Six fold general significator table for k.p.--SCANNED PAGES POSTED

[Guest guest]

The scanned pages for 3 examples "with SUB" and 13 examples "without SUB" from the same Krishnamurti Padhdhati Vol 1, 1966, Sagar Publications and Krishnamurti Padhdhati by Guruji KSK as Forward note to the Manu's Astrological Tables for All are posted in the file section under "kp2volumes" , starting from the last position "Picture", then "Picture 1" to "Picture 19", in a primitive way this time, for all members to see the truth by a way of putting all the cards on the table.

 

, "tw853" <tw853 wrote:>> This is the fact, no controversy at all, no opinion can help.> All these pages have already been scanned but there is some technical > problem in posting them in the file section for all members to see > the truth.> > > > , Dhanabalan R r.dhanabalan@ > wrote:> >> > Dear tw853> > > > I want to know the opinion of other senior astrologers like > Mr.Raichur, Sunil Gondhalekar, etc. about this controversy.> > > > R.Dhanabalan> > > > --- On Sun, 8/3/08, tw853 tw853@ wrote:> > > > tw853 tw853@> > Re: Six fold general significator table for > k.p.> > > > Sunday, August 3, 2008, 11:26 PM> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is absolutely wrong to say that the sub is taken by Guruji KSK > as the significator by referring the 3 examples with "or sub" and > not taking 13 examples "without sub" in the same manner, nothing > different, in the same KP 2 Volumes and the intention of such > biased presentation is suspicious.> > In addition, such saying is inconsistent with the following Guruji > KSK's finding:> > "The planet is the source, constellation indicates nature of the > result and the sub is a "deciding factor" whether the matter is > favorable or not."> > - Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2, p 41> > > > > > @gro ups.com, Dhanabalan R > <r.dhanabalan@ ...> wrote:> > >> > > Dear tw853> > > > > > 1) Mr.KSK gave 3 examples in pages 113-114, 274, 318-320 of > volume II taking sub as signification. In 13 examples he gave > predictions without taking sub. He gave more number of > examples without sub than with sub, so we need not consider the sub > as significator is meaningless. Principle is important. Number is not > important.> > > > > > 2) In those days, there was no calculator and no computer, so > Mr.KSK indicated the principle through 3 examples. He would have > calculated all the examples with sub signification if he had the > facility what we are having now.. > > > > > > So I request you to think in the other way.> > > > > > R.Dhanabalan> > > > > > --- On Sun, 8/3/08, tw853 tw853@ wrote:> > > > > > tw853 tw853@> > > Re: Six fold general significator table for > k.p.> > > @gro ups.com> > > Sunday, August 3, 2008, 4:47 AM> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The conclusion based on the 2 examples in pp 113-4 & 274 and a > write up in pp 319-20 "with the sub" but whithout consideration of > the following 13 examples "without sub" in the standard A to E order > of KP significaton is biased, i.e. 3 against 13 in the same > Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2, 1966, Sagar Publications itself.> > > 1) p 57 for Badhaka house;> > > 2) p 74 for 2,6,10,11 houses; > > > 3) p 118 for 12,7,5,8; > > > 4) p 139 for 4; > > > 5) p 236 for 2,7,11; > > > 6) p 244 for 2,7,11; > > > 7) p 256 for 2,5,11; > > > 8) p 269 for 2,5,11; > > > 9) pp 276-7 for 4 & 3;> > > 10) p 301 for 2,6,10; > > > 11) p 303 for 2,6,10; > > > 12) p 308 for 2,6,10 & > > > 13) p 333 for 2,3,6,10 houses> > > > > > @gro ups.com, Dhanabalan R > <r.dhanabalan@ ...> wrote:> > > >> > > > > > > > Dear members> > > > > > > > With reference to pages 113,114,274, 319,320 of Krishnamoorthy > Paddhati volume II of sagar publication in the year 1966, Mr.KSK has > considered the planets in the star and sub of occupants and the > planets in the star and sub of the house lords as significators. This > point has been supressed in the k..p.Reader III, V and VI. The > existing four fold general significator table has to be converted > into six fold as below to get better results.> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > House No> > > > > > > > Planets> > > > In the > > > > Sub of> > > > occupants> > > > > > > > Planets> > > > In the > > > > Star of> > > > occupants> > > > > > > > > > > > Occupants in the house> > > > > > > > Planets> > > > In the > > > > Sub of> > > > House lord> > > > > > > > Planets> > > > In the > > > > Star of> > > > House lord> > > > > > > > House lord> > > > > > > > > > > > I> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > II> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > III> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > IV> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > V> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > VI> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > VII> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > VIII> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > IX> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > X> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XI> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XII> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards> > > > R.Dhanabalan> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>

[Guest guest]

Dear Tw ji,

 

Appreciate your efforts and interest in sharing the book. This is really helpful.

Thanks & Regards,Punit Pandey

On Mon, Aug 4, 2008 at 10:38 AM, tw853 <tw853 wrote:

 

 

 

 

 

 

The scanned pages for 3 examples " with SUB " and 13 examples " without SUB " from the same Krishnamurti Padhdhati Vol 1, 1966, Sagar Publications and Krishnamurti Padhdhati by Guruji KSK as Forward note to the Manu's Astrological Tables for All are posted in the file section under " kp2volumes " , starting from the last position " Picture " , then " Picture 1 " to " Picture 19 " , in a primitive way this time, for all members to see the truth by a way of putting all the cards on the table.

 

, " tw853 " <tw853 wrote:>> This is the fact, no controversy at all, no opinion can help.

> All these pages have already been scanned but there is some technical > problem in posting them in the file section for all members to see > the truth.> > > > , Dhanabalan R r.dhanabalan@

> wrote:> >> > Dear tw853> > > > I want to know the opinion of other senior astrologers like > Mr.Raichur, Sunil Gondhalekar, etc. about this controversy.> >

> > R.Dhanabalan> > > > --- On Sun, 8/3/08, tw853 tw853@ wrote:> > > > tw853 tw853@> > Re: Six fold general significator table for > k.p.

> > > > Sunday, August 3, 2008, 11:26 PM> > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > It is absolutely wrong to say that the sub is taken by Guruji KSK > as the significator by referring the 3 examples with " or sub " and > not taking 13 examples " without sub " in the same manner, nothing

> different, in the same KP 2 Volumes and the intention of such > biased presentation is suspicious.> > In addition, such saying is inconsistent with the following Guruji > KSK's finding:

> > " The planet is the source, constellation indicates nature of the > result and the sub is a " deciding factor " whether the matter is > favorable or not. " > > - Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2, p 41

> > > > > > @gro ups.com, Dhanabalan R > <r.dhanabalan@ ...> wrote:> > >> > > Dear tw853

> > > > > > 1) Mr.KSK gave 3 examples in pages 113-114, 274, 318-320 of > volume II taking sub as signification. In 13 examples he gave > predictions without taking sub. He gave more number of

> examples without sub than with sub, so we need not consider the sub > as significator is meaningless. Principle is important. Number is not > important.> > > > > > 2) In those days, there was no calculator and no computer, so

> Mr.KSK indicated the principle through 3 examples. He would have > calculated all the examples with sub signification if he had the > facility what we are having now.. > > > > > > So I request you to think in the other way.

> > > > > > R.Dhanabalan> > > > > > --- On Sun, 8/3/08, tw853 tw853@ wrote:> > > > > > tw853 tw853@> > > Re: Six fold general significator table for

> k.p.> > > @gro ups.com> > > Sunday, August 3, 2008, 4:47 AM> > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The conclusion based on the 2 examples in pp 113-4 & 274 and a > write up in pp 319-20 " with the sub " but whithout consideration of

> the following 13 examples " without sub " in the standard A to E order > of KP significaton is biased, i.e. 3 against 13 in the same > Krishnamurti Padhdhati, Vol. 2, 1966, Sagar Publications itself.

> > > 1) p 57 for Badhaka house;> > > 2) p 74 for 2,6,10,11 houses; > > > 3) p 118 for 12,7,5,8; > > > 4) p 139 for 4; > > > 5) p 236 for 2,7,11;

> > > 6) p 244 for 2,7,11; > > > 7) p 256 for 2,5,11; > > > 8) p 269 for 2,5,11; > > > 9) pp 276-7 for 4 & 3;> > > 10) p 301 for 2,6,10;

> > > 11) p 303 for 2,6,10; > > > 12) p 308 for 2,6,10 & > > > 13) p 333 for 2,3,6,10 houses> > > > > > @gro ups.com, Dhanabalan R

> <r.dhanabalan@ ...> wrote:> > > >> > > > > > > > Dear members> > > > > > > > With reference to pages 113,114,274, 319,320 of Krishnamoorthy

> Paddhati volume II of sagar publication in the year 1966, Mr.KSK has > considered the planets in the star and sub of occupants and the > planets in the star and sub of the house lords as significators. This

> point has been supressed in the k..p.Reader III, V and VI. The > existing four fold general significator table has to be converted > into six fold as below to get better results.> > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > House No> > > > > > > > Planets> > > > In the

> > > > Sub of> > > > occupants> > > > > > > > Planets> > > > In the > > > > Star of> > > > occupants> > > >

> > > > > > > > Occupants in the house> > > > > > > > Planets> > > > In the > > > > Sub of> > > > House lord

> > > > > > > > Planets> > > > In the > > > > Star of> > > > House lord> > > > > > > > House lord> > > >

> > > > > > > > I> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > II> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > III> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > IV

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > V> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > VI

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > VII> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > VIII> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > IX> > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > X> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XI> > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > XII> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

> > > > Regards> > > > R.Dhanabalan> > > > > > > > > > > >> > >> >>