happy with the sound file, he sent to me after i informed him > > > about my > > > > difficulty on a portion of mantra. No problems, but i said, this > > > created > > > > a difference in between. > > > > > > > > I m still not saying what pandit ji saw and what he didnt, But > > he > > > mailed > > > > me constantly saying, it was my bad karma of previous birth, > > very > > > normal > > > > and very general, every second person w'd tell same, but when i > > > informed > > > > him about some spirit, he changed his line and said he has > > already > > > seen > > > > it, I agreed to this also, but i thought it's an important > > > information, > > > > better to keep it in the record, he denied to give this also, > > with > > > no > > > > reason. he said he wont give, still i was not complaining any > > > thing, > > > > just asked him once more for same prashna, he didn't tell any > > > reason and > > > > told that he is a VVIP, he wont give what he doesnt want. I > > didn't > > > > complain. > > > > > > > > And finally, He posted part of my mail to the group without > > > informing > > > > me, without seeking my consent and at the same time, he didnt > > > forget > > > > accusing me that i will disclose his precious techniques in the > > > group, > > > > mind u idiot, on the one hand he is doing same thing and on the > > > other he > > > > accused me saying - i may do it, and who did that - Pandit Ji ? > > > > > > > > And u are here to call me mad. U dont deserve any respect. There > > > is no > > > > value of ur Age and Experience, Yes, i should call u idiot. You > > > want to > > > > twist ethics , u cant. u want to use a handful knowledge to twist > > > > ethics, u cant. > > > > > > > > I said something in general about Vedanga, or Vedic Granthas, U > > > poker, > > > > entering into classification, definition. > > > > > > > > U want to challange me, for what ? instead of taking the > > challange > > > or > > > > trying to understand what i m saying, what i m sharing openly, u > > > keep > > > > abusing me. > > > > > > > > U put me a lot of pain and insult, I dont know if a handfull > > > knowledge > > > > makes a man like u, Can u tell me where is Priya and can u help > > me > > > > establish a contact with her, for what, i was craving whole > > year, > > > that u > > > > cant, u wont. coz u r fake. > > > > > > > > I cant write regards to u. Ok, > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " mohanraaam " > > <mohanraaam@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Dear Lalith: > > > > > > > > > > You have written " Panditji did not write about spirits but you > > > told > > > > > him.... " But from what he has posted, he had already found it > > out > > > > > and was not sharing it with you. He had suggested remedies > > > > > inclusive of that which is more important. A person of his > > > stature > > > > > need not try to " prove " his skills by giving shocking > > > predictions. > > > > > Experts of his calibre definitely are very subtle. In fact the > > > > > words " you have to balance your karma of previous lives " that > > you > > > > > claim he was harping on refers to this ghostly apparition. In > > > your > > > > > half-baked brain, it did not strike; that is all. > > > > > > > > > > Again, you claim that you are " helping " nature; and see the > > > evidence > > > > > you give for that......you have given all the projects that > > you > > > did > > > > > under somebody's resume to " help " him. Legally, my friend, you > > > are > > > > > not a helper but a " CRIMINAL " . No wonder with all your lies you > > > > > cannot share positive vibes with Panditji who never tells lies! > > > > > > > > > > You claim " shani " visited you; why don't you claim Lord Shiva > > > > > visited you! You are mad young man! If you had really had > > vision > > > > > of Lord Shani it would have been shown in the prashna chart > > that > > > you > > > > > are a Divine personality. You probably have debilitated > > planets > > > in > > > > > your 9th house. You have delusions of spirituality. > > > > > > > > > > You have written " You do not differentiate knowledge " ; but you > > > have > > > > > no rights to declassify what ancient people have classified > > with > > > a > > > > > purpose. Vedangas, shaastras, all might be one for you; but > > they > > > > > have differnet purposes. Do not try to sit in judgment over the > > > > > wisdom of the great Seers and Saints who did tapasya before > > > giving > > > > > those wonderful shastras to us. > > > > > > > > > > You have said you have learnt some vedas to search at your > > > Brahmin > > > > > roots. You have definitely not learnt under a competent person > > or > > > > > as usual, you have not imbibed the essence of the teachings > > well. > > > > > Vedas are oceanic and the little spec of knowledge you have in > > > that > > > > > does not qualify you to speak like this. > > > > > > > > > > " Hitham poorva aachaarya vaakyena " means " welfare comes by > > > following > > > > > the words of ancient Masters " is a known Dharma shastraic > > > injunction. > > > > > > > > > > You can research on things, you can analyze things with an open > > > > > mind; but do so with a reverential attitude and not with the > > > > > assumption " that in India they did not spread knowledge, etc. " > > > The > > > > > saints have purposefully hidden some powerful knowledge > > sources > > > so > > > > > that they are not misused by half-baked morons. You see, > > knowing > > > > > some part of vedas makes you think that you are qualified to > > > comment > > > > > on that.....it is precisely to avoid such calamities, that > > > ancients > > > > > hid powerful arts. Those arts in the hands of good persons can > > > > > benefit many, while they will become subjects of mockery in the > > > > > hands of those who do not appreciate their Divinity. > > > > > > > > > > You have written " My Ego has made me angry " ...what is there > > young > > > > > man? I got angry not because you attacked me or even Panditji; > > > but > > > > > because you have attacked this Divine Art and are remorseless. > > > > > > > > > > Please do not say that Shani spoke to you; you may be put into > > an > > > > > asylum for Paronia, Delusional Disorder, schizoid personality > > > > > disorder, etc. > > > > > > > > > > I sincerely apologize to the list for having written such a > > > personal > > > > > mail in this list, but this man cannot go unchallenged after > > he > > > has > > > > > attempted to malign Pandit Dakshinamoorthiji - a noble soul > > who > > > is > > > > > the pride of this group, and who I am sure - is considered as a > > > > > Blessing to this group by many members. I have nothing > > personal > > > in > > > > > this. Even if this person had called me an " idiot " or even in > > > > > unparliamentary language, I would have forgiven him; but his > > > > > irreverential attitude towards astrology and Panditji has > > really > > > put > > > > > me off and prompted me in this exchange. > > > > > > > > > > No matter what he writes, I will not reply henceforth. > > > > > > > > > > Mohanraaam. > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " litsol " mishra.lalit@ > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mohanraaam - Yogi, > > > > > > > > > > > > Your are so angry, what causes anger, a hurt ego... nothing > > > else. > > > > > > > > > > > > Even u have addressed your mail to Mr. Abhishek, while > > replying > > > > > to me. > > > > > > Pls. cool down. > > > > > > I have told u about " P - Priya and Preeti ... " . > > > > > > > > > > > > The first half part of ur findings is true, how much true, I > > > will > > > > > tell u > > > > > > - " I knew two girls, whose name begins with 'P', one is > > Preeti > > > and > > > > > other > > > > > > is Priya " . right, I m not like u, i mean, a man who is > > caught > > > up > > > > > in > > > > > > abundance of EGO, have confidence to accept the truth upto > > > where > > > > > it is > > > > > > true. > > > > > > > > > > > > Preeti is a Biotech student and she contacted me after she > > saw > > > my > > > > > > profile in the net, She is taller than me and 9 yrs younger > > to > > > me, > > > > > > still, wanted to proceed towards marriage, I thought this > > may > > > look > > > > > good > > > > > > today but tomorrow may not, I asked her to not to contact me > > > as i > > > > > dont > > > > > > think good prospects of togatherness, off cource, she w'd > > have > > > > > > discussed it in my home town, Rewa is not a big place and we > > > all > > > > > are > > > > > > brahmins, so things gets spread, the communication was > > throuh > > > net > > > > > and > > > > > > few times through phone, pls. mind it, i have not seen her > > > > > physically. > > > > > > never met her physically. So, ur prashan chart skills need > > to > > > ne > > > > > > refined, the basic is good, after a point and the > > interprition > > > > > that u do > > > > > > is misleading. Ok. > > > > > > > > > > > > Next is Priya, I liked this girl more, and felt bad about > > her, > > > she > > > > > is a > > > > > > kind of girl, misguided by the peers and this age. > > > > > > > > > > > > I never met her also, try to check in ur's prashna chart, She > > > > > again met > > > > > > me through Net, She gave her false introduction like She is a > > > > > Software > > > > > > Engineer, working with Mphasis, Bombay and about to visit > > > Germany, > > > > > All > > > > > > was wrong. She had a boy friend, once she refered to me and > > > then a > > > > > > deviation came in her behaviro, As per priya he already > > > proposed > > > > > her, > > > > > > but some disturbance between them came, He didn't belong to > > a > > > good > > > > > > family and of cheep type guy. > > > > > > > > > > > > I was worried for her, I never wanted her to spoil her life > > > with > > > > > a such > > > > > > type of guy, I tried to convince about the meaning of life > > and > > > > > values of > > > > > > our culture, She felt bad, and got angry, Once what happened > > > and > > > > > still > > > > > > unbelievable to me, let me put here, During my daily puja, I > > > saw > > > > > Shani > > > > > > is coming to me and has occupied me, I have got divine > > > protection > > > > > form > > > > > > lord Hanuman Ji, still, i could not call him for help, what i > > > > > could do > > > > > > and i had no idea about a learned siddha, what happens is, > > in a > > > > > minute > > > > > > My frined Nirmesh called me from mumbai. > > > > > > > > > > > > My friend Nirmesh is a Sr, HR Manager with Reliance Retail, > > he > > > was > > > > > with > > > > > > his girl friend, in fact i played a role in reconcilation of > > > > > disturbance > > > > > > between them so they were calling me, As Priya told to me, > > she > > > > > lives in > > > > > > Bombay, I missed her, and thought to contact her, I wanted to > > > > > write a > > > > > > mail about me , a mail with all my emotions but here Saturn > > > Played > > > > > a > > > > > > role and in place of sending that emotionl mail to Priya, I > > > happen > > > > > to > > > > > > post that mail in a , she and me both were > > members, > > > I > > > > > > created that group to promote youngersters of my region in > > > software > > > > > > industry, and my own personal mail was posted in the group, > > My > > > own > > > > > > mistake, Pls. check, if u are referring to this incident. > > > > > > > > > > > > She became so angry on me, but what i could do, all was my > > > mistake > > > > > and i > > > > > > lost her, I w'd like to tell u more, A friend of me was > > > jobless, I > > > > > gave > > > > > > him my own CV to put his name on the CV with all my projects > > > in his > > > > > > name, Pls check in ur's prashna chart. How i help people. > > Next > > > day > > > > > > after this incident, His birthday came, And the Priya > > addressed > > > > > him with > > > > > > so much of respect, The guy, in place of showing a respect > > > towards > > > > > me > > > > > > for my help, commented on me, A cunning man, I dont know he > > and > > > > > many > > > > > > others have contributed more in widening the gap in between > > me > > > and > > > > > > Priya. I dont know if he is still in touch with her, or all > > was > > > > > planned > > > > > > by them togather. I dont know anything. > > > > > > > > > > > > I still dont know who this Priya was and where she lives in, > > If > > > > > she is a > > > > > > girl or a game of those guys who wanted me to look down in > > that > > > > > > > > > > > Group. coz, when i started searching her, what i found is, in > > > > > mphasis > > > > > > there is only one Priya Tiwari, who works with a BPO, she > > was > > > not > > > > > a > > > > > > Software Engineer and she never lived in Bombay, She was in > > > Noida > > > > > > itself. For ur satisfaction, I can post my mails to HR > > > department > > > > > of > > > > > > Mphasis. > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont know what happend to her, This BPO priya, i also have > > > not > > > > > met > > > > > > her, looks different than the other Priya whom i was > > searching. > > > > > > > > > > > > So, Dear old friend, Check ur Prashna Chart skills more and > > > more, > > > > > Baiscs > > > > > > are correct, ur interpretition is quite wrong and u have not > > > got > > > > > enough > > > > > > experience in life to judge me and realities. > > > > > > > > > > > > whatever be is Vedanga or Shastra, I wanted to let u know > > every > > > > > bit of > > > > > > knowledge is divine and pavitra. Leave the arrogance and > > start > > > > > doing > > > > > > preperation for ur journey that u have to do in near future. > > > > > > > > > > > > If any one in the Group, can give light on this Priya's > > case, > > > coz > > > > > i had > > > > > > soft feelings for her despite all her lies, I w'd be grateful > > > > > otherwise > > > > > > it's OK. Can u tell me how and where she is and if she really > > > > > exists, > > > > > > and if any occult people can help me in establishing a > > contact > > > > > with her > > > > > > if she really exists w'd be good for me. I w'd pay whatever u > > > > > demand. > > > > > > Will any one take the challange ? i wont ask u what u cant > > do, > > > I > > > > > > promise. > > > > > > > > > > > > I didn't tell about Preeti and Priya to Pandit ji it was not > > > > > necessary, > > > > > > better if he w'd have told me sth about them, but Pandit Ji > > all > > > > > the time > > > > > > kept telling me about my Karmic Balance of the previous > > birth, > > > It > > > > > was me > > > > > > who gave him hints abot the spirit, Not he, he didnt tell me > > > any > > > > > thing > > > > > > about the spirit and when i told him about the spirti's > > > storey, he > > > > > said > > > > > > he has seen it Prashan chart, tell me where i was wrong, I > > > asked > > > > > him to > > > > > > give me Prashan Chart, he denied. > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear old friend, why u could not see in ur's prashna chart > > the > > > > > Saturn > > > > > > who got me occupied me during my Puja, I was not sleeping, I > > > saw > > > > > him > > > > > > with open eyes. > > > > > > > > > > > > Pls. check ur's prashna chart and I w'd request Mr. Rafal to > > > > > interefere > > > > > > and tell me about Priya, coz, i m having some pain, I dont > > know > > > > > anything > > > > > > , any truth of Priya Tiwari. I have her photograpgh that she > > > sent > > > > > to me > > > > > > which differs from the Priya whom i discovered in mphasis. > > > > > > > > > > > > Will any one come to help me ? > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " mohanraaam " > > > <mohanraaam@> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Abhishek: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Know the difference between shastraas and the > > > vedaangas.....you > > > > > > > think an astrologer and a yogi like me would not have > > known > > > all > > > > > > > these! siksha, kalpam, chandas, mimamsa,nruktam and > > Jyotisam > > > are > > > > > > > the vedangas. Don't confuse the 18 shastras or the 64 > > mighty > > > arts > > > > > > > with vedanga. You are shallow young man but are trying to > > > pass > > > > > > > judgments on great branches of knowledge and great persons > > of > > > > > > > knowledge. I am 86 years old and have lived a full life > > with > > > a > > > > > > > happy wife and 4 intelligent, well-settled children. Not a > > > > > > > frustrated unmarried luckless youngman like you! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Whatever you said to Panditji...I do not know because he > > has > > > not > > > > > > > divulged the complete exchange inthe forum...I think he > > > should > > > > > > > probably do that to expose your arrogance and idiocy > > levels > > > to > > > > > this > > > > > > > group...... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You may say that you did not have affairs - then what do > > you > > > > > tell of > > > > > > > a thing when you go after ladies and get heart-broken when > > > they > > > > > > > reject your proposal? You could not proceed to the level > > of a > > > > > > > mutual affair because they did not entertain you at all! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You have not commented on my finding about Priya/ > > > preeti.....I am > > > > > > > sure it is correct! And definitely your failures in this > > > regard > > > > > > > would have been a butt of jokes in your circle. I can bet > > on > > > > > that. > > > > > > > But definitely you will come out with your own versions to > > > deny > > > > > this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Did you tell all this to Guruji? I am sure you would not > > have > > > > > > > shared it in this light - but mark my words, he would have > > > found > > > > > it > > > > > > > out definitely! Only thing is - he is too decent to hurt > > > others > > > > > > > unnecessarily. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your posts are not clear....you are saying this and that > > > without > > > > > > > actually commenting on what others have written. Don't pass > > > > > > > judgement on astrology or its efficacy.Astrology is a basic > > > > > > > technique that one learns before predicting - but advanced > > > > > > > astrologers read far more into charts than what they > > indicate > > > > > from > > > > > > > conventional astrological classics - it is an applied > > field > > > and > > > > > the > > > > > > > horoscope is just a focus and an accessory tool for > > > prediction in > > > > > > > the hands of the greatest masters of this field. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely you are not one to comment on the need of > > > astrological > > > > > > > research without knowing the basic vedic etiquettes of > > > behaving > > > > > with > > > > > > > learned astrologers! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely Guruji's wise counsel have been useless to you - > > a > > > > > > > buffalo will cherish only the muddy waters - will it know > > the > > > > > > > differnece between Ganges and the gutter? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One suggestion young man - try to go into Guruji's mails > > > > > carefully > > > > > > > and quietly. His words are worth their weight in gold > > > usually. > > > > > > > Many have benefitted by his counsel - do not try to look > > > > > for " your > > > > > > > own version of truths " from his writings. If you do that, > > it > > > is a > > > > > > > waste of whatever money you paid Panditji. Understand his > > > > > counsel, > > > > > > > try to follow them, and you will do fine. But, stop > > > insulting and > > > > > > > passing unnecessary remarks on astrology and need for > > > > > astrological > > > > > > > development. Some self-seeking astrologers - capitalizing > > on > > > the > > > > > > > craze of Indian public for " scientific " research, " modern > > > > > research > > > > > > > into old classics " etc, have written volumes about the > > need > > > for > > > > > > > evolution of astrology whereas the reality is those who > > > follow > > > > > > > ancient classical wisdom have proved more efficient in all > > > these > > > > > > > predictive techniques than those " researchers " . Parampara > > > has its > > > > > > > own significance. You still eat through your mouth though > > > times > > > > > > > have changed (I am assuming here; or are you eating > > through > > > the > > > > > > > other end for novelty sake?). In the same way, nature has > > not > > > > > > > changed only certain outer manifestations have changed. > > Only > > > > > minor > > > > > > > modification of interpretaions are needed to suit > > > predictions to > > > > > > > modern day life and definitely there are not much gaps. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mohanraaam. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " litsol " > > > mishra.lalit@ > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mohanraaam, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I cant say u " Idiot " and wont speak to u using level of > > > ur's > > > > > > > language, > > > > > > > > ok, Pls. check ur's Prashna Skills 100 times and > > discover > > > more > > > > > > > about me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And my love affairs, I had no affair with any one, > > right, > > > check > > > > > > > it in > > > > > > > > ur Prashan Chart, however, when marriage came in my > > mind, i > > > > > came in > > > > > > > > touch with girls, liked two or three of them, ok, they > > > didn't > > > > > like > > > > > > > me, > > > > > > > > It happens. It was me who beforehand informed Panditji as > > > > > inputs > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > required to reach somewhere. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > See, i can say, the basic finding of ur prashan chart > > like > > > > > break > > > > > > > ups is > > > > > > > > true, but is little it misleading too, as no brak up in > > > sense > > > > > of > > > > > > > > break-up happened as no affiar even started, sometimes, u > > > > > should > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > careful more in reaching ur conclusions, that's why i > > say, > > > more > > > > > > > and more > > > > > > > > remains to discover, It's - " Apaurusheya " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, can u tell, in the storey, u posted in group, > > where > > > is > > > > > the > > > > > > > > " P-Priya, Preti etc.. " ? I will be more than happy to > > see > > > ur > > > > > > > findings, > > > > > > > > What Guruji said was completely different from u, I > > > discussed > > > > > > > with him > > > > > > > > why i dont get proposals from girls even having average > > > looks, > > > > > He > > > > > > > said > > > > > > > > to me, You change utr attitude and consider such > > > proposals, i > > > > > > > further > > > > > > > > asked him is it a big expectation to find a nice sweet > > > person, > > > > > i > > > > > > > dont > > > > > > > > think a model or actress but a girl with little good > > looks > > > and > > > > > good > > > > > > > > nature, even it is difficult, if it is difficult, i was > > > asking > > > > > him > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > describing him about me, my needs, my thoughts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and on what u did write - " And your posts about > > astrology > > > in > > > > > your > > > > > > > > arguments with Shri. Abhishek also clearly protray your > > > idiocy! > > > > > > > You are > > > > > > > > asking why Astrology > > > > > > > > alone is Divine and why not Engineering and other things? > > > > > Idiot - > > > > > > > > Astrology is a " Vedanga " a direct limb of the Vedas and > > not > > > > > > > > Engineering......You do not know all this > > classifications > > > and > > > > > are > > > > > > > > entering into debate on all these. Do not try to comment > > on > > > > > > > > subjects without knowing them " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pls study " Shulb Sutras " ok, U will find, Engineering is > > > there, > > > > > > > > Mathmatics is there, Ayourveda as medical science is > > there. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You are showing u r too full of urself, somtimes it > > > happens to > > > > > few > > > > > > > > people. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " mohanraaam " > > > > > <mohanraaam@> > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Lalith: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You " demanded " Panditji's phone no. and he > > refused....you > > > > > think > > > > > > > he > > > > > > > > > has no right to do that? It is his privacy...when you > > > have > > > > > been > > > > > > > > > pestering him over email how much more irresponsible > > you > > > > > would > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > been if he had given his phone no.? You think Panditji > > > has > > > > > time > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > spend on worthless brats like you who think the world > > is > > > > > > > revolving > > > > > > > > > around them? He has sent you an audio recording of the > > > > > mantra - > > > > > > > > > what else you need to know? Is the Great Man your > > slave > > > or > > > > > what > > > > > > > > > that you can demand everything that you want from him? > > > He is > > > > > too > > > > > > > > > proud for that! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You have no right to expect anything except service > > for > > > your > > > > > > > > > payment - assuming you have made some payment to > > Guruji! > > > Do > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > think you have bought him just because you asked his > > > > > service? I > > > > > > > am > > > > > > > > > sure you would have written something silly like this > > > (your > > > > > > > current > > > > > > > > > post is in itself silly) that annoyed Panditji! You > > say > > > the > > > > > > > matter > > > > > > > > > is over - but you keep on saying things as if Panditji > > > has > > > > > done a > > > > > > > > > mistake and you are justified. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And your posts about astrology in your arguments with > > > Shri. > > > > > > > Abhishek > > > > > > > > > also clearly protray your idiocy! You are asking why > > > > > Astrology > > > > > > > > > alone is Divine and why not Engineering and other > > things? > > > > > Idiot - > > > > > > > > > Astrology is a " Vedanga " a direct limb of the Vedas > > and > > > not > > > > > > > > > Engineering......You do not know all this > > classifications > > > > > and are > > > > > > > > > entering into debate on all these. Do not try to > > comment > > > on > > > > > > > > > subjects without knowing them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just checked up a prashna chart to see what sort of > > > person > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > are.....From this, try to understand what all > > astrology > > > is > > > > > > > capable > > > > > > > > > of..... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Last year you would have proposed to a Lady - and your > > > > > failure > > > > > > > was a > > > > > > > > > widely circulated joke in your social circle.....is it > > > true > > > > > or > > > > > > > not? > > > > > > > > > Just understand - people have made fun of you only > > > because of > > > > > > > > > your " loser " attitude. You are childish in your > > attitude; > > > > > this is > > > > > > > > > one reason why women in your life are running away > > from > > > you. > > > > > > > Guruji > > > > > > > > > has just hinted on love failures in his post - but my > > > prashna > > > > > > > > > clearly indicates they have rejected you outright after > > > > > initial > > > > > > > > > interactions with you because you have been " chasing " > > > them > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > troubling them with undiplomatic messages > > persistently. > > > Your > > > > > last > > > > > > > > > serious connection when the lady rejected your > > proposal - > > > her > > > > > > > name > > > > > > > > > is likely to be in the " pa " varga (preeti, Priya, etc. > > > any of > > > > > > > these - > > > > > > > > > you may think I have not found the right name - but > > > knowing > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > initial word of a person about whom I know nothing is > > in > > > > > itself > > > > > > > > > difficult - and no amount of research in scientific > > > > > astrology can > > > > > > > > > give the exact name! Don't think your " researches " will > > > > > > > > > automatically pave the way to find the name and glorify > > > > > > > astrology - > > > > > > > > > because that is not possible!) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now do you understand what an astrologer is capable of! > > > > > Guruji is > > > > > > > > > too decent to insult you by writing like this - > > > definitely he > > > > > > > would > > > > > > > > > have found out all these. He would have counselled you > > > about > > > > > > > change > > > > > > > > > of attitude mainly regarding this....you would not > > have > > > got > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > hint. Yet in message after message you are justifying > > and > > > > > > > > > projecting as if your grievance is genuine. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Heights of arrogance - thinking you have the right to > > > > > disturb a > > > > > > > > > learned senior astrologer as and when you want! I am > > > > > associated > > > > > > > > > with Panditji for so long and yet I do not have his > > > mobile > > > > > no. do > > > > > > > > > you know that? He has email id and he is very prompt > > in > > > his > > > > > > > replies > > > > > > > > > through that. Do you know anything of that great man > > or > > > his > > > > > daily > > > > > > > > > schedules? He has not merely one client like you - but > > > > > thosands > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > admirers, students, disciples, and clients all over the > > > > > world. If > > > > > > > > > all start calling Guruji will he ever have time for > > > himself? > > > > > That > > > > > > > > > is why he is not giving the mobile. Your post speaks > > as > > > if > > > > > he is > > > > > > > > > hiding himself. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is probably his mistake that he is helping out > > people > > > like > > > > > > > you - > > > > > > > > > the great man does not differentiate much and tries to > > > help > > > > > out > > > > > > > > > suffering people even if they are undeserving. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Try to change your attitude for your own good. Improve > > > > > yourself > > > > > > > > > before trying to comment on great fields like > > astrology, > > > > > about > > > > > > > which > > > > > > > > > you do not know even a speck. There are no gaps in > > > > > astrological > > > > > > > > > knowledge. Enough knowledge has been documented as > > Shri. > > > > > Potti > > > > > > > has > > > > > > > > > written in his post. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mohanraaam. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .vedic astrology , " litsol " > > > > > > > > > mishra.lalit@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear primusjyotish, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You are right, in fact differences begane, when i > > asked > > > > > Pandit > > > > > > > Ji's > > > > > > > > > > phone nos to communicate to him, he refused to give > > his > > > > > nos, I > > > > > > > was > > > > > > > > > > surprised, being a client, paying for the > > consultation > > > a > > > > > clear > > > > > > > > > > communication is required, so at least a > > communication > > > over > > > > > > > phone > > > > > > > > > > should happen, It was refused, he recommened a > > mantra, > > > i > > > > > was > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > clear > > > > > > > > > > on it's pronunciation, the rerequest to tell right > > > > > > > pronunciation > > > > > > > > > over > > > > > > > > > > phone was also refused, then a copy of charts made > > was > > > > > refused. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I didnt come to group for so many refusals. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And there were two contradictory explanations , the > > > timing > > > > > > > given > > > > > > > > > was > > > > > > > > > > very wide for an event - one year and it was said > > that > > > it's > > > > > > > > > conditional > > > > > > > > > > too, I was not understanding what to conclude and > > then > > > > > pandit > > > > > > > Ji > > > > > > > > > posted > > > > > > > > > > my private communication partly in the group. Later, > > > > > pandit ji > > > > > > > > > provided > > > > > > > > > > me sound files of the mantras, ok, my confusion on > > > > > > > pronunciation > > > > > > > > > > removed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, it is over, and i dont want to discuss it > > further. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " Jyotish > > > > > Volunteers " > > > > > > > > > > <primusjyotishi@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One would not consult a doctor for his physical > > > ailments > > > > > or a > > > > > > > > > > > psychiatrist for his mental ailments through > > > internet. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this is why many like Sri K.N. Rao strongly > > > > > recommend > > > > > > > > > against > > > > > > > > > > > seeking solutions to serious matters via internet > > > and to > > > > > use > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > time > > > > > > > > > > > tested procedure of face-to-face, in-person > > > consultation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Convenience gets in the way and causes more pain > > > > > ultimately, > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > > need to get the answer here and now, > > > unfortunately ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " litsol " > > > > > > > mishra.lalit@ > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit Ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I bought a service and had a private > > communication, > > > > > it's at > > > > > > > > > first > > > > > > > > > > > sight > > > > > > > > > > > > wrong for u to post any part of private > > > communication > > > > > > > without > > > > > > > > > my > > > > > > > > > > > > consent. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > U cant imagine anything solely at ur end, if i > > > myself > > > > > gave > > > > > > > u > > > > > > > > > hints > > > > > > > > > > > of a > > > > > > > > > > > > possible obstacle due to spirit, how i m going > > to > > > fear > > > > > some > > > > > > > > > thing > > > > > > > > > > > or the > > > > > > > > > > > > other. This should not be basis of not providing > > > > > > > infomation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You are at advanced level, which is realized by > > > many > > > > > that's > > > > > > > > > why u > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > being contacted, but that u r into deciding > > > everything > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > > profession one > > > > > > > > > > > > sided, can not be justified. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Though, i wanted chart for keeping in my > > records, > > > with > > > > > no > > > > > > > > > doubts on > > > > > > > > > > > u, > > > > > > > > > > > > ur apporach makes me think otherwise. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In any profession, transparency is key to gain > > > one's > > > > > faith > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > that u > > > > > > > > > > > > didn't bother this, on the basis of ur advanced > > > level u > > > > > > > pls. > > > > > > > > > dont > > > > > > > > > > > > justify what is incorrect, it's a pity that u > > make > > > ur > > > > > mood > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > post > > > > > > > > > > > > private communication and at the same time, in ur > > > > > reply to > > > > > > > my > > > > > > > > > > > private > > > > > > > > > > > > mail id, u accused me that i can post ur advanced > > > > > > > technique in > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > group, I dont know how to react. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's a clear contradiction, I was interested > > in > > > the > > > > > final > > > > > > > > > outcome > > > > > > > > > > > > which is chart, i should know that, and not in > > ur's > > > > > > > technique > > > > > > > > > but u > > > > > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > > > made it a public issue instread of giving same > > to > > > me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why development of ancient knowledge has come to > > an > > > > > end is > > > > > > > > > because > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > this fear which i dont know why some knowledgable > > > > > people > > > > > > > like u > > > > > > > > > > > > insttalled within. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wish to assure u that ur respect is no way > > > > > corroborated > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > intact in > > > > > > > > > > > > my views, i m also thankful to u for the > > remedies > > > and > > > > > > > mantras u > > > > > > > > > > > provided > > > > > > > > > > > > to me, even if that dont work, i will have same > > > respect > > > > > > > for u > > > > > > > > > but u > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > completely wrong at ur part in ur dealings. Pls. > > > check > > > > > ur > > > > > > > > > dasha and > > > > > > > > > > > > antardasha, something wrong somewhere. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic- > > > > > astrology , " dakshinastrologer " > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Members: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am posting an extract of the interaction > > > between > > > > > myself > > > > > > > > > and one > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > this list members who wanted a prediction from > > > me. I > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > given > > > > > > > > > > > him > > > > > > > > > > > > > counselling based on his horoscope and also > > > based on > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > prashna > > > > > > > > > > > > > chart. Marital chart showed marital delays and > > > > > problem > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > > love > > > > > > > > > > > > > matters which he has already experienced. The > > > prashna > > > > > > > chart > > > > > > > > > showed > > > > > > > > > > > > > the possibility of " Paisacha baadha " (trouble > > > due to > > > > > > > ghostly > > > > > > > > > > > > > entities that block happiness in the family). > > I > > > had > > > > > taken > > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > > > > > matter into account and not wanting to scare > > the > > > > > member > > > > > > > > > > > > > unnecessarily, I had not divulged the matter > > to > > > him. > > > > > > > > > Instead, I > > > > > > > > > > > > > suggested beeja mantras to counteract that > > > effect and > > > > > > > also > > > > > > > > > > > > > suggested " Sumangali Pooja " to be performed. > > He > > > later > > > > > > > came > > > > > > > > > back to > > > > > > > > > > > > > me and asked about the ghostly events himself > > > > > because his > > > > > > > > > family > > > > > > > > > > > > > members have had visitations from that entity. > > I > > > > > replied > > > > > > > back > > > > > > > > > > > > > saying that I have already taken that factor > > into > > > > > account > > > > > > > > > while > > > > > > > > > > > > > giving my suggestions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The prashna chart showed that the entity is > > > likely to > > > > > > > leave > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > Earth Plane by this year end and so it cannot > > > trouble > > > > > > > him any > > > > > > > > > > > > > longer. So, based on that and also based on his > > > > > > > horoscope, > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > having faith in the remedies I had suggested, > > I > > > had > > > > > > > predicted > > > > > > > > > > > > > possibility of marriage in Feb 2008 or in 2009. > > > > > Actually, > > > > > > > > > dasa- > > > > > > > > > > > > > bhukti and transit influences are quite tough > > and > > > > > > > > > contradictory > > > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > > > this event and I had taken so many factors and > > > > > > > > > balanced/counter- > > > > > > > > > > > > > balanced so many possibilities and had > > predicted > > > the > > > > > > > date as > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > Benediction; let the marriage happen in Feb > > > 2008! I > > > > > had > > > > > > > even > > > > > > > > > gone > > > > > > > > > > > > > to the extent of suggesting attitude > > modification > > > > > (he may > > > > > > > > > not get > > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > wife of his expectations) for the marriage to > > > > > happen; or > > > > > > > > > else it > > > > > > > > > > > > > might even be denied. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, the member has been persisting about > > > sharing the > > > > > > > prashna > > > > > > > > > > > chart > > > > > > > > > > > > > with him. I had given him broad hints about > > why I > > > > > though > > > > > > > > > Paisacha > > > > > > > > > > > > > baadha was there for him; but he insists that I > > > > > share the > > > > > > > > > prashna > > > > > > > > > > > > > chart and give the complete details to him, or > > > else > > > > > I am > > > > > > > > > unfair! > > > > > > > > > > > My > > > > > > > > > > > > > reservation regarding this is that prashna is > > an > > > > > advanced > > > > > > > > > > > > > application and sharing its techniques offhand > > > may be > > > > > > > > > confusing > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > may lead the native into reading too much into > > > each > > > > > > > prashna > > > > > > > > > chart > > > > > > > > > > > > > and fear paisacha baadha when infact it might > > > not be > > > > > > > there > > > > > > > > > at all! > > > > > > > > > > > > > He does not understand me and is getting at me > > > > > prompting > > > > > > > me > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > write > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail after mail and I am at my patience's end! > > > If I > > > > > spend > > > > > > > > > > > pointless > > > > > > > > > > > > > time debating like this with one person how > > can I > > > > > serve > > > > > > > > > > > > > others.....Why does not this member understand > > > this? > > > > > Not > > > > > > > > > sharing > > > > > > > > > > > > > sensitive prashna charts is a hallowed > > > > > tradition......Am > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > > > > > justified in my action when I have acted in > > the > > > best > > > > > > > > > interests of > > > > > > > > > > > > > the member? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am posting the latest exchange between us > > for > > > your > > > > > > > > > reference. I > > > > > > > > > > > > > request those who are knowledgeable in > > authentic > > > > > prashna > > > > > > > > > > > traditions > > > > > > > > > > > > > to write to the member (He is the person who is > > > > > cutting > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > pasting > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Garga Hora in this list) telling him that > > I > > > am > > > > > > > justified > > > > > > > > > in my > > > > > > > > > > > > > stand, and I am doing it in the best > > interests. > > > He > > > > > does > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > > > > > understand the danger of maintaining the > > prashna > > > > > chart > > > > > > > > > indicating > > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > paisacha baadha which is inauspicious! I am > > > pained > > > > > by his > > > > > > > > > words > > > > > > > > > > > > > like " Your are hiding something; hiding things > > is > > > > > not a > > > > > > > sign > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > fairness " etc. It is almost like accusing me of > > > > > being a > > > > > > > > > cheat! > > > > > > > > > > > Again > > > > > > > > > > > > > he comment on my professionalism; I am acting > > as > > > per > > > > > my > > > > > > > > > > > professional > > > > > > > > > > > > > ethics; why is he - a novice imputing motives > > to > > > me > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > commenting > > > > > > > > > > > > > on my professionalism? Is this what an > > astrologer > > > > > gets > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > his > > > > > > > > > > > > > service? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Below is the extract.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----------- --- > > -- > > > ---- > > > > > ---- > > > > > > > ---- > > > > > > > > > ----- > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri. Lalith Mishra: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unnecessary openness in the name of frankness > > is > > > the > > > > > > > bane of > > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > > > > society now-a-days. Will you go out in the > > nude > > > on > > > > > the > > > > > > > public > > > > > > > > > > > roads > > > > > > > > > > > > > just to prove you have nothing to hide? Asking > > > > > advanced > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > unique > > > > > > > > > > > > > predictive techniques of a practising > > > professional > > > > > > > > > persistently > > > > > > > > > > > even > > > > > > > > > > > > > after he has denied access to that knowledge > > is > > > very > > > > > > > rude . > > > > > > > > > The > > > > > > > > > > > > > access to that knowledge was denied because it > > > can be > > > > > > > > > > > misinterpreted > > > > > > > > > > > > > and if you post that " technique " in the VA > > list, > > > many > > > > > > > other > > > > > > > > > > > members > > > > > > > > > > > > > will get anxious (just as some members are > > > wondering > > > > > > > what is > > > > > > > > > wrong > > > > > > > > > > > > > with their horoscopes with the Garga Hora > > > posting of > > > > > > > yours!) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What do I have to gain by withholding > > > information? I > > > > > am > > > > > > > too > > > > > > > > > > > > > advanced in my profession to be taking advice > > > from > > > > > people > > > > > > > > > > > regarding > > > > > > > > > > > > > what is the professional way of handling my > > > clients. > > > > > I > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > no > > > > > > > > > > > > > malefic intentions, and your accusing me of > > being > > > > > unfair > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > rude > > > > > > > > > > > (in > > > > > > > > > > > > > fact each of your mails contains something or > > the > > > > > other). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can assure you only one thing - I have acted > > > in the > > > > > > > best of > > > > > > > > > > > > > intentions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am posting this in the VA list so that other > > > > > learned > > > > > > > > > members > > > > > > > > > > > might > > > > > > > > > > > > > put some wisdom into you (I have failed in > > this > > > with > > > > > my > > > > > > > > > repeated > > > > > > > > > > > > > replies to you). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " Lalit Mishra, Noida " mlalit@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Res. Pandit Ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On the one hand , I m thankful to you for all > > ur > > > > > analysis > > > > > > > > > and I > > > > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > > > > follow ur instructions but on the other I must > > > say > > > > > don't > > > > > > > > > seem fair > > > > > > > > > > > > > enough in ur professional approach. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hiding things is not a sign of fairness. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If I knew astrology, perhapse I w'd not have > > > asked u > > > > > for > > > > > > > such > > > > > > > > > > > simple > > > > > > > > > > > > > things or charts, required to keep in my > > > records. My > > > > > > > level > > > > > > > > > is not > > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > constraint for u to share important charts, if > > > > > tomorrow I > > > > > > > > > need to > > > > > > > > > > > > > contact u for sth, how I w'd do without any > > > > > reference. > > > > > > > If I > > > > > > > > > ask > > > > > > > > > > > u, u > > > > > > > > > > > > > should not hold things at ur's end and u don't > > > gain > > > > > any > > > > > > > > > thing with > > > > > > > > > > > > > ur approach. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit Mishra. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > =================================================================== > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 20, 2007 Report Share Posted July 20, 2007 Panditji, I understand what u say, and i have not much problems with u, only professionalism's violation to some extent was there. I m a considerate person and well aware of limitiations of astrology. But i do have severe problems with mohaan raam, he addressed me with " Liar " in title of his mail. And i think i will give him a lesson. regards, Lalit. vedic astrology , " dakshinastrologer " <dakshinastrologer wrote: > > Dear Shri Lalith: > > There is no contradiction in my predictions at all....you are as > usual confused in your reading of my predictions...... > > The pisacha baadha that I detected was definitely that of your wife > of earlier incarnations or a karmic baadha that arose out of your ill- > treatment of your wife of earlier incarnations (you have not > understood the dynamics of this as usual; the ghost need not be the > same entity that was originally affected by you; once you have > misbehaved with female gender, some other entity that had suffered > similar fate at the hands of someone else can definitely get at you > when your karma is like that). The thing I wrote about your > ancestors who died as " sumangali " is for remedial purpose. I had > requested you to offer pooja to those " benevolent " beings (they are > not ghosts for your information) as a protection against > the " paisacha baadhaa " . These are two different things; you have > confused the " remedy " with your " problem " . You can take it if you > believe it or leave it if you don't believe it. I did not even say > anything in detail to you because you might misunderstand it; and it > has happened! But, do not impute motives to me, and do not rubbish my > predictions in your misunderstanding. > > I think now you are " defaming " me by putting me in the wrong light > for no fault of mine. Please stop this. Even now, I have only given > clarification to you; I think I cannot do anything further than > this. I am not God to change your Fate. I have suggested a remedy > as I deemed fit. Please stop this controversy here. > > > Blessed be. > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > vedic astrology , " litsol " <mishra.lalit@> > wrote: > > > > > > You look quite Cunning, Clever and claim to be an Yogi !! > > > > A baised man, with handful knowledge, Why i should not take you > to the > > court , I seek a Sorry from you otherwise to give u a lsson, I will > > lodge a case of defamation against you, next week i will lodge a > case, > > Now be ready to know and read ur own fate. See it in ur's prashna > chart > > or ur's horoscope. I had no issues with you, still, u tried to > become > > oversmart, So, u should get e lesson. > > > > > > And see the contradiction in PanditJi's analysis - > > He says two things, this is to me in my mails - > > > > " Though none of your ancestors died a premature death, there will > > definitely be some lady ancestor who died even as her husband was > alive > > at least 4 generations back. They are venerated for > auspiciousness. > > You try to find out if someone was like that. If no one was like > that, > > even then the sumangali pooja can be done for your sister. This > will > > definitely help you " > > > > " Actually, when I said I will pray for you, I had this ghostly > > disturbance in mind. I had already decided that I will what I can > to > > control that. But, as you might be aware, it is quite possible > that the > > entity may be more powerful than me, and might win the battle! > That is > > why I did not want to commit anything " > > > > And this is in the group - > > > > " Honestly, I did identify the Paisacha Baadha which has got to do > > with his own maltreatment of his wife of earlier birth. That is why > > I said it was karmic. If it is a simple ghostly visit, exorcism is > > not difficult; but when his karma intervenes, we cannot help him > > unless his attitude changes and he " accepts " he has possibly gone > > wrong somewhere .... " > > > > Now, see, on the one hand " The lady spirit is my ancestor, and on > the > > other, my previsou birth's wife or someone related to my wife " . > > > > Open ur eyes, old man... ur ego wont help u and u wont win any > respect > > with ur cunningness. > > Ur biased nature indicates faults in ur horoscope, Post ur > horoscope in > > the group, ur truth will come out in ur own way. > > > > This is the gist of ur's 86 years of life and yoga sadhana that u > are > > biased and cunning, political and clever in ur approach. cramming > > shlokas wont help u in ur unethical behavior. > > > > U say, if i m craving for meeting or knowing a person, i have an > affair, > > now, i m craving to meet u, I have an affair with u, what a genius > u r > > !! great and if u dont say sorry, i will meet u in the court room. > I can > > firgive u if u confess ur biased attitude. > > > > ~Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " dakshinastrologer " > > <dakshinastrologer@> wrote: > > > > > > Respected Mohanraaamji: > > > > > > I will just represent these facts: > > > > > > 1) I did refuse to share my mobile no. with the member Lalith just > > > as I do with everyone. I am always accessible by email; and email > > > exchanges are convenient to me because I can answer them back as > > > soon as I am free after a pooja session or counselling session. > > > Getting a phone call in the midst of a pooja or a counselling > > > disturbs me. Everyone who has moved with me knows that. Somehow > > > Shri. Lalith got offended by that. I could not help it, and I > don't > > > intend to change my stance of not sharing mobile nos. with anyone. > > > I DID REFUSE TO SHARE THE PRASHNA CHART WITH HIM FOR REASONS I > HAVE > > > STATED BEFORE AND WHICH RAFALJI HAS ALSO POINTED OUT CORRECTLY > > > > > > 2) I NEVER CLAIMED I AM A VVIP IN ANY OF MY MAILS TO HIM....He is > > > probably exaggerating it in his anger. However, when he wrote > > > lecturistic mails saying things like " You are unprofessional; you > > > are hiding something, it is not fair " , etc. I did write " I am too > > > senior to be taking advices from novices like you " . This is > exactly > > > (or something similar in meaning) what I wrote to him. You are > right > > > in saying that I would not have written like that... Thanks for > your > > > trust in me and my nature. > > > > > > 3) Honestly, I did identify the Paisacha Baadha which has got to > do > > > with his own maltreatment of his wife of earlier birth. That is > why > > > I said it was karmic. If it is a simple ghostly visit, exorcism is > > > not difficult; but when his karma intervenes, we cannot help him > > > unless his attitude changes and he " accepts " he has possibly gone > > > wrong somewhere and that is the root of his frustration. Again, he > > > is not able to digest that he will not get a wife according to his > > > expectations. That was the real root of the problem. I had > > > categorically told him that which is what prompted the frequent > > > mails between us. CAN THE ASTROLOGER PLAY GOD AND SAY WHAT THE > > > CLIENT WISHES TO HEAR? I do not believe in that. I am a human with > > > normal human limitations, and I belive even remedies are only > humble > > > Mercy Petitions and it is up to Divine Providence to hear our > pleas > > > and consider our requests favourably. > > > > > > 4) I believe Fate is dynamic and remedies do have the potential to > > > change Fate. It is customary of me to avoid predicting events for > > > which I have given remedies for this simple reason.....Remedies > are > > > given ONLY when the astrologer sees something is wrong and there > is > > > some hope to redeem the situation. That being the case, if the > > > client insists on a technically correct analysis at this point of > > > time - then the prediction should necessarily be negative. But, > > > then what about the remedies? If they succeed, the thing could > > > change! Now, what can the astrologer say in this situation. So, my > > > usual request to clients in such a situation is to perform the > > > remedies and get back to me after certain period, and later check > > > with a prashna to see if the remedies have infact produced any > > > desirable alteration in Fate. Somehow, the member has > misunderstood > > > the dynamics of this and possibly even my motives. > > > > > > 5) He wrote to me yesterday apologizing for the bitter turn of > > > events, and I have Blessed him and requested him to do the > > > remedies. Even today, he asked for guidance about the sumangali > > > pooja because it seems the Vedic Pandits in his areas did not > about > > > it. I have detailed the procedure to him. I wonder why he still > > > harps on the matter sharing things uncharitably about me. I have > > > been providing him support and guidance to the best of my > abilities > > > and if he still misunderstands me, I can't help it; nor do I have > > > the time to brood on that. > > > > > > Please for the benefit of the forum, let us end this here. > > > > > > If Shri Lalith is not willing to end the matter, Mohanraaamji - I > > > implore you ....you at least end this exchange with him. > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI. > > > > > > vedic astrology , " mohanraaam " > > > mohanraaam@ wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Lalith: > > > > > > > > Can you post in the forum Panditji's mail where you claim he has > > > > written he is a VVIP? This must be a blatant lie. Pandit > > > > Dakshinamoorthiji is not one to write like that! This is a > > > blatant > > > > lie! I am sure. If Panditji has really claimed he is a VVIP, I > > > > will take back all that I have written to you. > > > > > > > > He has never given his phone no. to anyone in this list. So, > what > > > > special previlege do you think you have got you faggot? Does he > > > not > > > > have a right for his own privacy? > > > > > > > > What will happen to his sanity if he starts getting your idiotic > > > > phone calls on top of your stupid mails? > > > > > > > > He would have repeatedly written to you only in reply. You would > > > > have pestered him and he would have replied. You idiot have > > > failed > > > > to understand the decency of an astrologer when he has hinted at > > > > your problems diplomatically, and now you claim " he changed > lines " > > > > as if he is a cheat! > > > > > > > > I do not know how long you are associated with this > > > group.......Ask > > > > any forum member here whether Panditji is a person who changes > > > tack > > > > like that. In fact he is one of the more honest astrologers who > > > > admits that he has made a mistake if ever he has made one! But, > > > you > > > > are almost putting words into his mouth, and depicting as if he > > > has > > > > failed in his predictions. > > > > > > > > Truth to be told, Panditji would have felt no hope in your > > > situation > > > > unless you change yourself; and he would not have seen any > > > > possibility for that also. Hence he would have been at a loss of > > > > words as to what to do. Collaring an astrologer when he is > trying > > > > to soothen you with some hopeful predictions is really rude. > > > > > > > > Panditji is too senior and respected; otherwise, I would have > > > > written to him directly regarding this matter and known what is > > > all > > > > this......But, believing an idiot like you and enquiring with a > > > > senior astrologer is not possible. > > > > > > > > I again challenge you......show us the mail where Panditji > claimed > > > > hs is VVIP......You liar.....know whom you are accusing! > > > > > > > > Mohanraaam.-- In vedic astrology , " litsol " > > > > <mishra.lalit@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What to say u old man, U have lost power to understand : > > > > > > > > > > I gave him my own resume, all my projects that i did, simply > > > gave > > > > him. > > > > > > > > > > Now, I have all rights to call u " Idiot " . U r too full of > > > > urself, A > > > > > blind man with heap of false EGO,what happened to me, I shared > > > > with u > > > > > and all, still u see, i m telling lies, m criminal. > Constantly u > > > r > > > > > advancing with ur poor logic and handful knowledge to blame me > > > for > > > > > everything. > > > > > > > > > > So, you are here to advocate pandit ji, I have not said a > single > > > > word > > > > > against him and u are abusing me constantly, I have posted my > > > birth > > > > > details in the group: - 17 -08-1972, 08:15 PM at Rewa (M.P) > and > > > > sent to > > > > > pandit ji, if u r using that to tell there is some debilitated > > > > planet, > > > > > not a strange for a man like u to play tricks. > > > > > > > > > > I purchased a service, didn't complain any thing to any one, > > > just > > > > asked > > > > > a phone no. to remove my doubts, It was my fault coz the > Pandit > > > Ji > > > > was > > > > > VVIP, it is his right to not to give me his phone and i have > no > > > > rights. > > > > > stop it and don't try to be smart. Ok, i still compromised and > > > > became > > > > > happy with the sound file, he sent to me after i informed him > > > > about my > > > > > difficulty on a portion of mantra. No problems, but i said, > this > > > > created > > > > > a difference in between. > > > > > > > > > > I m still not saying what pandit ji saw and what he didnt, But > > > he > > > > mailed > > > > > me constantly saying, it was my bad karma of previous birth, > > > very > > > > normal > > > > > and very general, every second person w'd tell same, but when > i > > > > informed > > > > > him about some spirit, he changed his line and said he has > > > already > > > > seen > > > > > it, I agreed to this also, but i thought it's an important > > > > information, > > > > > better to keep it in the record, he denied to give this also, > > > with > > > > no > > > > > reason. he said he wont give, still i was not complaining any > > > > thing, > > > > > just asked him once more for same prashna, he didn't tell any > > > > reason and > > > > > told that he is a VVIP, he wont give what he doesnt want. I > > > didn't > > > > > complain. > > > > > > > > > > And finally, He posted part of my mail to the group without > > > > informing > > > > > me, without seeking my consent and at the same time, he didnt > > > > forget > > > > > accusing me that i will disclose his precious techniques in > the > > > > group, > > > > > mind u idiot, on the one hand he is doing same thing and on > the > > > > other he > > > > > accused me saying - i may do it, and who did that - Pandit > Ji ? > > > > > > > > > > And u are here to call me mad. U dont deserve any respect. > There > > > > is no > > > > > value of ur Age and Experience, Yes, i should call u idiot. > You > > > > want to > > > > > twist ethics , u cant. u want to use a handful knowledge to > twist > > > > > ethics, u cant. > > > > > > > > > > I said something in general about Vedanga, or Vedic Granthas, > U > > > > poker, > > > > > entering into classification, definition. > > > > > > > > > > U want to challange me, for what ? instead of taking the > > > challange > > > > or > > > > > trying to understand what i m saying, what i m sharing > openly, u > > > > keep > > > > > abusing me. > > > > > > > > > > U put me a lot of pain and insult, I dont know if a handfull > > > > knowledge > > > > > makes a man like u, Can u tell me where is Priya and can u > help > > > me > > > > > establish a contact with her, for what, i was craving whole > > > year, > > > > that u > > > > > cant, u wont. coz u r fake. > > > > > > > > > > I cant write regards to u. Ok, > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " mohanraaam " > > > <mohanraaam@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Lalith: > > > > > > > > > > > > You have written " Panditji did not write about spirits but > you > > > > told > > > > > > him.... " But from what he has posted, he had already found > it > > > out > > > > > > and was not sharing it with you. He had suggested remedies > > > > > > inclusive of that which is more important. A person of his > > > > stature > > > > > > need not try to " prove " his skills by giving shocking > > > > predictions. > > > > > > Experts of his calibre definitely are very subtle. In fact > the > > > > > > words " you have to balance your karma of previous lives " > that > > > you > > > > > > claim he was harping on refers to this ghostly apparition. > In > > > > your > > > > > > half-baked brain, it did not strike; that is all. > > > > > > > > > > > > Again, you claim that you are " helping " nature; and see the > > > > evidence > > > > > > you give for that......you have given all the projects that > > > you > > > > did > > > > > > under somebody's resume to " help " him. Legally, my friend, > you > > > > are > > > > > > not a helper but a " CRIMINAL " . No wonder with all your lies > you > > > > > > cannot share positive vibes with Panditji who never tells > lies! > > > > > > > > > > > > You claim " shani " visited you; why don't you claim Lord > Shiva > > > > > > visited you! You are mad young man! If you had really had > > > vision > > > > > > of Lord Shani it would have been shown in the prashna chart > > > that > > > > you > > > > > > are a Divine personality. You probably have debilitated > > > planets > > > > in > > > > > > your 9th house. You have delusions of spirituality. > > > > > > > > > > > > You have written " You do not differentiate knowledge " ; but > you > > > > have > > > > > > no rights to declassify what ancient people have classified > > > with > > > > a > > > > > > purpose. Vedangas, shaastras, all might be one for you; but > > > they > > > > > > have differnet purposes. Do not try to sit in judgment over > the > > > > > > wisdom of the great Seers and Saints who did tapasya before > > > > giving > > > > > > those wonderful shastras to us. > > > > > > > > > > > > You have said you have learnt some vedas to search at your > > > > Brahmin > > > > > > roots. You have definitely not learnt under a competent > person > > > or > > > > > > as usual, you have not imbibed the essence of the teachings > > > well. > > > > > > Vedas are oceanic and the little spec of knowledge you have > in > > > > that > > > > > > does not qualify you to speak like this. > > > > > > > > > > > > " Hitham poorva aachaarya vaakyena " means " welfare comes by > > > > following > > > > > > the words of ancient Masters " is a known Dharma shastraic > > > > injunction. > > > > > > > > > > > > You can research on things, you can analyze things with an > open > > > > > > mind; but do so with a reverential attitude and not with the > > > > > > assumption " that in India they did not spread knowledge, > etc. " > > > > The > > > > > > saints have purposefully hidden some powerful knowledge > > > sources > > > > so > > > > > > that they are not misused by half-baked morons. You see, > > > knowing > > > > > > some part of vedas makes you think that you are qualified to > > > > comment > > > > > > on that.....it is precisely to avoid such calamities, that > > > > ancients > > > > > > hid powerful arts. Those arts in the hands of good persons > can > > > > > > benefit many, while they will become subjects of mockery in > the > > > > > > hands of those who do not appreciate their Divinity. > > > > > > > > > > > > You have written " My Ego has made me angry " ...what is there > > > young > > > > > > man? I got angry not because you attacked me or even > Panditji; > > > > but > > > > > > because you have attacked this Divine Art and are > remorseless. > > > > > > > > > > > > Please do not say that Shani spoke to you; you may be put > into > > > an > > > > > > asylum for Paronia, Delusional Disorder, schizoid > personality > > > > > > disorder, etc. > > > > > > > > > > > > I sincerely apologize to the list for having written such a > > > > personal > > > > > > mail in this list, but this man cannot go unchallenged after > > > he > > > > has > > > > > > attempted to malign Pandit Dakshinamoorthiji - a noble soul > > > who > > > > is > > > > > > the pride of this group, and who I am sure - is considered > as a > > > > > > Blessing to this group by many members. I have nothing > > > personal > > > > in > > > > > > this. Even if this person had called me an " idiot " or even > in > > > > > > unparliamentary language, I would have forgiven him; but his > > > > > > irreverential attitude towards astrology and Panditji has > > > really > > > > put > > > > > > me off and prompted me in this exchange. > > > > > > > > > > > > No matter what he writes, I will not reply henceforth. > > > > > > > > > > > > Mohanraaam. > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " litsol " > mishra.lalit@ > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mohanraaam - Yogi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your are so angry, what causes anger, a hurt ego... > nothing > > > > else. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Even u have addressed your mail to Mr. Abhishek, while > > > replying > > > > > > to me. > > > > > > > Pls. cool down. > > > > > > > I have told u about " P - Priya and Preeti ... " . > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The first half part of ur findings is true, how much > true, I > > > > will > > > > > > tell u > > > > > > > - " I knew two girls, whose name begins with 'P', one is > > > Preeti > > > > and > > > > > > other > > > > > > > is Priya " . right, I m not like u, i mean, a man who is > > > caught > > > > up > > > > > > in > > > > > > > abundance of EGO, have confidence to accept the truth upto > > > > where > > > > > > it is > > > > > > > true. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Preeti is a Biotech student and she contacted me after she > > > saw > > > > my > > > > > > > profile in the net, She is taller than me and 9 yrs > younger > > > to > > > > me, > > > > > > > still, wanted to proceed towards marriage, I thought this > > > may > > > > look > > > > > > good > > > > > > > today but tomorrow may not, I asked her to not to contact > me > > > > as i > > > > > > dont > > > > > > > think good prospects of togatherness, off cource, she w'd > > > have > > > > > > > discussed it in my home town, Rewa is not a big place and > we > > > > all > > > > > > are > > > > > > > brahmins, so things gets spread, the communication was > > > throuh > > > > net > > > > > > and > > > > > > > few times through phone, pls. mind it, i have not seen her > > > > > > physically. > > > > > > > never met her physically. So, ur prashan chart skills need > > > to > > > > ne > > > > > > > refined, the basic is good, after a point and the > > > interprition > > > > > > that u do > > > > > > > is misleading. Ok. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Next is Priya, I liked this girl more, and felt bad about > > > her, > > > > she > > > > > > is a > > > > > > > kind of girl, misguided by the peers and this age. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I never met her also, try to check in ur's prashna chart, > She > > > > > > again met > > > > > > > me through Net, She gave her false introduction like She > is a > > > > > > Software > > > > > > > Engineer, working with Mphasis, Bombay and about to visit > > > > Germany, > > > > > > All > > > > > > > was wrong. She had a boy friend, once she refered to me > and > > > > then a > > > > > > > deviation came in her behaviro, As per priya he already > > > > proposed > > > > > > her, > > > > > > > but some disturbance between them came, He didn't belong > to > > > a > > > > good > > > > > > > family and of cheep type guy. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I was worried for her, I never wanted her to spoil her > life > > > > with > > > > > > a such > > > > > > > type of guy, I tried to convince about the meaning of life > > > and > > > > > > values of > > > > > > > our culture, She felt bad, and got angry, Once what > happened > > > > and > > > > > > still > > > > > > > unbelievable to me, let me put here, During my daily > puja, I > > > > saw > > > > > > Shani > > > > > > > is coming to me and has occupied me, I have got divine > > > > protection > > > > > > form > > > > > > > lord Hanuman Ji, still, i could not call him for help, > what i > > > > > > could do > > > > > > > and i had no idea about a learned siddha, what happens is, > > > in a > > > > > > minute > > > > > > > My frined Nirmesh called me from mumbai. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My friend Nirmesh is a Sr, HR Manager with Reliance > Retail, > > > he > > > > was > > > > > > with > > > > > > > his girl friend, in fact i played a role in reconcilation > of > > > > > > disturbance > > > > > > > between them so they were calling me, As Priya told to me, > > > she > > > > > > lives in > > > > > > > Bombay, I missed her, and thought to contact her, I > wanted to > > > > > > write a > > > > > > > mail about me , a mail with all my emotions but here > Saturn > > > > Played > > > > > > a > > > > > > > role and in place of sending that emotionl mail to Priya, > I > > > > happen > > > > > > to > > > > > > > post that mail in a , she and me both were > > > members, > > > > I > > > > > > > created that group to promote youngersters of my region in > > > > software > > > > > > > industry, and my own personal mail was posted in the > group, > > > My > > > > own > > > > > > > mistake, Pls. check, if u are referring to this incident. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > She became so angry on me, but what i could do, all was my > > > > mistake > > > > > > and i > > > > > > > lost her, I w'd like to tell u more, A friend of me was > > > > jobless, I > > > > > > gave > > > > > > > him my own CV to put his name on the CV with all my > projects > > > > in his > > > > > > > name, Pls check in ur's prashna chart. How i help people. > > > Next > > > > day > > > > > > > after this incident, His birthday came, And the Priya > > > addressed > > > > > > him with > > > > > > > so much of respect, The guy, in place of showing a respect > > > > towards > > > > > > me > > > > > > > for my help, commented on me, A cunning man, I dont know > he > > > and > > > > > > many > > > > > > > others have contributed more in widening the gap in > between > > > me > > > > and > > > > > > > Priya. I dont know if he is still in touch with her, or > all > > > was > > > > > > planned > > > > > > > by them togather. I dont know anything. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I still dont know who this Priya was and where she lives > in, > > > If > > > > > > she is a > > > > > > > girl or a game of those guys who wanted me to look down in > > > that > > > > > > > > > > > > > Group. coz, when i started searching her, what i found > is, in > > > > > > mphasis > > > > > > > there is only one Priya Tiwari, who works with a BPO, she > > > was > > > > not > > > > > > a > > > > > > > Software Engineer and she never lived in Bombay, She was > in > > > > Noida > > > > > > > itself. For ur satisfaction, I can post my mails to HR > > > > department > > > > > > of > > > > > > > Mphasis. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I dont know what happend to her, This BPO priya, i also > have > > > > not > > > > > > met > > > > > > > her, looks different than the other Priya whom i was > > > searching. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, Dear old friend, Check ur Prashna Chart skills more > and > > > > more, > > > > > > Baiscs > > > > > > > are correct, ur interpretition is quite wrong and u have > not > > > > got > > > > > > enough > > > > > > > experience in life to judge me and realities. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > whatever be is Vedanga or Shastra, I wanted to let u know > > > every > > > > > > bit of > > > > > > > knowledge is divine and pavitra. Leave the arrogance and > > > start > > > > > > doing > > > > > > > preperation for ur journey that u have to do in near > future. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If any one in the Group, can give light on this Priya's > > > case, > > > > coz > > > > > > i had > > > > > > > soft feelings for her despite all her lies, I w'd be > grateful > > > > > > otherwise > > > > > > > it's OK. Can u tell me how and where she is and if she > really > > > > > > exists, > > > > > > > and if any occult people can help me in establishing a > > > contact > > > > > > with her > > > > > > > if she really exists w'd be good for me. I w'd pay > whatever u > > > > > > demand. > > > > > > > Will any one take the challange ? i wont ask u what u cant > > > do, > > > > I > > > > > > > promise. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I didn't tell about Preeti and Priya to Pandit ji it was > not > > > > > > necessary, > > > > > > > better if he w'd have told me sth about them, but Pandit > Ji > > > all > > > > > > the time > > > > > > > kept telling me about my Karmic Balance of the previous > > > birth, > > > > It > > > > > > was me > > > > > > > who gave him hints abot the spirit, Not he, he didnt tell > me > > > > any > > > > > > thing > > > > > > > about the spirit and when i told him about the spirti's > > > > storey, he > > > > > > said > > > > > > > he has seen it Prashan chart, tell me where i was wrong, I > > > > asked > > > > > > him to > > > > > > > give me Prashan Chart, he denied. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear old friend, why u could not see in ur's prashna chart > > > the > > > > > > Saturn > > > > > > > who got me occupied me during my Puja, I was not > sleeping, I > > > > saw > > > > > > him > > > > > > > with open eyes. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pls. check ur's prashna chart and I w'd request Mr. Rafal > to > > > > > > interefere > > > > > > > and tell me about Priya, coz, i m having some pain, I dont > > > know > > > > > > anything > > > > > > > , any truth of Priya Tiwari. I have her photograpgh that > she > > > > sent > > > > > > to me > > > > > > > which differs from the Priya whom i discovered in mphasis. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Will any one come to help me ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " mohanraaam " > > > > <mohanraaam@> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Abhishek: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Know the difference between shastraas and the > > > > vedaangas.....you > > > > > > > > think an astrologer and a yogi like me would not have > > > known > > > > all > > > > > > > > these! siksha, kalpam, chandas, mimamsa,nruktam and > > > Jyotisam > > > > are > > > > > > > > the vedangas. Don't confuse the 18 shastras or the 64 > > > mighty > > > > arts > > > > > > > > with vedanga. You are shallow young man but are trying > to > > > > pass > > > > > > > > judgments on great branches of knowledge and great > persons > > > of > > > > > > > > knowledge. I am 86 years old and have lived a full life > > > with > > > > a > > > > > > > > happy wife and 4 intelligent, well-settled children. > Not a > > > > > > > > frustrated unmarried luckless youngman like you! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Whatever you said to Panditji...I do not know because he > > > has > > > > not > > > > > > > > divulged the complete exchange inthe forum...I think he > > > > should > > > > > > > > probably do that to expose your arrogance and idiocy > > > levels > > > > to > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > group...... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You may say that you did not have affairs - then what do > > > you > > > > > > tell of > > > > > > > > a thing when you go after ladies and get heart-broken > when > > > > they > > > > > > > > reject your proposal? You could not proceed to the level > > > of a > > > > > > > > mutual affair because they did not entertain you at all! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You have not commented on my finding about Priya/ > > > > preeti.....I am > > > > > > > > sure it is correct! And definitely your failures in this > > > > regard > > > > > > > > would have been a butt of jokes in your circle. I can > bet > > > on > > > > > > that. > > > > > > > > But definitely you will come out with your own versions > to > > > > deny > > > > > > this. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Did you tell all this to Guruji? I am sure you would not > > > have > > > > > > > > shared it in this light - but mark my words, he would > have > > > > found > > > > > > it > > > > > > > > out definitely! Only thing is - he is too decent to hurt > > > > others > > > > > > > > unnecessarily. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your posts are not clear....you are saying this and that > > > > without > > > > > > > > actually commenting on what others have written. Don't > pass > > > > > > > > judgement on astrology or its efficacy.Astrology is a > basic > > > > > > > > technique that one learns before predicting - but > advanced > > > > > > > > astrologers read far more into charts than what they > > > indicate > > > > > > from > > > > > > > > conventional astrological classics - it is an applied > > > field > > > > and > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > horoscope is just a focus and an accessory tool for > > > > prediction in > > > > > > > > the hands of the greatest masters of this field. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely you are not one to comment on the need of > > > > astrological > > > > > > > > research without knowing the basic vedic etiquettes of > > > > behaving > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > learned astrologers! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Definitely Guruji's wise counsel have been useless to > you - > > > a > > > > > > > > buffalo will cherish only the muddy waters - will it > know > > > the > > > > > > > > differnece between Ganges and the gutter? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One suggestion young man - try to go into Guruji's mails > > > > > > carefully > > > > > > > > and quietly. His words are worth their weight in gold > > > > usually. > > > > > > > > Many have benefitted by his counsel - do not try to look > > > > > > for " your > > > > > > > > own version of truths " from his writings. If you do > that, > > > it > > > > is a > > > > > > > > waste of whatever money you paid Panditji. Understand > his > > > > > > counsel, > > > > > > > > try to follow them, and you will do fine. But, stop > > > > insulting and > > > > > > > > passing unnecessary remarks on astrology and need for > > > > > > astrological > > > > > > > > development. Some self-seeking astrologers - > capitalizing > > > on > > > > the > > > > > > > > craze of Indian public for " scientific " > research, " modern > > > > > > research > > > > > > > > into old classics " etc, have written volumes about the > > > need > > > > for > > > > > > > > evolution of astrology whereas the reality is those who > > > > follow > > > > > > > > ancient classical wisdom have proved more efficient in > all > > > > these > > > > > > > > predictive techniques than those " researchers " . > Parampara > > > > has its > > > > > > > > own significance. You still eat through your mouth > though > > > > times > > > > > > > > have changed (I am assuming here; or are you eating > > > through > > > > the > > > > > > > > other end for novelty sake?). In the same way, nature > has > > > not > > > > > > > > changed only certain outer manifestations have changed. > > > Only > > > > > > minor > > > > > > > > modification of interpretaions are needed to suit > > > > predictions to > > > > > > > > modern day life and definitely there are not much gaps. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mohanraaam. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " litsol " > > > > mishra.lalit@ > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Mohanraaam, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I cant say u " Idiot " and wont speak to u using level > of > > > > ur's > > > > > > > > language, > > > > > > > > > ok, Pls. check ur's Prashna Skills 100 times and > > > discover > > > > more > > > > > > > > about me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And my love affairs, I had no affair with any one, > > > right, > > > > check > > > > > > > > it in > > > > > > > > > ur Prashan Chart, however, when marriage came in my > > > mind, i > > > > > > came in > > > > > > > > > touch with girls, liked two or three of them, ok, they > > > > didn't > > > > > > like > > > > > > > > me, > > > > > > > > > It happens. It was me who beforehand informed > Panditji as > > > > > > inputs > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > required to reach somewhere. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > See, i can say, the basic finding of ur prashan chart > > > like > > > > > > break > > > > > > > > ups is > > > > > > > > > true, but is little it misleading too, as no brak up > in > > > > sense > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > break-up happened as no affiar even started, > sometimes, u > > > > > > should > > > > > > > > be > > > > > > > > > careful more in reaching ur conclusions, that's why i > > > say, > > > > more > > > > > > > > and more > > > > > > > > > remains to discover, It's - " Apaurusheya " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Well, can u tell, in the storey, u posted in group, > > > where > > > > is > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > " P-Priya, Preti etc.. " ? I will be more than happy to > > > see > > > > ur > > > > > > > > findings, > > > > > > > > > What Guruji said was completely different from u, I > > > > discussed > > > > > > > > with him > > > > > > > > > why i dont get proposals from girls even having > average > > > > looks, > > > > > > He > > > > > > > > said > > > > > > > > > to me, You change utr attitude and consider such > > > > proposals, i > > > > > > > > further > > > > > > > > > asked him is it a big expectation to find a nice sweet > > > > person, > > > > > > i > > > > > > > > dont > > > > > > > > > think a model or actress but a girl with little good > > > looks > > > > and > > > > > > good > > > > > > > > > nature, even it is difficult, if it is difficult, i > was > > > > asking > > > > > > him > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > describing him about me, my needs, my thoughts. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and on what u did write - " And your posts about > > > astrology > > > > in > > > > > > your > > > > > > > > > arguments with Shri. Abhishek also clearly protray > your > > > > idiocy! > > > > > > > > You are > > > > > > > > > asking why Astrology > > > > > > > > > alone is Divine and why not Engineering and other > things? > > > > > > Idiot - > > > > > > > > > Astrology is a " Vedanga " a direct limb of the Vedas > and > > > not > > > > > > > > > Engineering......You do not know all this > > > classifications > > > > and > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > entering into debate on all these. Do not try to > comment > > > on > > > > > > > > > subjects without knowing them " > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pls study " Shulb Sutras " ok, U will find, Engineering > is > > > > there, > > > > > > > > > Mathmatics is there, Ayourveda as medical science is > > > there. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You are showing u r too full of urself, somtimes it > > > > happens to > > > > > > few > > > > > > > > > people. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " mohanraaam " > > > > > > <mohanraaam@> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Lalith: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You " demanded " Panditji's phone no. and he > > > refused....you > > > > > > think > > > > > > > > he > > > > > > > > > > has no right to do that? It is his privacy...when > you > > > > have > > > > > > been > > > > > > > > > > pestering him over email how much more irresponsible > > > you > > > > > > would > > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > been if he had given his phone no.? You think > Panditji > > > > has > > > > > > time > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > spend on worthless brats like you who think the > world > > > is > > > > > > > > revolving > > > > > > > > > > around them? He has sent you an audio recording of > the > > > > > > mantra - > > > > > > > > > > what else you need to know? Is the Great Man your > > > slave > > > > or > > > > > > what > > > > > > > > > > that you can demand everything that you want from > him? > > > > He is > > > > > > too > > > > > > > > > > proud for that! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You have no right to expect anything except service > > > for > > > > your > > > > > > > > > > payment - assuming you have made some payment to > > > Guruji! > > > > Do > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > > think you have bought him just because you asked his > > > > > > service? I > > > > > > > > am > > > > > > > > > > sure you would have written something silly like > this > > > > (your > > > > > > > > current > > > > > > > > > > post is in itself silly) that annoyed Panditji! You > > > say > > > > the > > > > > > > > matter > > > > > > > > > > is over - but you keep on saying things as if > Panditji > > > > has > > > > > > done a > > > > > > > > > > mistake and you are justified. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And your posts about astrology in your arguments > with > > > > Shri. > > > > > > > > Abhishek > > > > > > > > > > also clearly protray your idiocy! You are asking why > > > > > > Astrology > > > > > > > > > > alone is Divine and why not Engineering and other > > > things? > > > > > > Idiot - > > > > > > > > > > Astrology is a " Vedanga " a direct limb of the Vedas > > > and > > > > not > > > > > > > > > > Engineering......You do not know all this > > > classifications > > > > > > and are > > > > > > > > > > entering into debate on all these. Do not try to > > > comment > > > > on > > > > > > > > > > subjects without knowing them. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I just checked up a prashna chart to see what sort > of > > > > person > > > > > > you > > > > > > > > > > are.....From this, try to understand what all > > > astrology > > > > is > > > > > > > > capable > > > > > > > > > > of..... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Last year you would have proposed to a Lady - and > your > > > > > > failure > > > > > > > > was a > > > > > > > > > > widely circulated joke in your social circle.....is > it > > > > true > > > > > > or > > > > > > > > not? > > > > > > > > > > Just understand - people have made fun of you only > > > > because of > > > > > > > > > > your " loser " attitude. You are childish in your > > > attitude; > > > > > > this is > > > > > > > > > > one reason why women in your life are running away > > > from > > > > you. > > > > > > > > Guruji > > > > > > > > > > has just hinted on love failures in his post - but > my > > > > prashna > > > > > > > > > > clearly indicates they have rejected you outright > after > > > > > > initial > > > > > > > > > > interactions with you because you have > been " chasing " > > > > them > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > troubling them with undiplomatic messages > > > persistently. > > > > Your > > > > > > last > > > > > > > > > > serious connection when the lady rejected your > > > proposal - > > > > her > > > > > > > > name > > > > > > > > > > is likely to be in the " pa " varga (preeti, Priya, > etc. > > > > any of > > > > > > > > these - > > > > > > > > > > you may think I have not found the right name - but > > > > knowing > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > initial word of a person about whom I know nothing > is > > > in > > > > > > itself > > > > > > > > > > difficult - and no amount of research in scientific > > > > > > astrology can > > > > > > > > > > give the exact name! Don't think your " researches " > will > > > > > > > > > > automatically pave the way to find the name and > glorify > > > > > > > > astrology - > > > > > > > > > > because that is not possible!) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now do you understand what an astrologer is capable > of! > > > > > > Guruji is > > > > > > > > > > too decent to insult you by writing like this - > > > > definitely he > > > > > > > > would > > > > > > > > > > have found out all these. He would have counselled > you > > > > about > > > > > > > > change > > > > > > > > > > of attitude mainly regarding this....you would not > > > have > > > > got > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > hint. Yet in message after message you are > justifying > > > and > > > > > > > > > > projecting as if your grievance is genuine. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Heights of arrogance - thinking you have the right > to > > > > > > disturb a > > > > > > > > > > learned senior astrologer as and when you want! I am > > > > > > associated > > > > > > > > > > with Panditji for so long and yet I do not have his > > > > mobile > > > > > > no. do > > > > > > > > > > you know that? He has email id and he is very prompt > > > in > > > > his > > > > > > > > replies > > > > > > > > > > through that. Do you know anything of that great man > > > or > > > > his > > > > > > daily > > > > > > > > > > schedules? He has not merely one client like you - > but > > > > > > thosands > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > admirers, students, disciples, and clients all over > the > > > > > > world. If > > > > > > > > > > all start calling Guruji will he ever have time for > > > > himself? > > > > > > That > > > > > > > > > > is why he is not giving the mobile. Your post speaks > > > as > > > > if > > > > > > he is > > > > > > > > > > hiding himself. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is probably his mistake that he is helping out > > > people > > > > like > > > > > > > > you - > > > > > > > > > > the great man does not differentiate much and tries > to > > > > help > > > > > > out > > > > > > > > > > suffering people even if they are undeserving. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Try to change your attitude for your own good. > Improve > > > > > > yourself > > > > > > > > > > before trying to comment on great fields like > > > astrology, > > > > > > about > > > > > > > > which > > > > > > > > > > you do not know even a speck. There are no gaps in > > > > > > astrological > > > > > > > > > > knowledge. Enough knowledge has been documented as > > > Shri. > > > > > > Potti > > > > > > > > has > > > > > > > > > > written in his post. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Mohanraaam. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .vedic astrology , " litsol " > > > > > > > > > > mishra.lalit@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear primusjyotish, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You are right, in fact differences begane, when i > > > asked > > > > > > Pandit > > > > > > > > Ji's > > > > > > > > > > > phone nos to communicate to him, he refused to > give > > > his > > > > > > nos, I > > > > > > > > was > > > > > > > > > > > surprised, being a client, paying for the > > > consultation > > > > a > > > > > > clear > > > > > > > > > > > communication is required, so at least a > > > communication > > > > over > > > > > > > > phone > > > > > > > > > > > should happen, It was refused, he recommened a > > > mantra, > > > > i > > > > > > was > > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > > clear > > > > > > > > > > > on it's pronunciation, the rerequest to tell right > > > > > > > > pronunciation > > > > > > > > > > over > > > > > > > > > > > phone was also refused, then a copy of charts made > > > was > > > > > > refused. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I didnt come to group for so many refusals. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > And there were two contradictory explanations , > the > > > > timing > > > > > > > > given > > > > > > > > > > was > > > > > > > > > > > very wide for an event - one year and it was said > > > that > > > > it's > > > > > > > > > > conditional > > > > > > > > > > > too, I was not understanding what to conclude and > > > then > > > > > > pandit > > > > > > > > Ji > > > > > > > > > > posted > > > > > > > > > > > my private communication partly in the group. > Later, > > > > > > pandit ji > > > > > > > > > > provided > > > > > > > > > > > me sound files of the mantras, ok, my confusion on > > > > > > > > pronunciation > > > > > > > > > > > removed. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, it is over, and i dont want to discuss it > > > further. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic astrology , " Jyotish > > > > > > Volunteers " > > > > > > > > > > > <primusjyotishi@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One would not consult a doctor for his physical > > > > ailments > > > > > > or a > > > > > > > > > > > > psychiatrist for his mental ailments through > > > > internet. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Perhaps this is why many like Sri K.N. Rao > strongly > > > > > > recommend > > > > > > > > > > against > > > > > > > > > > > > seeking solutions to serious matters via > internet > > > > and to > > > > > > use > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > time > > > > > > > > > > > > tested procedure of face-to-face, in-person > > > > consultation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Convenience gets in the way and causes more pain > > > > > > ultimately, > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > > > need to get the answer here and now, > > > > unfortunately ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic- astrology , " litsol " > > > > > > > > mishra.lalit@ > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit Ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I bought a service and had a private > > > communication, > > > > > > it's at > > > > > > > > > > first > > > > > > > > > > > > sight > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrong for u to post any part of private > > > > communication > > > > > > > > without > > > > > > > > > > my > > > > > > > > > > > > > consent. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > U cant imagine anything solely at ur end, if i > > > > myself > > > > > > gave > > > > > > > > u > > > > > > > > > > hints > > > > > > > > > > > > of a > > > > > > > > > > > > > possible obstacle due to spirit, how i m going > > > to > > > > fear > > > > > > some > > > > > > > > > > thing > > > > > > > > > > > > or the > > > > > > > > > > > > > other. This should not be basis of not > providing > > > > > > > > infomation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You are at advanced level, which is realized > by > > > > many > > > > > > that's > > > > > > > > > > why u > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > being contacted, but that u r into deciding > > > > everything > > > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > > > profession one > > > > > > > > > > > > > sided, can not be justified. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Though, i wanted chart for keeping in my > > > records, > > > > with > > > > > > no > > > > > > > > > > doubts on > > > > > > > > > > > > u, > > > > > > > > > > > > > ur apporach makes me think otherwise. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In any profession, transparency is key to gain > > > > one's > > > > > > faith > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > that u > > > > > > > > > > > > > didn't bother this, on the basis of ur > advanced > > > > level u > > > > > > > > pls. > > > > > > > > > > dont > > > > > > > > > > > > > justify what is incorrect, it's a pity that u > > > make > > > > ur > > > > > > mood > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > post > > > > > > > > > > > > > private communication and at the same time, > in ur > > > > > > reply to > > > > > > > > my > > > > > > > > > > > > private > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail id, u accused me that i can post ur > advanced > > > > > > > > technique in > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > group, I dont know how to react. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > That's a clear contradiction, I was interested > > > in > > > > the > > > > > > final > > > > > > > > > > outcome > > > > > > > > > > > > > which is chart, i should know that, and not in > > > ur's > > > > > > > > technique > > > > > > > > > > but u > > > > > > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > > > > made it a public issue instread of giving same > > > to > > > > me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Why development of ancient knowledge has come > to > > > an > > > > > > end is > > > > > > > > > > because > > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > this fear which i dont know why some > knowledgable > > > > > > people > > > > > > > > like u > > > > > > > > > > > > > insttalled within. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wish to assure u that ur respect is no way > > > > > > corroborated > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > intact in > > > > > > > > > > > > > my views, i m also thankful to u for the > > > remedies > > > > and > > > > > > > > mantras u > > > > > > > > > > > > provided > > > > > > > > > > > > > to me, even if that dont work, i will have > same > > > > respect > > > > > > > > for u > > > > > > > > > > but u > > > > > > > > > > > > are > > > > > > > > > > > > > completely wrong at ur part in ur dealings. > Pls. > > > > check > > > > > > ur > > > > > > > > > > dasha and > > > > > > > > > > > > > antardasha, something wrong somewhere. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > vedic- > > > > > > astrology , " dakshinastrologer " > > > > > > > > > > > > > <dakshinastrologer@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Members: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am posting an extract of the interaction > > > > between > > > > > > myself > > > > > > > > > > and one > > > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this list members who wanted a prediction > from > > > > me. I > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > given > > > > > > > > > > > > him > > > > > > > > > > > > > > counselling based on his horoscope and also > > > > based on > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > prashna > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chart. Marital chart showed marital delays > and > > > > > > problem > > > > > > > > with > > > > > > > > > > love > > > > > > > > > > > > > > matters which he has already experienced. > The > > > > prashna > > > > > > > > chart > > > > > > > > > > showed > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the possibility of " Paisacha baadha " > (trouble > > > > due to > > > > > > > > ghostly > > > > > > > > > > > > > > entities that block happiness in the > family). > > > I > > > > had > > > > > > taken > > > > > > > > > > this > > > > > > > > > > > > > > matter into account and not wanting to scare > > > the > > > > > > member > > > > > > > > > > > > > > unnecessarily, I had not divulged the matter > > > to > > > > him. > > > > > > > > > > Instead, I > > > > > > > > > > > > > > suggested beeja mantras to counteract that > > > > effect and > > > > > > > > also > > > > > > > > > > > > > > suggested " Sumangali Pooja " to be performed. > > > He > > > > later > > > > > > > > came > > > > > > > > > > back to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > me and asked about the ghostly events > himself > > > > > > because his > > > > > > > > > > family > > > > > > > > > > > > > > members have had visitations from that > entity. > > > I > > > > > > replied > > > > > > > > back > > > > > > > > > > > > > > saying that I have already taken that factor > > > into > > > > > > account > > > > > > > > > > while > > > > > > > > > > > > > > giving my suggestions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The prashna chart showed that the entity is > > > > likely to > > > > > > > > leave > > > > > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Earth Plane by this year end and so it > cannot > > > > trouble > > > > > > > > him any > > > > > > > > > > > > > > longer. So, based on that and also based on > his > > > > > > > > horoscope, > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > having faith in the remedies I had > suggested, > > > I > > > > had > > > > > > > > predicted > > > > > > > > > > > > > > possibility of marriage in Feb 2008 or in > 2009. > > > > > > Actually, > > > > > > > > > > dasa- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bhukti and transit influences are quite > tough > > > and > > > > > > > > > > contradictory > > > > > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this event and I had taken so many factors > and > > > > > > > > > > balanced/counter- > > > > > > > > > > > > > > balanced so many possibilities and had > > > predicted > > > > the > > > > > > > > date as > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Benediction; let the marriage happen in Feb > > > > 2008! I > > > > > > had > > > > > > > > even > > > > > > > > > > gone > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to the extent of suggesting attitude > > > modification > > > > > > (he may > > > > > > > > > > not get > > > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wife of his expectations) for the marriage > to > > > > > > happen; or > > > > > > > > > > else it > > > > > > > > > > > > > > might even be denied. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Now, the member has been persisting about > > > > sharing the > > > > > > > > prashna > > > > > > > > > > > > chart > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with him. I had given him broad hints about > > > why I > > > > > > though > > > > > > > > > > Paisacha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > baadha was there for him; but he insists > that I > > > > > > share the > > > > > > > > > > prashna > > > > > > > > > > > > > > chart and give the complete details to him, > or > > > > else > > > > > > I am > > > > > > > > > > unfair! > > > > > > > > > > > > My > > > > > > > > > > > > > > reservation regarding this is that prashna > is > > > an > > > > > > advanced > > > > > > > > > > > > > > application and sharing its techniques > offhand > > > > may be > > > > > > > > > > confusing > > > > > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > > > may lead the native into reading too much > into > > > > each > > > > > > > > prashna > > > > > > > > > > chart > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and fear paisacha baadha when infact it > might > > > > not be > > > > > > > > there > > > > > > > > > > at all! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > He does not understand me and is getting at > me > > > > > > prompting > > > > > > > > me > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > write > > > > > > > > > > > > > > mail after mail and I am at my patience's > end! > > > > If I > > > > > > spend > > > > > > > > > > > > pointless > > > > > > > > > > > > > > time debating like this with one person how > > > can I > > > > > > serve > > > > > > > > > > > > > > others.....Why does not this member > understand > > > > this? > > > > > > Not > > > > > > > > > > sharing > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sensitive prashna charts is a hallowed > > > > > > tradition......Am > > > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > > > > > > justified in my action when I have acted in > > > the > > > > best > > > > > > > > > > interests of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the member? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am posting the latest exchange between us > > > for > > > > your > > > > > > > > > > reference. I > > > > > > > > > > > > > > request those who are knowledgeable in > > > authentic > > > > > > prashna > > > > > > > > > > > > traditions > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to write to the member (He is the person > who is > > > > > > cutting > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > > > pasting > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Garga Hora in this list) telling him > that > > > I > > > > am > > > > > > > > justified > > > > > > > > > > in my > > > > > > > > > > > > > > stand, and I am doing it in the best > > > interests. > > > > He > > > > > > does > > > > > > > > not > > > > > > > > > > > > > > understand the danger of maintaining the > > > prashna > > > > > > chart > > > > > > > > > > indicating > > > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > paisacha baadha which is inauspicious! I am > > > > pained > > > > > > by his > > > > > > > > > > words > > > > > > > > > > > > > > like " Your are hiding something; hiding > things > > > is > > > > > > not a > > > > > > > > sign > > > > > > > > > > of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fairness " etc. It is almost like accusing > me of > > > > > > being a > > > > > > > > > > cheat! > > > > > > > > > > > > Again > > > > > > > > > > > > > > he comment on my professionalism; I am > acting > > > as > > > > per > > > > > > my > > > > > > > > > > > > professional > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ethics; why is he - a novice imputing > motives > > > to > > > > me > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > commenting > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on my professionalism? Is this what an > > > astrologer > > > > > > gets > > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > > > his > > > > > > > > > > > > > > service? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Below is the extract.... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------- -- > --- > > > -- > > > > ---- > > > > > > ---- > > > > > > > > ---- > > > > > > > > > > ----- > > > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Dear Shri. Lalith Mishra: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unnecessary openness in the name of > frankness > > > is > > > > the > > > > > > > > bane of > > > > > > > > > > our > > > > > > > > > > > > > > society now-a-days. Will you go out in the > > > nude > > > > on > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > public > > > > > > > > > > > > roads > > > > > > > > > > > > > > just to prove you have nothing to hide? > Asking > > > > > > advanced > > > > > > > > and > > > > > > > > > > unique > > > > > > > > > > > > > > predictive techniques of a practising > > > > professional > > > > > > > > > > persistently > > > > > > > > > > > > even > > > > > > > > > > > > > > after he has denied access to that knowledge > > > is > > > > very > > > > > > > > rude . > > > > > > > > > > The > > > > > > > > > > > > > > access to that knowledge was denied because > it > > > > can be > > > > > > > > > > > > misinterpreted > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and if you post that " technique " in the VA > > > list, > > > > many > > > > > > > > other > > > > > > > > > > > > members > > > > > > > > > > > > > > will get anxious (just as some members are > > > > wondering > > > > > > > > what is > > > > > > > > > > wrong > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with their horoscopes with the Garga Hora > > > > posting of > > > > > > > > yours!) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What do I have to gain by withholding > > > > information? I > > > > > > am > > > > > > > > too > > > > > > > > > > > > > > advanced in my profession to be taking > advice > > > > from > > > > > > people > > > > > > > > > > > > regarding > > > > > > > > > > > > > > what is the professional way of handling my > > > > clients. > > > > > > I > > > > > > > > have > > > > > > > > > > no > > > > > > > > > > > > > > malefic intentions, and your accusing me of > > > being > > > > > > unfair > > > > > > > > is > > > > > > > > > > rude > > > > > > > > > > > > (in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > fact each of your mails contains something > or > > > the > > > > > > other). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I can assure you only one thing - I have > acted > > > > in the > > > > > > > > best of > > > > > > > > > > > > > > intentions. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am posting this in the VA list so that > other > > > > > > learned > > > > > > > > > > members > > > > > > > > > > > > might > > > > > > > > > > > > > > put some wisdom into you (I have failed in > > > this > > > > with > > > > > > my > > > > > > > > > > repeated > > > > > > > > > > > > > > replies to you). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Blessed be. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pandit R.DAKSHINAMOORTHI > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > " Lalit Mishra, Noida " mlalit@ wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Res. Pandit Ji, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On the one hand , I m thankful to you for > all > > > ur > > > > > > analysis > > > > > > > > > > and I > > > > > > > > > > > > will > > > > > > > > > > > > > > follow ur instructions but on the other I > must > > > > say > > > > > > don't > > > > > > > > > > seem fair > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enough in ur professional approach. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hiding things is not a sign of fairness. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If I knew astrology, perhapse I w'd not have > > > > asked u > > > > > > for > > > > > > > > such > > > > > > > > > > > > simple > > > > > > > > > > > > > > things or charts, required to keep in my > > > > records. My > > > > > > > > level > > > > > > > > > > is not > > > > > > > > > > > > a > > > > > > > > > > > > > > constraint for u to share important charts, > if > > > > > > tomorrow I > > > > > > > > > > need to > > > > > > > > > > > > > > contact u for sth, how I w'd do without any > > > > > > reference. > > > > > > > > If I > > > > > > > > > > ask > > > > > > > > > > > > u, u > > > > > > > > > > > > > > should not hold things at ur's end and u > don't > > > > gain > > > > > > any > > > > > > > > > > thing with > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ur approach. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Lalit Mishra. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > =================================================================== > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been > removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.