Astrology itself is from vedic . For transit: western aspect or vedic aspect

[Guest guest]

Modern Astrological Research Institued, Madras has found-

(1) Ashtaka Varga is incomplete; hence incoorect.

(2) It needs more research to make it correct.

(3) Therefore, full details are not furnished . But why I declare

that the literature available at present is insufficient to get

correct results is given below:-

(explained in one page ---------)

-Krishnamurti Padhdhati Vol. 2, 1966, pp 394-396 (Ashtaka Varga)

-KP Reader III, 1971 version, pp 311-313

-KP Reader III, revised version, pp 487-490

 

The lack of knowledge is possible, like the moderator of Krushna's

Ashtakavarga System group is not aware what Kushna has mentioned in

the posted demonstartion article on Richard Houck about the

difference between his ayanamsa and Lahiri's, although the moderator

is posting his articles below this Kushna's article. (Ref. Msg#16871)

 

 

 

, " Ash's Corner " <kas

wrote:

>

> Dear Dhanabalan,

>

> Most probably Mr. KSK was not having good knowledge of

Ashtakavarga or he

> might have tried it with the scanty knowledge that might be " self

made

> theories " put in books in the name of Sages.

>

> The powerful Ashtakavarga system's were kept hidden with

Families.

>

> Cheers !!!

> Ash -> <http://www.ashtro.ca/> http://www.ashtro.ca

>

>

On

> Behalf Of Dhanabalan R

> Tuesday August 5, 2008 11:50 PM

>

> Re: Re:Astrology itself is from vedic . For

transit:

> western aspect or vedic aspect

>

>

> Dear Sagar

>

> You said that you predicted correctly with ashtakavarga. Whereas

Mr.KSK said

> that ashtakavarga will not give correct prediction. I think the

same is said

> by Mr.B.V.Raman.

>

> Most of the computers are calculating the ashtakavarga using

parasara method

> and Varagamigra method. Even I have tried with ashtakavarga but

could not

> succeed. Ekadipadya sothana, trikona sothana, planet pindu and

karaka pindu

> are able to print out correctly with reliable software.

>

> Not only myself, most of the astrologers do not know how to use

ashtakavarga

> for prediction. Some said that it is useful only for transit

analysis.

>

> It seems that the books available in the market are not explaining

correctly

> how to use ashtakavarga.

>

> I have read that even one's life can be calculated accurately with

> ashtakavarga.

>

> Dhanabalan

>

> --- On Tue, 8/5/08, Sagar S <ssagar86 wrote:

> Sagar S <ssagar86

> Re: Re:Astrology itself is from vedic . For

transit:

> western aspect or vedic aspect

>

> Tuesday, August 5, 2008, 5:40 PM

>

> Astrology itself from vedic, hence any method introducing time to

time is

> nothing but researched and developed with the same 12 signs,27

> constallations, vimshothari dasha periods and 9 planets.

>

> Parasara school of thoughts is base and foundation of vedic

astrology is

> only a question and answer between the student Maitreyi and Master

> parashara. Later many more scolar researched and developed it

further more.

> Meena stellar astrology, KSK, KB, Khullur . vaikari ramamurthy and

many more

> .

>

> need more search in the field of astrology.

> I had given the marks card , percentage of seats, etc as well as

predicted

> queka,hurrickanes, early monsoon, floods etc with the help of

ashtakavarga

> and mundane astrology all of my own researched but used vedic

astrology

> method ashtakavarga, mundane astrology.

> Sahhasra Saagara.

>

> --- On Tue, 5/8/08, ash <ashutosh.1966@ gmail.com> wrote:

> ash <ashutosh.1966@ gmail.com>

> Re: Re: For transit: western aspect or vedic

aspect

> @gro ups.com

> Tuesday, 5 August, 2008, 4:13 PM

> Thank you Shri Dhanabalan,

> I'm greatly encouraged by your kind words.....

> Ashutosh

> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@

> <r.dhanabalan > wrote:

>

> Dear Ash

>

> K.P. system is 100% vedic. Mr.KSK developed the K.P. system from

vedic

> astrology only. If you are through in vedic astrology you could

> understand... My advice is before learning k.p., first learn

vedic. K.P. is

> very simple and interesting. It is an advanced stage of vedic.

>

> Dhanabalan

>

> --- On Tue, 8/5/08, ash <ashutosh.1966@ gmail.com

> <ashutosh.1966 > wrote:

> ash <ashutosh.1966@ <ashutosh.1966 gmail.com>

> Re: Re: For transit: western aspect or vedic

aspect

> @gro

ups.com

> Tuesday, August 5, 2008, 7:01 AM

> Dear Learned Astrologers,

> This discussion though enlightening is extremely confusing for

beginners...

> .... Is KP Astrology like Western Astrology as it uses Placidus

System and

> Raphael's Tables ? Then it means we use the TROPICAL ZODIAC. As we

know,

> VEDIC SYTEM uses SIDEREAL ZODIAC...... . . The debate between the

two has

> been going on for ages and unfortunately only ONE system can be

right.

> regards,

> Ashutosh

> ------------ --------- --------- -----

>

> On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 7:35 PM, tw853 <tw853

> <tw853 > wrote:

> 1. Use the Vedic aspect in KP like in the KP Readers, keeping in

> mind that the tighter an orb is, the stronger the aspect (or

> conjunction) will be.

>

> 2. Some experimental applications of the Western aspects in the

> original KP 2 volumes are minimised in the KP Readers, perhaps

> because of the problem to reconsile the ouright good or bad

aspects

> depending on the type of aspects in the Western aspects and the KP

> principles of judging whether benefic or malefic planet.

>

> 3. If one wants to use the Western aspects in KP, the articles,

for

> instance in KP & Astrology, of Shri K.P. Kuppu Ganapathi (not K.

> Ganapathi, eldest son of Guruji KSK) are advisable to study. Shri

> Raichur had to coporate the Western aspects in his KP SW long ago

> especially for him.

> @gro ups.com <%

40> ,

> Dhanabalan R <r.dhanabalan@ ...>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear members

> >

> > I) Refer pages xviii, xix and xx of Reader V (Transit) 2004

> edition.. I reproduce below.

> > " According to Westerners the correct method of judgement is as

> follows:-

> > 1

> > 2

> > 3..

> > 13) The above is followed by westerners and not included in my

> system. "

> >

> > The author explained the western aspect upto para 12 and finally

> in para 13, he gave above statement.

> >

> > II) Please refer pages 256 and 257 in Reader V. I reproduce.

> >

> > " Western system amended by K S K.

> > Lords of 1,2.. houses, whenever they, during transit, form

> favourable aspects, offer desirable results., whenever they form

> evil aspects during transit, the native wins. "

> > When Saturn transits in Pisces-Meena- and forms favourable

aspect

> with its radical position.. "

> >

> > It seems contradictory to the first point. The author has first

> told that the western system is not followed in k.p. Later he gave

> examples based on western aspect.

> >

> > III) Please refer pages 383 to 388 in volume II (1966). I

> reproduce.

> >

> > " It would then be said to be transiting in sextile, square,

trine,

> etc., to the radical planet or radical cusp. "

> >

> > The author explained the western aspect and did not tell as

above

> in para I..

> >

> > My question is which aspect we have to use for transit

prediction

> in k.p.? Western or vedic aspect.

> >

> > Dhanabalan

> >

>

>

>

> _____

>

> Unlimited freedom, unlimited storage. Get it now

>

<http://in.rd./tagline_mail_2/*http:/help./l/in/yah

oo/mail

> /mail/tools/tools-08..html/>

>