Guest guest Posted August 14, 2008 Report Share Posted August 14, 2008 Dear Dhanabalan, As the 4 step authority is telling to read the book, I can answer your questions on the basis of the 4 step book as given below. Regards, tw Planet Ke:> Starlord of Ke is Ma: 6; 2-7> Sublord of Ke is Ju:> Starlord of Ju is Ke: 12; Sgl Me(4, 9, Cnj Ve[4, 1-8, Asp by Ju{10, 3}]);Stl Ma(6, 2-7)> > > My doubt:> While taking Ketu signification in the star level,> 1) Ketu is posited in 12 o.k.> 2) Ketu¢s star Mars o.k. > 3) Ketu is in the sign of Mecury representing houses 4, 9 o.k.> 4) Mercury conjoins with Venus> 5) Venus is aspected by Jupiter.> > Here, Mercury conjoins Venus, venus is aspected by Jupiter are considered. Is it necessary to consider this chain. Whether the 4 step theory says like that.> Mercury conjoins Venus 13. If a planet is conjoined with another planet within 3d:20m orb, the planet becomes a primary significator of another planet, only if the original planet itself is a primary significator (as per the rules in the point 5). These two planets (excluding Rahu/Ketu) in conjunction will offer the results to each other. (A Note on Four Step Theory) venus is aspected by Jupiter are considered. 19. If a planet has the Hindu aspect (throwing or receiving) with another planet within the 3d:20m orb, the planet becomes a primary significator of another planet, provided the original planet itself is a primary significator (as per the rules in the point 5). (R 1, pages 28, 30, 54, 57, 70, 75) (A Note on Four Step Theory) Is it necessary to consider this chain. Whether the 4 step theory says like that. Yes, as per examples in the Four Step Book. > Not only for Ketu, the same type of combination is considered for all the planets in the star level. I am new to this theory. I did not come across this type of combination. > > Not only for Ketu, the same type of combination is considered for all the planets in the star level. Yes, it's as per examples in the Four Step Book. Notes: All 4 step rules, including the alledged special or specific rules from the 4 step book and the postings in this group and another group are presented in A Note on Four Step Theory. , Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan wrote:>> Dear Tin Win> > This is reference to the chart posted in the file section for study.> > "For the practical discussion, the KP chart of Sushma's daughter, which seems interesting for KP learning, is TEMPORARILY posted in the file section of this group under "Sushma's Daughter", and the 4 step primary significators of the KPAstro 3.0 print out are giev below:> > KP marriage> - Page 1 -> Astrologer: Tin Win, , , - . EMail: tw853 > Man Machine Systems, Ph:(044)-22580377. URL: www.system. com > Printed on: August 08 2008> > > 4 Step Significators> > Empty houses: 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9> Planets with no planets in their stars (+): Su, Ve, Sa> Planets in own stars (*): Mo> > Sa conj 6> Me conj Ve> Ra conj Ma> > Me is aspected by Ju> Ju is aspected by Me, Ve> Ve is aspected by Ju> Ke is aspected by Ma> Sa aspects 12> > Planet Ke:> Starlord of Ke is Ma: 6; 2-7> Sublord of Ke is Ju:> Starlord of Ju is Ke: 12; Sgl Me(4, 9, Cnj Ve[4, 1-8, Asp by Ju{10, 3}]);Stl Ma(6, 2-7)> > > My doubt:> While taking Ketu signification in the star level,> 1) Ketu is posited in 12 o.k.> 2) Ketu¢s star Mars o.k. > 3) Ketu is in the sign of Mecury representing houses 4, 9 o.k.> 4) Mercury conjoins with Venus> 5) Venus is aspected by Jupiter.> > Here, Mercury conjoins Venus, venus is aspected by Jupiter are considered. Is it necessary to consider this chain. Whether the 4 step theory says like that.> > Not only for Ketu, the same type of combination is considered for all the planets in the star level. I am new to this theory. I did not come across this type of combination. > > Dhanabalan> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 14, 2008 Report Share Posted August 14, 2008 Dear Tin Win Thank for your reply. According to the examples given in the 4 step book, the chain has to be considered. Dhanabalan--- On Thu, 8/14/08, tw853 <tw853 wrote: tw853 <tw853 Re: 4 step theory -- - No more doubt Date: Thursday, August 14, 2008, 1:26 AM Dear Dhanabalan, As the 4 step authority is telling to read the book, I can answer your questions on the basis of the 4 step book as given below. Regards, tw Planet Ke:> Starlord of Ke is Ma: 6; 2-7> Sublord of Ke is Ju:> Starlord of Ju is Ke: 12; Sgl Me(4, 9, Cnj Ve[4, 1-8, Asp by Ju{10, 3}]);Stl Ma(6, 2-7)> > > My doubt:> While taking Ketu signification in the star level,> 1) Ketu is posited in 12 o.k.> 2) Ketu¢s star Mars o.k. > 3) Ketu is in the sign of Mecury representing houses 4, 9 o.k.> 4) Mercury conjoins with Venus> 5) Venus is aspected by Jupiter.> > Here, Mercury conjoins Venus, venus is aspected by Jupiter are considered. Is it necessary to consider this chain. Whether the 4 step theory says like that.> Mercury conjoins Venus 13. If a planet is conjoined with another planet within 3d:20m orb, the planet becomes a primary significator of another planet, only if the original planet itself is a primary significator (as per the rules in the point 5).. These two planets (excluding Rahu/Ketu) in conjunction will offer the results to each other. (A Note on Four Step Theory) venus is aspected by Jupiter are considered. 19. If a planet has the Hindu aspect (throwing or receiving) with another planet within the 3d:20m orb, the planet becomes a primary significator of another planet, provided the original planet itself is a primary significator (as per the rules in the point 5). (R 1, pages 28, 30, 54, 57, 70, 75) (A Note on Four Step Theory) Is it necessary to consider this chain. Whether the 4 step theory says like that. Yes, as per examples in the Four Step Book. > Not only for Ketu, the same type of combination is considered for all the planets in the star level. I am new to this theory. I did not come across this type of combination. > > Not only for Ketu, the same type of combination is considered for all the planets in the star level. Yes, it's as per examples in the Four Step Book. Notes: All 4 step rules, including the alledged special or specific rules from the 4 step book and the postings in this group and another group are presented in A Note on Four Step Theory. @gro ups.com, Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ ...> wrote:>> Dear Tin Win> > This is reference to the chart posted in the file section for study.> > "For the practical discussion, the KP chart of Sushma's daughter, which seems interesting for KP learning, is TEMPORARILY posted in the file section of this group under "Sushma's Daughter", and the 4 step primary significators of the KPAstro 3.0 print out are giev below:> > KP marriage> - Page 1 -> Astrologer: Tin Win, , , - . EMail: tw853 > Man Machine Systems, Ph:(044)-22580377. URL: www.system. com > Printed on: August 08 2008> > > 4 Step Significators> > Empty houses: 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9> Planets with no planets in their stars (+): Su, Ve, Sa> Planets in own stars (*): Mo> > Sa conj 6> Me conj Ve> Ra conj Ma> > Me is aspected by Ju> Ju is aspected by Me, Ve> Ve is aspected by Ju> Ke is aspected by Ma> Sa aspects 12> > Planet Ke:> Starlord of Ke is Ma: 6; 2-7> Sublord of Ke is Ju:> Starlord of Ju is Ke: 12; Sgl Me(4, 9, Cnj Ve[4, 1-8, Asp by Ju{10, 3}]);Stl Ma(6, 2-7)> > > My doubt:> While taking Ketu signification in the star level,> 1) Ketu is posited in 12 o.k.> 2) Ketu¢s star Mars o.k. > 3) Ketu is in the sign of Mecury representing houses 4, 9 o.k.> 4) Mercury conjoins with Venus> 5) Venus is aspected by Jupiter.> > Here, Mercury conjoins Venus, venus is aspected by Jupiter are considered. Is it necessary to consider this chain. Whether the 4 step theory says like that.> > Not only for Ketu, the same type of combination is considered for all the planets in the star level. I am new to this theory. I did not come across this type of combination. > > Dhanabalan> > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.