Guest guest Posted August 15, 2008 Report Share Posted August 15, 2008 Dear Tin Win Mr.KSK¢s rules rgarding Rahu/Ketu is very clear in page 36 of Volume II(1966) It is in the order of a) Representing the planets which are conjoined b) If no conjoined planet then it represents the aspecting planets c) If no conjoin and aspecting planets then it will represent its own starlord(where Rahu/Ketu deposited) d) Lastly the lord of the sign The 4 step method confirms the above order. No deviation from k.p My question is we are not following the above order either in k.p. or in 4 step method. We are not stopping at one point. The KPASTRO software is almost covering all the houses for Rahu/Ketu in some of the examples. We are justifying ourselves because Mr.KSK has violated the rules. It is not correct. Police also driving their two wheelers without helmet, for that we should not justify that all the public can violate the rules. The police is not the rule maker but rule enforcing authority. The rule maker should not violate the rules framed by him. If he violates the rule, the rule become ineffective. So we can remove all the rules from the book which were violated or neglected by Mr.KSK. Dhanabalan Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 16, 2008 Report Share Posted August 16, 2008 Dear Dhanabalan, As I've thoroughly studied the KP practical signification of Rahu/Ketu, I've no more comment not to waste time, except that no KP astrologer is exactly following this basic rule of Kalidas as you wish. Regards, tw , Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan wrote: > > Dear Tin Win > > Mr.KSK¢s rules rgarding Rahu/Ketu is very clear in page 36 of Volume II(1966) > It is in the order of > a) Representing the planets which are conjoined > b) If no conjoined planet then it represents the aspecting planets > c) If no conjoin and aspecting planets then it will represent its own starlord(where Rahu/Ketu deposited) > d) Lastly the lord of the sign > > The 4 step method confirms the above order. No deviation from k.p > > My question is we are not following the above order either in k.p. or in 4 step method. We are not stopping at one point. The KPASTRO software is almost covering all the houses for Rahu/Ketu in some of the examples. > > We are justifying ourselves because Mr.KSK has violated the rules. It is not correct. Police also driving their two wheelers without helmet, for that we should not justify that all the public can violate the rules. The police is not the rule maker but rule enforcing authority. > > The rule maker should not violate the rules framed by him. If he violates the rule, the rule become ineffective. So we can remove all the rules from the book which were violated or neglected by Mr.KSK. > > Dhanabalan > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.