Guest guest Posted September 28, 2008 Report Share Posted September 28, 2008 Dear Experts, What is your opinion on lunar parallax correction for moon position as ephimaries give geocentric position for planets. D.P.Agarwal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 3, 2008 Report Share Posted October 3, 2008 1. Garth Allen (The Parallax Problem in Astrology) suggests that parallax moon (which is geographic) produces good results in eclipse and new moon situations. 2. As the parallax can be just over one degree, the star and sub (basis for KP analysis) would not change, except in border line cases. 3. As per Geoffrey Dean (Recent Advances in Natal Astrology, A Critical Review 1900-1976), no studies of whether correction for lunar parallax improves the accuracy of techniques have been published. Fortunately, there is little difference between the two and in most cases would not change the Sub Lord. " The Parallax Problem in Astrology " Moon and the Sun's antipodes, which is the same thing but for a slight parallax correction that never exceeds 0.15 degree , " dpa54in " <agarwal_dp wrote: > > Dear Experts, > > What is your opinion on lunar parallax correction for moon position as > ephimaries give geocentric position for planets. > > D.P.Agarwal > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 5, 2008 Report Share Posted October 5, 2008 -It certainly effects dasa/bhukti. The difference could be upto one year as parallax could be 1 degree. If dasa balance is saturn or rahu the difference is more prominent. The nakshtra of moon and sub can/shall change also.All earlier panchangas are based on geographic position of moon. -- In , " tw853 " <tw853 wrote: > > 1. Garth Allen (The Parallax Problem in Astrology) suggests that > parallax moon (which is geographic) produces good results in > eclipse and new moon situations. > > 2. As the parallax can be just over one degree, the star and sub > (basis for KP analysis) would not change, except in border line cases. > > 3. As per Geoffrey Dean (Recent Advances in Natal Astrology, A > Critical Review 1900-1976), no studies of whether correction for > lunar parallax improves the accuracy of techniques have been > published. > > > > Fortunately, there is little difference between the two and in > most cases would not change the Sub Lord. > " The Parallax Problem in Astrology " > Moon and the Sun's antipodes, which is the same thing but for a > slight parallax correction that never exceeds 0.15 degree > > > , " dpa54in " <agarwal_dp@> wrote: > > > > Dear Experts, > > > > What is your opinion on lunar parallax correction for moon position > as > > ephimaries give geocentric position for planets. > > > > D.P.Agarwal > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 6, 2008 Report Share Posted October 6, 2008 That is why the modern ephemeris uses the geocentric position of moon. Right now 5 Oct 21:00 PM DST (5hr West)the difference is 31min:36sec. , " dpa54in " <agarwal_dp wrote: > > -It certainly effects dasa/bhukti. The difference could be upto one > year as parallax could be 1 degree. If dasa balance is saturn or rahu > the difference is more prominent. The nakshtra of moon and sub > can/shall change also.All earlier panchangas are based on geographic > position of moon. > > -- In , " tw853 " <tw853@> wrote: > > > > 1. Garth Allen (The Parallax Problem in Astrology) suggests that > > parallax moon (which is geographic) produces good results in > > eclipse and new moon situations. > > > > 2. As the parallax can be just over one degree, the star and sub > > (basis for KP analysis) would not change, except in border line cases. > > > > 3. As per Geoffrey Dean (Recent Advances in Natal Astrology, A > > Critical Review 1900-1976), no studies of whether correction for > > lunar parallax improves the accuracy of techniques have been > > published. > > > > > > > > Fortunately, there is little difference between the two and in > > most cases would not change the Sub Lord. > > " The Parallax Problem in Astrology " > > Moon and the Sun's antipodes, which is the same thing but for a > > slight parallax correction that never exceeds 0.15 degree > > > > > > , " dpa54in " <agarwal_dp@> wrote: > > > > > > Dear Experts, > > > > > > What is your opinion on lunar parallax correction for moon position > > as > > > ephimaries give geocentric position for planets. > > > > > > D.P.Agarwal > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 11, 2008 Report Share Posted October 11, 2008 Does it mean that we ignore effect of lunar parallax in calculating vimshotri dasa , the best effective tool for timing an event. , " tw853 " <tw853 wrote: > > That is why the modern ephemeris uses the geocentric position of moon. > Right now 5 Oct 21:00 PM DST (5hr West)the difference is 31min:36sec. > > > , " dpa54in " <agarwal_dp@> wrote: > > > > -It certainly effects dasa/bhukti. The difference could be upto one > > year as parallax could be 1 degree. If dasa balance is saturn or rahu > > the difference is more prominent. The nakshtra of moon and sub > > can/shall change also.All earlier panchangas are based on geographic > > position of moon. > > > > -- In , " tw853 " <tw853@> wrote: > > > > > > 1. Garth Allen (The Parallax Problem in Astrology) suggests that > > > parallax moon (which is geographic) produces good results in > > > eclipse and new moon situations. > > > > > > 2. As the parallax can be just over one degree, the star and sub > > > (basis for KP analysis) would not change, except in border line cases. > > > > > > 3. As per Geoffrey Dean (Recent Advances in Natal Astrology, A > > > Critical Review 1900-1976), no studies of whether correction for > > > lunar parallax improves the accuracy of techniques have been > > > published. > > > > > > > > > > > > Fortunately, there is little difference between the two and in > > > most cases would not change the Sub Lord. > > > " The Parallax Problem in Astrology " > > > Moon and the Sun's antipodes, which is the same thing but for a > > > slight parallax correction that never exceeds 0.15 degree > > > > > > > > > , " dpa54in " <agarwal_dp@> wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Experts, > > > > > > > > What is your opinion on lunar parallax correction for moon position > > > as > > > > ephimaries give geocentric position for planets. > > > > > > > > D.P.Agarwal > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted October 13, 2008 Report Share Posted October 13, 2008 Yes So far in KP Ihave not met anybody who uses parallax in KPraichur anant mumbai--- On Sat, 10/11/08, dpa54in <agarwal_dp wrote:dpa54in <agarwal_dp Re: lunar parallax Date: Saturday, October 11, 2008, 4:18 PM Does it mean that we ignore effect of lunar parallax in calculating vimshotri dasa , the best effective tool for timing an event. @gro ups.com, "tw853" <tw853 wrote: > > That is why the modern ephemeris uses the geocentric position of moon. > Right now 5 Oct 21:00 PM DST (5hr West)the difference is 31min:36sec. > > > @gro ups.com, "dpa54in" <agarwal_dp@ > wrote: > > > > -It certainly effects dasa/bhukti. The difference could be upto one > > year as parallax could be 1 degree. If dasa balance is saturn or rahu > > the difference is more prominent. The nakshtra of moon and sub > > can/shall change also.All earlier panchangas are based on geographic > > position of moon. > > > > -- In @gro ups.com, "tw853" <tw853@> wrote: > > > > > > 1. Garth Allen (The Parallax Problem in Astrology) suggests that > > > parallax moon (which is geographic) produces good results in > > > eclipse and new moon situations. > > > > > > 2. As the parallax can be just over one degree, the star and sub > > > (basis for KP analysis) would not change, except in border line cases. > > > > > > 3. As per Geoffrey Dean (Recent Advances in Natal Astrology, A > > > Critical Review 1900-1976), no studies of whether correction for > > > lunar parallax improves the accuracy of techniques have been > > > published. > > > > > > > > > > > > Fortunately, there is little difference between the two and in > > > most cases would not change the Sub Lord. > > > "The Parallax Problem in Astrology" > > > Moon and the Sun's antipodes, which is the same thing but for a > > > slight parallax correction that never exceeds 0.15 degree > > > > > > > > > @gro ups.com, "dpa54in" <agarwal_dp@ > wrote: > > > > > > > > Dear Experts, > > > > > > > > What is your opinion on lunar parallax correction for moon position > > > as > > > > ephimaries give geocentric position for planets. > > > > > > > > D.P.Agarwal > > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.