Guest guest Posted March 12, 2006 Report Share Posted March 12, 2006 ~~ ~~~ truly Angela, that is the question we ask of EVERY other EVERY day. Mother Nature will continue, some form of ecosphere, and perhaps even some form of irresponsible laboratory 'humanity' -- yet we wish and work towards a planet of forests and rainforests, an Earth with frogs, birds and trees, not simply insects and mold; of bison & bears, and elephants & giraffes, of panthers & crocodiles in vast natural numbers, in true wilderness ... of a PURE CLEAN living ocean with Whales and Dolphins returned to ten times greater, happy, populations -- if not their natural hundred- times greater populations. this is the difference between a living planet cared for by an enlightened world-tribe -- and the cesspool which it has become at the hands of sickly homo sapiens sapiens. we have but this year to act, to turn about and save some few species -- requiring a re-planeting of the ocean and global rainforest -- before there is no turning back -- before there is no living flora and fauna, living land and sea, nothing at all left to bring back to life ... a planet eradicated of all our relations, Millennium Twain ~~~~ ~~~~~ In WeComeAsEagles, Angela Luchera wrote: that was an excellent post!! I thoroughly enjoyed it as one of my interests is to prove/show that indeed 'science' has a lot to add to 'spirituality' in a very intricate, dynamic way. And you have SHOWN THAT!! Now the question that still plagues me - and it's an important one is this: Can NATURE (and we know how powerful nature is in a biological and fundamental way) keep SUSTAINING itself, DESPITE the horrendous things we inflict upon it?(i.e.: pollution, oil drilling, underground nuclear testing, electro-frequency testing, etc.,-just a few examples - there are more)? And do WE, the inhabitants of this amazing planet - have the highest RESPONSIBILITY to maintain NATURE in a form that 'helps it to be sustaining' and 'nourishing'? I believe we do. But there are many powerful individuals/corporations out there, that do not have the same set of 'values' ... and are willing to gamble with the very life of this planet. angelica ~~ ~~~ MessiahTwain <yonibluestar wrote: namaste loving Bo, yes, Sankhara, change! therefore I speak of nuclear structure because that is the paradigm that I have revealed -- and nuclear fusion because that is the experience of creation, of refinement, of cultivation -- a lesson that has been hidden from a world 'bent' on the patriarchal, on the violent, on the destructive for several thousand years heretofore. my gift to the world -- language, topology, and proof of the living process of consciousness, of electromagnetic wave, become physical matter -- become electron, proton, neutron and nucleus! and thus I reveal to you, and a world of seven billion sovereign siblings, that the spiritual world is named ELECTRODYNAMIC -- and the physical world is an essential and unmistakable part of that experience of the divine. nature IS the divine. this I have proven, without ambiguity, wholly and clearly for a whole loving planet to grow upon. as you had read my letter, you will understand CLEARLY that I revealed that energy is but a small subset of the twenty times greater phenomenon of electromagnetism, consciousness, aether. energy is only the lollipop, the candy, the drug, for those adolescents who are not yet mindful, not yet sensitive enough to witness their dreaming, the process of their own thinking/being. for those who see only the superficial, the consumer, the televised world. electromagnetism, electrodynamics, the Great Mother, Way of the Tao, is not divine 'power', but simply the WHOLE divine song ... the full SPECTRUM of beingness ... including 'powerlessness' and a thousand million billion trillion other attributes, characteristics, personalities of heartmind unfettered and unbounded, our living breathing celestial wilderness. the rainbow of ALL colours, everywhere, everywhen. ancestors, deities and their never-ending song. we all understand, of course, that Siddhartha Gautama represented an early and provincial stage of enlightenment. without a WORLD of culture to share first hand, absent the returned feminine, untutored of an astrophysical knowledge extending to ten-to-the-eleventh-power light years, 2500 years before the awakening of a global electronic infrastructure linking seven billions in one humanisphere of vision -- the Buddha/Prince was limited to indulging a modest continent of unrefined masculinity, unbalanced, in fear and ignorance of the divine feminine, sacred nature, and living body of humanity (the Blue Star) only just ascended. there certainly WERE individuals thousands of years ago who lived the way of the Tao, as well as setting an example of balance and asceticism, and even traveled to the Alta Plana of the Andes to experience enlightenment under the Serpent Priestesses ... yet the 'rationalists' of Europe had not yet been born, and the Dutchmen's telescope (perhaps) not yet polished ... and the internet backbone of planetwide intellect not yet plugged in ... and thousands of more years of sister/brotherly struggle & co-evolution not yet experienced, recorded, mulled over. and now, witness, Global Consciousness! hence, you and I now refine together, cultivate as co-evolvers in a planetwide 'riverpersona' which illumines and outlines, and echos and transmits, our every shared word -- and thus polishes it- (her-) self, resplendently! as we speak, WE shimmer and shine ... Millennium Twain NuclearStructure/ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In BuddhistWellnessGroup, bo khinmaung wrote: Dear brother Messiah Thank you for your reply. Still not sure about your intention and substance. Let me quote some of your concepts. You said' Nature is to create not to destroy'. I would have to disagree. Nature is 'change (Sankhara)'. It depends on individual's point of view to see that 'change' as creation or destruction. You mentioned, ' knowledge of impedence, capacitance, dielectric constant, magnetic susceptibily and permeability'. Knowdledge is not physical. Knowledge can not have above characteristics. You compared Electromagnetic waves with divine power. Electro- magnetic waves are nothing but transfer of some form of physical energy. It can not be compared with divine power. Anyway, I am not here to argue with your theories. You have a right to believe what you think is right. It is just that although you mentioned your concepts in English, the meaning is not transparent. And I am not sure why it is necessary to quote nuclear physics heavily to explain your concepts. Thank you again for your further discussion. with love and kindness abidhama ... .. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.