days in a year

September 13, 2008

if we take 360 days in a year with new KP ayamnsha we get better results.

September 14, 2008

Then it will not coincide with the Calender which in general use with 365 days a year

--- On Sat, 13/9/08, dpa54in <agarwal_dp wrote:

dpa54in <agarwal_dp days in a year Date: Saturday, 13 September, 2008, 10:22 AM

if we take 360 days in a year with new KP ayamnsha we get better results.

Be the first one to try the new Messenger 9 Beta!

September 16, 2008

one has to calculate or use available software

, rao chitturu <csr162002 wrote:

>

> Then it will not coincide with the Calender which in general use

with 365 days a year

>

> --- On Sat, 13/9/08, dpa54in <agarwal_dp wrote:

>

> dpa54in <agarwal_dp

> days in a year

>

> Saturday, 13 September, 2008, 10:22 AM

if we take 360 days in a year with new KP ayamnsha we get better

results.

>

Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now, on

http://help./l/in//mail/mail/tools/tools-08.html/

>

September 16, 2008

" 360 vs 365 D-Y.doc, 365 vs 360 day year Dasa " article in file

section and Msg#3018/2076 may help.

, " dpa54in " <agarwal_dp wrote:

>

> one has to calculate or use available software

>

> , rao chitturu <csr162002@> wrote:

> >

> > Then it will not coincide with the Calender which in general use

> with 365 days a year

> >

> > --- On Sat, 13/9/08, dpa54in <agarwal_dp@> wrote:

> >

> > dpa54in <agarwal_dp@>

> > days in a year

> >

> > Saturday, 13 September, 2008, 10:22 AM

> >

> > if we take 360 days in a year with new KP ayamnsha we get better

> results.

> >

> > Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now, on

> http://help./l/in//mail/mail/tools/tools-08.html/

> >

>

September 16, 2008

Dear Agarwal

The discussion on 360 or 365.24 is already over. This forum has decided to use only 365.24 days per year as recommended by Mr.KSK, according to Paladipigai. Please go through the file section for detailed reading.

Dhanabalan--- On Tue, 9/16/08, dpa54in <agarwal_dp wrote:

dpa54in <agarwal_dp Re: days in a year Date: Tuesday, September 16, 2008, 4:04 AM

one has to calculate or use available software@gro ups.com, rao chitturu <csr162002@. ..> wrote:>> Then it will not coincide with the Calender which in general usewith 365 days a year> > > --- On Sat, 13/9/08, dpa54in <agarwal_dp@ ...> wrote:> > dpa54in <agarwal_dp@ ...>> days in a year> @gro ups.com> Saturday, 13 September, 2008, 10:22 AM> > > > > > > if we take 360 days in a year with new KP ayamnsha we get betterresults.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now, onhttp://help. / l/in// mail/mail/ tools/tools- 08.html/>

September 17, 2008

Dear Friends."....This forum has decided to use only 365.24 days per year as recommended by Mr.KSK........,If everything should be done only as recommended by KSK, then why are we discussing Cuspal Interlinks Method or 4 Step Theory or any other theory in this forum. We can straight away cut them all and stick on just with the 6 Readers of KSK.We have already been informed and notified to a great extent in this forum by some enthusiasts that 6 Readers have controversial statements or guidelines. Then why the soft-corner for 365.25 days alone in our minds. Any special reason?What would one say if a chart is done with 360 days per year

calculation and the prediction also comes out true? In such case, a person who claims it right will have to prove the same result using 365.25 days also, which will certainly not show the same Anthara and Sookshama Lords for that particular event..We cannot claim that this one is wrong and that one is right without showing ample practical proof on the matter. With thanks and warm regards,MK (Mohan Kumar.R.)Scientific Astrologer & Spoken English TutorAdvanced Stellar Astrology Research Academy (KP based)219/84, Moongapadi St.,Gugai, SALEM - 636 006Cell: 99443-07025Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 10:33:47 PMRe: Re: days in a year

Dear Agarwal

The discussion on 360 or 365.24 is already over. This forum has decided to use only 365.24 days per year as recommended by Mr.KSK, according to Paladipigai. Please go through the file section for detailed reading.

Dhanabalan--- On Tue, 9/16/08, dpa54in <agarwal_dp (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote:

dpa54in <agarwal_dp (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> Re: days in a year@gro ups.comTuesday, September 16, 2008, 4:04 AM

one has to calculate or use available software@gro ups.com, rao chitturu <csr162002@. ..> wrote:>> Then it will not coincide with the Calender which in general usewith 365 days a year> > > --- On Sat, 13/9/08, dpa54in <agarwal_dp@ ...> wrote:> > dpa54in <agarwal_dp@ ...>> days in a year> @gro ups.com> Saturday, 13 September, 2008, 10:22 AM> > > > > > > if we take 360 days in a year with new KP ayamnsha we get betterresults.> > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now, onhttp://help. / l/in// mail/mail/ tools/tools- 08.html/>

September 17, 2008

Dear Sir, Our Julian Calendar year of 365.25 is named after Julius Caesar. Astrologically, it denotes Sun's transit period to reach the same point on the zodiac.But, our astrological time periods are based on Vimshottari Uda Maha Dasa calculations, which in turn is based on Moon's position in the chart in question.Which one would you prefer now?Things may not be as we think what is correct.The only best way will be to reason out before accepting anything, if we are not able to check it out ourselves.Please look at the clue in the message: "...if we take 360 days in a year with new KP ayanamsha we get better results." (this is the clue. Only results can make a claim.).With thanks and warm regards,MK (Mohan Kumar.R.)Scientific Astrologer & Spoken English TutorAdvanced Stellar Astrology Research Academy (KP based)219/84, Moongapadi St.,Gugai, SALEM - 636 006Cell: 99443-07025tw853 <tw853 Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2008 5:19:48 PM Re: days in a year

"360 vs 365 D-Y.doc, 365 vs 360 day year Dasa" article in file

section and Msg#3018/2076 may help.

@gro ups.com, "dpa54in" <agarwal_dp@ ...> wrote:

>

> one has to calculate or use available software

>

> @gro ups.com, rao chitturu <csr162002@> wrote:

> >

> > Then it will not coincide with the Calender which in general use

> with 365 days a year

> >

> > --- On Sat, 13/9/08, dpa54in <agarwal_dp@ > wrote:

> >

> > dpa54in <agarwal_dp@ >

> > days in a year

> > @gro ups.com

> > Saturday, 13 September, 2008, 10:22 AM

> >

> > if we take 360 days in a year with new KP ayamnsha we get better

> results.

> >

> > Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now, on

> http://help. / l/in// mail/mail/ tools/tools- 08.html/

> >

>

September 17, 2008

Dear Mohankumar

They have discussed in depth in all aspect but could not come to a conclusion. Therefore they have decided to follow what Mr.KSK said.

Even if we start the discussion on this subject, we can not come to a conclusion accepted by all. So we can concentrate in some other topics, leaving it as 365.24 days. If any one is getting correct prediction with 360 days, it should be proved for at least 50 charts.

Dhanabalan--- On Wed, 9/17/08, Mohan Kumar Ragunathan <kpmk_astrology wrote:

Mohan Kumar Ragunathan <kpmk_astrologyRe: Re: days in a year Date: Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 5:52 AM

Dear Friends."....This forum has decided to use only 365.24 days per year as recommended by Mr.KSK........,If everything should be done only as recommended by KSK, then why are we discussing Cuspal Interlinks Method or 4 Step Theory or any other theory in this forum. We can straight away cut them all and stick on just with the 6 Readers of KSK.We have already been informed and notified to a great extent in this forum by some enthusiasts that 6 Readers have controversial statements or guidelines. Then why the soft-corner for 365.25 days alone in our minds. Any special reason?What would one say if a chart is done with 360 days per year calculation and the prediction also comes out true? In such case, a

person who claims it right will have to prove the same result using 365.25 days also, which will certainly not show the same Anthara and Sookshama Lords for that particular event..We cannot claim that this one is wrong and that one is right without showing ample practical proof on the matter.

With thanks and warm regards,MK (Mohan Kumar.R.)Scientific Astrologer & Spoken English TutorAdvanced Stellar Astrology Research Academy (KP based)219/84, Moongapadi St.,Gugai, SALEM - 636 006Cell: 99443-07025

Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ >@gro ups.comTuesday, September 16, 2008 10:33:47 PMRe: Re: days in a year

Dear Agarwal

The discussion on 360 or 365.24 is already over. This forum has decided to use only 365.24 days per year as recommended by Mr.KSK, according to Paladipigai. Please go through the file section for detailed reading.

Dhanabalan--- On Tue, 9/16/08, dpa54in <agarwal_dp (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote:

dpa54in <agarwal_dp (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> Re: days in a year@gro ups.comTuesday, September 16, 2008, 4:04 AM

one has to calculate or use available software@gro ups.com, rao chitturu <csr162002@. ..> wrote:>> Then it will not coincide with the Calender which in general usewith 365 days a year> > > --- On Sat, 13/9/08, dpa54in <agarwal_dp@ ...> wrote:> > dpa54in <agarwal_dp@ ...>> days in a year> @gro ups.com> Saturday, 13 September, 2008, 10:22 AM> > > > > > > if we take 360 days in a year with new KP ayamnsha we get betterresults.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now, onhttp://help. / l/in// mail/mail/ tools/tools- 08.html/>

September 17, 2008

Dear Friend, Of course. Anyone can have his own way. I have more than 50 charts, rather in hundreds with me.Let me give a suggestion. Take it if you like it or just drop it. I won't mind.Please try to compare at least 5 to 10 charts to start with.Cast two charts for a native, one with 365.25 days and the other with 360 days.Check out a few past events and see for yourself. Then one can come to a conclusion.With thanks and warm regards,MK (Mohan Kumar.R.)Scientific Astrologer & Spoken English

TutorAdvanced Stellar Astrology Research Academy (KP based)219/84, Moongapadi St.,Gugai, SALEM - 636 006Cell: 99443-07025Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 3:42:42 PMRe: Re: days in a year

Dear Mohankumar

They have discussed in depth in all aspect but could not come to a conclusion. Therefore they have decided to follow what Mr.KSK said.

Even if we start the discussion on this subject, we can not come to a conclusion accepted by all. So we can concentrate in some other topics, leaving it as 365.24 days. If any one is getting correct prediction with 360 days, it should be proved for at least 50 charts.

Dhanabalan--- On Wed, 9/17/08, Mohan Kumar Ragunathan <kpmk_astrology@ > wrote:

Mohan Kumar Ragunathan <kpmk_astrology@ >Re: Re: days in a year@gro ups.comWednesday, September 17, 2008, 5:52 AM

Dear Friends."....This forum has decided to use only 365.24 days per year as recommended by Mr.KSK........,If everything should be done only as recommended by KSK, then why are we discussing Cuspal Interlinks Method or 4 Step Theory or any other theory in this forum. We can straight away cut them all and stick on just with the 6 Readers of KSK.We have already been informed and notified to a great extent in this forum by some enthusiasts that 6 Readers have controversial statements or guidelines. Then why the soft-corner for 365.25 days alone in our minds. Any special reason?What would one say if a chart is done with 360 days per year calculation and the prediction also comes out true? In such case, a

person who claims it right will have to prove the same result using 365.25 days also, which will certainly not show the same Anthara and Sookshama Lords for that particular event..We cannot claim that this one is wrong and that one is right without showing ample practical proof on the matter.

With thanks and warm regards,MK (Mohan Kumar.R.)Scientific Astrologer & Spoken English TutorAdvanced Stellar Astrology Research Academy (KP based)219/84, Moongapadi St.,Gugai, SALEM - 636 006Cell: 99443-07025

Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ >@gro ups.comTuesday, September 16, 2008 10:33:47 PMRe: Re: days in a year

Dear Agarwal

The discussion on 360 or 365.24 is already over. This forum has decided to use only 365.24 days per year as recommended by Mr.KSK, according to Paladipigai. Please go through the file section for detailed reading.

Dhanabalan--- On Tue, 9/16/08, dpa54in <agarwal_dp (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote:

dpa54in <agarwal_dp (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> Re: days in a year@gro ups.comTuesday, September 16, 2008, 4:04 AM

one has to calculate or use available software@gro ups.com, rao chitturu <csr162002@. ..> wrote:>> Then it will not coincide with the Calender which in general usewith 365 days a year> > > --- On Sat, 13/9/08, dpa54in <agarwal_dp@ ...> wrote:> > dpa54in <agarwal_dp@ ...>> days in a year> @gro ups.com> Saturday, 13 September, 2008, 10:22 AM> > > > > > > if we take 360 days in a year with new KP ayamnsha we get betterresults.> > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > >

Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now, onhttp://help. / l/in// mail/mail/ tools/tools- 08.html/>

September 17, 2008

Dear Friends,

Could you kindly provide any well known Vedic or KP astrloger using 360 d/y or any reason for 360 d/y other than mentioned in:

360 vs 365 D-Y.doc 365 vs 360 day year Dasa in File section

Msg#3018/2076

Thanks and regards,

tw , Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan wrote:>> Dear Mohankumar> They have discussed in depth in all aspect but could not come to a conclusion. Therefore they have decided to follow what Mr.KSK said.> > Even if we start the discussion on this subject, we can not come to a conclusion accepted by all. So we can concentrate in some other topics, leaving it as 365.24 days. If any one is getting correct prediction with 360 days, it should be proved for at least 50 charts.> > Dhanabalan> > --- On Wed, 9/17/08, Mohan Kumar Ragunathan kpmk_astrology wrote:> > Mohan Kumar Ragunathan kpmk_astrology Re: Re: days in a year> > Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 5:52 AM> > > > > > > > Dear Friends.> "....This forum has decided to use only 365.24 days per year as recommended by Mr.KSK........,> If everything should be done only as recommended by KSK, then why are we discussing Cuspal Interlinks Method or 4 Step Theory or any other theory in this forum. > We can straight away cut them all and stick on just with the 6 Readers of KSK.> > We have already been informed and notified to a great extent in this forum by some enthusiasts that 6 Readers have controversial statements or guidelines. Then why the soft-corner for 365.25 days alone in our minds. Any special reason?> > What would one say if a chart is done with 360 days per year calculation and the prediction also comes out true? In such case, a person who claims it right will have to prove the same result using 365.25 days also, which will certainly not show the same Anthara and Sookshama Lords for that particular event..> > We cannot claim that this one is wrong and that one is right without showing ample practical proof on the matter.> > With thanks and warm regards,> > MK (Mohan Kumar.R.)> Scientific Astrologer & Spoken English Tutor> Advanced Stellar Astrology Research Academy (KP based)> 219/84, Moongapadi St.,Gugai, SALEM - 636 006> Cell: 99443-07025> > > > > > Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ >> @gro ups.com> Tuesday, September 16, 2008 10:33:47 PM> Re: Re: days in a year> > > > > > > > > Dear Agarwal> > The discussion on 360 or 365.24 is already over. This forum has decided to use only 365.24 days per year as recommended by Mr.KSK, according to Paladipigai. Please go through the file section for detailed reading.> > Dhanabalan> > --- On Tue, 9/16/08, dpa54in agarwal_dp (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote:> > dpa54in agarwal_dp (AT) hotmail (DOT) com>> Re: days in a year> @gro ups.com> Tuesday, September 16, 2008, 4:04 AM> > > > > one has to calculate or use available software> > @gro ups.com, rao chitturu csr162002@ ..> wrote:> >> > Then it will not coincide with the Calender which in general use> with 365 days a year> > > > > > --- On Sat, 13/9/08, dpa54in <agarwal_dp@ ...> wrote:> > > > dpa54in <agarwal_dp@ ...>> > days in a year> > @gro ups.com> > Saturday, 13 September, 2008, 10:22 AM> > > > > > > > > > > > > > if we take 360 days in a year with new KP ayamnsha we get better> results.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now, on> http://help. / l/in// mail/mail/ tools/tools- 08.html/> >>

September 18, 2008

Dear Friend,

To show your own way, could you kindly start a practical study with any of your charts or the chart provided below. More than hundreds of charts can be provided depending on the progress of your job. I've never come across or can't imagine that a research astrologer can be so low to manipulate the data. Never mind, please go ahead with any chart. Doing something is much better than just saying only.

Thanks and regards,

tw

Albert Einstein, Mar 14, 1879, 11:30 AM (1hr East of GMT), (AA Rated, Courtesy of AstroDatabank), Ulm, Germany, 48N24, 10E00, Asc Ge 19:33:56, Moon Sc 22:26:41, Mercury Dasa Bal 9Y:7M:18D, New KPA 22:04:51 ( KPAstro 3.0)

Timeline (First DBAS as per 365 d/y and second DBAS as per 360 d/y)

1) 23-06-1902 (Ve-Ma-Me-Ve) [Ve-Ma-Me-Sa ] joined first job

2) 06-01-1903 (Ve-Ra-Ra-Ra) [Ve-Ra-Ra-Ju ] married

3) 15-01-1906 (Ve-Ju-Ju-Ju) [Ve-Ju-Ju-Ve ] got PhD

4) 13-05-1910 (Ve-Sa-Su-Ra) [Ve-Sa-Mo-Ju ] became assistant professor

5) 01-04-1911 (Ve-Sa-Ra-Ve) [Ve-Sa-Ju-Sa ] became professor

6) 14-02-1919 (Su-Sa-Ve-Ju) [su-Sa-Ve-Me ] divorce from first wife

7) 02-06-1919 (Su-Sa-Ra-Sa) [su-Sa-Ra-Ve ] married second wife

8) 10-12-1922 (Mo-Ma-Sa-Ra) [Mo-Ma-Sa-Ju ] won Nobel Prize

9) 19-10-1933 (Ma-Ju-Ve-Mo) [Ma-Ju-Ve-Ra ] moved to US

10) 20-12-1936 (Ma-Ve-Su-Sa) [Ma-Ve-Mo-Sa ] death of second wife

11) 18-04-1955 (Ra-Mo-Me-Ra) [Ra-Mo-Ve-Mo ] death

, Mohan Kumar Ragunathan <kpmk_astrology wrote:>> Dear Friend, > Of course.Anyone can have his own way. > I have more than 50 charts, rather in hundreds with me.> Let me give a suggestion. Take it if you like it or just drop it. I won't mind.> Please try to compare at least 5 to 10 charts to start with.> Cast two charts for a native, one with 365.25 days and the other with 360 days.> Check out a few past events and see for yourself. > Then one can come to a conclusion.> > > With thanks and warm regards,> > MK (Mohan Kumar.R.)> Scientific Astrologer & Spoken English Tutor> Advanced Stellar Astrology Research Academy (KP based)> 219/84, Moongapadi St.,Gugai, SALEM - 636 006> Cell: 99443-07025> > > > > Dhanabalan R r.dhanabalan > Wednesday, September 17, 2008 3:42:42 PM> Re: Re: days in a year> > > Dear Mohankumar> They have discussed in depth in all aspect but could not come to a conclusion. Therefore they have decided to follow what Mr.KSK said.> > Even if we start the discussion on this subject, we can not come to a conclusion accepted by all. So we can concentrate in some other topics, leaving it as 365.24 days. If any one is getting correct prediction with 360 days, it should be proved for at least 50 charts.> > Dhanabalan> > --- On Wed, 9/17/08, Mohan Kumar Ragunathan <kpmk_astrology@ > wrote:> > Mohan Kumar Ragunathan <kpmk_astrology@ >> Re: Re: days in a year> @gro ups.com> Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 5:52 AM> > > Dear Friends.> "....This forum has decided to use only 365.24 days per year as recommended by Mr.KSK........,> If everything should be done only as recommended by KSK, then why are we discussing Cuspal Interlinks Method or 4 Step Theory or any other theory in this forum. > We can straight away cut them all and stick on just with the 6 Readers of KSK.> > We have already been informed and notified to a great extent in this forum by some enthusiasts that 6 Readers have controversial statements or guidelines. Then why the soft-corner for 365.25 days alone in our minds. Any special reason?> > What would one say if a chart is done with 360 days per year calculation and the prediction also comes out true? In such case, a person who claims it right will have to prove the same result using 365.25 days also, which will certainly not show the same Anthara and Sookshama Lords for that particular event..> > We cannot claim that this one is wrong and that one is right without showing ample practical proof on the matter.> > With thanks and warm regards,> > MK (Mohan Kumar.R.)> Scientific Astrologer & Spoken English Tutor> Advanced Stellar Astrology Research Academy (KP based)> 219/84, Moongapadi St.,Gugai, SALEM - 636 006> Cell: 99443-07025 > > > > > Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ >> @gro ups.com> Tuesday, September 16, 2008 10:33:47 PM> Re: Re: days in a year> > > Dear Agarwal> > The discussion on 360 or 365.24 is already over. This forum has decided to use only 365.24 days per year as recommended by Mr.KSK, according to Paladipigai. Please go through the file section for detailed reading.> > Dhanabalan> > --- On Tue, 9/16/08, dpa54in agarwal_dp (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote:> > dpa54in agarwal_dp (AT) hotmail (DOT) com>> Re: days in a year> @gro ups.com> Tuesday, September 16, 2008, 4:04 AM> > > one has to calculate or use available software> > @gro ups.com, rao chitturu csr162002@ ..> wrote:> >> > Then it will not coincide with the Calender which in general use> with 365 days a year> > > > > > --- On Sat, 13/9/08, dpa54in <agarwal_dp@ ...> wrote:> > > > dpa54in <agarwal_dp@ ...>> > days in a year> > @gro ups.com> > Saturday, 13 September, 2008, 10:22 AM> > > > > > > > > > > > > > if we take 360 days in a year with new KP ayamnsha we get better> results.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now, on> http://help. / l/in// mail/mail/ tools/tools- 08.html/> >>

September 18, 2008

Dear MK

soon after i got my natal chart in ur SW , i replied with thanks for ur service.

I want to know that 11th November 1992 (as per the chart errected by me Mer/Ven/JUP started on 11th Nov 1992) as per ur SW it differs with Mer/Ven/Sat, would u feel 360 days calculation will give the accuracy and what r the important points significance u found on 11th Nov 1992 as one of the important prediction made as per KP horary proved very accurate and Mr.S.Bangarappa resignied on 11th Nov 1992 as i have predicted on 26th August 1992.

This prediction made me in to the lime light , name, fame and prosperity through people rushed to my home for their horoscope.

i hope u r doing very well in this field and ur BTR method bring a new wave in BTR>

I wish u all the best at all moments.

Due to lack of fund i have not purchased ARRAICHUR"S SW/kp3.0 and i wish to have ur SW by ICS.

Let me know the cost of it so i can try to buy it in the near future.

Sahhasra Saagara--- On Wed, 17/9/08, Mohan Kumar Ragunathan <kpmk_astrology wrote:

Mohan Kumar Ragunathan <kpmk_astrologyRe: Re: days in a year Date: Wednesday, 17 September, 2008, 10:23 PM

Dear Friend, Of course. Anyone can have his own way. I have more than 50 charts, rather in hundreds with me.Let me give a suggestion. Take it if you like it or just drop it. I won't mind.Please try to compare at least 5 to 10 charts to start with.Cast two charts for a native, one with 365.25 days and the other with 360 days.Check out a few past events and see for yourself. Then one can come to a conclusion.

With thanks and warm regards,MK (Mohan Kumar.R.)Scientific Astrologer & Spoken English TutorAdvanced Stellar Astrology Research Academy (KP based)219/84, Moongapadi St.,Gugai, SALEM - 636 006Cell: 99443-07025

Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ >@gro ups.comWednesday, September 17, 2008 3:42:42 PMRe: Re: days in a year