Guest guest Posted September 13, 2008 Report Share Posted September 13, 2008 Respected group member When we discuss significators some sentances often make confused as used by many here also.Plz clearify as doubts are listed below. 1- As far as my understanding is concerned significators are planets which are in the stars of occupants and lords of anyhouses along with occupants and lord .Many astrologers use sentences like " planets in the stars of significators " what is the meaning of this sentance I could not understand? DO they want to convey that significators are only occupants or lords? or plantes in the stars of A type significator (planets in the stars of occupants)also signify ???? I dont want to mention names but here in this group also many use such sentance .I hope they will make it clear why they use such sentance . 2- As far as i remembered Bhatt's used only star signification of any planet and planet's lordship or its sub position is used for showing the connection. Connections are used there to acertain the atrributes for source planet,Am I right? If yes then bhatt did not accept lord of any house as pure significator even if the house is empty he used lordship only to know connections of planet, If such type of positions are exist then it is imperative to define first his concept for planets signification before discussion otherwise it will lead only confusion . With regards AMIT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.