Debate on kp system Dhanabalan vs. others.

[Guest guest]

Dear Members of the group,

 

For the past few weeks, the debate of KP System sub and star lord of sub, which ought to be a lively one scientific and authentic, is turning to war of words with Mr.Dhanabalan & others. The former is requested to tone down his aggressive approach and explain his stand with a concrete example case and the same example with the method applying to the star lord of Sub, to show where the difference lies. This will greatly help the beginners as well as the members of the group, who are watching the debate with interest.

 

Astrologically yours,

K.S.V.Ramani (a Group member)

[Guest guest]

Dear Ramani

The discussion is not to test the ability of any individual astrologer. Discussion is about the system.

 

R.Dhanabalan--- On Sun, 8/3/08, Ramani <kadavasalramani wrote:

Ramani <kadavasalramani Debate on kp system Dhanabalan vs. others. Date: Sunday, August 3, 2008, 7:52 AM

 

 

 

Dear Members of the group,

 

For the past few weeks, the debate of KP System sub and star lord of sub, which ought to be a lively one scientific and authentic, is turning to war of words with Mr.Dhanabalan & others. The former is requested to tone down his aggressive approach and explain his stand with a concrete example case and the same example with the method applying to the star lord of Sub, to show where the difference lies. This will greatly help the beginners as well as the members of the group, who are watching the debate with interest.

 

Astrologically yours,

K.S.V.Ramani (a Group member)

[Guest guest]

Dear Ramani,

We seem to be discussing needlessly...each one justifying his own stand and belief...

It would be best to leave a K.P. follower to use the Ayanamsa with which he has experienced the most accurate results...

Why doesn't each contributor first determine whether he himself fits into the rules given by KSK,to become a good and successful astrologer...then let him join the discussion with his own experience quoting relevant examples giving the entire horoscope,NOT just part information,to make the discussion more fruitful...else this discussion wil never end egos getting bloated and exhibiting themselves brazenly...Does being a PhD,or an M.E., or D.Sc. make one a better K.P. Astrologer...Only INTUITION needs to be conciously as suggested by Swami Vevekananda... In the meanwhile it is hoped that contributors stop the flaunting of one's high academic qualifications...unless severe inferiority complex is forcing one to flaunt it...needlessly...

A Professor of Management need not necessarily become a top industrialist or business magnate...The sublord and/or sub-sub lord of his Ascendant will decide this...depending upon it's significations in the chart at birth...and the D/B/A/S running when the person is in the Prime of his life...and so on...there are specific rules in K.P. OLD or as per the 6 Readers...!

As Mr.Punit Pandey suggests,we had better stop this FRUITLESS DISCUSSION...

With best wishes,

L.Y.Rao.

GOOD LUCK !

 

Ramani <kadavasalramani Sent: Sunday, 3 August, 2008 1:22:53 PM Debate on kp system Dhanabalan vs. others.

 

 

Dear Members of the group,

 

For the past few weeks, the debate of KP System sub and star lord of sub, which ought to be a lively one scientific and authentic, is turning to war of words with Mr.Dhanabalan & others. The former is requested to tone down his aggressive approach and explain his stand with a concrete example case and the same example with the method applying to the star lord of Sub, to show where the difference lies. This will greatly help the beginners as well as the members of the group, who are watching the debate with interest.

 

Astrologically yours,

K.S.V.Ramani (a Group member)

Connect with friends all over the world. Get India Messenger.

[Guest guest]

|| Om Gurave Namah ||Om SreeMahaGanaadhipataye Namah Hari Om,

Dear Dhanabalan ji,

Your views are based on your understanding and study.These may be correct.I too feel KP readers 1-6 as they exist are not of much use to students like me who has ordinary intellect.

My preposition is , since you have taken pains to establish that 1966 edition was authentic,My simple query is , if you can share, How many accurate prediction you have been able to make by following strictly teachings contained there in.

Your sharing of experience will kindle more interest than tons of quotations and comparison.My feeling is; every astrologer is always in search of accurate methodology.

with regards.

OM TATSAT------------------------Swami_RCS -----------------------" Let us meditate on the glorious effulgence of that Divine Being who hascreated the three worlds.May He Direct our understanding."--

 

-

Dhanabalan R

Sunday, August 03, 2008 1:38 PM

Re: Debate on kp system Dhanabalan vs. others.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Ramani

The discussion is not to test the ability of any individual astrologer. Discussion is about the system.

 

R.Dhanabalan--- On Sun, 8/3/08, Ramani <kadavasalramani > wrote:

Ramani <kadavasalramani > Debate on kp system Dhanabalan vs. others. Date: Sunday, August 3, 2008, 7:52 AM

 

 

 

Dear Members of the group,

 

For the past few weeks, the debate of KP System sub and star lord of sub, which ought to be a lively one scientific and authentic, is turning to war of words with Mr.Dhanabalan & others. The former is requested to tone down his aggressive approach and explain his stand with a concrete example case and the same example with the method applying to the star lord of Sub, to show where the difference lies. This will greatly help the beginners as well as the members of the group, who are watching the debate with interest.

 

Astrologically yours,

K.S.V.Ramani (a Group member)

[Guest guest]

Dear swami

 

Discussion is about the controversis in the original volume and the present Readers.

 

Individual predictions differ from person to person. Most of the k.p. asatrologers are giving prediction by blending vedic, jaimuni, nadi, horary and cuspal links. No doubt that they can give accurate predictions.

 

How many k.p.astrologers are giving predictions based on only k.p. In our study only less than 10% are giving prediction based on only with k.p. But their success rate is less than 20%.

 

In salem, we were using sub's star theory. Since we could not get results from sub's star theory, part of the astrologers switched over to sub's sub's star theory. In fact there is a war between these two groups about which system is correct.

 

The fact is both the system are wrong.

 

As told earlier, about 854 persons studied k.p. from the teacher Mr.Vaithialingam for the past 17 years. Only about 20 persons are practicingby blending some other sysytem with k.p. Due to the mistake in the k.p.system, the remining persons could not survive, swithced over to their own business.

 

I hope you understand the controversis in the k.p. system.

 

R.Dhanabalan--- On Sun, 8/3/08, swami <swami wrote:

swami <swamiRe: Debate on kp system Dhanabalan vs. others. Date: Sunday, August 3, 2008, 3:26 PM

 

 

 

 

|| Om Gurave Namah ||Om SreeMahaGanaadhipat aye Namah Hari Om,

Dear Dhanabalan ji,

Your views are based on your understanding and study.These may be correct.I too feel KP readers 1-6 as they exist are not of much use to students like me who has ordinary intellect.

My preposition is , since you have taken pains to establish that 1966 edition was authentic,My simple query is , if you can share, How many accurate prediction you have been able to make by following strictly teachings contained there in.

Your sharing of experience will kindle more interest than tons of quotations and comparison.My feeling is; every astrologer is always in search of accurate methodology.

with regards.

OM TATSAT------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------Swami_RCS ------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------" Let us meditate on the glorious effulgence of that Divine Being who hascreated the three worlds.May He Direct our understanding. "------------ --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --

 

-

Dhanabalan R

@gro ups.com

Sunday, August 03, 2008 1:38 PM

Re: Debate on kp system Dhanabalan vs. others.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dear Ramani

The discussion is not to test the ability of any individual astrologer. Discussion is about the system.

 

R.Dhanabalan--- On Sun, 8/3/08, Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> wrote:

Ramani <kadavasalramani@ gmail.com> Debate on kp system Dhanabalan vs. others.@gro ups.comSunday, August 3, 2008, 7:52 AM

 

 

 

Dear Members of the group,

 

For the past few weeks, the debate of KP System sub and star lord of sub, which ought to be a lively one scientific and authentic, is turning to war of words with Mr.Dhanabalan & others. The former is requested to tone down his aggressive approach and explain his stand with a concrete example case and the same example with the method applying to the star lord of Sub, to show where the difference lies. This will greatly help the beginners as well as the members of the group, who are watching the debate with interest.

 

Astrologically yours,

K.S.V.Ramani (a Group member)