Six fold general significator table for k.p.- - ONLY RESEARCH IS RELIABLE

[Guest guest]

Only research is reliable, not here say experience, for instance, the child gender prediction has generally 50-50 correctness with or without astrology and so no child gender prediction method is reliable, as some are claiming without being backed by research. Please see the "Child Sex Study" recently uploaded in the file section.

, "sunilalaka" <sunilalaka wrote:>> dear dhanabalan,> i am following 4 step theory,in which some rules are conflicting> to original kp method.so i dont think it is some contraversy> in kp method which you are referring.> i have already sent the messsage that in KPreaders other articles> of kp followers are included.that doesnt mean that kpreaders are not > to be followed.> whether you follow 4 fold/6 fold/4 step theory is not a > matter.the experience is the great teacher.> thanks> -sunil gondhalekar> > , Dhanabalan R r.dhanabalan@ > wrote:> >> > Dear tw853> > > > I want to know the opinion of other senior astrologers like > Mr.Raichur, Sunil Gondhalekar, etc. about this controversy.> > > > R.Dhanabalan> > > > --- On Sun, 8/3/08, tw853 tw853@ wrote:> > > > tw853 tw853@> > Re: Six fold general significator table for > k.p.> > > > Sunday, August 3, 2008, 11:26 PM> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is absolutely wrong to say that the sub is taken by Guruji KSK > as the significator by referring the 3 examples with "or sub" and > not taking 13 examples "without sub" in the same manner, nothing > different, in the same KP 2 Volumes and the intention of such > biased presentation is suspicious.> > In addition, such saying is inconsistent with the following Guruji > KSK's finding:> > "The planet is the source, constellation indicates nature of the > result and the sub is a "deciding factor" whether the matter is > favorable or not."> > - Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2, p 41> > > > > > @gro ups.com, Dhanabalan R > <r.dhanabalan@ ...> wrote:> > >> > > Dear tw853> > > > > > 1) Mr.KSK gave 3 examples in pages 113-114, 274, 318-320 of > volume II taking sub as signification. In 13 examples he gave > predictions without taking sub. He gave more number of > examples without sub than with sub, so we need not consider the sub > as significator is meaningless. Principle is important. Number is > not important.> > > > > > 2) In those days, there was no calculator and no computer, so > Mr.KSK indicated the principle through 3 examples. He would have > calculated all the examples with sub signification if he had the > facility what we are having now.. > > > > > > So I request you to think in the other way.> > > > > > R.Dhanabalan> > > > > > --- On Sun, 8/3/08, tw853 tw853@ wrote:> > > > > > tw853 tw853@> > > Re: Six fold general significator table > for k.p.> > > @gro ups.com> > > Sunday, August 3, 2008, 4:47 AM> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The conclusion based on the 2 examples in pp 113-4 & 274 and a > write up in pp 319-20 "with the sub" but whithout consideration of > the following 13 examples "without sub" in the standard A to E order > of KP significaton is biased, i.e. 3 against 13 in the same > Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2, 1966, Sagar Publications itself.> > > 1) p 57 for Badhaka house;> > > 2) p 74 for 2,6,10,11 houses; > > > 3) p 118 for 12,7,5,8; > > > 4) p 139 for 4; > > > 5) p 236 for 2,7,11; > > > 6) p 244 for 2,7,11; > > > 7) p 256 for 2,5,11; > > > 8) p 269 for 2,5,11; > > > 9) pp 276-7 for 4 & 3;> > > 10) p 301 for 2,6,10; > > > 11) p 303 for 2,6,10; > > > 12) p 308 for 2,6,10 & > > > 13) p 333 for 2,3,6,10 houses> > > > > > @gro ups.com, Dhanabalan R > <r.dhanabalan@ ...> wrote:> > > >> > > > > > > > Dear members> > > > > > > > With reference to pages 113,114,274, 319,320 of Krishnamoorthy > Paddhati volume II of sagar publication in the year 1966, Mr.KSK has > considered the planets in the star and sub of occupants and the > planets in the star and sub of the house lords as significators. > This point has been supressed in the k..p.Reader III, V and VI. The > existing four fold general significator table has to be converted > into six fold as below to get better results.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > House No> > > > > > > > Planets> > > > In the > > > > Sub of> > > > occupants> > > > > > > > Planets> > > > In the > > > > Star of> > > > occupants> > > > > > > > > > > > Occupants in the house> > > > > > > > Planets> > > > In the > > > > Sub of> > > > House lord> > > > > > > > Planets> > > > In the > > > > Star of> > > > House lord> > > > > > > > House lord> > > > > > > > > > > > I> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > II> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > III> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > IV> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > V> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > VI> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > VII> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > VIII> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > IX> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > X> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XI> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XII> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards> > > > R.Dhanabalan> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>

[Guest guest]

Dear tw853

 

Please tell me what are the researches carried so far either by the KSK group or by the k.p. followers and what are the findings.

 

Dhanabalan

 

--- On Tue, 8/5/08, tw853 <tw853 wrote:

tw853 <tw853 Re: Six fold general significator table for k.p.- - ONLY RESEARCH IS RELIABLE Date: Tuesday, August 5, 2008, 4:15 AM

 

 

 

Only research is reliable, not here say experience, for instance, the child gender prediction has generally 50-50 correctness with or without astrology and so no child gender prediction method is reliable, as some are claiming without being backed by research. Please see the "Child Sex Study" recently uploaded in the file section.

@gro ups.com, "sunilalaka" <sunilalaka@. ..> wrote:>> dear dhanabalan,> i am following 4 step theory,in which some rules are conflicting> to original kp method.so i dont think it is some contraversy> in kp method which you are referring.> i have already sent the messsage that in KPreaders other articles> of kp followers are included.that doesnt mean that kpreaders are not > to be followed.> whether you follow 4 fold/6 fold/4 step theory is not a > matter.the experience is the great teacher.> thanks> -sunil gondhalekar> > @gro ups.com, Dhanabalan R r.dhanabalan@ > wrote:> >> > Dear tw853> > > > I want to know the opinion of other senior astrologers like > Mr.Raichur, Sunil Gondhalekar, etc. about this controversy.> >

> > R.Dhanabalan> > > > --- On Sun, 8/3/08, tw853 tw853@ wrote:> > > > tw853 tw853@> > Re: Six fold general significator table for > k.p.> > @gro ups.com> > Sunday, August 3, 2008, 11:26 PM> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is absolutely wrong to say that the sub is taken by Guruji KSK > as the significator by referring the 3 examples with "or sub" and > not taking 13 examples "without sub" in the same manner, nothing > different, in the same KP 2 Volumes and the intention of such > biased presentation is suspicious.> > In addition, such saying is inconsistent with the following Guruji > KSK's finding:> > "The planet is the source, constellation

indicates nature of the > result and the sub is a "deciding factor" whether the matter is > favorable or not."> > - Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2, p 41> > > > > > @gro ups.com, Dhanabalan R > <r.dhanabalan@ ...> wrote:> > >> > > Dear tw853> > > > > > 1) Mr.KSK gave 3 examples in pages 113-114, 274, 318-320 of > volume II taking sub as signification. In 13 examples he gave > predictions without taking sub. He gave more number of > examples without sub than with sub, so we need not consider the sub > as significator is meaningless. Principle is important. Number is > not important.> > > > > > 2) In those days, there was no calculator and no computer, so > Mr.KSK indicated the principle through 3 examples. He would

have > calculated all the examples with sub signification if he had the > facility what we are having now.. > > > > > > So I request you to think in the other way.> > > > > > R.Dhanabalan> > > > > > --- On Sun, 8/3/08, tw853 tw853@ wrote:> > > > > > tw853 tw853@> > > Re: Six fold general significator table > for k.p.> > > @gro ups.com> > > Sunday, August 3, 2008, 4:47 AM> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The conclusion based on the 2 examples in pp 113-4 & 274 and a > write up in pp 319-20 "with the sub" but whithout consideration of > the following 13 examples "without sub" in the standard

A to E order > of KP significaton is biased, i.e. 3 against 13 in the same > Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2, 1966, Sagar Publications itself.> > > 1) p 57 for Badhaka house;> > > 2) p 74 for 2,6,10,11 houses; > > > 3) p 118 for 12,7,5,8; > > > 4) p 139 for 4; > > > 5) p 236 for 2,7,11; > > > 6) p 244 for 2,7,11; > > > 7) p 256 for 2,5,11; > > > 8) p 269 for 2,5,11; > > > 9) pp 276-7 for 4 & 3;> > >

10) p 301 for 2,6,10; > > > 11) p 303 for 2,6,10; > > > 12) p 308 for 2,6,10 & > > > 13) p 333 for 2,3,6,10 houses> > > > > > @gro ups.com, Dhanabalan R > <r.dhanabalan@ ...> wrote:> > > >> > > > > > > > Dear members> > > > > > > > With reference to pages 113,114,274, 319,320 of Krishnamoorthy > Paddhati volume II of sagar publication in the year 1966, Mr.KSK has > considered the planets in the star and sub of occupants and the > planets in the star and sub of the house lords as significators. > This point has been supressed in the k..p.Reader III, V and VI. The > existing four fold general significator table has to be converted > into six fold

as below to get better results.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > House No> > > > > > > > Planets> > > > In the > > > > Sub of> > > > occupants> > > > > > > > Planets> > > > In the > > > > Star of> > > > occupants> > > > > > > > > > > > Occupants in the house> > > > > > > > Planets> > > > In the > > > > Sub of> > > > House lord> > > > > > > > Planets> > > > In the > > > > Star of> > > > House lord> > > > > > > >

House lord> > > > > > > > > > > > I> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > II> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > III> > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > IV> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > V> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > VI> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > VII> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > VIII> > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > IX> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > X> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XI> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XII> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > Regards> > > > R.Dhanabalan> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>